Advertisement

Effective plant-endophyte interplay can improve the cadmium hyperaccumulation in Brachiaria mutica

  • Muhammad Tayyab AhsanEmail author
  • Razia Tahseen
  • Abida Ashraf
  • Abid Mahmood
  • Muhammad Najam-ul-haq
  • Muhammad ArslanEmail author
  • Muhammad Afzal
Original Paper

Abstract

Soil contamination due to cadmium (Cd) is a ubiquitous environmental problem for which inexpensive remediation alternatives are required. Phytoaccumulation, the use of plants to extract and accumulate heavy metals from the contaminated environment, is such an alternative. In this study, we aimed at establishing effective plant-bacteria interplay between Brachiaria mutica and Cd-resistant endophytic bacteria eventually leading to improved phytoremediation. B. mutica was grown in a Cd-contaminated soil and inoculated with three Cd-tolerant endophytic bacteria individually as well as in combination. Plant physiological parameters, biomass production, bacterial colonization, and Cd-accumulation were observed at four different Cd exposures, i.e., 100, 200, 400 and 1000 mg kg−1 of soil. The combined application of endophytic bacteria was more effective as compared to their individual applications at all concentrations. Nevertheless, highest performance of consortium was seen at 100 mg Cd kg−1 of soil, i.e., root length was enhanced by 46%, shoot length by 62%, chlorophyll content by 40%, and dry biomass by 64%; which was reduced with the increase in Cd concentration. The bacterial population was highest in the root interior followed by rhizosphere and shoot interior. Concomitantly, plants inoculated with bacterial consortium displayed more Cd-accumulation in the roots (95%), shoots (55%), and leaves (44%). Higher values of BCFroot (> 1), and lower values for BCFshoot and TF (< 1) indicates capability of B. mutica to accumulate high amounts of Cd in the roots as compared to the aerial parts. The present study concludes that plant-endophyte interplay could be a sustainable and effective strategy for Cd removal from the contaminated soils.

Keywords

Brachiaria mutica Cadmium Heavy metals Phytoaccumulation Phytoremediation Plant-endophyte interplay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for the financial Grant: 20-3854. Moreover, we are thankful to Dr. Saddam Akber Abbasi, Mathematics and Statistics Department, Qatar University Doha, Qatar, for his help in correspondence analysis.

References

  1. Adediran GA, Ngwenya BT, Mosselmans JFW, Heal KV, Harvie BA (2015) Mechanisms behind bacteria induced plant growth promotion and Zn accumulation in Brassica juncea. J Hazard Mater 283:490–499PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Adriano DC (2001) Cadmium, trace elements in terrestrial environments. Springer, New York, pp 263–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Afzal M, Yousaf S, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2012) The inoculation method affects colonization and performance of bacterial inoculant strains in the phytoremediation of soil contaminated with diesel oil. Int J Phytorem 14:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahemad M (2015) Enhancing phytoremediation of chromium-stressed soils through plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 13:51–58PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahsan MT, Najam-ul-Haq M, Idrees M, Ullah I, Afzal M (2017) Bacterial endophytes enhance phytostabilization in soils contaminated with uranium and lead. Int J Phytorem 19(10):937–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahsan MT, Saeed A, Mustafa T, Afzal M (2018) Augmentation with potential endophytes enhances phytostabilization of Cr in contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(7):7021–7032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andria V, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A (2009) Expression of alkane monooxygenase (alkB) genes by plant-associated bacteria in the rhizosphere and endosphere of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) grown in diesel contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 157:3347–3350PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arslan M, Afzal M, Amin I, Iqbal S, Khan QM (2014) Nutrients can enhance the abundance and expression of alkane hydroxylase CYP153 gene in the rhizosphere of ryegrass planted in hydrocarbon-polluted soil. PLoS One 9(10):e111208PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashraf S, Afzal M, Naveed M, Shahid M, Ahmad Zahir Z (2018) Endophytic bacteria enhance remediation of tannery effluent in constructed wetlands vegetated with Leptochloa fusca. Int J Phytorem 20:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Astier C, Gloaguen V, Faugeron C (2014) Phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soils by young douglas fir trees: effects of cadmium exposure on cell wall composition. Int J Phytorem 16:790–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bäckström M, Karlsson S, Allard B (2004) Metal leachability and anthropogenic signal in road side soils estimated from sequential extraction and stable lead isotopes. Environ Monit Assess 90:135–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baraud F, Fan TM, Higashi RM (2005) Effect of cadmium and humic acids on metal accumulation in plants. In: Lichtfouse E, Schwarzbauer J, Robert D (eds) Environmental chemistry: green chemistry and pollutants in ecosystems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blaylock MJ, Salt DE, Dushenkov S, Zakharova O, Gussman C, Kapulnik Y, Ensley BD, Raskin I (1997) Enhanced accumulation of Pb in Indian mustard by soil-applied chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol 31:860–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brunetti G, Farrag K, Soler-Rovira P, Ferrara M, Nigro F, Senesi N (2012) The effect of compost and Bacillus licheniformis on the phytoextraction of Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn by three brassicaceae species from contaminated soils in the Apulia region, Southern Italy. Geoderma 170:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chaudhuri D, Majumder A, Misra AK, Bandyopadhyay K (2014) Cadmium removal by Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza. Int J Phytorem 16:1119–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen YX, He YF, Luo YM, Yu YL, Lin Q, Wong MH (2003) Physiological mechanism of plant roots exposed to cadmium. Chemosphere 50:789–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cheng S, Ren F, Grosse W, Wu Z (2002) Effects of cadmium on chlorophyll content, photochemical efficiency, and photosynthetic intensity of Canna indica Linn. Int J Phytorem 4:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dary M, Chamber-Pérez MA, Palomares AJ, Pajuelo E (2010) “In situ” phytostabilisation of heavy metal polluted soils using Lupinus luteus inoculated with metal resistant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Hazard Mater 177(1–3):323–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Das P, Samantaray S, Rout GR (1997) Studies on cadmium toxicity in plants: a review. Environ Pollut 98(1):29–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egidi E, Wood JL, Aracic S, Kannan R, McDonald L, Bell CA, Fox EM, Liu W, Franks AE (2016) Draft genome sequence of Enterobacter ludwigii NCR3, a heavy metal–resistant rhizobacterium. Genome Announce 4:e01076–e1116Google Scholar
