Advertisement

Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 313–327 | Cite as

Restoration flows for the Colorado River estuary, México: estimates from oxygen isotopes in the bivalve mollusk Mulinia coloradoensis (Mactridae: Bivalvia)

  • Carlos E. Cintra-Buenrostro
  • Karl W. Flessa
  • David L. Dettman
Original Paper

Abstract

Because of competing demands for freshwater, restoration of estuaries requires estimates of inflows to sustain key species. In this study we estimated the pre-dam salinities of the Colorado River estuary by using oxygen isotopes in subfossil shells of the bivalve mollusk Mulinia coloradoensis. Since the construction of upstream dams and water diversions, average salinity in the estuary has increased to 38 practical salinity units (psu) and the population of M. coloradoensis has decreased by ~90%. In the pre-dam estuary, specimens grew when salinity ranged from 22 to 33 psu at the mouth of the river while populations 40 km distant grew at salinities from 30 to 38 psu. The river flow needed to reduce salinities at the mouth of the river to those recorded in the most distant localities (40 km from river’s mouth) ranges from 120 to 290 m3 s−1. If these flows were sustained for a year, they would total 7–16 % of the river’s annual average historical flow (~1.8 × 1010 m3).

Keywords

Bivalves Mollusks Colorado River Restoration Gulf of California Stable isotopes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Environmental Defense, NSF, and CONACyT for financial support. We also thank J. Campoy-Favela director of the Reserva de la Biósfera Alto Golfo de California y Delta del Río Colorado for assistance in our research, R. Soberanes for transportation to the study sites, G. E. Avila-Serrano, P. Liebig, K. Rowell, T. A. Taylor, M. A. Téllez-Duarte, and former students from Centro de Estudios de Almejas Muertas (CEAM) and Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenada for field assistance, D. Winter (UC Davis) and N. English for laboratory assistance. We also thank M. Ducea for lending us laboratory equipment. Data from samples analyzed by C. Rodriguez, L. F. Barra-Pantoja, K. Rowell and T. A. Taylor were used as part of this study. The present manuscript benefited from the comments of two anonymous reviewers, R. Brusca, A. Cohen and M. A. Téllez-Duarte. CCB dedicates this paper to the memory of his beloved friend A. Mestre Marechan (1974–2002). This is CEAM publication # 75 (http://www/geo.arizona.edu/ceam).

References

  1. Alber M (2002) A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries 25:1246–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez LG, Jones SE (2004) Short-term observations of suspended particulate matter in a macro-tidal inverse estuary: the upper Gulf of California. J Coast Res 20:645–654Google Scholar
  3. Anderson RM (1978) The regulation of host population growth by parasitic species. Parasitology 76:119–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avila-Serrano GE, Flessa KW, Téllez-Duarte MA, Cintra-Buenrostro CE (2006) Distribución de la macrofauna intermareal del Delta del Río Colorado, norte del Golfo de California, México. Cienc Mar 32:649–661Google Scholar
  5. Beman JM, Arrigo KR, Matson PA (2005) Agricultural runoff fuels large phytoplankton blooms in vulnerable areas of the ocean. Nature 434:211–214Google Scholar
  6. Bemis BE, Geary DH (1996) The usefulness of bivalve stable isotope profiles as environmental indicators: data from the eastern Pacific Ocean and the southern Caribbean Sea. Palaios 11:328–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calabrese A (1969) The early life history and larval ecology of the Coot Clam, Mulinia lateralis (Say) (Mactridae, Pelecypoda). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  8. Carbajal N, Souza A, Durazo R (1997) A numerical study of the ex-ROFI of the Colorado River. J Mar Syst 12:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carriquiry JD, Sánchez A (1999) Sedimentation in the Colorado River Delta and upper Gulf of California after nearly a century of discharge loss. Mar Geol 158:125–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cintra-Buenrostro CE, Flessa KW (2004) Cavidades, mordiscos y peladas: herramientas para determinar la importancia trófica de una especie en desvanecimiento dentro del Delta del Río Colorado, México. Cienc Mar 8:3–19Google Scholar
  11. Cintra-Buenrostro CE, Flessa KW, Avila-Serrano GE (2005) Who cares about a vanishing clam? Trophic importance of Mulinia coloradoensis inferred from predatory damage. Palaios 20:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colijn F, Cadée GC (2003) Is phytoplankton growth in the Wadden Sea light or nitrogen limited? J Sea Res 49:83–93Google Scholar
  13. Dayton PK, Tegner MJ, Edwards PB, Roser KL (1998) Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecol Appl 8:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dettman DL, Flessa KW, Roopnarine PD, Schöne BR, Goodwin DH (2004) The use of oxygen isotope variation in shells of estuarine mollusks as a quantitative record of seasonal and annual Colorado River discharge. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:1253–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietl GP, Flessa KW (2011) Conservation paleobiology. Putting the dead to work. Trends Ecol Evol 26:30–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drinkwater KF, Frank KT (1994) Effects of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates. Aquat Conserv Freshw Mar Ecosyst 4:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finney BP, Gregory-Eaves I, Sweetman J, Douglas MSV, Smol JP (2000) Impacts of climatic change and fishing on Pacific Salmon abundance over the past 300 years. Science 290:795–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galindo-Bect MS, Glenn EP, Page HM, Fitzsimmons K, Galindo-Bect LA, Hernández-Ayón JM, Petty RL, García-Hernández J, Moore D (2000) Penaeid shrimp landings in the upper Gulf of California in relation to Colorado River freshwater discharge. Fish Bull 98:222–225Google Scholar
  19. García-Hernández J, King KA, Velasco AL, Shumilin E, Mora MA, Glenn EP (2001) Selenium, selected inorganic elements, and organochlorine pesticides in bottom material and biota from the Colorado River Delta. J Arid Environ 49:65–89Google Scholar
  20. Glenn EP, Lee C, Valdes-Casillas C (2001a) Introduction. J Arid Environ 49:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glenn EP, Zamora-Arroyo F, Nagler PL, Briggs M, Shaw W, Flessa KW (2001b) Ecology and conservation biology of the Colorado River Delta. J Arid Environ 49:5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodwin DH, Flessa KW, Schöne BR, Dettman DL (2001) Cross-calibration of daily growth increments, stable isotope variation, and temperature in the Gulf of California bivalve mollusk Chione (Chionista) cortezi: implications for paleoenvironmental analysis. Palaios 16:387–398Google Scholar
  23. Goodwin DH, Schöne BR, Dettman DL (2003) Resolution and fidelity of oxygen isotopes as paleotemperature proxies in bivalve mollusk shells: models and observations. Palaios 18:110–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grossman EL, Ku TL (1986) Oxygen and carbon isotope fractionation in biogenic aragonite: temperature effects. Chem Geol (Isot Geosci Sect) 59:59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez-Galindo EA, Flores-Muñoz G, Villa-Andrade MF, Villaescusa-Celaya JA (1988a) Insecticidas organoclorados en peces del Valle de Mexicali, Baja California, México. Cienc Mar 14:1–22Google Scholar
  26. Gutiérrez-Galindo EA, Flores-Muñoz G, Villaescusa-Celaya J (1988b) Hidrocarburos clorados en moluscos del Valle de Mexicali y alto Golfo de California. Cienc Mar 14:91–113Google Scholar
  27. Hallim Y (1991) The impact of human alterations of the hydrological cycle of ocean margins. In: Mantoura RFC, Martin J-M, Wollast R (eds) Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change. J Wiley Sons, United Kingdom, pp 301–327 Google Scholar
  28. Harding BL, Sangoyomi TB, Payton EA (1995) Impacts of severe sustained drought on Colorado River water resources. Water Resour Bull 31:815–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hégaret H, Smolowitz RM, Sunila I, Shumway SE, Alix J, Dixon M, Wikfors GH (2010) Combined effects of a parasite, QPX, and the harmful-alga, Prorocentrum minimum on northern quahogs, Mercenaria mercenaria. Mar Environ Res 69:337–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hernández-Ayón JM, Galindo-Bect MS, Flores-Báez BP, Alvarez-Borrego S (1993) Nutrient concentrations are high in the turbid waters of the Colorado River Delta. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 37:593–602 Google Scholar
  31. Hine PM, Thorne T (2000) A survey of some parasites and diseases of several species of bivalve mollusc in northern Western Australia. Dis Aquat Org 40:67–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson JBC, Kirby MX, Berger WH, Bjorndal KA, Botsford LW, Bourque BJ, Bradbury RH, Cooke R, Erlandson J, Estes JA, Hughes TP, Kidwell S, Lange CB, Lenihan HS, Pandolfi JM, Peterson CH, Steneck RS, Tegner MJ, Warner RR (2001) Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293:629–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones DS (1998) Isotopic determination of growth and longevity in fossil and modern invertebrates. In: Manger WL, Meeks LK (eds) Isotope paleobiology and paleoecology. Paleontological Society papers, vol 4, pp 37–67Google Scholar
  34. Jordan TE, Correll DL, Miklas J, Weller DE (1991) Long-term trends in estuarine nutrients and chlorophyll, and short-term effects of variation in watershed discharge. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 75:121–132Google Scholar
  35. Kimmerer WJ (2002) Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary. Estuaries 25:1275–1290Google Scholar
  36. Kowalewski M, Goodfriend GA, Flessa KW (1998) High-resolution estimates of temporal mixing within shell beds: the evils and virtues of time-averaging. Paleobiology 24:287–304Google Scholar
  37. Kowalewski M, Avila Serrano GE, Flessa KW, Goodfriend GA (2000) Dead delta’s former productivity: two trillion shells at the mouth of the Colorado River. Geology 28:1059–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lavín MF, Sánchez S (1999) On how the Colorado River affected the hydrography of the Upper Gulf of California. Cont Shelf Res 19:1545–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lavín MF, Godínez VM, Alvarez LG (1998) Inverse-estuarine features of the Upper Gulf of California. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 47:769–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. López-Hoffman L, Mc Govern ED, Varady RG, Flessa KW (eds) (2009) Conservation of shared environments: learning from the United States and México. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  41. Luecke DF, Pitt J, Congdon C, Glenn E, Valdés-Casillas C, Briggs M (1999) A delta once more: restoring riparian and wetland habitat in the Colorado River Delta. Environmental Defense Fund Publications, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. Marcos J, Cornelius S (2004) Mapping the organizational landscape on the Colorado River delta: the big picture on binational collaboration. Southwest Hydrol 3:22–26Google Scholar
  43. Millán-Núñez R, Santamaria del Angel E, Cajal-Medrano R, Barocio-León OA (1999) The Colorado River delta: a high primary productivity ecosystem. Cienc Mar 25:509–524Google Scholar
  44. Montagna PA, Alber M, Doering P, Connor MS (2002) Freshwater inflow: science, policy, management. Estuaries 25:1243–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morrison JI, Postel SL, Gleick PH (1996) The sustainable use of water in the Lower Colorado River Basin. Pacific institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  46. National Research Council (NRC) (2005) The geological record of ecological dynamics: understanding the biotic effects of future environmental change. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. Nixon SW, Oviatt CA, Frithsen J, Sullivan B (1986) Nutrients and productivity of estuarine and coastal marine systems. J Limnol Soc South Afr 12:43–71Google Scholar
  48. Núñez-Esquer O (1975) Concentración de DDT en Chione californiensis de la parte norte del Golfo de California. Cienc Mar 2:6–13Google Scholar
  49. Pauly D (1995) Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol Evol 10:430PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pitt J, Luecke D, Cohen M, Glenn E, Valdés-Casillas C (2000) Two countries, one river: managing ecosystem conservation in the Colorado River Delta. Nat Resour J 40:819–864Google Scholar
  51. Rabalais NN, Wiseman WJ Jr, Turner RE, Justíc D, Sen Gupta BK, Dortch Q (1996) Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf. Estuaries 19:386–407Google Scholar
  52. Rodriguez CA, Flessa KW, Dettman DL (2001a) Effects of upstream diversion of Colorado River water on the estuarine bivalve mollusc Mulinia coloradoensis. Conserv Biol 15:249–258Google Scholar
  53. Rodriguez CA, Flessa KW, Téllez-Duarte MA, Dettman DL, Avila-Serrano GE (2001b) Macrofaunal and isotopic estimates of the former extent of the Colorado River estuary, upper Gulf of California, México. J Arid Environ 49:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rowell K, Flessa KW, Dettman DL, Román M (2005) The importance of Colorado River flow to nursery habitats of the Gulf Corvina (Cynoscion othonopterus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2874–2885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rowell K, Flessa KW, Dettman DL, Román MJ, Gerber LR, Findley LT (2008) Diverting the Colorado River leads to a dramatic life history shift in an endangered marine fish. Biol Conserv 141:1138–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schöne BR, Flessa KW, Dettman DL, Goodwin DH (2003) Upstream dams and downstream clams: growth rates of bivalve mollusks unveil impact of river management on estuarine ecosystems (Colorado River Delta, México). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:715–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sklar FH, Browder JA (1998) Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of México. Environ Manag 22:547–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smolowitz R, Leavitt D, Perkins F (1998) Observations of a protistan disease similar to QPX in Mercenaria mercenaria (hard clams) from the coast of Massachusetts. J Invert Pathol 71:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson RW (1968) Tidal flat sedimentation on the Colorado River Delta, northwestern Gulf of California. Geol Soc Am Mem 107:1–133Google Scholar
  60. Turner RE, Rabalais NA (1994) Coastal eutrophication near the Mississippi river delta. Nature 368:619–621Google Scholar
  61. Woodhouse CA, Gray ST, Meko DM (2006) Updated streamflow reconstructions for the Upper Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Res 42:W05415. doi:  10.1029/2005WR004455
  62. Zamora-Arroyo F, Nagler PL, Briggs M, Radtke D, Rodriquez H, García J, Valdés C, Huete A, Glenn EP (2001) Regeneration of native trees in response to flood release from the United States into the delta of the Colorado River, México. J Arid Environ 49:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos E. Cintra-Buenrostro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karl W. Flessa
    • 1
  • David L. Dettman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Texas at BrownsvilleBrownsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations