World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 1377–1385 | Cite as

Isolation and identification of a new intracellular antimicrobial peptide produced by Paenibacillus alvei AN5

  • Bassam Alkotaini
  • Nurina Anuar
  • Abdul Amir Hassan Kadhum
  • Asmahani Azira Abdu Sani
Original Paper

Abstract

A wild-type, Gram-positive, rod-shaped, endospore-forming and motile bacteria has been isolated from palm oil mill sludge in Malaysia. Molecular identification using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the bacteria belonged to genus Paenibacillus. With 97 % similarity to P. alvei (AUG6), the isolate was designated as P. alvei AN5. An antimicrobial compound was extracted from P. alvei AN5-pelleted cells using 95 % methanol and was then lyophilized. Precipitates were re-suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), producing an antimicrobial crude extract (ACE). The ACE showed antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13076, Escherichia coli ATCC 29522, Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 and Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 8014. By using SP-Sepharose cation exchange chromatography, Sephadex G-25 gel filtration and Tricine SDS-PAGE, the ACE was purified, which produced a ~2-kDa active band. SDS-PAGE and infrared (IR) spectroscopy indicated the proteinaceous nature of the antimicrobial compound in the ACE, and liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy and de novo sequencing using an automatic, Q-TOF premier system detected a peptide with the amino acid sequence F–C–K–S–L–P–L–P–L–S–V–K (1,330.7789 Da). This novel peptide was designated as AN5-2. The antimicrobial peptide exhibited stability from pH 3 to 12 and maintained its activity after being heated to 90 °C. It also remained active after incubation with denaturants (urea, SDS and EDTA).

Keywords

Paenibacillus alvei AN5 Antimicrobial peptide AN5-2 LC/ESI–MS Characterization Mode of action 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Research Grants UKM-DPP-2013-044 and GUP-2012-002 from the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. The author would also like to thank the Proteomic Laboratory of the Malaysian Genome Institute for LC–ESI/TOF–MS service.

