Packet concatenation at the IP level for performance enhancement in wireless local area networks
- 64 Downloads
Wireless local area networks experience performance degradation in presence of small packets. The main reason for that is the large overhead added at the physical and link layers. This paper proposes a concatenation algorithm which groups IP layer packets prior to transmission, called PAC-IP. As a result, the overhead added at the physical and the link layers is shared among the grouped packets. Along with performance improvement, PAC-IP enables packet-based fairness in medium access as well as includes QoS support module handling delay-sensitive traffic demands. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated through both simulations and an experimental WLAN testbed environment covering the single-hop and the widespread infrastructure network scenarios. Obtained results underline significant performance enhancement in different operating scenarios and channel conditions.
KeywordsPacket concatenation WLAN performance optimization IEEE 802.11
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.J. Postel, Transmission control protocol, RFC 793 (September 1981).Google Scholar
- 4.Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE 802.11 standard (1997).Google Scholar
- 5.J. Tourrilhes, Packet frame grouping: Improving IP multimedia performance over CSMA/CA, IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications Florence, Italy (1998).Google Scholar
- 6.Official IEEE 802.11 Working Group Project Timelines, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/802.11_Timelines.htm
- 7.The Norwegian academic and research data network, http://www.uninett.no/wlan/throughput.html
- 8.J. Nagle, Congestion control in IP/TCP internetworks, RFC 896 (1984).Google Scholar
- 10.K. Yeung, 802.11a modeling and MAC enhancements for high speed rate adaptive networks, Technical Report UCLA (2002).Google Scholar
- 11.P. Lettieri and M. Srivastava, Adaptive frame length control for improving wireless link throughput, range, and energy efficiency, Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Vol. 2, (March/April 1998) pp. 564–571.Google Scholar
- 12.NS-2 simulator tool home page. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/ (2000).
- 13.Iperf performance measurement tool, http://dast.nlanr.net/Projects/Iperf
- 14.F. Ohrtman, Voice over 802.11, Artech Hose (2004).Google Scholar
- 16.V.M. Vokkarane, Q. Zhang, J.P. Jue and B. Chen, Generalized burst assembly and scheduling techniques for QoS support in optical burst-switched networks, in: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (November 2002).Google Scholar
- 17.J. Nagle, Personal Communication (February 1999).Google Scholar
- 18.G. Minshall, Y. Saito, J. Mogul and B. Verghese, Application performance pitfalls and TCP’s Nagle algorithm, in: Second Workshop on Internet Server Performance Atlanta, GA (1999).Google Scholar
- 19.S. Kent and R. Atkinson, Security acrchitecture for the Internet protocol, IETF, RFC 2401 (1998).Google Scholar