Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Field assessment of environmental factors constraining the development and expansion of Schoenoplectus californicus marsh at a California tidal freshwater restoration site

Abstract

The effective restoration of wetland habitats requires understanding the establishment requirements, growth responses, and expansion dynamics of targeted plant species. This is particularly true when restoring areas that have been previously managed for other activities, such as agriculture, which can have legacy effects on the local environment. We investigated environmental factors (specifically hydrology and soil physicochemical conditions) that may influence the establishment, growth and expansion of Schoenoplectus californicus in a tidal freshwater marsh restoration site in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, California, USA. This study site was previously leveed, drained, and utilized for agricultural production. A 1997 levee breach restored tidal connectivity and wetland vegetation has re-established in portions of the area. Our approach coupled an intensively-sampled transect study in S. californicus-dominated marshes with a spatially-extensive survey of S. californicus lateral expansion rates and elevation. Lateral expansion of S. californicus marsh edge was significantly less in lower elevation areas (0.61 ± 0.04 m NAVD88), whereas the marsh edge at higher elevations (0.84 ± 0.03 m NAVD88) exhibited greater expansion, often at rates greater than 1.0 m year−1. These elevation means correspond to percentages of time that the marsh surface was flooded of 100 and 94 %, respectively. Although marsh edge expansion was influenced by elevation and the resultant hydrology, other factors, such as physical exposure of marsh shorelines and compacted agricultural soils also appear to be important. However, once established, S. californicus appears to be able to ameliorate high soil bulk densities over time as the advancing marsh platform develops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Atwater BF, Conard SG, Dowden JN, Hedel CW, Macdonald RL, Savage W (1979) History, landforms, and vegetation of the estuary’s tidal marshes. In: Conomos TJ (ed) San Francisco Bay: the urbanized estuary. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, pp 347–444

  2. Banack SA, Rondon XJ, Diaz-Huamanchumo W (2004) Indigenous cultivation and conservation of Totora (Schoenoplectus californicus, cyperaceae) in Peru. Econ Bot 58:11–20

  3. Bennett WA, Moyle PB (1996) Where have all the fishes gone? Interactive factors producing fish declines in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary. In: Hollibaugh JT (ed) San Francisco Bay: the ecosystem. Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, pp 519–542

  4. Chabreck RH (1958) Beaver-forest relationships in St. Tammany Parish. Louisiana. The Journal of Wildlife Management 22:179–183

  5. Cloern JE, Knowles N, Brown LR, Cayan D, Dettinger MD et al (2011) Projected evolution of California’s San Francisco Bay-delta-river system in a century of climate change. PLoS One 6(9):e24465. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024465

  6. Conomos TJ, Smith RE, Gartner JW (1985) Environmental setting of the San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129:1–12

  7. de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408

  8. de Lange PJ, Gardner RO, Champion PD, Tanner CC (1998) Schoenoplectus californicus in New Zealand. N Z J Bot 36:319–327

  9. Denson K, Langford F (1982) Expansion of transplanted giant bulrush in central Florida lakes. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 36:287–293

  10. Diggory ZE, Parker VT (2011) Seed supply and revegetation dynamics at restored tidal marshes, Napa River, California. Restor Ecol 19:121–130

  11. Ewing JM, Vepraskas MJ, Broome SW, White JG (2012) Changes in wetland soil morphological and chemical properties after 15, 20, and 30 years of agricultural production. Geoderma 179–180:73–80

  12. Kimble RB, Ensminger A (1959) Duck food habits in Southwestern Louisiana marshes following a hurricane. J Wildl Manag 23:453–455

  13. Klemas V (2013) Using remote sensing to select and monitor wetland restoration sites: an overview. J Coast Res 29:958–970

  14. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

  15. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Irwin, Illinois

  16. Neubauer ME, Plaza de los Reyes C, Pozo G, Villamar CA, Vidal G (2012) Growth and nutrient uptake by Schoenoplectus californicus (C.A. Méyer) Sójak in a constructed wetland fed with swine slurry. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 12:421–430

  17. Perry RW, Skalski JR (2009) Estimating survival and migration route probabilities of juvenile Chinook salmon in the Sacramento–San Joaquin River Delta. North Am J Fish Manag 30:142–156

  18. Pratolongo P, Kandus P, Brinson MM (2008) Net aboveground primary production and biomass dynamics of Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae) marshes growing under different hydrological conditions. Darwiniana 46:258–269

  19. Ramirez CG, Anazco R (1982) Seasonal variations in the development of Scirpus californicus, Typha angustifolia and Phragmites communis in Valdivian swamps, Chile. Agro Sur 10:111–123

  20. Richardson JR, Harris TT, Williges KA (1995) Vegetation correlations with various parameters in the Lake Okeechobee marsh ecosystem. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 45:41–46

  21. Sloey TM, Willis JM, Hester MW (2015) Hydrologic and edaphic constraints on Schoenoplectus acutus, Schoenoplectus californicus, and Typha latifolia in tidal marsh restoration. Restor Ecol 23:430–438

  22. Stirzaker RJ, Passioura JB, Wilms Y (1996) Soil structure and plant growth: impact of bulk density and biopores. Plant Soil 185:151–162

  23. Sweetnam DA (1999) Status of delta smelt in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Estuary. Calif Fish Game 85:22–27

  24. Thompson PJ, Jansen IJ, Hooks CL (1987) Penetrometer resistance and bulk density as parameters for predicting root system performance in mine soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1288–1293

  25. Vasey MC, Parker VT, Callaway JC, Herbert ER, Schille LM (2012) Tidal wetland vegetation in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary. San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci 10:1–16

  26. Waaland M (1995) Revegetation at La Franchi Demonstration Wetland Santa Rosa, California. In: Macdonald KB, Weinmann F (eds) Wetland and riparian restoration: taking a broader view: contributed papers and selected abstracts, Society for Ecological Restoration International Conference, Sep 14–16, 1995, Seattle, Washington

  27. Watson EB, Byrne R (2009) Abundance and diversity of tidal marsh plants along the salinity gradient of the San Francisco Estuary: implications for global change ecology. Plant Ecol 205:113–128

  28. Williams P, Faber P (2001) Salt marsh restoration experience in San Francisco Bay. J Coast Res 27:203–211

  29. Wills SA, Needelman BA, Weil RR (2008) Carbon distribution in restored and reference marshes at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. Arch Agron Soil Sci 54:239–248

  30. Wohl E, Palmer M, Kondolf GM (2012) River management in the United States. In: Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (eds) River futures: an integrative scientific approach to river repair. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 174–200

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the California Federal Bay Delta Program, Ecosystem Restoration Program. We would like to thank the California Department of Fish and Game for field assistance and logistical support. We would also like to thank other members of the BREACH III team for their efforts on this project as well as Michael Dupuis and Christine Pickens for invaluable field assistance.

Author information

Correspondence to Mark W. Hester.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 268 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hester, M.W., Willis, J.M. & Sloey, T.M. Field assessment of environmental factors constraining the development and expansion of Schoenoplectus californicus marsh at a California tidal freshwater restoration site. Wetlands Ecol Manage 24, 33–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-015-9448-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bulk density
  • Elevation
  • Environmental factors
  • Hydrology
  • Lateral expansion
  • Wetland restoration