Advertisement

Wireless Networks

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 519–529 | Cite as

Packet concatenation at the IP level for performance enhancement in wireless local area networks

  • Dzmitry Kliazovich
  • Fabrizio Granelli
Article

Abstract

Wireless local area networks experience performance degradation in presence of small packets. The main reason for that is the large overhead added at the physical and link layers. This paper proposes a concatenation algorithm which groups IP layer packets prior to transmission, called PAC-IP. As a result, the overhead added at the physical and the link layers is shared among the grouped packets. Along with performance improvement, PAC-IP enables packet-based fairness in medium access as well as includes QoS support module handling delay-sensitive traffic demands. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated through both simulations and an experimental WLAN testbed environment covering the single-hop and the widespread infrastructure network scenarios. Obtained results underline significant performance enhancement in different operating scenarios and channel conditions.

Keywords

Packet concatenation WLAN performance optimization IEEE 802.11 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Fraleigh, S. Moon, B. Lyles, C. Cotton, M. Khan, D. Moll, R. Rockell, T. Seely and S.C. Diot, Packet-level traffic measurements from the sprint IP backbone, IEEE Network 17(6) (2003) 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Thompson, G.J. Miller and R. Wilder, Wide-area internet traffic patterns and characteristics (Extended Version), IEEE Network 11(6) (1997) 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Postel, Transmission control protocol, RFC 793 (September 1981).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE 802.11 standard (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Tourrilhes, Packet frame grouping: Improving IP multimedia performance over CSMA/CA, IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications Florence, Italy (1998).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Official IEEE 802.11 Working Group Project Timelines, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/802.11_Timelines.htm
  7. 7.
    The Norwegian academic and research data network, http://www.uninett.no/wlan/throughput.html
  8. 8.
    J. Nagle, Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks, RFC 896 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Mogul and G. Minshall, Rethinking the TCP Nagle algorithm, Computer Communication Review 31 (2001) 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Yeung, 802.11a modeling and MAC enhancements for high speed rate adaptive networks, Technical Report UCLA (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Lettieri and M. Srivastava, Adaptive frame length control for improving wireless link throughput, range, and energy efficiency, Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol. 2, (March/April 1998) pp. 564–571.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NS-2 simulator tool home page. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ (2000).
  13. 13.
    Iperf performance measurement tool, http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf
  14. 14.
    F. Ohrtman, Voice over 802.11, Artech Hose (2004).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Choi, Y. Choi and I. Lee, IEEE 802.11 MAC-Level FEC with retransmission combining, IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communication 5(1) (2006) 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    V.M. Vokkarane, Q. Zhang, J.P. Jue and B. Chen, Generalized burst assembly and scheduling techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks, in: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (November 2002).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Nagle, Personal Communication (February 1999).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Minshall, Y. Saito, J. Mogul and B. Verghese, Application performance pitfalls and TCP’s Nagle algorithm, in: Second Workshop on Internet Server Performance Atlanta, GA (1999).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Kent and R. Atkinson, Security acrchitecture for the Internet protocol, IETF, RFC 2401 (1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIT - University of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations