Prediction of time series using wavelet Gaussian process for wireless sensor networks

  • Jose Mejia
  • Alberto Ochoa-Zezzatti
  • Oliverio Cruz-MejíaEmail author
  • Boris Mederos


The detection and transmission of a physical variable over time, by a node of a sensor network to its sink node, represents a significant communication overload and consequently one of the main energy consumption processes. In this article we present an algorithm for the prediction of time series, with which it is expected to reduce the energy consumption of a sensor network, by reducing the number of transmissions when reporting to the sink node only when the prediction of the sensed value differs in certain magnitude, to the actual sensed value. For this end, the proposed algorithm combines a wavelet multiresolution transform with robust prediction using Gaussian process. The data is processed in wavelet domain, taking advantage of the transform ability to capture geometric information and decomposition in more simple signals or subbands. Subsequently, the decomposed signal is approximated by Gaussian process one for each subband of the wavelet, in this manner the Gaussian process is given to learn a much simple signal. Once the process is trained, it is ready to make predictions. We compare our method with pure Gaussian process prediction showing that the proposed method reduces the prediction error and is improves large horizons predictions, thus reducing the energy consumption of the sensor network.


Sensor networks Time series Gaussian process 



Funding was provided by Sistema Nacional de Investigadores, CONACYT, México.


  1. 1.
    Le Borgne, Y.-A., Santini, S., & Bontempi, G. (2007). Adaptive model selection for time series prediction in wireless sensor networks. Signal Processing,87(12), 3010–3020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lazaridis, I., & Mehrotra, S. (2003). Capturing sensor-generated time series with quality guarantees. In Proceedings 19th international conference on data engineering (Cat. No. 03CH37405). IEEE.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madden, S., Franklin, M. J., Hellerstein, J. M., & Hong, W. (2002). Tag: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review,36(SI), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nath, S., Gibbons, P. B., Seshan, S., & Anderson, Z. R. (2004). Synopsis diffusion for robust aggregation in sensor networks. In SenSys.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goel, S., & Imielinski, T. (2001). Prediction-based monitoring in sensor networks: Taking lessons from MPEG. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review,31(5), 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Längkvist, M., Karlsson, L., & Loutfi, A. (2014). A review of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning for time-series modeling. Pattern Recognition Letters,42, 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tulone, D., & Madden, S. (2006). PAQ: Time series forecasting for approximate query answering in sensor networks. In European workshop on wireless sensor networks. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ji, H., et al. (2017). Distributed information-weighted Kalman consensus filter for sensor networks. Automatica,77, 18–30.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, X., et al. (2015). Long short-term memory neural network for traffic speed prediction using remote microwave sensor data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,54, 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation,9(8), 1735–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In F. Pereira, C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, & K. Q. Weinberger (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 1097–1105).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girard, A., Rasmussen, C. E., Candela, J. Q., & Murray-Smith, R. (2003). Gaussian process priors with uncertain inputs application to multiple-step ahead time series forecasting. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 545–552).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborne, M. A., et al. (2008). Towards real-time information processing of sensor network data using computationally efficient multi-output Gaussian processes. In 2008 international conference on information processing in sensor networks (IPSN 2008). IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richter, P., & Toledano-Ayala, M. (2015). Revisiting Gaussian process regression modeling for localization in wireless sensor networks. Sensors,15(9), 22587–22615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roberts, S., Osborne, M., Ebden, M., Reece, S., Gibson, N., & Aigrain, S. (2013). Gaussian processes for time-series modelling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A,371, 20110550.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers, A., Maleki, S., Ghosh, S., and Jennings, N. R. (2011). Adaptive home heating control through Gaussian process prediction and mathematical programming. Nychka, D.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leith, D. J., Heidl, M., & Ringwood, J. V. (2004). Gaussian process prior models for electrical load forecasting. In International conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems (pp. 112–117).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandyopadhyay, S., Hammerling, D., Lindgren, F., & Sain, S. (2015). A multiresolution Gaussian process model for the analysis of large spatial datasets. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,24(2), 579–599.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Percival, D. B., & Walden, A. T. (2006). Wavelet methods for time series analysis (Vol. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soltani, S. (2002). On the use of the wavelet decomposition for time series prediction. Neurocomputing,48(1), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Strang, G., & Nguyen, T. (1996). Wavelets and filter banks. Cambridge: SIAM.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. (2006). Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang, T., & Kuo, C. C. J. (1993). texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet tranform. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2(4), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mallat, S. (1999). A wavelet tour of signal processing. Cambridge: Academic Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vaidyanathan, P. P. (1993). Multirate systems and filter banks. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Vito, S., Massera, E., Piga, M., Martinotto, L., & Di Francia, G. (2008). On field calibration of an electronic nose for benzene estimation in an urban pollution monitoring scenario. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical,129(2), 750–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Buitinck, L., Louppe, G., Blondel, M., Pedregosa, F., Mueller, A., Grisel, O., et al. (2013). Design for machine learning software: experiences from the scikit-learn project. In ECML PKDD workshop: Languages for data mining and machine learning (pp. 108–122).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lucas, D. D., Yver Kwok, C., Cameron-Smith, P., Graven, H., Bergmann, D., Guilderson, T. P., et al. (2015). Designing optimal greenhouse gas observing networks that consider performance and cost. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems,4(1), 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad JuárezCiudad JuárezMexico
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoNezahualcoyotlMexico

Personalised recommendations