Advertisement

Design and experimental evaluation of OnDemand inter-domain mobility in SDN supported PMIPv6

  • Syed M. RazaEmail author
  • Pankaj Thorat
  • Rajesh Challa
  • Seil Jeon
  • Hyunseung ChooEmail author
Article
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

The soaring number of mobile devices and their demands for enhanced services have forced operators to adopt locally software defined and globally distributed multi-domain systems. Network managed IP mobility across these domains is significant, and needs to be handled at service level granularity with OnDemand approach for resource efficiency and minimal transmission delay. Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a well-established network initiated local mobility solution. This paper evolves PMIPv6 to present a distributed architecture for OnDemand mobility across multiple domains with Software Defined Networking (SDN). In our proposed solution, controllers in SDN enabled PMIPv6 domains perform distributed communication with each other to provide inter-domain mobility. A novel home network prefix retrieval mechanism allows the domains to reclaim the prefixes once they are released by the mobile node. We also propose a route convergence based path update technique to reduce the transmission delay; and present a detailed experimental and analytical performance evaluation for handover delay, transmission delay, and control signaling overhead. The results show 4–9% and 30–45% gain over current work in handover delay and transmission delay, respectively.

Keywords

Software defined networking PMIPv6 Inter-domain IP mobility OnDemand mobility 5G 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is partly supported by the Ministry of Education and Institute of Information and Communications Technology Promotion (IITP), Korea under the GITRC support program (IITP-2018-2015-0-00742), AI Graduate School Support Program (No.2019-0-00421), and Development of Access Technology Agnostic Next-Generation Networking Technology for Wired-Wireless Converged Networks (No.2015-0-00567).

References

  1. 1.
    El Hattachim, R., & Erfanian, J. (2015). 5 g white paper. Tech. Report. Next Generation Mobile Network.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G-PPP. (2016). View on 5 g architecture. Tech. Report. 5G-PPP Architecture Working Group.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bega, D., Gramaglia, M., et al. (2017). Toward the network of the future: From enabling technologies to 5 g concepts. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 28(8), e3205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gundavelli, S., Leung, K., et al. (2008). Proxy mobile ipv6. RFC 5213. Internet Engineering Task Force.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giust, F., Cominardi, L., et al. (2015). Distributed mobility management for future 5 g networks: overview and analysis of existing approaches. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(1), 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neumann, N., Lei, J., et al. (2009). I-pmip: An inter-domain mobility extension for proxy-mobile ip. In 5th ACM IWCMC. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhon, F., Yeo, C. K., et al. (2010). Enabling inter-pmipv6-domain handover with traffic distributors. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 33(4), 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Surmi, I., Othman, M., et al. (2013). Enhancing inter-pmipv6-domain for superior handover performance across ip based wireless domain networks. Wireless Networks, 19(6), 1317–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen, T. T., & Bonnet, C. (2013). Dmm-based inter-domain mobility support for proxy mobile ipv6. In 15th IEEE WCNC.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yegin, A., Moses, D., et al. (2017). On demand mobility management. Internet-draft. Internet Engineering Task Force.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raza, S. M., Thorat, P., et al. (2016). Sdn based inter-domain mobility for pmipv6 with route optimization. In 2nd IEEE NetSoft.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raza, S. M., Thorat, P., et al. (2017). On demand inter domain mobility in sdn based proxy mobile ipv6. In 31st IEEE ICOIN.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, S. M., Choi, H. Y., et al. (2014). Openflow-based proxy mobile ipv6 over software defined network. In 11th IEEE CCNC.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bradai, A., Benslimane, A., et al. (2015). Dynamic anchor points selection for mobility management in software-defined networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 57, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, H., Jeon, S., et al. (2018). Service-aware split point selection for user centric mobility enhancement in sdn. In 12th ACM IMCOM.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raza, S. M., Kim, D. S., et al. (2016). Leveraging proxy mobile ipv6 with software-defined networking. Journal of Communications and Networks, 18(3), 460–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McKeown, N., Anderson, T., et al. (2008). Openflow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Open Networking Foundation. (2012). Openflow switch specification. Tech. Specification 007 V1.3.1.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crawford, M., & Haberman, B. (2006). Ipv6 node information query. Experimental RFC 4620. Internet Engineering Task Force.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Al-Hashimi, H. A., Abu Bakar, K., et al. (2010). Inter-domain proxy mobile ipv6 based vehicular network. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 2(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hussain, H. N., Abu-bakar, K., et al. (2011). A novel intra-domain continues handover solution for inter-domain pmipv6 based vehicular network. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2(12), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, L. E., Mao, Z. M., et al. (2012). Toward software-defined cellular networks. In EWSDN.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pentikousis, K., Wang, Y., et al. (2013). Mobileflow: Toward software defined mobile networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jeon, S., Guimaraes, C., et al. (2014). Sdn-based mobile networking for cellular operators. In 14th ACM MobiArch.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karimzadeh, M., Valtulina, L., et al. (2017). Double-nat based mobility management for future lte networks. In 15th IEEE WCNC.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karimzadeh, M., Valtulina, L., et al. (2017). Software defined networking to support ip address mobility in future lte network. In Wireless days.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rekhter, Y., Li, T., et al. (2006). A border gateway protocol 4. RFC 4271. Internet Engineering Task Force.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Labovitz, C., Ahuja, A., et al. (2001). Delayed internet routing convergence. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 9(3), 293–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pei, D., Azuma, M., et al. (2005). Bgp-rcn: Improving bgp convergence through root cause notification. Journal of Computer Networks, 48(2), 175–194.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fabrikant, A., Syed, U., et al. (2011). There’s something about mrai: Timing diversity can exponentially worsen bgp convergence. In 30th IEEE INFOCOM.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Berde, P., Gerola, M., et al. (2014). Onos: Towards an open, distributed sdn os. In 3rd ACM HotSDN.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee, J. H., Yan, Z., et al. (2011). Enhancing qos of mobile devices by a new handover process in pmipv6 networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 61(4), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, J. H., Ernst, T., et al. (2012). Performance analysis of pmipv6-based network mobility for intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(1), 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhao, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2010). On the aggregatability of router forwarding tables. In IEEE INFOCOM.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, B., Massey, D., et al. (2004). Destination reachability and bgp convergence time. In IEEE GLOBECOM.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pack, S., Nam, M., et al. (2006). An adaptive mobility anchor point selection scheme in hierarchical mobile ipv6 networks. Computer Communications, 29(16), 3066–3078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Makaya, C., & Pierre, S. (2008). An analytical framework for performance evaluation of ipv6-based mobility management protocols. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(3), 972–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cisco. (2017). Cisco visual networking index: Global mobile data traffic forecast update white paper. Tech. Report.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lantz, B., Heller, B., et al. (2010). A network in a laptop: Rapid prototyping for software-defined networks. In 9th ACM HotNets.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Open source router kernel for embedded devices. https://openwrt.org/. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
  41. 41.
    Cpqd: Implementation of openflow v1.3 for controller and switch. https://github.com/CPqD/. Retrieved 10 May 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of SoftwareSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonSouth Korea
  2. 2.5G NetworksSamsung R&D Institute BangaloreBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Core & Automation GroupSamsung R&D InstituteBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations