Advertisement

Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 187–201 | Cite as

Ecosystem carbon stocks of mangrove forests along the Pacific and Caribbean coasts of Honduras

  • Rupesh K. Bhomia
  • J. Boone Kauffman
  • Tyler N. McFadden
Original Paper

Abstract

Among the many ecosystem services provided by mangrove ecosystems, their role in carbon (C) sequestration and storage is quite high compared to other tropical forests. Mangrove forests occupy less than 1 % of tropical forested areas but account for approximately 3 % of global carbon sequestration by tropical forests. Yet there remain many areas where little data on the size and variation of mangrove C stocks exist. To address this gap and examine the range of C stocks in mangroves at landscape scales, we quantified C stocks of Honduran mangroves along the Pacific and Caribbean coasts and the Bay Islands. We also examined differences in ecosystem C stocks due to size and structure of mangrove vegetation found in Honduras. Ecosystem C stocks ranged from 570 Mg C ha−1 in the Pacific coast to ~1000 Mg C ha−1 in Caribbean coast and the Bay Islands. Ecosystem C stocks on the basis of mangrove structure were 1200, 800 and 900 Mg C ha−1, in low, medium and tall mangroves, respectively. We did not find significant differences in ecosystem C stocks on the basis of location (Pacific coast, Caribbean coast and Bay Islands) or mangrove type (low, medium and tall). Mangrove soils represented the single largest pool of total C in these ecosystems, with 87, 81 and 94 % at the Pacific coast, Caribbean coast and the Bay Islands, respectively. While there were no significant differences in total ecosystem stocks among mangrove types, there were differences in where carbon is stored. Mangrove soils among low, medium and tall mangroves contained 99, 93 and 80 % of the total ecosystem C stocks. In addition, we found a small yet significant negative correlation between vegetation C pools and pore water salinity and pH at the sampled sites. Conversion of mangroves into other land use types such as aquaculture or agriculture could result in loses of these soil C reserves due to mineralization and oxidation. Coupled with their other ecosystem services, an understanding of the size of mangrove ecosystem C stocks underscores their values in the formulation of conservation and climate change mitigation strategies in Central America.

Keywords

Coastal ecosystems Land use Shrimp ponds Organic soils Climate change mitigation Carbon dynamics REDD+ 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out under the Sustainable Wetlands Adaptation and Mitigation Program (SWAMP), a collaborative effort by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Oregon State University, and the United States Forest Service (USFS), with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). We wish to thank Ian Drysdale, Luis Turcios, Pamela Ortega, Wendy Naira and Claudia Vallejo for their logistical support, as well as Johnathon Lainez and the Honduran Secretariat of Natural Resources and the Environment (SERNA) for their collaboration. We are grateful to the team of hardworking and committed participants who enabled data collection in the field. We also acknowledge the Seagrass Lab, Florida International University, Miami, USA where the soil nutrient analyses were performed. We are thankful to three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions which helped significantly to improve the quality of this article.

Funding

This work was part of the Sustainable Wetlands Adaptation and Mitigation Program (SWAMP), a collaborative effort by the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Oregon State University, and the United States Forest Service, with financial support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and CIFOR.

References

  1. Adame MF et al (2013) Carbon stocks of tropical coastal wetlands within the karstic landscape of the Mexican Caribbean. PLoS One 8:e56569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056569 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajonina G, Kairo J, Grimsditch G, Sembres T, Chuyong G, Diyouke E (2014) Assessment of mangrove carbon stocks in Cameroon, Gabon, the Republic of Congo (RoC) and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) including their potential for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+). In: Diop S, Barusseau J-P, Descamps C (eds) The Land/Ocean Interactions in the Coastal Zone of West and Central Africa. Estuaries of the World. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 177–189. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06388-1_15 Google Scholar
  3. Alongi DM (2012) Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests. Carbon Manag 3:313–322. doi: 10.4155/cmt.12.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbier EB, Hacker SD, Kennedy C, Koch EW, Stier AC, Silliman BR (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81:169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouillon S, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Rao AVVS, Koedam N, Dehairs F (2003) Sources of organic carbon in mangrove sediments: variability and possible ecological implications. Hydrobiologia 495:33–39. doi: 10.1023/A:1025411506526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breithaupt JL, Smoak JM, Smith TJ, Sanders CJ, Hoare A (2012) Organic carbon burial rates in mangrove sediments: strengthening the global budget. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 26(3):1–11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown JK (1974) Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. General Technical Report GTR-INT-16. MissoulaGoogle Scholar
  8. Cahoon DR, Hensel P (2002) Hurricane mitch: a regional perspective on mangrove damage, recovery, and sustainability. USGS Open File Report 03-183. US Department of the Interior, US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen C-F et al (2013) Multi-decadal mangrove forest change detection and prediction in Honduras, Central America, with Landsat Imagery and a Markov chain model. Remote Sens 5:6408–6426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen JE, Small C, Mellinger A, Gallup J, Sachs J (1997) Estimates of coastal populations. Science 278:1209–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5341.1209c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewalt BR, Vergne P, Hardin M (1996) Shrimp aquaculture development and the environment: people, mangroves and fisheries on the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. World Dev 24:1193–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dittmar T, Hertkorn N, Kattner G, Lara RJ (2006) Mangroves, a major source of dissolved organic carbon to the oceans. Global Biogeochem Cycles 20:GB1012. doi: 10.1029/2005GB002570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Murdiyarso D, Kurnianto S, Stidham M, Kanninen M (2011) Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat Geosci 4:293–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donato DC, Kauffman JB, Mackenzie RA, Ainsworth A, Pfleeger AZ (2012) Whole-island carbon stocks in the tropical Pacific: implications for mangrove conservation and upland restoration. J Environ Manag 97:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duarte C, Dennison W, Orth RW, Carruthers TB (2008) The Charisma of coastal ecosystems: addressing the imbalance. Estuar Coast 31:233–238. doi: 10.1007/s12237-008-9038-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2007) The World’s Mangroves 1980–2005. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Feagin RA et al (2010) Shelter from the storm? Use and misuse of coastal vegetation bioshields for managing natural disasters. Conserv Lett 3:1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00087.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fromard F, Puig H, Mougin E, Marty G, Betoulle JL, Cadamuro L (1998) Structure, above-ground biomass and dynamics of mangrove ecosystems: new data from French Guiana. Oecologia 115:39–53. doi: 10.2307/4221977 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harborne AR, Afzal DC, Andrews MJ (2001) Honduras: caribbean Coast. Mar Pollut Bull 42:1221–1235. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00239-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2014) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands. IPCC, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  21. Jaxion-Harm J, Saunders J, Speight (2012) Distribution of fish in seagrass, mangroves and coral reefs: life-stage dependent habitat use in Honduras. Revis Biol Trop 60:683–698Google Scholar
  22. Kauffman JB, Donato D (2012) Protocols for the measurement, monitoring and reporting of structure, biomass and carbon stocks in mangrove forests Center for International Forestry Research Center (CIFOR) Working paper 86Google Scholar
  23. Kauffman JB, Cummings D, Ward D, Babbitt R (1995) Fire in the Brazilian Amazon: 1. Biomass, nutrient pools, and losses in slashed primary forests. Oecologia 104:397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kauffman JB, Heider C, Cole TG, Dwire KA, Donato DC (2011) Ecosystem carbon stocks of Micronesian mangrove forests. Wetlands 31:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kauffman JB, Heider C, Norfolk J, Payton F (2014) Carbon stocks of intact mangroves and carbon emissions arising from their conversion in the Dominican Republic. Ecol Appl 24:518–527. doi: 10.1890/13-0640.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Komiyama A, Ong JE, Poungparn S (2008) Allometry, biomass, and productivity of mangrove forests: a review. Aquat Bot 89:128–137. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krauss KW, Lovelock CE, McKee KL, López-Hoffman L, Ewe SM, Sousa WP (2008) Environmental drivers in mangrove establishment and early development: a review. Aquat Bot 89:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Little EL Jr, Wadsworth FH (1964) Common trees of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Luther DA, Greenberg R (2009) Mangroves: a global perspective on the evolution and conservation of their terrestrial vertebrates. Bioscience 59:602–612. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. MacKenzie RA, Cormier N (2012) Stand structure influences nekton community composition and provides protection from natural disturbance in Micronesian mangroves. Hydrobiologia 685:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malavassi IMC (1992) Maderas de Costa Rica: 150 Especies forestales. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  32. McIvor AL, Möller I, Spencer T, Spalding M (2012a) Reduction of wind and swell waves by mangroves. The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. McIvor AL, Spencer T, Möller I, Spalding M (2012b) Storm surge reduction by mangroves. The Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  34. McKee KL, Mendelssohn IA, Hester MW (1988) Reexamination of pore water sulfide concentrations and redox potentials near the aerial roots of Rhizophora mangle and Avicennia germinans. Am J Bot 75:1352–1359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McKee KL, Cahoon DR, Feller IC (2007) Caribbean mangroves adjust to rising sea level through biotic controls on change in soil elevation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:545–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middelburg J, Nieuwenhuize J, Lubberts R, Van de Plassche O (1997) Organic carbon isotope systematics of coastal marshes. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 45:681–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being, vol 5. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Murdiyarso D, Kauffman JB, Warren M, Pramova E, Hergoualc’h K (2012) Tropical wetlands for climate change adaptation and mitigation: science and policy imperatives with special reference to Indonesia. Center for International Forest Research, BogorGoogle Scholar
  39. Nagelkerken I et al (2008) The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquat Bot 89:155–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Odum W, McIvor C, Smith TI (1982) The ecology of the mangroves of South Florida: a community profile vol FWS/OBS-81/24. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Polidoro BA et al (2010) The loss of species: mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS One 5:e10095CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Rivera-Monroy VH, Twilley RR, Casta‘eda E (2002) Hurricane Mitch: integrative management and rehabilitation of mangrove resources to develop sustainable shrimp mariculture in the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras vol 03-177. USGS Open File ReportGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandilyan S, Kathiresan K (2015) Mangroves as bioshield: an undisputable fact. Ocean Coast Manag 103:94–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snedaker SC, Lahmann EJ (1988) Mangrove understorey absence: a consequence of evolution? J Trop Ecol 4:311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World Atlas of Mangroves. A collaborative project of ITTO, ISME, FAO, UNEP-WCMC, UNESCO-MAB, UNU-INWEH and TNC. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Tue NT, Dung LV, Nhuan MT, Omori K (2014) Carbon storage of a tropical mangrove forest in Mui Ca Mau National Park. Vietnam Catena 121:119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Twilley RR, Day JW (1999) The productivity and nutrient cycling of mangrove ecosystem. In: Ecosistemas de manglar en América Tropical. Instituto de Ecología, AC México, UICN/ORMA, Costa Rica, NOAA/NMFS, Silver Spring, MD, pp 127–151Google Scholar
  48. UNEP (2014) The importance of mangroves to people: a call to action. World Conservation Monitoring Centre, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. Valiela I, Bowen JL, York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 51:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vergne P, Hardin M, Dewalt B (1993) Environmental study of the Gulf of Fonseca. Tropical Research & Development, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  51. Zanne AE et al (2009) Global wood density database. Data from: ta worldwide wood economics spectrum. Dryad Data Repository. PLoS One. doi: 10.5061/dryad.234 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rupesh K. Bhomia
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Boone Kauffman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tyler N. McFadden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)BogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations