Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 339–351 | Cite as

Maximising adaptive potential in translocated populations of clonal saltmarsh plants: a case study on Wilsonia backhousei, Convolvulaceae

  • Karen Sommerville
  • Maurizio Rossetto
  • Alex Pulkownik
Original Paper


We investigated the implications of clonality for translocation of Wilsonia backhousei, a threatened, outbreeding, saltmarsh plant with tidally-dispersed fruit. Eight microsatellite loci were used to characterise samples from three estuaries in New South Wales, Australia, and to determine the size and distribution of genetically distinct individuals (genets). Within-population diversity was compared to the presence or absence of seed production using the t test. Ordinal logistic regression was used to investigate the relative influence on seed yield of soil characteristics (soil moisture, salinity, pH) and the number of clonal lineages within a 5 and 10 m radius. Principal coordinate analysis, analysis of molecular variance and Bayesian analysis were used to investigate the extent of gene flow within and among the three estuaries. We found individual genets could cover extensive areas (up to 225 m2) and apparently large populations could consist of only a few individuals. Populations that failed to produce seed had significantly less genetic diversity than populations that produced seed (P = 0.001). Seed yield showed a significant positive response to both increasing soil moisture content (P = 0.003) and increasing genetic diversity in a 5 m radius (P = 0.003). Gene flow was found to occur chiefly within estuaries though occasional longer-distance gene transfer was evident. To maximise adaptive potential in translocated populations of W. backhousei, we recommend sourcing propagules from multiple populations and planting representatives of the different populations in close proximity to facilitate sexual reproduction. These findings are likely to be applicable to other outbreeding clonal saltmarsh plants with tidally-dispersed fruit or seed.


Adaptation Clonality Genetic diversity Restoration Saltmarsh Translocation 



We thank the Sydney Olympic Park Authority for providing financial support and access to Newington Nature Reserve. We thank Carolyn Porter and Paul Rymer for technical support in laboratory and genetic analyses.


  1. Adam P (1990) Saltmarsh ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam P (2002) Saltmarshes in a time of change. Environ Conserv 29:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberto F, Gouveia L, Arnaud-Haond S, Pérez-Lloréns JL, Duarte CM, Serrão EA (2005) Within-population spatial genetic structure, neighbourhood size and clonal subrange in the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. Mol Ecol 14:2669–2681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnaud-Haond S, Belkhir K (2007) GenClone: a computer program to analyse genotypic data, test for clonality and describe spatial clonal organization. Mol Ecol Notes 7:15–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnaud-Haond S, Duarte CM, Alberto F, Serrão EA (2007) Standardizing methods to address clonality in population studies. Mol Ecol 16:5115–5139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximising evolutionary potential. Evol Appl 1:587–597Google Scholar
  7. CHAH (The Council of Heads of Australasian Herbaria) (2013) Australia’s virtual herbarium. Accessed 14 Apr 2013
  8. Charpentier A (2002) Consequences of clonal growth for plant mating. Evol Ecol 15:521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorken ME, Eckert CG (2001) Severely reduced sexual reproduction in northern populations of a clonal plant, Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). J Ecol 89:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fenster CB, Galloway LF (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaechrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv Biol 14:1406–1412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forrest CN, Ottewell KM, Whelan RJ, Ayre DJ (2011) Tests for inbreeding and outbreeding depression and estimation of population differentiation in the bird-pollinated shrub Grevillea mucronulata. Ann Bot 108:185–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR, Fenster CB (2011) Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 25:465–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grindeland JM (2008) Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in Digitalis purpurea: optimal outcrossing distance in a tetraploid. J Evol Biol 21:716–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross CL, Nelson PA, Haddadchi A, Fatemi M (2012) Somatic mutations contribute to genotypic diversity in sterile and fertile populations of the threatened shrub, Grevillea rhizomatosa (Proteaceae). Ann Bot 109:331–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton AA (1919) An ecological study of the saltmarsh vegetation in the Port Jackson district. Proc Linn Soc NSW 44:463–513Google Scholar
  16. Harris JA, Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Aronson J (2006) Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restor Ecol 14:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Honnay O, Bossuyt B (2005) Prolonged clonal growth: escape route or route to extinction? Oikos 108:427–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Howard RJ, Rafferty PS (2006) Clonal variation in response to salinity and flooding stress in four marsh macrophytes of the northern gulf of Mexico, USA. Environ Exp Bot 56:301–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klekowski EJ (2003) Plant clonality, mutation, diplontic selection and mutational meltdown. Biol J Linn Soc 79:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laegdsgaard P (2006) Ecology, disturbance and restoration of coastal saltmarsh in Australia: a review. Wetl Ecol Manag 14:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazumder D, Saintilan N, Williams RJ (2006) Fish assemblages in three tidal saltmarsh and mangrove flats in temperate NSW, Australia: a comparison based on species diversity and abundance. Wetl Ecol Manag 14:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) “How local is local?”—a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Rest Ecol 13:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morzaria-Luna HN, Zedler JB (2007) Does seed availability limit plant establishment during saltmarsh restoration? Estuaries Coasts 30:12–25Google Scholar
  24. NSW Legislation (2011). Threatened species conservation regulation 2010. Accessed 27 May 2013
  25. O’Connell LM, Ritland K (2004) Somatic mutations at microsatellite loci in western red cedar (Thuja plicata: Cupressaceae). J Hered 95:172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OEH (NSW Office of Environment and Heritage) (2011) Wilsonia backhousei (a perennial mat-forming sub-shrub)—vulnerable species listing. Accessed 27 May 2013
  27. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rand TA (2000) Seed dispersal, habitat suitability and the distribution of halophytes across a saltmarsh tidal gradient. J Ecol 88:608–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossetto M, Gross CL, Jones R, Hunter J (2004) The impact of clonality on an endangered tree (Elaeocarpus williamsianus) in a fragmented rainforest. Biol Conserv 117:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossetto M, Crayn D, Ford A, Mellick R, Sommerville K (2009) The influence of environment and life history traits on the distribution of genes and individuals: a comparative study of 11 rainforest trees. Mol Ecol 18:1422–1438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sgrò CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffman AA (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4:326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slavov GT, Leonardi S, Burczyk J, Adams WT, Strauss SH, Difazio SP (2009) Extensive pollen flow in two ecologically contrasting populations of Populus trichocarpa. Mol Ecol 18:357–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sommerville KD (2007) Conservation of Wilsonia backhousei and Lampranthus tegens. University of Technology, Sydney, PhD DissertationGoogle Scholar
  36. Sommerville K, Rossetto M, Pulkownik A (2006) Isolation and characterisation of polymorphic microsatellite loci from Wilsonia backhousei (Convolvulaceae). Mol Ecol Notes 6:419–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sommerville K, Pulkownik A, Burchett M (2012) Reproductive biology of a threatened Australian saltmarsh plant—Wilsonia backhousei. Aquat Bot 99:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Valiela I (2006) Global Coastal Change. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 124–144Google Scholar
  39. Vallee L, Hogbin T, Monks L, Makinson B, Matthes M, Rossetto M (2004) Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia, 2nd edn. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  40. van der Merwe M, Spain CS, Rossetto M (2010) Enhancing the survival and expansion potential of a founder population through clonality. New Phytol 188:868–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watrud LS, Lee EH, Fairbrother A et al (2004) Evidence for landscape-level, pollen-mediated gene flow from genetically modified creeping bentgrass with CP4 EPSPS as a marker. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14533–14538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weeks AR, Sgrò CM, Young AG et al (2011) Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evol Appl 4:709–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffman AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolters M, Garbutt A, Bekker RM, Bakker JP, Carey PD (2008) Restoration of salt-marsh vegetation in relation to site suitability, species pool and dispersal traits. J Appl Ecol 45:904–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zedler JB, Adam P (2002) Saltmarshes. In: Perrow MR, Davy AJ (eds) Handbook of Ecological Restoration, vol 2., Restoration in Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 236–266Google Scholar
  46. Zeyl C, Mizesko M, de Visser JAGM (2001) Mutational meltdown in laboratory yeast populations. Evolution 55:909–917PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zimmerman R, Minello TJ, Rozas LP (2000) Saltmarsh linkages to productivity of penaeid shrimps and blue crabs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In: Weinstein M, Kreeger D (eds) Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 293–314Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Sommerville
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Maurizio Rossetto
    • 2
  • Alex Pulkownik
    • 1
  1. 1.School of the Environment, University of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia
  2. 2.National Herbarium of New South Wales, The Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain TrustSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.The Australian Botanic GardenMount AnnanAustralia

Personalised recommendations