Advertisement

Development of an effective method of tariff formation for rural areas: the case of Russian Federation

  • João Paulo PereiraEmail author
  • Daria Zamotajlova
  • Elena Popova
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The conducted researches have shown that the features of the housing and communal sector do not allow talking about the possibility of calculating the “optimal” tariff rate. The development of an effective method of tariff formation for rural areas is particularly acute. The use of traditional method to calculate the amount of tariffs for housing and communal services provided to the population and enterprises (called “cost plus” approach) consists in a simple summation of the cost price of a service with a premium that was set directly by a particular housing and communal enterprise within the maximum and minimum values. The authors found that none of the current pricing and tariffs’ setting methods fulfills the requirements for an effective and economically founded tariff policy in the housing and communal services sector. In this regard, the development of a new methodology that will ensure the receipt of compromise tariffs for housing and communal services is required. Compromise analysis, the main purpose of which is to obtain optimal prices, can be used as a basis of such methodology.

Keywords

Housing and communal complex Method of tariff formation Compromise prices and tariffs Social demand Rural areas 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Jukic, B., Jukic, N., & Parameswaran, M. (2002). Data models for information sharing in e-partnerships: Analysis, improvements, and relevance. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,12, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kardash, V. A. (2006). Conflicts and trade-offs in a market economy. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borkovskaya, V. (2018). Project management risks in the sphere of housing and communal services. MATEC Web of Conferences,251, 06025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zamotajlova, D., Popova, E., Gorkavoy, P., & Nedogonova, T. (2018). Compromise tariff formation as one of the bases of development of the housing and com-munal complex of rural areas. Kuban State Agrarian University.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    OECD. (2007). Innovative rural regions. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chan, H. K., & Chan, F. T. S. (2009). Effect of information sharing in supply chains with flexibility. International Journal of Production Research,47, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ingenbleek, P. T., & Van der Lans, I. A. (2013). Relating price strategies and price-setting practices. European Journal of Marketing,47, 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lummi, K., & Rautiainen, A. (2017). Development options and impacts of distribution tariff structures. Tampere University of Technology, Finland 65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oksana, S. (2017). Management of reforming of housing-and-communal services. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,90, 10.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zamotajlova, D., Kurnosova, N., & Reznikov, V. (2017). Methodological approaches to estimation of management organizations’ efficiency of activity in housing and communal sphere. Kuban State Agrarian University.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    European-Commission. (2015). Study on tariff design for distribution systems.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davcik, N. S., & Piyush, S. (2015). Impact of product differentiation, marketing investments and brand equity on pricing strategies: A brand level investigation. European Journal of Marketing,49, 760–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zaheeruddin, & Manas, M. (2015). Analysis of design of technologies, tariff structures, and regulatory policies for sustainable growth of the smart grid. Energy Technology & Policy,2, 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryahovskaya, A. (2016). Government regulation of the economy in crisis. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alcalde, J., & Peris, J. E. (2017). Sharing costs and the compromise solution. University of Alicante, D. Quantitative Methods and Economic Theory.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Politécnico de BragançaBragançaPortugal
  2. 2.Kuban State Agrarian UniversityKrasnodarRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations