Wireless Networks

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 679–690

Energy efficient routing with delay guarantee for sensor networks



The paper presents a routing algorithm that maximizes the lifetime of a sensor network in which all data packets are destined for a single collection node. Lifetime is maximized by adjusting the number of packets traversing each node. The adjustment is carried out by transmitting over alternative routes. The first part of the paper assumes that the worst case delay resulting from energy efficient routing is less than the maximum tolerable value. Ignoring the delay constraint of the network, the routes are selected as the solution to a linear programming (LP) problem in which the objective is to maximize the minimum lifetime of each node. The solution is implemented in a centralized algorithm, and then approximated by an iterative algorithm based on least cost path routing, in which each step is implemented efficiently in a distributed manner. The second part of the paper incorporates delay guarantee into energy efficient routing by constraining the length of the routing paths from each sensor node to the collection node. Simulations reveal that the lifetime of the network increases significantly by optimal routing, and including delay constraint in energy efficient routing improves the network performance since the delay of the network keeps increasing as the delay constraint is relaxed beyond the value at which the optimal lifetime is achieved.


Sensor networks Routing Energy efficiency Delay guarantee Linear programming 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, C. Sharp and D. Culler, The Mote Revolution: Low Power Wireless Sensor Network Devices, Hot Chips 16: A Symposium on High Performance Chips (Aug. 2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.C. Ergen and P. Varaiya PEDAMACS: Power Efficient and Delay Aware Medium Access Protocol for Sensor Networks, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Coleri, PEDAMACS: Power Efficient and Delay Aware Medium Access Protocol for Sensor Networks, Master Thesis, University of California, Berkeley (Dec. 2002).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E.M. Royer and C. Toh, A Review of Current Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks, IEEE Personal Communications (April 1999) pp. 46–55.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Singh, M. Woo and C. Raghavendra, Power-aware Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, MOBICOM (1998) pp. 181–190.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Chang and L. Tassiulas, Maximum Lifetime Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol.12, issue. 4 (Aug. 2004).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Bhardwaj and A.P. Chandrakasan, Bounding the Lifetime of Sensor Networks Via Optimal Role Assignments, IEEE INFOCOM (2002) pp. 1587–1596.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.J. Block and C.W. Baum, Energy-Efficient Self-Organizing Communication Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks, IEEE MILCOM (2001).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F.J. Block and C.W. Baum, An Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks with Battery Level Uncertainty, IEEE MILCOM (2002).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    C.K. Toh, Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad hoc Networks, IEEE Communications Magazine (June 2001) pp. 138–147.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, B. Prabhakar and A. El Gamal, Energy-Efficient Packet Transmission over a Wireless Link, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Vol. 10, No. 4 (Aug. 2002).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Swetha Narayanaswamy, Vikas Kawadia, R.S. Sreenivas and P.R. Kumar, Power Control in Ad-Hoc Networks: Theory, Architecture, Algorithm and Implementation of the COMPOW protocol, Proceedings of European Wireless 2002 (Feb. 2002) Italy.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Cristescu, B. Beferull-Lozano and M. Vetterli, On Network Correlated Data Gathering, IEEE INFOCOM (2004).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.K. Ahuja, T.L. Magnanti and J.B. Orlin, Network Flows, Prentice Hall (1993).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    B. Krishnamachari, S.B. Wicker and B. Bejar, Phase Transition Phenomena in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks, Symposium on Ad-Hoc Wireless Networks, GlobeCom 2001, San Antonio, Texas (Nov. 2001).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations