World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 1941–1946 | Cite as

Characterization of the dominant microflora in naturally fermented camel milk shubat

  • Nurgul Rahman
  • Chen Xiaohong
  • Feng Meiqin
  • Dong Mingsheng
Original Paper

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the dominant microflora in shubat, a special fermented product prepared from unheated two-humped camel milk. In the seven investigated samples of shubat, lactic acid bacteria and yeasts were the dominant microorganisms with the number ranging from log 6.8 to 7.6 cfu/ml and from log 4.3 to 4.7 cfu/ml, respectively. Using phenotypic and molecular methods, a total of 48 LAB isolates were identified as Lactobacillus sakei, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus helveticus, Leuconstoc lactis, Enterococcus feacalis, Lactobacillus brevis and Weissella hellenica, whereas 15 yeast isolates were identified as Kluyveromyces marxianus, Kazahstan uiosporus, and Candida ethanolica. Results showed also that Lactobacillus and Enterococcus as well as Kluyveromyces were the predominant genera, with the most frequently isolated species being Lactobacillus sakei and Enterococcus faecium as well as Kluyveromyces maxius, respectively. This is the first report on the characterization of dominant microflora of shubat in China.

Keywords

shubat Camel milk Lactic acid bacteria Yeasts Characterization 

References

  1. Abdelgadir WS, Hamad SH, Møller PL, Jakobsen M (2001) Characterisation of the dominant microbiota of Sudanese fermented milk Rob. Int Dairy J 11:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelgadir WS, Nennis DS, Hamad SHP, Jakobsen M (2008) A traditional Sudanese fermented camel’s milk products, Gariss, as a habitat of Streptococcus infantarius subsp. Infantarius. Int J Food Microbiol 127:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewan S, Tamang JP (2007) Dominant lactic acid bacteria and their technological properties isolated from the Himalayan ethnic fermented milk products. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 92:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Giraffa G (2003) Functionality of enterococci in dairy products. Int J Food Microbiol 88:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harrigan WF, McCance ME (1976) Laboratory methods in food and dairy microbiology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Lachance MA (1998) Kluyveromyces van der Walt emend. van der Walt. In: Kurtzmann CP, Fell JW (Eds) The yeasts—a taxonomic study. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 227–247Google Scholar
  7. Latorre-García L et al (2007) Taxonomical classification of yeasts isolated from kefir based on the sequence of their ribosomal RNA genes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:785–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Leroy F, De Vuyst L (2004) Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lore TA, Mbugua SK, Wangoh J (2005) Enumeration and identification of microflora in suusac, a Kenyan traditional fermented camel milk product. Lwt-Food Sci Technol 38:125–130Google Scholar
  10. Morea M, Baruzzi F, Cappa F, Cocconcelli PS (1998) Molecular characterization of the Lactobacillus community in traditional processing of Mozzarella cheese. Int J Food Microbiol 43:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moreno MRF, Sarantinopoulos P, Tsakalidou E, De Vuyst L (2006) The role and application of enterococci in food and health. Int J Food Microbiol 106:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Najjari A, Ouzari H, Boudabous A, Zagorec M (2008) Method for reliable isolation of Lactobacillus sakei strains originating from Tunisian seafood and meat products. Int J Food Microbiol 121:342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Narvhus JA, Gadaga TH (2003) The role of interaction between yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in African fermented milks: a review. Int J Food Microbiol 86:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Randazzo CL, Vaughan EE, Caggia C (2006) Artisanal and experimental Pecorino Siciliano cheese: microbial dynamics during manufacture assessed by culturing and PCR-DGGE analyses. Int J Food Microbiol 109:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shuangquan, Burentegusi, Yu B, Miyamoto T (2004) Microflora in traditional fermented camel’s milk from Inner Mongolia, China. Milchwissenschaft 59:649–652Google Scholar
  16. Watanabe K et al (2008) Diversity of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts in Airag and Tarag, traditional fermented milk products of Mongolia. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S et al (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand H, Sninsky JS, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  18. Wouters JTM, Ayad EHE, Hugenholtz J, Smit G (2002) Microbes from raw milk for fermented dairy products. Int Dairy J 12:91–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zamfir M, Vancanneyt M, Makras L, Vaningelgem F, Lefebvre K, Pot B, Swings J, De Vuyst L (2006) Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in Romanian dairy products. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nurgul Rahman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chen Xiaohong
    • 1
  • Feng Meiqin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Dong Mingsheng
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Food Science & TechnologyNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Life Science and ChemistryXinjiang Normal UniversityWulumuqiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Animal Science and TechnologyJinling Institute of TechnologyNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations