Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 315–318 | Cite as

Distance from shore positively influences alert distance in three wetland bird species

  • Emma J. Dear
  • Patrick-J. Guay
  • Randall W. Robinson
  • Michael A. WestonEmail author
Short Communication


Behavioural responses of wetland fauna to humans constitutes a potential conservation threat, and may alter how animals use wetlands and their surrounds. We predicted that the farther from refuge (i.e. water) that terrestrially foraging rails occurred, the longer the distance at which they would become alert when approached. We found that the distance at which Eurasian Coot, Fulica atra, Purple Swamphen, Porphyrio porphyrio, and Dusky Moorhen, Gallinula tenebrosa became alert to an approaching predator (i.e. human) increased with distance from the shore of a wetland (species and starting distance were not significant but associated with low power). Thus, these behavioural measures suggest these birds use water in wetlands as a refuge from potential threats such as people.


Disturbance Buffers Human Wildlife Interactions Conflict Eurasian Coot Fulica atra Purple Swamphen Porphyrio porphyrio Dusky Moorhen Gallinula tenebrosa 



This research was supported by funding from Melbourne Water, a Victoria University Fellowship and a Faculty of Health Engineering and Science Collaborative Research Grant Scheme to PJG. We thank Dr W.K. Steele for his support and advice and Gina Marino and William Maloney for their help in the field. Data were collected under Victoria University Animal Ethics Committee Permit AEETH 15/10, National Parks Permit 10004656, Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Scientific Permit Nos. 10004656 and 10005536. The write up was facilitated by a New Initiatives Grant from the School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Deakin University).


  1. Antos MJ, Ehmke GC, Tzaros CL, Weston MA (2007) Unauthorised human use of an urban coastal wetland sanctuary: current and future patterns. Landsc Urban Plan 80:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard CJ (1980) Flock feeding and time budgets in House Sparrow (Passer domesticus L.). Anim Behav 28:295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumstein DT (2003) Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J Wildl Manag 67:852–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonenfant M, Kramer DL (1996) The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the Woodchuck, Marmota monax. Behav Ecol 7:299–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper WE, Frederick WG (2010) Predator lethality, optimal escape behavior, and autotomy. Behav Ecol 21:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper W, Wilson DS (2007) Beyond optimal escape theory: microhabitats as well as predation risk affect escape and refuge use by the Phrynosomatid Lizard Sceloporus virgatu. Behaviour 144:1235–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Debus SJS (2011) Parental time-budgets and breeding behaviour of the Little Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides in northern New South Wales. Corella 35:65–72Google Scholar
  8. Dill LM (1990) Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae. Environ Biol Fish 27:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dill LM, Houtman R (1989) The influence of distance to refuge on flight initiation distance in the Gray Squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Can J Zool 67:233–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frid A, Dill LM (2002) Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv Ecol 6:11Google Scholar
  11. Garamszegi LZ, Eens M, Török J (2009) Behavioural syndromes and trappabillity in free-living Collared Flycatchers, Ficedulla albicollis. Anim Behav 77:803–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glover HK, Weston MA, Maguire GS, Miller KK, Christie BA (2011) Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc Urban Plan 103:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guay P-J, Lorenz RDA, Robinson RW, Symonds MRE, Weston MA (2013a) Distance from water, sex and approach direction influence flight distances among habituated Black Swans. Ethology 119:552–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guay P-J, McLeod EM, Cross R, Formby AJ, Maldonado SP, Stafford-Bell RE, St-James-Turner ZN, Robinson RW, Mulder RA, Weston MA (2013b) Observer effects occur when estimating alert but not flight-initiation distances. Wildl Res 40:289–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lagos PA, Meier A, Ortiz L, Castro RA, Bozinovic F, Ebensperger LA (2009) Flight initiation distance is differentially sensitive to the costs of staying and leaving food patches in a small-mammal prey. Can J Zool 87:1016–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martín J, Luque-Larena JJ, López P (2005) Factors affecting escape behavior of Iberian Green Frogs (Rana perezi). Can J Zool 83:1189–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLean EB, Godin J-GJ (1989) Distance to cover and fleeing from predators in fish with different amounts of defensive armour. Oikos 55:281–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLeod EM, Guay P-J, Taysom AJ, Robinson RW, Weston MA (2013) Buses, cars, bicycles and walkers: the influence of the type of human transport on the flight responses of waterbirds. PLoS One 8:e82008CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schlacher TA, Nielsen T, Weston MA (2013) Human recreation alters behaviour profiles of non-breeding birds on open-coast sandy shores. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 118:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stankowich T, Blumstein DT (2005) Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 272:2627–2634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Symonds MRE, Weston MA, Robinson RW, Guay P-J (2014) Comparative analysis of classic brain component sizes in relation to flightiness in birds. PLoS One 9:e91960CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Weston MA, Elgar MA (2007) Responses of incubating Hooded Plovers (Thinornis rubricollis) to disturbance. J Coast Res 23:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weston MA, Antos MJ, Glover HK (2009) Birds, buffers and bicycles: a review and case study of wetland buffers. Vic Nat 126:79–86Google Scholar
  24. Weston MA, McLeod EM, Blumstein DT, Guay P-J (2012) A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu 112:269–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ydenberg RC, Dill LM (1986) The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv Study Behav 16:229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma J. Dear
    • 1
  • Patrick-J. Guay
    • 1
  • Randall W. Robinson
    • 1
  • Michael A. Weston
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Applied Ecology Research Group and Institute for Sustainability and Innovation, College of Engineering and ScienceVictoria University–St-Albans CampusMelbourne MCAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Engineering and the Built EnvironmentDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations