Combination of natural antimicrobials for contamination control in ethanol production
Presence of bacterial contaminants at levels > 107 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) during ethanol production processes reduces the alcoholic fermentation yield by 30%. Antibiotics are currently used to control contamination, but their residues may be detected in yeast extract, restricting this by-product trade to several countries. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess antimicrobial activity of the natural compounds hops extract, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, nisin Z, and lysozyme against Lactobacillus fermentum, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, aiming development of a formula. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of each antimicrobial was determined for bacteria and subsequently, nisin (30 mg/L) and hops extract (5 mg/L) were tested together, showing inhibitory effects combining doses of each antimicrobial that were equivalent to an eightfold reduction of their original Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (3.75 and 0.625 mg/L, respectively), resulting in a FICIndex of 0.25. Thereon, a formula containing both compounds was developed and tested in fermentation assays, promoting reductions on bacterial population and no severe interferences in yeast viability or population even at extreme doses. Therefore, these compounds have great potential to successfully substitute conventional antibiotics in the ethanol industry.
KeywordsAntimicrobial formula Hops extract Lactic-acid bacteria Nisin Sugarcane mills
The authors would like to acknowledge Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná for the financial support through scholarships provided for the students involved in this research.
This study was funded by Sugar Cane Ltd. (Brazil). Additionally, this work was performed at Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná (Brazil), which also granted scholarship to the students involved in the research. Luciano, Maia and Rigotti hold a patent at INPI - Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (Brazil) on the developed formulation described in the present work. Register Number: BR1020160260205, deposited in 11/2016. Also, we point that Silva Junior is vinculated to Sugar Cane Inc., funding source of this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Adeboye PT, Bettiga M, Olsson L (2014) The chemical nature of phenolic compounds determines their toxicity and induces distinct physiological responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in lignocellulose hydrolysates. AMB Express 4:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-014-0046-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institution (2017) CLSI standard M100. In: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 27th edn, p 224Google Scholar
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institution (2018) CLSI standard M07. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 11th edn, pp 15–52.Google Scholar
- Cueva C, Moreno-Arribas MV, Martín-Álvarez PJ, Bills G, Vicente MF, Basilio A, Rivas CL, Requena T, Rodríguez JM, Bartolomé B (2010) Antimicrobial activity of phenolic acids against commensal, probiotic and pathogenic bacteria. Res Microbiol 161:372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2010.04.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento - CONAB (2016) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de cana-de-açúcar: terceiro levantamento - safra 2016/2017. Cia Nac Abast - CONAB 3:174Google Scholar
- European Union (2003) Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003. Off J Eur Union 4:L 268/29-42. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/?uri=celex:32003R1831
- Jouany J-P, Medina B, Bertin G, Julliand V (2009) Effect of live yeast culture supplementation on hindgut microbial communities and their polysaccharidase and glycoside hydrolase activities in horses fed a high-fiber or high-starch diet. J Anim Sci 87:2844–2852. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1602 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Limayem A, Hanning IB, Muthaiyan A, Illeghems K, Kim J-W, Crandall PG, O’Bryan C, Ricke SC (2011) Alternative antimicrobial compounds to control potential Lactobacillus contamination in bioethanol fermentations. J Environ Sci Health B 46:709–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2011.594411 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mckenzie HA, White FH (1991) Lysozyme and α-lactalbumin: structure, function, and interrelationships. In: Anfinsen CB, Richards FM, Edsall JT, Eisenberg DSBT-A in PC (eds) Advances in protein chemistry. Academic Press, pp 173–315Google Scholar
- Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2000) Urea hydrogen peroxide reduces the numbers of Lactobacilli, nourishes yeast, and leaves no residues in the ethanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4187–4192. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.10.4187-4192.2000 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Prado JL, Venturini Filho WG (2014) Uso de antibióticos convencionais e antimicrobianos a base de lúpulo no controle da infecção bacteriana em fermentação alcoólica. Rev Energ na Agric 29:45Google Scholar
- Radler F (1990) Possible use of nisin in winemaking. I. Action of nisin against lactic acid bacteria and wine yeast in solid and liquid media. Am J Enol Vitic 41:1–6Google Scholar
- Rigotti RT, Corrêa JAF, Maia NJL, Cesaro G, Rosa EAR, Macedo REFD, Luciano FB (2017) Combination of natural antimicrobials and sodium dodecyl sulfate for disruption of biofilms formed by contaminant bacteria isolated from sugarcane mills. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rückle L, Senn T (2006) Hop acids can efficiently replace antibiotics in ethanol production. Int Sugar J 108:139–147Google Scholar