Intelligent framework for radio access network design
- 5 Downloads
The evolution of 5G networks over the last few years has introduced a variety of technologies for more efficient radio access networks (RANs), which end up in ultra-dense heterogeneous infrastructure with deployments of high complexity. In this paper, we propose a new framework for RAN design in ultra-dense urban scenario based on the machine learning. The key idea of the proposed framework is to bring intelligent capabilities to the coverage planning problem for complex multi-tier scenarios, in order to achieve better network performance. We design our framework for small cells coverage optimization with 3D urban environment, macro cell locations, and realistic traffic statistics. Simulation results show that our proposed intelligent RAN framework significantly outperforms the conventional coverage design solutions, even after only a short learning time.
KeywordsRAN workflow HetNets Artificial intelligence Self-supervised learning Big data
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency, Project Numbers APVV-15-0055 and APVV-18-0214, Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, science, research and sport of the Slovak Republic under the Contract No. 1/0268/19 and by the European Intergovernmental Framework COST Action CA15140: Improving Applicability of Nature-Inspired Optimisation by Joining Theory and Practice. This research was also supported by the Project No. 0117U007177 “Designing the methods of adaptive radio resource management in LTE-U mobile networks for 4G/5G development in Ukraine,” funded by Ukrainian government.
- 2.Collet, P., & Rennard, J.-P. (2008). Stochastic optimization algorithms. In: Intelligent information technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1121–1137). IGI Global.Google Scholar
- 5.Moysen, J., Giupponi, L., & Mangues-Bafalluy, J. (2016). On the potential of ensemble regression techniques for future mobile network planning. In IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communication (ISCC) (pp. 477–483). IEEE.Google Scholar
- 12.Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Chen, K.-C., Hanzo, L., et al. (2019). Thirty years of machine learning: The road to pareto-optimal next-generation wireless networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01946.
- 13.Maksymyuk, T., Dumych, S., Brych, M., Satria, D., & Jo, M. (2017). An IoT based monitoring framework for software defined 5G mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on ubiquitous information management and communication (p. 105). ACM.Google Scholar
- 17.Sculley, D. (2010). Web-scale K-means clustering. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (pp. 1177–1178). ACM.Google Scholar
- 18.Feizollah, A., Anuar, N. B., Salleh, R., & Amalina, F. (2014). Comparative study of K-means and mini batch K-means clustering algorithms in Android malware detection using network traffic analysis. In International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (ISBAST) (pp. 193–197). IEEE.Google Scholar
- 19.Dhillon, H. S., Ganti, R. K., & Andrews, J. G. (2011). A tractable framework for coverage and outage in heterogeneous cellular networks. In Information Theory and Applications Workshop (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
- 21.Jain, R., Durresi, A., & Babic, G. (1999). Throughput fairness index: An explanation.Google Scholar
- 22.3GPP, “Small cell enhancements for E-UTRA and E-UTRAN—Physical layer aspects,” 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Technical Report (TR) 36.872, 12 2013, version 12.1.0. http://www.3gpp.org/-DynaReport/-36872.htm.