Biosafety evaluation of bacteriophages for treatment of diarrhea due to intestinal pathogen Escherichia coli 3-2 infection of chickens

Original Paper

Abstract

Intestinal Escherichia coli caused diarrhea in chicken makes serious damage directly to the chicken culture industry. Bacteriophage therapy is able to control the diarrhea in chickens effectively. In this study, the biosafety of bacteriophages was evaluated for treating intestinal pathogenic E.coli, which induced diarrhea in chickens. Ten bacteriophages were isolated from feces of chickens with diarrhea using the ill-chicken intestinal pathogenic E. coli 3-2 as target organism. Three bacteriophages propagated on E. coli 3-2 with relative big and clear plaques were selected and used together for toxicity experiment and evaluating the effect of therapy on chicken weight gain. In 3 weeks of trial, no mice given with or without mixed bacteriophages died, and the weight of mice of the experimental group did not show significant difference to the control group after 3 weeks infection. Besides remarkable decreasing the death rate of chickens with diarrhea, treatment of mixed bacteriophages also promoted the weight gain and saved the diet consumption as the utilize rate of diet increased 11% compared with the control group. These observations indicated that a mixture of three bacteriophages would be biosafe for rapid and effective preventing pathogenic E. coli infections.

Keywords

Diarrhea Pathogenic Escherichia coli Baceriophage Biosafety 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Project No. 30200004).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adams MH (ed) (1959) Enumeration of bacteriophage particles. In: Bacteriophages. Interscience Publishers, NY, pp 27–30Google Scholar
  2. Barrow PA (1986) Bacteriophages mediating somatic antigenic conversion in Salmonella cholerae-suis; their isolation from sewage and other Salmpnella serotypes possessing the somatic 6 antigen. J Gen Microbiol 132:835–837Google Scholar
  3. Barrow PA, Soothill JS (1997) Bacteriophage therapy and prophylaxis: rediscovery and renewed assessment of potential. Trends Microbiol 5:268–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrow P, Lovell M, Berchieri A Jr (1998) Use of lytic bacteriophage for control of experimental Escherichia coli septicemia and meningitis in chickens and calves. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 5:294–298Google Scholar
  5. Capparelli R, Nocerino N, Iannaccone M, Ercolini D, Parleto M, Chiara M, Iannelli D (2010) Bacteriophage therapy of Salmonella enterica: a fresh appraisal of bacteriophage therapy. J Infect Dis 201:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlton RM (1999) Phage therapy: past history and future prospects. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 47:267–274Google Scholar
  7. Carrillo CL, Atterbury RJ, El-Shibiny A, Connerton PL, Dillon E, Scott A, Connerton IF (2005) Bacteriophage therapy to reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6554–6563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Herelle F (1917) Sur un microbe invisible antagonists des bacilles dysenteriques. Comptes Rendus Acad Sci Paris 165:373–375Google Scholar
  9. Doyle MP, Erickson MC (2006) Reducing the carriage of foodborne pathogens in livestock and poultry. Poult Sci 85:960–973Google Scholar
  10. Gorski A, Miedzybrodzki R, Borysowski J, Weber-Dabrowska B, Lobocka M, Fortuna W, Letkiewicz S, Zimecki M, Filby G (2009) Bacteriophage therapy for the treatment of infections. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 10:766–774Google Scholar
  11. Hagens S, Loessner MJ (2009) Bacteriophage for biocontrol of foodborne parhogens: calculations and considerations. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 11:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Housby JN, Mann NH (2009) Phage therapy. Drug Discov Today 14:536–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huff WE, Huff GR, Rath NC, Balog JM, Donoghue AM (2002a) Prevention of Escherichia coli infection in Broiler chickens with a bacteriophage aerosol spray. Poult Sci 81:1486–1491Google Scholar
  14. Huff WE, Huff GR, Rath NC, Balog JM, Xie H, Moore PA, Donoghue AM (2002b) Prevention of Escherichia coli respiratory infection in Broiler chickens with bacteriophage (SPRO2). Poult Sci 81:437–441Google Scholar
  15. Inal JM (2003) Phage therapy: a reappraisal of bacteriophages as antibiotics. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 51:237–244Google Scholar
  16. Jagusztyn-Krynicka EK, Wyszyńska A (2008) The decline of antibiotic era–new approaches for antibacterial drug discovery. Pol J Microbiol 57:91–98Google Scholar
  17. Jamalludeen N, Johnson RP, Friendship R, Kropinski AM, Lingohr EJ, Gyles CL (2007) Isolation and characterization of nine bacteriophages that lyse O149 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol 124:47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim JH, Gomes DK, Nakai T, Park SC (2010) Isolation and identification of bacteriophages infecting ayu Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis specific Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Vet Microbiol 140:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li H, Xie HJ, Kong J, Ma GR (2004) Biological characterization of fowl intestinal bacteriophage. Microbiology 31:10–13 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Matsuzaki S, Rashel M, Uchiyama J, Sakurai S, Ujihara T, Kuroda M, Ikeuchi M, Tani T, Fujieda M, Wakiguchi H, Imai S (2005) Bacteriophage therapy: a revitalized therapy against bacterial infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother 11:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakai T, Park SC (2002) Bacteriophage therapy of infectious diseases in aquaculture. Res Microbiol 153:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Flaherty S, Ross RP, Coffey A (2009) Bacteriophage and their lysins for elimination of infectious bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:801–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliveira A, Sereno R, Nicolau A, Azeredo J (2009) In vivo toxicity of phage lysate in chickens. Br Poult Sci 50:558–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliveira A, Sereno R, Azeredo J (2010) In vivo efficiency evaluation of a phage cocktail in controlling severe colibacillosis in confined conditions and experimental poultry houses. Vet Microbiol 146:303–308Google Scholar
  25. Park SC, Shimamura I, Fukunaga M, Mori KI, Nakai T (2000) Isolation of bacteriophages specific to a fish pathogen, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida, as a candidate for disease control. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1416–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Payne RJH, Phil D, Jansen VAA (2000) Phage therapy: the peculiar kinetics of self-replicating pharmaceuticals. Clin Pharmacol Ther 68:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheng HQ, Knecht HJ, Kudva IT, Hovde CJ (2006) Application of bacteriophages to control intestinal Escherichia coli O157:H7 levels in ruminants. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5359–5366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith HW, Huggins MB (1982) Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics. J Gen Microbiol 128:307–318Google Scholar
  29. Smith HW, Huggins MB (1983) Effectiveness of phages in treating experimental Escherichia coli diarrhoea in calves, piglets and lambs. J Gen Microbiol 129:2659–2675Google Scholar
  30. Stenholm AR, Dalsgaard I, Middelboe M (2008) Isolation and characterization of bacteriophages infecting the fish pathogen Flavobacterium psychrophilum. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:4070–4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sulakvelidze A, Alavidze Z, JGJr Morris (2001) Bacteriophage therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Twort FW (1915) An investigation on the nature of ultramicroscopic viruses. Lancet 2:1241–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weber-Dabrowska B, Mulczyk M, Gorski A (2000) Bacteriophage therapy of bacterial infections: an update of our institute’s experience. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) 48:547–551Google Scholar
  34. Xie HJ, Zhuang XL, Kong J, Ma GR, Zhang HX (2005) Bacteriophage Esc-A is an efficient therapy for Escherichia coli 3–1 caused diarrhea in chickens. J Gen Appl Microbiol 51:159–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life Science and TechnologyBeijing University of Chemical TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Environment Research InstituteShandong UniversityJinanChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Microbial TechnologyShandong UniversityJinanChina

Personalised recommendations