References

  1. Alkotaini B, Anuar N, Kadhum AAH, Sani AA (2013) Detection of secreted antimicrobial peptides isolated from cell-free culture supernatant of Paenibacillus alvei AN5. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 40:571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anandaraj B, Vellaichamy A, Kachman M, Selvamanikandan A, Pegu S, Murugan V (2009) Co-production of two new peptide antibiotics by a bacterial isolate Paenibacillus alvei NP75. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 379:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD (1992) Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 64:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhunia A, Johnson M, Ray B (1987) Direct detection of an antimicrobial peptide of Pediococcus acidilactici in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2:319–322Google Scholar
  5. Brogden KA (2005) Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol 3:238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucci R, Calamo-Specchia FP, Zanetti L (1990) Nisin in food preservation: a bibliographic update and review of related international legislation. Ann Ig 2:271–281Google Scholar
  7. Chen WM, Lin CY, Chen CA, Wang JT, Sheu SY (2010) Involvement of an l-amino acid oxidase in the activity of the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Enzyme Microb Technol 47:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen I, Ron I, Ben-Jacob E (2000) From branching to nebula patterning during colonial development of the Paenibacillus alvei bacteria. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 286:321–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies EA, Bevis HE, Delves-Broughton J (1997) The use of the bacteriocin, nisin, as a preservative in ricotta-type cheeses to control the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Lett Appl Microbiol 24:343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng Y, Lu Z, Bi H, Lu F, Zhang C, Bie X (2009) Isolation and characterization of peptide antibiotics LI-F04 and polymyxin B6 produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa strain JSa-9. Peptides 32:1917–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deng Y, Lu Z, Lu F, Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhao H, Bie X (2011) Identification of LI-F type antibiotics and di-n-butyl phthalate produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa. J Microbiol Methods 85:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devasahayam G, Scheld WM, Hoffman PS (2010) Newer antibacterial drugs for a new century. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 19:215–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Djordjevic SP, Forbes WA, Smith LA, Hornitzky MA (2000) Genetic and biochemical diversity among isolates of Paenibacillus alvei cultured from Australian honeybee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1098–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox GE, Stackebrandt E, Hespell RB, Gibson J, Maniloff J, Dyer TA, Wolfe RS, Balch WE, Tanner RS, Magrum LJ (1980) The phylogeny of prokaryotes. Science 209:457–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halverson T, Basir YJ, Knoop FC, Conlon JM (2000) Purification and characterization of antimicrobial peptides from the skin of the North American green frog Rana clamitans. Peptides 21:469–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B (1995) Bacteriocins of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Rev 59:171–200Google Scholar
  17. Kayalvizhi N, Gunasekaran P (2010) Purification and characterization of a novel broad-spectrum bacteriocin from Bacillus licheniformis MKU3. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 15:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kong J, Yu S (2007) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 39:549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landy M, Warren G, Rosenman MS, Colio L (1948) Bacillomycin: an antibiotic from Bacillus subtilis active against pathogenic fungi. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 67:539–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee YK, Kim HW, Liu CL, Lee HK (2003) A simple method for DNA extraction from marine bacteria that produce extracellular materials. J Microbiol Methods 52:245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leite JRSA, Silva LP, Rodrigues MIS, Prates MV, Brand GD, Lacava BM, Azevedo RB, Bocca AL, Albuquerque S, Bloch C (2005) Phylloseptins: a novel class of anti-bacterial and anti-protozoan peptides from the Phyllomedusa genus. Peptides 26:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maquelin K, Kirschner C, Choo-Smith LP, van den Braak N, Endtz HP, Naumann D, Puppels GJ (2000) Identification of medically relevant microorganisms by vibrational spectroscopy. J Microbiol Methods 51:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin NI (2003) Isolation, structural characterization, and properties of mattacin (polymyxin M), a cyclic peptide antibiotic produced by Paenibacillus kobensis M. J Biol Chem 278:13124–13132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsuzaki K (2009) Control of cell selectivity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788:1687–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naghmouchi K, Paterson L, Forster B, McAllister T, Ohene-Adjei S, Drider D, Teather R, Baah J (2011) Paenibacillus polymyxa JB05-01-1 and its perspectives for food conservation and medical applications. Arch Microbiol 193:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Orwa JA, Govaerts C, Gevers K, Roets E, Van Schepdael A, Hoogmartens J (2002) Study of the stability of polymyxins B(1), E(1) and E(2) in aqueous solution using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 29:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oscáriz JC, Pisabarro AG (2001) Classification and mode of action of membrane-active bacteriocins produced by gram-positive bacteria. Int Microbiol 4:13–19Google Scholar
  28. Papagianni M (2003) Ribosomally synthesized peptides with antimicrobial properties: biosynthesis, structure, function, and applications. Biotechnol Adv 21:465–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Raza W, Yang W, Shen Q (2008) Paenibacillus polymyxa: antibiotics, hydrolytic enzymes and hazard assessment. J Plant Pathol 90:419–430Google Scholar
  30. Schägger H (2006) Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc 1:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Straus SK, Hancock RW (2006) Mode of action of the new antibiotic for Gram-positive pathogens daptomycin: comparison with cationic antimicrobial peptides and lipopeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758:1215–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teixeira V, Feio MJ, Bastos M (2012) Role of lipids in the interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Prog Lipid Res 51:149–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wescombe PA, Upton M, Dierksen KP, Ragland NL, Sivabalan S, Wirawan RE, Inglis MA, Moore CJ, Walker GV, Chilcott CN (2006) Production of the lantibiotic salivaricin A and its variants by oral streptococci and use of a specific induction assay to detect their presence in human saliva. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1459–1466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao Z, Ma Y, Dai C, Zhao R, Li S, Wu Y, Cao Z, Li W (2009) Imcroporin, a new cationic antimicrobial peptide from the venom of the scorpion Isometrus maculates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3472–3477CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bassam Alkotaini
    • 1
  • Nurina Anuar
    • 1
  • Abdul Amir Hassan Kadhum
    • 1
  • Asmahani Azira Abdu Sani
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Proteomic LaboratoryMalaysian Genome InstituteBangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations