Advertisement

Diverse mechanisms adopted by fluorescent Pseudomonas PGC2 during the inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici

  • Naveen Kumar AroraEmail author
  • Ekta Khare
  • Ji Hoon Oh
  • Sun Chul Kang
  • Dinesh K. Maheshwari
Brief Communication

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici are two of the most destructive phytopathogens occurring worldwide and are only partly being managed by traditional control strategies. Fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates PGC1 and PGC2 were checked for the antifungal potential against R. solani and P. capsici. Both the isolates were screened for the ability to produce a range of antifungal compounds. The results of this study indicated the role of chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in the inhibition of R. solani, however, antifungal metabolites of a non-enzymatic nature were responsible for inhibition of P. capsici. The study confirmed that multiple and diverse mechanisms are adopted by the same antagonist to suppress different phytopathogens, as evidenced in case of R. solani and P. capsici.

Keywords

Biocontrol Chitinase Fluorescent Pseudomonas Phytophthora capsici Rhizoctonia solani β-1,3-Glucanase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

International collaboration and exchange programme between INSA- KOSEF under which the work was carried out is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are due to Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi and the Vice-Chancellor, CSJM University Kanpur, for providing financial assistance and facilities, respectively.

References

  1. Ajit NS, Verma R, Shanmugam V (2006) Extracellular chitinases of fluorescent pseudomonads antifungal to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi causing carnation wilt. Curr Microbiol 52:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer GA, Agarwal R, Singh DV, Srivastava KD (1997) Interaction of Bacillus thuringiensis with Pythium ultimum and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici: possible role in biological control. Curr Sci 3:284–286Google Scholar
  3. Arora NK, Singhal V, Maheshwari DK (2006) Salinity-induced accumulation of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate in rhizobia indicating its role in cell protection. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22: 603–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartnicki-Garcia S (1968) Cell wall chemistry, morphogenesis and taxonomy of fungi. Ann Rev Microbiol 22:87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger LR, Reynolds DM (1958) The chitinase system of a strain of Streptomyces griseus. Biochim Biophys Acta 29:522–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook RJ (1993) Making greater use of introduced microorganisms for biological control of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 31:53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fridlender M, Inbar J, Chet I (1993) Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens by a β-1,3-glucanase-producing Pseudomonas cepacia. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1211–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garbeva P, van Vean JA, van Elas JD (2004) Assessment of the diversity and antagonism towards Rhizoctonia solani AG3 of Pseudomonas spp. in soil from different agricultural regimes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gooday GW (1990) The ecology of chitin degradation. In: Marshall KC (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol. 11. Plenum, New York, pp 387–430Google Scholar
  10. Griffin DM (1985) A comparison of the roles of bacteria and fungi. In: Leadbetter ER, Poindexter JS (eds) Bacteria in nature. I. Bacterial activities in perspective. Plenum, New York, pp 221–255Google Scholar
  11. Gupta CP, Dubey RC, Kang SC, Maheshwari DK (2001) Antibiosis-mediated necrotrophic effect of Pseudomonas GRC2 against two fungal plant pathogens. Curr Sci 81:91–94Google Scholar
  12. Gupta CP, Kumar B, Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2006) Chitinase-mediated destrictive antagonistic potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC1 against Sclerotina sclerotiorum causing stem rot of peanut. Biocontrol 51:821–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hader Y, Chet I, Henis Y (1979) Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani damping off with wheat bran culture of Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 69:64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kishore GK, Pande S (2007) chitin-supplemented foliar application of chitinolytic Bacillus cereus reduces severity of Botrytis gray mold disease in chickpea under controlled conditions. Lett Appl Microbiol 44:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kremer R, Souissi T (2001) Cyanide production by Rhizobacteria and potential for suppression of weed seedling growth. Curr Microbiol 43:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King EO, Ward MK, Rany DE (1954) Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. J Lab Clin Med 44:301–307Google Scholar
  18. Leah RH, Tommerup S, Svendsen I, Murphy J (1991) Biochemical mioleculasr characterization of three barley seed proteins with antifungal properties. J Biol Chem 266:1564–1573Google Scholar
  19. Lee KP, Kim CN, Yu JH, Oh DH (1990) The production and purification of chitinases from Aeromonas salmonicida YA7–625. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:599–606Google Scholar
  20. Lim HS, Kim SD (1990) The role of Pseudomonas stutzeri YPL-1 in biocontrol of Fusarium solani. Korean J Appl Microbiol Biotech 18:188–194Google Scholar
  21. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugars. Anal Chem 31:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ogoshi A. (1987) Ecology, and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Ann Rev Phytopathol 25:125–143Google Scholar
  23. Paul D, Sharma Y (2006) Antagonistic effects of metabolites of Pseudomonas fluorescens strains on the different growth phases of Phytophthora capsici, foot rot pathogen of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 39:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwyn B, Neilands JB (1987) Universal chemical assay for the detection and determination of siderophores. Anal Biochem 160:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naveen Kumar Arora
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ekta Khare
    • 1
  • Ji Hoon Oh
    • 2
  • Sun Chul Kang
    • 2
  • Dinesh K. Maheshwari
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biosciences and BiotechnologyCSJM UniversityKanpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyDaegu UniversityKyungbukKorea
  3. 3.Department of Botany and MicrobiologyGurukula Kangri UniversityHaridwarIndia

Personalised recommendations