Maximising adaptive potential in translocated populations of clonal saltmarsh plants: a case study on Wilsonia backhousei, Convolvulaceae
- 248 Downloads
We investigated the implications of clonality for translocation of Wilsonia backhousei, a threatened, outbreeding, saltmarsh plant with tidally-dispersed fruit. Eight microsatellite loci were used to characterise samples from three estuaries in New South Wales, Australia, and to determine the size and distribution of genetically distinct individuals (genets). Within-population diversity was compared to the presence or absence of seed production using the t test. Ordinal logistic regression was used to investigate the relative influence on seed yield of soil characteristics (soil moisture, salinity, pH) and the number of clonal lineages within a 5 and 10 m radius. Principal coordinate analysis, analysis of molecular variance and Bayesian analysis were used to investigate the extent of gene flow within and among the three estuaries. We found individual genets could cover extensive areas (up to 225 m2) and apparently large populations could consist of only a few individuals. Populations that failed to produce seed had significantly less genetic diversity than populations that produced seed (P = 0.001). Seed yield showed a significant positive response to both increasing soil moisture content (P = 0.003) and increasing genetic diversity in a 5 m radius (P = 0.003). Gene flow was found to occur chiefly within estuaries though occasional longer-distance gene transfer was evident. To maximise adaptive potential in translocated populations of W. backhousei, we recommend sourcing propagules from multiple populations and planting representatives of the different populations in close proximity to facilitate sexual reproduction. These findings are likely to be applicable to other outbreeding clonal saltmarsh plants with tidally-dispersed fruit or seed.
KeywordsAdaptation Clonality Genetic diversity Restoration Saltmarsh Translocation
We thank the Sydney Olympic Park Authority for providing financial support and access to Newington Nature Reserve. We thank Carolyn Porter and Paul Rymer for technical support in laboratory and genetic analyses.
- Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximising evolutionary potential. Evol Appl 1:587–597Google Scholar
- CHAH (The Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria) (2013) Australia’s virtual herbarium. http://avh.chah.org.au. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
- Hamilton AA (1919) An ecological study of the saltmarsh vegetation in the Port Jackson district. Proc Linn Soc NSW 44:463–513Google Scholar
- Morzaria-Luna HN, Zedler JB (2007) Does seed availability limit plant establishment during saltmarsh restoration? Estuaries Coasts 30:12–25Google Scholar
- NSW Legislation (2011). Threatened species conservation regulation 2010. http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/maintop/view/inforce/subordleg+495+2010+cd+0+N. Accessed 27 May 2013
- OEH (NSW Office of Environment and Heritage) (2011) Wilsonia backhousei (a perennial mat-forming sub-shrub)—vulnerable species listing. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/determinations/WilsoniaBackhouseiVulSpListing.htm. Accessed 27 May 2013
- Sommerville KD (2007) Conservation of Wilsonia backhousei and Lampranthus tegens. University of Technology, Sydney, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
- Valiela I (2006) Global Coastal Change. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 124–144Google Scholar
- Vallee L, Hogbin T, Monks L, Makinson B, Matthes M, Rossetto M (2004) Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia, 2nd edn. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Zedler JB, Adam P (2002) Saltmarshes. In: Perrow MR, Davy AJ (eds) Handbook of Ecological Restoration, vol 2., Restoration in Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236–266Google Scholar
- Zimmerman R, Minello TJ, Rozas LP (2000) Saltmarsh linkages to productivity of penaeid shrimps and blue crabs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Weinstein M, Kreeger D (eds) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 293–314Google Scholar