Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 285–292 | Cite as

Vereda and Murundu wetlands and changes in Brazilian environmental laws: challenges to conservation

  • Vania Rosolen
  • Diego Alves de Oliveira
  • Guilherme Taitson Bueno
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Vereda and Murundu wetlands are widespread in the Cerrado (Brazilian savannah). The wetlands occupy topographic depressions on the flat plateau, which are permanently or seasonally waterlogged, with topsoil that has high contents of organic matter and endemic fauna and flora. These systems are important for regulating the water flux in the riverine network. Despite their environmental importance, the wetlands are largely neglected in planning policy, environmental legislation and scientific research, resulting in their degradation by the expansion and intensification of agriculture. In the studied catchment, a typical tropical savannah landscape and a region of typical agribusiness land use in the state of Minas Gerais was considered, where the Vereda and Murundu ecosystems are completely surrounded by agriculture. The transition zone between dry and wet soils is the most fragile and susceptible to degradation because it is subjected to the continuous expansion of land tillage. If the agribusiness model deployed in the region is responsible for the increase in wetland destruction, then changes in regulatory laws to define and preserve permanent preservation areas in the Brazilian Forest Code, for the years 1934, 1965, 1989 and in the two versions from 2012, are an impediment to the effectiveness of forest and wetlands protection and the policy of sustainable development.

Keywords

Wetlands Vereda and Murundu Cerrado Forest code 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo—Proc. n° 2014/001131-4) and FAPEMIG (Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais—Proc. n°. CRA-APQ-01103-11) for supporting this research.

References

  1. MMA—Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2011). Plano de ação para prevenção e controle do desmatamento e das queimadas: Cerrado. http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/201/_arquivos/ppCerrado_201.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2012
  2. Augustin CHRR, Melo DR, Aranha PRA (2009) Aspectos geomorfológicos de vereda: um ecossistema do Bioma do Cerrado. Brasil Rev Br Geom 10(1):103–114Google Scholar
  3. Barberi M, Salgado-Labouriau ML, Suguio K (2000) Paleovegetation and paleoclimate of “Vereda de Águas Emendadas”, central Brazil. J South Am Earth Sci 13:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasil (1934) Decreto Federal n 23.793, de 23 de janeiro de 1934. Aprova o Código Florestal. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/1930-1949/d23793.htm. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  5. Brasil (1965) Lei Federal n 4.771 de 15 de setembro de 1965. Institui o novo Código Florestal. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L4771.htm. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  6. Brasil (1989) Lei Federal n°s 7.803 de 17 de julho de 1989. Altera a redação da Lei nº 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, e revoga as Leis nºs 6.535, de 15 de junho de 1978, e 7.511, de 7 de julho de 1986. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7803.htm. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  7. Brasil (2012) Medida Provisória n° 571, de 25 de maio de 2012. Altera a Lei no 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012, que dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa; altera as Leis nos 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, 9.393, de 19 de dezembro de 1996, e 11.428, de 22 de dezembro de 2006; revoga as Leis nos 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, e 7.754, de 14 de abril de 1989, e a Medida Provisória no 2.166-67, de 24 de agosto de 2001. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2011-2014/2012/Mpv/571.htm. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  8. Brossard M, Lópes-Hernández D (2005) Des indicateurs d’évolution du milieu et des sols pour rendre durable l’usage des savanes d’Amérique du Sud. Nat Sci Soci 13:266–278. doi: 10.1051/nss:2005041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CONAMA—Conselho Nacional Do Meio Ambiente (2002) Resolução 303, de 20 de março de 2002. Dispõe sobre parâmetros, definições e limites de Áreas de Preservação Permanente. http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/res/res02/res30302.html. Accessed 27 Jan 2013
  10. Correa GF (1989) Les microreliefs “murundus” et leur environment pedologique dans l’ouest du Minas Gerais, region du plateau central bresilian. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Nancy I, FranceGoogle Scholar
  11. Ewing JM, Vepraskas MJ, Broome SW, White JG (2012) Changes in wetland soil morphological and chemical properties after 15, 20, and 30 years of agricultural production. Geoderma 179–180:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbs JP (2000) Wetland loss and biodiversity conservation. Cons Bio 14(1):314–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Junk WJ, Piedade MTF, Lourival R, Wittmann F, Kandus P, Lacerda LD, Bozelli RL, Esteves FA, Nunes da Cunha C, Maltchik L, Schöngart J, Schaeffer-Novelli Y, Agostinho AA (2013) Brazilian wetlands: their definition, delineation, and classification for research, sustainable management, and protection. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst, Aquatic Conserv. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2386 Google Scholar
  14. Klink CA, Machado RB (2005) Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conserv Biol 19(3):707–713 MachadoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matiza T (1994) Wetlands in Zimbabwe: an overview. In: Matiza T, Crafter SA (eds) Wetlands Ecology and Priorities for Conservation in Zimbabwe: Proceedings of a Seminar on Wetlands of Zinbabwe. Published by IUCN, Switzerland, The IUCN Wetlands Programme, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  16. Nishiyama L (1989) Geologia do Município de Uberlândia e áreas adjacentes. Soc Nat 1:9–16Google Scholar
  17. Oliveira AT, Ratter JA (2002) Vegetation physiognomies and woody flora of the cerrado biome. In: Oliveira AT, Marquis RJ (eds) The cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 91–120Google Scholar
  18. Ponce VM, Cunha CN (1993) Vegetated earthmounds in tropical savannas of Central Brazil: with special reference to the Pantanal do Mato Grosso. J Biogeogr 20(2):219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roberts N (1988) Dambos in development: management of a fragile ecological resources. J Biogeogr 15:141–148. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00594.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sousa FDR, Elmoor-Loureiro LMA, Galvão LM (2013) Cladocerans (Crustacea, Anomopoda and Ctenopoda) from Cerrado of central Brazil: inventory of phytophilous community in natural wetlands. Biota Neotrop 13(3):222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tilton DL (1995) Integrating wetlands into planned landscape. Land Urb Plan 32:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. von der Heyden CJ, New MG (2003) The role of a dambo in the hydrology of a catchment and the river network downstream. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(3):339–357. doi: 10.5194/hess-13-1299-2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wantzen KM, Siqueira A, Cunha CN, Sa MFP (2006) Stream-valley systems of the Brazilian Cerrado: impact assessment and conservation scheme. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 16:713–732. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wantzen KM, Couto EG, Mund EE, Amorin RSS, Siqueira A, Tielbörger K, Seifan M (2012) Soil carbon stocks in stream-valley-ecosystems in the Brazilian cerrado agrescape. Agr Ecosyst Environ 151:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vania Rosolen
    • 1
  • Diego Alves de Oliveira
    • 2
  • Guilherme Taitson Bueno
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Petrology and Metallogeny (DPM)University of State of São Paulo (UNESP)Rio ClaroBrazil
  2. 2.Institute of Geography (IG)Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU)UberlândiaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of GeographyPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC-Minas)Belo HorizonteBrazil

Personalised recommendations