  22. Fatima K, Imran A, Amin I, Khan QM, Afzal M (2016) Plant species affect colonization patterns and metabolic activity of associated endophytes during phytoremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(7):6188–6196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gjengedal E, Steinnes E (1994) The mobility of metals in the soil-plant system in manipulated catchments: plant species suitable for biomonitoring of Cd, Pb, Zn, and Rb. Ecol Eng 3(3):267–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glick BR (2003) Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol Adv 21:383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Glick BR (2010) Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 28:367–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria, new perspectives and approaches in plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria research. Springer, New York, pp 329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gołda S, Korzeniowska J (2016) Comparison of phytoremediation potential of three grass species in soil contaminated with cadmium. Ochrona Srodowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych 27:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hao X, Xie P, Johnstone L, Miller SJ, Rensing C, Wei G (2012) Genome sequence and mutational analysis of plant-growth-promoting bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens CCNWGS0286 isolated from a zinc-lead mine tailing. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:5384–5394PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hasan SA, Fariduddin Q, Ali B, Hayat S, Ahmad A (2009) Cadmium: toxicity and tolerance in plants. J Environ Biol 30(2):165–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. He H, Ye Z, Yang D, Yan J, Xiao L, Zhong T, Yuan M, Cai X, Fang Z, Jing Y (2013) Characterization of endophytic Rahnella sp. JN6 from Polygonum pubescens and its potential in promoting growth and Cd, Pb Zn uptake by Brassica napus. Chemosphere 90:1960–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hechmi N, Ben Aissa N, Abdenaceur H, Jedidi N (2015) Uptake and bioaccumulation of pentachlorophenol by emergent wetland plant Phragmites australis (common reed) in cadmium co-contaminated soil. Int J Phytoremed 17:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hua J-F, Lin X-G, Bai J-F, Shao Y-F, Yin R, Jiang Q (2010) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and earthworm on nematode communities and arsenic uptake by maize in arsenic-contaminated soils. Pedosphere 20:163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ijaz A, Imran A, ul Haq MA, Khan QM, Afzal M (2016) Phytoremediation: recent advances in plant-endophytic synergistic interactions. Plant Soil 405(1–2):179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68:167–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarup L, Alfven T (2004) Low level cadmium exposure, renal and bone effects—the OSCAR study. Biometals 17:505–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiang C-y, Sheng X-f, Qian M, Wang Q-y (2008) Isolation and characterization of a heavy metal-resistant Burkholderia sp. from heavy metal-contaminated paddy field soil and its potential in promoting plant growth and heavy metal accumulation in metal-polluted soil. Chemosphere 72:157–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Karthikeyan R, Kulakow PA (2003) Soil plant microbe interactions in phytoremediation. In: Tsao DT (ed) Phytoremediation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 52–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khan MU, Sessitsch A, Harris M, Fatima K, Imran A, Arslan M, Shabir G, Khan QM, Afzal M (2015) Cr-resistant rhizo-and endophytic bacteria associated with Prosopis juliflora and their potential as phytoremediation enhancing agents in metal-degraded soils. Front Plant Sci 5(10):3389Google Scholar
  39. Kumar M, Mishra S, Dixit V, Kumar M, Agarwal L, Chauhan PS, Nautiyal CS (2016) Synergistic effect of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ameliorates drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L). Plant Signal Behav 11:e1071004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee S, Flores-Encarnacion M, Contreras-Zentella M, Garcia-Flores L, Escamilla JE, Kennedy C (2004) Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis is deficient in Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strains with mutations in cytochrome c biogenesis genes. J Bacteriol 186:5384–5391PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin Y-F, Severing EI, te Lintel HB, Schijlen E, Aarts MG (2014) A comprehensive set of transcript sequences of the heavy metal hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens. Front Plant Sci 5:00261Google Scholar
  42. Liu J, Zhou Q, Wang S (2010) Evaluation of chemical enhancement on phytoremediation effect of Cd-contaminated soils with Calendula officinalis L. Int J Phytorem 12:503–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lotfy SM, Mostafa AZ (2014) Phytoremediation of contaminated soil with cobalt and chromium. J Geochem Explor 144:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma Y, Prasad MNV, Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol Adv 29:248–258PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Ma Y, Rajkumar M, Zhang C, Freitas H (2016) Beneficial role of bacterial endophytes in heavy metal phytoremediation. J Environ Manage 174:14–25PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahar A, Wang P, Ali A, Awasthi MK, Lahori AH, Wang Q, Li R, Zhang Z (2016) Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ saf 126:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mani D, Kumar C, Patel NK (2015) Hyperaccumulator oilcake manure as an alternative for chelate-induced phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated alluvial soils. Int J Phytorem 17:256–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marques APGC, Moreira H, Franco AR, Rangel AOSS, Castro PML (2013) Inoculating Helianthus annuus (sunflower) grown in zinc and cadmium contaminated soils with plant growth promoting bacteria—effects on phytoremediation strategies. Chemosphere 92:74–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mohammadzadeh A, Tavakoli M, Motesharezadeh B, Chaichi MR (2016) Effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil by sunflower. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mohanty M, Patra HK (2012) Effect of chelate-assisted hexavalent chromium on physiological changes, biochemical alterations, and chromium bioavailability in crop plants—an in vitro phytoremediation approach. Bioremediat j 16(3):147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nie L, Shah S, Rashid A, Burd GI, Dixon DG, Glick BR (2002) Phytoremediation of arsenate contaminated soil by transgenic canola and the plant growth-promoting bacterium Enterobacter cloacae CAL2. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ozyigit II, Dogan I (2015) Plant–microbe interactions in phytoremediation. In: Krhsör M (ed) Soil remediation and plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 255–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peltola P, Åström M (2003) Urban geochemistry: a multimedia and multielement survey of a small town in northern Europe. Environ Geochem Health 25:397–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pietrini F, Zacchini M, Iori V, Pietrosanti L, Bianconi D, Massacci A (2009) Screening of poplar clones for cadmium phytoremediation using photosynthesis, biomass and cadmium content analyses. Int J Phytorem 12:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prapagdee B, Khonsue N (2015) Bacterial-assisted cadmium phytoremediation by Ocimum gratissimum L. in polluted agricultural soil: a field trial experiment. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3843–3852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prapagdee B, Chanprasert M, Mongkolsuk S (2013) Bioaugmentation with cadmium-resistant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to assist cadmium phytoextraction by Helianthus annuus. Chemosphere 92:659–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rajkumar M, Ae N, Freitas H (2009) Endophytic bacteria and their potential to enhance heavy metal phytoextraction. Chemosphere 77:153–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rajkumar M, Ae N, Prasad MN, Freitas H (2010) Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction. Trends Biotechnol 28:142–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Román-Ponce B, Ramos-Garza J, Vásquez-Murrieta MS, Rivera-Orduña FN, Chen WF, Yan J, Estrada-de Los Santos P, Wang ET (2016) Cultivable endophytic bacteria from heavy metal (loid)-tolerant plants. Arch Microbiol 198:941–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar NP, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I, Raskin I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Bio/technology 13(5):468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M (2013) The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60:182–194PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharma RK, Archana G (2016) Cadmium minimization in food crops by cadmium resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 107:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shabir G, Arslan M, Fatima K, Amin I, Khan QM, Afzal M (2016) Effects of inoculum density on plant growth and hydrocarbon degradation. Pedosphere 26(5):774–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma RK, Agrawal M, Agrawal SB (2010) Physiological, biochemical and growth responses of lady’s finger (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) plants as affected by Cd contaminated soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:765–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Srivastava S, Verma PC, Chaudhry V, Singh N, Abhilash PC, Kumar KV, Sharma N, Singh N (2013) Influence of inoculation of arsenic-resistant Staphylococcus arlettae on growth and arsenic uptake in Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Var. R-46. J Hazard Mater 262:1039–1047PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutton S (2011) Determination of inoculum for microbiological testing. J GXP Compliance 15:49Google Scholar
  67. Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT, Garcia C (2008) Application of different organic amendments in a gasoline contaminated soil: effect onsoil microbial properties. Bioresour Technol 99(8):2872–2880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tirry N, Joutey NT, Sayel H, Kouchou A, Bahafid W, Asri M, El Ghachtouli N (2018) Screening of plant growth promoting traits in heavy metals resistant bacteria: prospects in phytoremediation. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16:613–619PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules 21(5):573PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Yuan M, He H, Xiao L, Zhong T, Liu H, Li S, Deng P, Ye Z, Jing Y (2014) Enhancement of Cd phytoextraction by two Amaranthus species with endophytic Rahnella sp. JN27. Chemosphere 103:99–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang YF, He LY, Chen ZJ, Wang QY, Qian M, Sheng XF (2011) Characterization of ACC deaminase-producing endophytic bacteria isolated from copper-tolerant plants and their potential in promoting the growth and copper accumulation of Brassica napus. Chemosphere 83(1):57–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang S, Lin H, Deng L, Gong G, Jia Y, Xu X, Li T, Li Y, Chen H (2013) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation characteristics of Siegesbeckia orientalis L. Ecol Eng 51:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Environmental Biotechnology DivisionNational Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE)FaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Kutchery CampusThe Women University MultanMultanPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Environmental Sciences & EngineeringGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  4. 4.Division of Analytical Chemistry, Institute of Chemical SciencesBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  5. 5.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations