Modeling of lutein production by heterotrophic Chlorella in batch and fed-batch cultures
- 320 Downloads
Chlorella is a promising alternative resource of lutein (xanthophyll) production as it can be cultivated heterotrophically in fermentors. In this paper, a kinetic model for lutein production by heterotrophic Chlorella pyrenoidosa was developed based on batch cultivations in 250-ml flasks and a 19-l fermentor. The model was validated by experimental data from two fed-batch cultivations performed in the same fermentor. The dynamic behavior of lutein production by C. pyrenoidosa with various concentrations of glucose and nitrogen was analyzed based on the kinetic model. Model-based analyses suggested that glucose concentrations between 5 and 24 g/l and nitrogen concentrations between 0.7 and 12 g/l during the cultivation were favorable for lutein production by heterotrophic C. pyrenoidosa. It also showed that fed-batch cultivations are more suitable for efficient production of lutein than batch ones. The results obtained in this study may contribute to commercial lutein production by heterotrophic Chlorella.
KeywordsLutein production Xanthophyll Chlorella pyrenoidosa Heterotrophic culture Kinetic model
This research was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (863 project No. 2006AA02Z226).
- Brinda BR, Sarada R, Kamath BS, Ravishankar GA (2004) Accumulation of astaxanthin in flagellated cells of Haematococcus pluvialis—cultural and regulatory aspects. Curr Sci 87:1290–1295Google Scholar
- Fabregas J, Dominguez A, Maseda A, Otero A (2003) Interactions between irradiance and nutrient availability during astaxanthin accumulation and degradation in Haematococcus pluvialis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61:545–551Google Scholar
- Mares-Perlman JA, Millen AE, Ficek TL, Hankinson SE (2002) The body of evidence to support a protective role for lutein and zeaxanthin in delaying chronic disease. Overview. J Nutr 132:5185–5245Google Scholar
- SEPA (1998) Manual on water and waste water analysis. State Environmental Protection Administration, China, pp266–269Google Scholar