Trust-aware FuzzyClus-Fuzzy NB: intrusion detection scheme based on fuzzy clustering and Bayesian rule

  • Neenavath VeeraiahEmail author
  • B. Tirumala Krishna


The dynamic nature of the nodes on the mobile ad hoc network (MANET) imposes security issues in the network and most of the Intrusion detection methods concentrated on the energy dissipation and obtained better results, whereas the trust remained a hectic factor. This paper proposes a trust-aware scheme to detect the intrusion in the MANET. The proposed Trust-aware fuzzy clustering and fuzzy Naive Bayes (trust-aware FuzzyClus-Fuzzy NB) method of detecting the intrusion is found to be effective. The fuzzy clustering concept determines the cluster-head to form the clusters. The proposed BDE-based trust factors along with the direct trust, indirect trust, and the recent trust, hold the information of the nodes and the fuzzy Naive Bayes determine the intrusion in the nodes using the node trust table. The simulation results convey the effectiveness of the proposed method and the proposed method is analyzed based on the metrics, such as delay, energy, detection rate, and throughput. The delay is in minimum at a rate of 0.00434, with low energy dissipation of 9.933, high detection rate of 0.623, and greater throughput of 0.642.


Mobile ad hoc network Intrusion detection Trust Fuzzy Naive Bayes Fuzzy clustering 


  1. 1.
    Kuo, W.-K., & Chu, S.-H. (2016). Energy efficiency optimization for mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Access, 4, 928–940.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    El Khawaga, S. E., Saleh, A. I., & Ali, H. A. (2016). An administrative cluster-based cooperative caching (ACCC) strategy for mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 69, 54–76.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuppusamy, P., & Kalaavathi, B. (2012). Cluster-based data consistency for cooperative caching over partitionable mobile adhoc network. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(8), 1307–1315.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marchang, N., Datta, R., & Das, S. K. (2017). A novel approach for efficient usage of intrusion detection system in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(2), 1684–1695.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khamayseh, Y. M., Aljawarneh, S. A., & Asaad, A. E. (2017). Ensuring survivability against black hole attacks in MANETS for preserving energy efficiency. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 18, 1–23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tseng, C. (2006). Distributed intrusion detection models for mobile ad hoc networks. Ph.D. thesis, University of California Davis.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Umamaheswari, S., & Radhamani, G. (2015). Enhanced ANTSEC framework with cluster-based cooperative caching in mobile ad hoc networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 17(1), 40–46.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh, O., Singh, J., & Singh, R. (2018). Multi-level trust based intelligence intrusion detection system to detect the malicious nodes using elliptic curve cryptography in MANET. Cluster Computing, 21(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narayandas, V., Tiruvayipati, S., Hanmandlu, M., & Thimmareddy, L. (2017). Anomaly detection system in a cluster-based MANET. In Proceedings in computer communication, networking and internet security (pp. 11–21). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feng, D., Jiang, C., Lim, G., Cimini, L. J., Jr., Feng, G., & Li, G. Y. (2013). A survey of energy-efficient wireless communications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(1), 167–178.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Usha, G., Rajesh Babu, M., & Saravana Kumar, S. (2017). Dynamic anomaly detection using cross-layer security in MANET. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 59, 231–241.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arthur, M. P., & Kannan, K. (2016). Cross-layer based multiclass intrusion detection system for secure multicast communication of MANET in military networks. Wireless Networks, 22(3), 1035–1059.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shams, E. A., & Rizaner, A. (2018). A novel support vector machine based intrusion detection system for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 24(5), 1821–1829.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumarasamy, S., Hemalatha, B., & Hashini, P. (2013). Cluster-based cost efficient intrusion detection system for MANET. In Proceedings in arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.1446 (pp. 1–9).
  15. 15.
    Gerla, M., Kwon, T., & Pei, G. (2000). On demand routing in large ad hoc wireless networks with passive clustering. In Proceedings in IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perkins, C. E. (1997). Mobile ad hoc networking terminology. Internet draft, from draft-IETF-manet-term-00.txt.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson, D. B., & Maltz, D. A. (1996). Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. Mobile Computing, 353, 153–181.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ratnasamy, S., Karp, B., Shenker, S., Estrin, D., Govindan, R., Yin, L., et al. (2003). Data-centric storage in sensornets with GHT, a geographic Hash table. Mobile Networks and Applications, 8(4), 427–442.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, M., Ti, J., & Tay, Y. (1999). Cluster based routing protocol. Internet draft, from draft-IETF-manet-cbrpspec-01.txt.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Banerjee, A., King, C.-T., & Hsiao, H.-C. (2017). On state maintenance in cluster-based mobile ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 66, 95–109.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sivakumar, R., Sinha, P., & Bharghavan, V. (1999). CEDAR: A core-extraction distributed ad hoc routing algorithm. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(8), 1454–1465.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Denning, D. E. (1987). An intrusion detection model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13(2), 222–232.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anjum, F., Subhadrabandhu, D., & Sarkar, S. (2003). Signature-based intrusion detection for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings in VTC (Vol. 3, pp. 2152–2156), USA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Subba, B., Biswas, S., & Karmakar, S. (2016). Intrusion detection in Mobile Ad hoc Networks: Bayesian game formulation. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 19(2), 782–799.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, J., Lewis, H. W. (2016). Fuzzy clustering algorithms—review of the applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on smart cloud (SmartCloud) (pp. 282–288).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Störr, H. H. P., Xu, Y., & Choi, J. (2002). A compact fuzzy extension of the Naive Bayesian classification algorithm. In Proceedings of InTech/VJFuzzy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JNTUKKakinadaIndia
  2. 2.ECE DepartmentDVR & DHS MIC College of TechnologyKanchikacharla, Krishna DistrictIndia
  3. 3.ECE DepartmentJNTUK UniversityKakinadaIndia

Personalised recommendations