Advertisement

World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1227–1232 | Cite as

Increase in cell size and acid tolerance response in a stepwise-adapted methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus mutant

  • S. Raju
  • Gururaj Rao
  • S. A. Patil
  • Chandrakanth R. KelmaniEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

A methicillin-susceptible strain of Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) showed stepwise adaptation when grown in increasing concentrations of oxacillin, eventually reaching a maximum of 35 μg/ml. The resultant oxacillin resistant mutant strain was stable and did not revert to susceptibility on frequent subculturing. The response of the cells to different concentrations of oxacillin was examined by scanning electron microscopy, which showed that the size of the bacterium increased with increasing concentrations of oxacillin. These changes in cell size were dependent on the concentration of oxacillin and occurred only after addition of non-lethal concentrations. In the presence of lethal concentrations (≥35 μg/ml) that completely inhibited cell growth, the cell sizes were smaller than those of wild-type cells and irregular in shape. This stepwise-adapted methicillin (oxacillin) resistant S. aureus (MRSA) mutant showed a greater acid tolerance response (ATR) to lactic and citric acids than the parent susceptible strain. These data indicates that methicillin resistance alters the morphology and ATR in stepwise-adapted MRSA mutant cells.

Keywords

ATR MRSA mutant Scanning electron microscopy Stepwise adaptation 

References

  1. Aldsworth TG, Sharman RL, Dodd CER (1999) Bacterial suicide through stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 56:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Booth IR, Kroll RG (1989) The preservation of foods by low pH. In: Gould GW (ed) Mechanisms of action of food preservation procedures. Elsevier, London, pp 119–160Google Scholar
  3. Clements MO, Foster SJ (1999) Stress resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol 7:458–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conrad RS, Howard MJ, Garrison RC, Winters S, Henderson D (1998) The effects of daptomycin on chemical composition and morphology of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Okla Acad Sci 78:15–22Google Scholar
  5. Cormican M (1996) Emerging resistance to antimicrobial agents in gram-positive bacteria. Drugs 51:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotter PD, Hill C (2003) Surviving the acid test: responses of gram-positive bacteria to low pH. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:429–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diarra MS, Petitclerc D, Lacasse P (2002) Effect of lactoferrin in combination with penicillin on the morphology and the physiology of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis. J Dairy Sci 85:1141–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd CER, Sharman RL, Bloomfield SF, Booth IR, Stewart GSAB (1997) Inimical processes: bacterial self-destruction and sublethal injury. Trends Food Sci Technol 8:238–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giesbrecht P, Kersten T, Maidnhof H, Wecke J (1998) Staphylococcal cell wall: morphogenesis and fatal variations in the presence of penicillin. Microbiol and Mol Biol Rev 62:1371–1414Google Scholar
  10. Heipieper HJ, Weber FJ, Sikkema J, Keweloh H, de Bont JAM (1993) Mechanisms behind resistance of whole cells to toxic organic solvents. Trends Biotechnol 12:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC (1997) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother 40:135–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lanzarini F (1990) Effect of teicoplanin and vancomycin on Staphylococcus ultrastructure. Microbiologica 13:231–237Google Scholar
  13. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. New Engl J Med 339:520–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mansour M, Linder M, Milliere JB, Lefebvre G (1998) Combined effects of nisin, lactic acid and potassium sorbate on Bacillus licheniformis spores in milk. Lait 78:117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthew M, Harris M, Marshall MJ, Rose GW (1975) The use of analytical isoelectric focusing for detection and identification of β-lactamases. J Gen Microbiol 88:169–178Google Scholar
  16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2000) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing for bacteria that grow aerobically, 5th edn. Approved standard M7–A5. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, WayneGoogle Scholar
  17. Neumann G, Veeranagouda Y, Karegoudar TB, Sahin O, Mausezahl I, Kabelitz N, Kappelmeyer U, Heipieper HJ (2005) Cells of Pseudomonas putida and Enterobacter sp. adapt to toxic organic compounds by increasing their size. Extremophiles 9:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Hara GW, Glenn AR (1994) The adaptive acid tolerance response in root nodule bacteria and Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 161:286–292Google Scholar
  19. Ritz M, Tholozan JL, Federighi M, Pilet MF (2001) Morphological and physiological characterization of Listeria monocytogenes subjected to high hydrostatic pressure. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2240–2247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanyal D (1993) An electron microscope study of glycopeptide antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermis. J Med Microbiol 39:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sawer IK, Berry MI, Ford JL (2005) The killing effect of cryptolepine on Staphylococcus aureus. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:24–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith PF, Wilkinson BJ (1981) Differential methicillin susceptibilities of peptidoglycan syntheses in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 148:610–617Google Scholar
  23. Thomas LV, Wimpenny JWT (1996) Investigation of the effect of combined variations in temperature, pH and NaCl concentrations on nisin inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2006–2012Google Scholar
  24. Watson SP, Antonio M, Foster SJ (1998) Isolation and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus starvation-induced, stationary-phase mutants defective in survival or recovery. Microbiology 144:3159–3169Google Scholar
  25. Weinrick B, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Fang Y, Novick RP (2004) Effect of mild acid on gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186:8407–8423CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Raju
    • 1
  • Gururaj Rao
    • 1
  • S. A. Patil
    • 2
  • Chandrakanth R. Kelmani
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Deparment of BiotechnologyGulbarga UniversityGulbargaIndia
  2. 2.Department of NeuromicrobiologyNational Institute of Mental Health and Neuro SciencesBangalore-29India

Personalised recommendations