Advertisement

Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 35–51 | Cite as

The work of wetland credit markets: two cases in entrepreneurial wetland banking

  • Morgan Robertson
Original Paper

Abstract

Wetland banking has been discussed in the policy literature mainly at a high level of abstraction, using economic models or generic examples to illustrate the concepts and tensions within wetland banking. This article illustrates two cases of wetland bank creation in-depth using the methodology of the extended case study, following the process from the initiation of interest in forming a bank through to the approval of credits for sale. The close attention to actual cases serves to move discussion beyond the goodness of models or the supposed rationality of economic actors, towards a consideration of actual market participants in complex situations. Successful wetland credit producers must negotiate a number of different economic, political, interpersonal, and ecological forces which impact their project from a number of different scales. While no optimal solution to this complexity is likely to be reached that is generalizable, the use of entrepreneurial wetland banking as a market-based policy may expand where skillful bankers and regulators together arrive at adequate solutions that are matched to the specificity of their contexts.

Keywords

Wetland banking Wetland mitigation Compensation Ecosystem services Market-based environmental policy Clean Water Act 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to express my gratitude to the many interviewees who contributed to this research, and to the very helpful criticisms offered by two anonymous reviewers. All mistakes are, of course, my own. This research was supported by a Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement Grant from the NSF, a Dissertation Writing Fellowship from the University of Wisconsin, and a fellowship from the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.

References

  1. BenDor TK, Brozovic N (2007) Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation. Environ Manage 40:349–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonds MH, Pompe JJ (2003) Calculating wetland mitigation banking credits: adjusting for wetland function and location. Nat Resour J 43:961–978Google Scholar
  3. Boyd J, Wainger L (2002) Landscape indicators of ecosystem service benefits. Am J Agric Econ 84:1371–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bromley DW (2006) Sufficient reason: volitional pragmatism and the meaning of economic institutions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  5. Brumbaugh RW, Reppert R (1992) Wetlands mitigation banking demonstration study: status and summary. In: Kusler JA, Lassonde C (eds) Effective mitigation: mitigation banks and joint projects in the context of wetland management plans. ASWM, Palm Beach Gardens, pp 12–17Google Scholar
  6. Brumbaugh RW, Reppert R (1994) National wetland mitigation banking study: first phase report. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  7. Burawoy M (1991) The extended case method. In: Burawoy M (ed) Ethnography unbound. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 271–287Google Scholar
  8. Burawoy M (2000) Introduction: reaching for the global. In: Burawoy M, Blum JA, George S, Gille Z, Gowan T, Haney L, Klawiter M, Lopez SH, Riain SÓ, Thayer M (eds) Global ethnography: forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  9. Corps (US Army Corps of Engineers) (2006) Draft environmental assessment, finding of no significant impact, and regulatory analysis for proposed compensatory mitigation regulation. US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington. March 13, 2006Google Scholar
  10. Environmental Law Institute [ELI] (2005) National forum on synergies between water quality trading and wetland mitigation banking: forum report. ELI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Environmental Law Institute [ELI] (2006) 2005 Status report on compensatory mitigation in the United States. ELI, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernandez L, Karp L (1998) Restoring wetlands through wetlands mitigation banks. Environ Resour Econ 12:323–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner RC, Pulley Radwan TJ (2005) What happens when a wetland mitigation bank goes bankrupt? Environ Law Rep 35:10590–10604Google Scholar
  14. Henderson GL (2003) California and the fictions of capital. Temple University Press, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. King DM, Herbert LW (1997) The fungibility of wetlands. Natl Wetlands Newsl. September–October 1997, pp 10–13Google Scholar
  16. King DM, Price EW (2006) Developing defensible wetland mitigation ratios: standard tools for “scoring” wetland creation, restoration, enhancement, and conservation. Report prepared for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Habitat Protection, Silver Spring, MD, August 15, 2006Google Scholar
  17. Mack JJ, Micacchion M (2006) An ecological assessment of Ohio mitigation banks: vegetation, amphibians, hydrology and soils. Ohio EPA Technical Report WET/2006-1. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Surface Water, Wetland Ecology Group, Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  18. Mäki U (2000) Kinds of assumptions and their truth: shaking an untwisted F-twist. Kyklos 53(3):317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAfee K (1999) Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environ Plan D 17:133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirowski P (2001) Machine dreams: economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. NRC (National Research Council) (2001) Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Oates WE (2006) An economic perspective on environmental and resource management: an introduction. In: Oates WE (ed) The RFF reader in environmental and resource policy. Resources for the Future, Washington, pp xv–xxGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Connor M (1994) On the misadventures of capitalist nature. In: O’Connor M (ed) Is capitalism sustainable?: political economy and the politics of ecology. Guilford, New York, pp 125–151Google Scholar
  25. Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabin M (1998) Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 36:11–46Google Scholar
  27. Robertson M (2006) Emerging ecosystem service markets: trends in a decade of entrepreneurial wetland banking. Front Ecol Environ Sci 4(6):297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson M (2007) Discovering price in all the wrong places: the work of commodity definition and price under neoliberal environmental policy. Antipode 39(3):500–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosenberg A (1992) Economics: mathematical politics or science of diminishing returns? University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruhl JB, Juge Gregg R (2001) Integrating ecosystem services into environmental law: a case study of wetlands mitigation banking. Stanford Environ Law J 20:365–392Google Scholar
  31. Ruhl JB, Salzman J (2006) The effects of wetland mitigation banking on people. Natl Wetlands Newsl 28(2):1, 9–14Google Scholar
  32. Salzman J, Ruhl JB (2000) Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanford Law Rev 53:607–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scodari P, Shabman LA (1995) National wetland mitigation banking study: commercial wetland mitigation credit markets: theory and practice. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Alexandria, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  34. Shabman LA, Scodari PF (2004) The past, present, and future of wetlands credit sales. Resources for the future discussion paper 04-48. Resources for the Future, Washington. http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-DP-04-48.pdf
  35. Shabman LA, Scodari PF, King DM (1994) National wetland mitigation banking study: expanding opportunities for successful mitigation: the private credit market alternative. US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  36. Spieles D, Coneybeer M, Horn J (2006) Community structure and quality after 10 years in two central Ohio mitigation bank wetlands. Environ Manage 38:837–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. SWS (Society of Wetland Scientists) (2005) Wetland mitigation banking. http://www.sws.org/wetlandconcerns/banking.html. Accessed August 16, 2006

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations