Advertisement

A new approach for two-way relaying networks: improving performance by successive interference cancellation, digital network coding and opportunistic relay selection

  • Pham Ngoc SonEmail author
  • Tran Trung Duy
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new approach based on combination of successive interference cancellation (SIC), digital network coding (DNC), and opportunistic relay selection in a two-way cooperative scheme in which two source nodes send simultaneously their packets to each other with a help of multiple relaying nodes, called as SIC–DNC protocol. In the proposed SIC–DNC protocol, the cooperative relays use the SIC technique to decode sequentially the packets from received sum signals, and then encode these packets by the DNC technique. These relays operate in the half-duplex mode, and suffer interference signals from imperfect SIC operations. A best relay is selected by the opportunistic relay selection based on taking maximization of signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios from a successful decoding relay set to two source nodes in the last time slot. Exact and asymptotic closed-form outage probability expressions are obtained to evaluate the proposed SIC–DNC protocol, and then are verified by performing the Monte Carlo simulations. Our results show performance improvement of the proposed SIC–DNC protocol because of increase of the number of the cooperative relays, decrease of the residual interference signal powers, and respect to optimal relay locations and optimal power allocation coefficients of the near source. In addition, insightful comparisons with a conventional two-way decode-and-forward scheme are provided to prove highlight performances in asymmetric two-way cooperative schemes whereas the proposed SIC–DNC protocol owns better spectrum utilization efficiency. Finally, the simulation results are harvested to valid the exact and asymptotic analysis values.

Keywords

Two-way relaying scheme Successive interference cancellation Digital network coding Opportunistic relay selection Non-orthogonal multiple access 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 102.04-2019.13.

References

  1. 1.
    Niu, Y., Li, Y., Jin, D., Su, L., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). A survey of millimeter wave communications (mmWave) for 5G: Opportunities and challenges. Wireless Networks, 21(8), 2657–2676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP TR 38.913: Study on scenarios and requirements for next generation access technologies. V14.2.0, 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    AlQahtani, S. A., & Altamrah, A. S. (2018). Supporting QoS requirements provisions on 5G network slices using an efficient priority-based polling technique. Wireless Networks,.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-01917-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, X., Jia, M., Ho, I. W.-H., Guo, Q., & Lau, F. C. M. (2018). Exploiting full-duplex two-way relay cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Transactions on Communications,.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2890264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dai, L., Wang, B., Yuan, Y., Han, S., Chih-Lin, I., & Wang, Z. (2015). Non-orthogonal multiple access for 5G: Solutions, challenges, opportunities, and future research trends. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(9), 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liaqat, M., Noordin, K. A., Latef, T. A., & Dimyati, K. (2018). Power-domain non orthogonal multiple access (PD-NOMA) in cooperative networks: An overview. Wireless Networks,.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1807-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, X., Jia, R., & Ng, D. W. K. (2019). On the design of massive non-orthogonal multiple access with imperfect successive interference cancellation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 67(3), 2539–2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zou, X., He, B., & Jafarkhani, H. (2019). An analysis of two-user uplink asynchronous non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 18(2), 1404–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ali, K. S., Haenggi, M., ElSawy, H., Chaaban, A., & Alouini, M. (2019). Downlink non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in Poisson networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 67(2), 1613–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang, Z., Ding, Z., Fan, P., & Al-Dhahir, N. (2017). The impact of power allocation on cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access networks with SWIPT. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(7), 4332–4343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yue, X., Liu, Y., Kang, S., Nallanathan, A., & Chen, Y. (2018). Modeling and analysis of two-way relay non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 66(9), 3784–3796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Popovski, P., & Yomo, H. (2007). Physical network coding in two-way wireless relay channels. In 2007 IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 707–712).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jang, Y. U., & Lee, Y. H. (2010). Performance analysis of user selection for multiuser two-way amplify-and-forward relay. IEEE Communications Letters, 14(11), 1086–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nosratinia, A., Hunter, T. E., & Hedayat, A. (2004). Cooperative communication in wireless networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(10), 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jamshidi, A., Nasiri-Kenari, M., Zeinalpour, Z., & Taherpour, A. (2007). Space-frequency coded cooperation in OFDM multiple-access wireless networks. IET Communications, 1(6), 1152–1160.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tourki, K., Yang, H. C., & Alouini, M. S. (2011). Accurate outage analysis of incremental decode-and-forward opportunistic relaying. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(4), 1021–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duy, T. T., & Kong, H. Y. (2012). Exact outage probability of cognitive two-way relaying scheme with opportunistic relay selection under interference constraint. IET Communications, 6(16), 2750–2759.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Son, P. N., & Kong, H. Y. (2014). Exact outage probability of two-way decode-and-forward scheme with opportunistic relay selection under physical layer security. Wireless Personal Communications, 77(4), 2889–2917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghorbani, S., Jamshidi, A., & Keshavarz-Haddad, A. (2018). Performance evaluation of joint relay selection and network coding in two-way relaying wireless communication networks. In Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE) (pp. 755–757).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahdavi, A., Jamshidi, A., & Keshavarz-Haddad, A. (2017). Selective physical layer network coding in bidirectional relay channel. IET Communications, 11(18), 2691–2701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lv, L., Chen, J., Ni, Q., & Ding, Z. (2017). Design of cooperative non-orthogonal multicast cognitive multiple access for 5G systems: User scheduling and performance analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65(6), 2641–2656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yuan, L., Pan, J., Yang, N., Ding, Z., & Yuan, J. (2018). Successive interference cancellation for LDPC coded non-orthogonal multiple access systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(6), 5460–5464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ding, Z., Peng, M., & Poor, H. V. (2015). Cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access in 5G systems. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(8), 1462–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, J. B., & Lee, I. H. (2015). Capacity analysis of cooperative relaying systems using non-orthogonal multiple access. IEEE Communications Letters, 19(11), 1949–1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pei, L., Zhifeng, T., Zinan, L., Erkip, E., & Panwar, S. (2006). Cooperative wireless communications: A cross-layer approach. IEEE Wireless Communications, 13(4), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Papoulis, A., & Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, random variables and stochastic processes (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ozduran, V., Yarman, B. S. B., & Cioffi, J. M. (2019). Opportunistic source-pair selection method with imperfect channel state information for multiuser bi-directional relaying networks. IET Communications, 13(7), 905–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ozduran, V., Soleimani-Nasab, E., & Yarman, B. S. (2016). Opportunistic source-pair selection for multi-user two-way amplify-and-forward wireless relaying networks. IET Communications, 10(16), 2106–2118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soleimani-Nasab, E., Matthaiou, M., Ardebilipour, M., & Karagiannidis, G. K. (2013). Two-way AF relaying in the presence of co-channel interference. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 61(8), 3156–3169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chong, E. K. P., & Zak, S. H. (2001). An introduction to optimization (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michalopoulos, D. S., Suraweera, H. A., Karagiannidis, G. K. & Schober, R. (2010). Amplify-and-forward relay selection with outdated channel state information. In 2010 IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and EducationHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.Posts and Telecommunications Institute of TechnologyHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations