Analysis of bacterial communities in rhizosphere soil of continuously cropped healthy and diseased konjac

  • Jinping Wu
  • Zhenbiao Jiao
  • Jie Zhou
  • Fengling Guo
  • Zili Ding
  • Zhengming Qiu
Original Paper

Abstract

The bacterial community and diversity in healthy and diseased konjac rhizosphere soils with different ages of continuous cropping were investigated using next-generation sequencing. The results demonstrated that the number of years of continuous cropping significantly altered soil bacterial community and diversity. Soil bacterial Shannon diversity index and Chao 1 index decreased with the increasing cropping years of konjac. After 1 year of cropping, the soil exhibited the highest bacterial relative abundance and diversity. Of the 44 bacterial genera (relative abundance ratio of genera greater than 0.3%), 14 were significantly affected by the duration of continuous cropping and plant status. With increasing continuous cropping, Alicyclobacillus decreased, while Achromobacter, Lactobacillus, Kaistobacter, Rhodoplanes increased after 3 years continuous cropping. Continuous cropping altered the structure and composition of the soil bacterial community, which led to the reduction in the beneficial bacteria and multiplication of harmful bacteria. These results will improve our understanding of soil microbial community regulation and soil health maintenance in konjac farm systems.

Keywords

High throughput sequencing analysis Bacterial community Continuous cropping Amorphophallus konjac 

References

  1. Bevivino A, Paganin P, Bacci G, Florio A, Pellicer MS, Papaleo MC et al (2014) Soil bacterial community response to differences in agricultural management along with seasonal changes in a Mediterranean region. PLoS ONE 21(8):e0105515. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0105515 Google Scholar
  2. Bull CT, Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1991) Relationship between root colonization and suppression of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 2–79. Phytopathology 81:954–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen MN, Li X, Yang QL, Chi XY, Pan LJ, Chen N et al (2014) Dynamic succession of soil bacterial community during continuous cropping of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). PLoS ONE 10(7):e0101355. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101355 Google Scholar
  4. Cui M, Zhao XX, Xie LH, Zheng YH, Qiu YG, Liu HP (2001) Hazard investigation and occurrence of Amorphophallus konjac disease in Ankang region. Shaanxi J Agri Sci 42(1):42–44Google Scholar
  5. Davies TJ, Pedersen AB (2008) Phylogeny and geography predict pathogen community similarity in wild primates and humans. Proc R Soc Lond B 275(1643):1695–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Boer W, Wagenaar AM, Gunnewiek PJK, Van Veen JA (2007) In vitro suppression of fungi caused by combinations of apparently non-antagonistic soil bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59(1):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding ZL, Wu JP, You AQ, Huang BQ, Cao CG (2016) Effects of heavy metals on soil microbial community structure and diversity in the rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp. Japonica, Food Crops Institute of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences) rhizosphere. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. doi:10.1080/00380768.2016.1247385 Google Scholar
  8. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Egamberdieva D, Kamilova F, Validov S, Gafurova L, Kucharova Z, Lugtenberg B (2008) High incidence of plant growth-stimulating bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of wheat grown on salinated soil in Uzbekistan. Environ Microbiol 10(1):1–9Google Scholar
  10. Fu QX, Gu J, Li YD, Qian X, Sun W, Wang XJ et al (2015) Analyses of microbial biomass and community diversity in kiwifruit orchard soils of different planting ages. Acta Ecol Sin 35:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gu MY, Xu WL, Mao J, Zhang ZD, Tang GM, Ge CH (2012) Microbial community diversity of rhizosphere soil in continuous cotton cropping system in Xinjiang. Acta Ecol Sin 32(10):3031–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. İnceoǧlu Ö, Hoogwout EF, Hill P, van Elsas JD (2010) Effect of DNA extraction method on the apparent microbial diversity of soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(10):3378–3382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kowalchuk GA, Stienstra AW, Heilig GHJ, Stephen JR, Woldendorp JW (2000) Molecular analysis of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in soil of successional grasslands of the Drentsche A (The Netherlands). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 31(3):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larkin RP (2003) Characterization of soil microbial communities under different potato cropping systems by microbial population dynamics, substrate utilization, and fatty acid profiles. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1451–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li T, Wei WG, Shao W, Chen BL, Huang YP (2010) Lead and other elemental content of normal and Erwinia carotovora infected Amorphallus konjac corms. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84(6):744–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ma NN, Li TL (2013) Effect of long-term continuous cropping of protected tomato on soil microbial community structure and diversity. Acta Hortic Sin 40:255–264Google Scholar
  18. Pérombelon MC, Kelman A (1980) Ecology of the soft rot Erwinias. Ann Rev Phytopathol 18:361–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raaijmakers JM, Leeman M, van Oorschot MM, Van der Sluis I, Schippers B, Bakker PAHM (1995) Dose-response relationships in biological-control of Fusarium wilt of radish by Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 85:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt PA, Bálint M, Greshake B, Bandow C, Römbke J, Schmitt I (2013) Illumina metabarcoding of a soil fungal community. Soil Biol Biochem 65:128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tago K, Itoh H, Kikuchi Y, Hori T, Sato Y, Nagayama A et al (2014) A fine-scale phylogenetic analysis of free-living Burkholderia species in sugarcane field soil. Microbes Environ 29:434–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trivedi P, He ZL, Van Nostrand JD, Albrigo G, Zhou J, Wang N (2012) Huanglongbing alters the structure and functional diversity of microbial communities associated with citrus rhizosphere. ISME J 6(2):363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Urashima Y, Sonoda T, Fujita Y, Uragami A (2012) Application of PCR-denaturinggradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to examine microbial community structure in asparagus fields with growth inhibition due to continuous cropping. Microbes Environ 27:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vasques CA, Rossetto S, Halmenschlager G, Linden R, Heckler E, Fernandez MSP et al (2008) Evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic efficacy of Garcinia cambogia plus Amorphophallus konjac for the treatment of Obesity. Phytother Res 22:1135–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vink SN, Neilson R, Robinson D, Daniell TJ (2014) Temporal and land use effects on soil bacterial community structure of the machair, an EU Habitats Directive Annex I low-input agricultural system. Appl Soil Ecol 73:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wright PJ (1998) A soft rot of calla (Zantedeschia spp.) caused by Erwinia carotovora subspecies carotovora. New Zeal J Crop Hort 26:331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu FZ, Wang XZ, Xue CY (2009) Effect of cinnamic acid on soil microbial characteristics in the cucumber rhizosphere. Eur J Soil Biol 45:356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu JP, Liu XY, Diao Y, Ding ZL, Hu ZL (2012) Authentication and characterization of a candidate antagonistic bacterium against soft rot of Amorphophallus konjac. Crop Prot 34:83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xing L, Zhang JL, Gu TY, Zhang WM, Shen QR, Yin SX, Qiu HZ (2014) Microbial community diversities and taxa abundances in soils along a seven-year gradient of potato monoculture using high throughput pyrosequencing approach. PLoS ONE 9(1):e86610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu Y, Sun GD, Jin JH, Liu Y, Luo M, Zhong ZP et al (2014) Successful bioremediation of an aged and heavily contaminated soil using amicrobial/plant combination strategy. J Hazard Mater 264:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yao H, Jiao X, Wu F (2006) Effects of continuous cucumber cropping and alternative rotations under protected cultivation on soil microbial community diversity. Plant Soil 284:195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang SX, Gao ZQ (2000) Continuous cropping obstacle and rhizospheric micro-ecology II. Root exudates and phenolic acids. Chin J Appl Ecol 11(1):152–156Google Scholar
  33. Zhao WJ, Wang YP, Liu SY, Huang JJ, Zhai ZX, He C et al (2015) The dynamic distribution of porcine microbiota across different ages and gastrointestinal tract segments. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0117441. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117441 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuppinger-Dingley D, Schmid B, Petermann JS, Yadav V, De Deyn GB, Flynn DF (2014) Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects. Nature 515:108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinping Wu
    • 1
  • Zhenbiao Jiao
    • 1
  • Jie Zhou
    • 1
  • Fengling Guo
    • 1
  • Zili Ding
    • 1
  • Zhengming Qiu
    • 1
  1. 1.Hubei Academy of Agricultural SciencesWuhan CityChina

Personalised recommendations