Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 237–253 | Cite as

Vegetation along hydrologic, edaphic, and geochemical gradients in a high-elevation poor fen in Canaan Valley, West Virginia

  • James S. Rentch
  • James T. Anderson
  • Sam Lamont
  • John Sencindiver
  • Robert Eli
Original Paper

Abstract

Wetland plant community composition and pattern are regulated by a host of abiotic/environmental gradients and biotic factors. We used multivariate analyses to classify wetland plant communities and determine the relation of hydrologic, edaphic, and geochemical gradients on community composition and spatial distribution among 18 vegetation, hydrology, and soil sampling points in Abe Run, a botanically unique poor fen in northeastern West Virginia. We also examined the interactions of disturbance with the physical environment and species composition. A total of 179 vascular plant species were identified from sample plots. Vegetative composition and structure, dominant soil texture, and hydrology lacked the distinct concentric zonation of northern peatlands; instead, all were patchy and varied considerably over short distances. Graminoid-forb meadows with primarily silt-loam mineral horizons, greater depth to groundwater, and fewer days of inundation characterized the lower reaches of the wetland. These plots were more acidic, with absent or shallow O horizons, and lower concentrations of soil base cations (Ca, Mg, K). In the upper reaches of the wetland, mixed herb-shrub-tree dominated communities were structurally and compositionally more complex; here, organic horizons were much more prominent, peat depth ranged from 80 to 100 cm, and the average depth to water table was 10 cm less than for wells in the lower reaches of the wetland. Plots from upper transects (3–6) tended to have more shrub and tree cover, and higher concentrations of soil base cations. Much of the variability among plots in the upper and lower reaches of the wetland are consistent with beaver inundation of a large portion of the wetland during the 1980s. Multiple-response permutation procedures verified the difference (P < 0.0001) between vegetation of plots in the lower and upper reaches of the watershed. Because fens are connected to groundwater, these habitats are particularly vulnerable to disturbances, particularly those that alter existing land use and land cover. Minimization of disturbances in the surrounding watershed, controls on an excessive deer population, removal of exotic, non-native species, and control on foot traffic are all integral to maintaining the integrity of this high-value wetland.

Keywords

Gradient analysis Non-metric multidimensional scaling Multi-response permutation procedures Species richness 

References

  1. Allard HA, Leonard EC (1952) The Canaan and Stony River Valleys of West Virginia, their former magnificent spruce forests, their vegetation and floristics today. Castanea 17:1–60Google Scholar
  2. Amon JP, Thompson CA, Carpenter QJ, Miner J (2002) Temperate zone fens of the glaciated Midwestern USA. Wetlands 22:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bedford BL, Godwin KS (2003) Fens of the United States: distribution, characteristics, and scientific connection versus legal isolation. Wetlands 23:608–629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beverage W (1967) Soil survey, Tucker County, West Virginia. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenthal D (2005) Interrelated causes of plant invasion. Science 130:243–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowles ML, Kelsey PD, McBride JL (2005) Relationships among environmental factors, vegetation zones, and species richness in a North American calcareous prairie fen. Wetlands 25:685–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Byers EA, Vanderhorst JP, Streets BP (2007) Classification and conservation assessment of high elevation wetland communities in the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia. West Virginia Natural Heritage Program, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, ElkinsGoogle Scholar
  8. Christie J, Hausmann S (2003) Various state reactions to the SWANCC decision. Wetlands 23:653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Core EL (1966) The vegetation of West Virginia. McClain Printing Company, Parsons, WVGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MG, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 429–453Google Scholar
  11. Darlington HC (1943) Vegetation and substrate of Cranberry Glades, West Virginia. Bot Gaz 104:371–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daubenmire R (1968) Plant communities: a textbook of plant synecology. Harper and Row, New York, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Diehl JW, Behling RE (1982) Geologic factors affecting formation and presence of wetlands in the north central section of the Appalachian Plateaus province of West Virginia. In: McDonald DR (ed) Proceeding of the symposium on wetlands of the unglaciated Appalachian Region. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, pp 3–10, May 26–28, 1982Google Scholar
  14. Drohan PJ, Ross CN, Anderson JT, Fortney RF, Rentch JS (2006) Soil and hydrological drivers of Typha latifolia encroachment in a marl wetland. Wetlands Ecol Manage 14:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edens DL (1973) The ecology and succession of Cranberry Glades, West Virginia. Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortney RH (1975) The vegetation of Canaan Valley, West Virginia: a taxonomic and ecological study. Ph.D. dissertation, West Virginia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Fortney RH, Rentch JS (2003) Post-logging era plant successional trends and geospatial vegetation patterns in Canaan Valley, West Virginia. 1945 to 1997. Castanea 68:317–334Google Scholar
  18. Foster RD, Wetzel PR (2005) Invading monotypic stands of Phalaris arundinacea: a test of fire, herbicide, and wood and herbaceous native plant groups. Restor Ecol 13:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francl KE, Ford WM, Castleberry SB (2004) Characterization of high elevation central Appalachian wetlands. USDA Forest Service, Res Pap NE−725Google Scholar
  20. Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North American. Wetlands 19:733–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson JR (1970) The flora of Alder Run Bog, Tucker County, West Virginia. Castanea 35:81–98Google Scholar
  22. Gleason HA, Cronquist A (1991) Manual of vascular plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NYGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwin KS, Shallenberger JP, Leopold DJ, Bedford BL (2002) Linking landscape properties to local hydrogeologic gradients and plant species occurrence in minerotrophic fens of New York State, USA: a hydrogeologic setting (HGS) framework. Wetlands 22:722–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grace JB (1999) the factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology. Evol Syst 21:1–28Google Scholar
  25. Gregg KB (2004) Recovery of showy lady’s slippers (Cypredium reginae Walter) from moderate and severe herbivory by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus Zimmerman). Nat Areas J 24:232–241Google Scholar
  26. Harmon PJ, Ford-Werntz D, Grafton W (2006) Checklist and atlas of the vascular flora of West Virginia. West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Section, Elkins, WV, USA, pp 381Google Scholar
  27. Heinselman ML (1970) Landscape evolution, peatland types, and the environment in the Lake Agassiz Peatlands Natural Area, Minnesota. Ecol Monogr 40:235–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hurt GW, Carlisle VW (2001) Delineating hydric soils. In: Richardson JL, Vepraskas MJ (eds) Wetland soils: genesis, hydrology, landscapes, and classification. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 183–206Google Scholar
  29. Ingham ME (1996) The bog region of the Allegheny Mountains of West Virginia. M. A. thesis. University of South Florida, Tampa, FLGoogle Scholar
  30. Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional Scaling. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CAGoogle Scholar
  31. Leibowitz SG (2003) Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23:517–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4.0. MjM Software Design, Glenedon Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  33. McCune B, Grace JG, Urban DL (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Glenedon Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  34. Mather PM (1976) Computational methods of multivariate analysis in physical geography. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michael ED (1992) Impact of deer browing on regeneration of balsam fir in Canaan Valley, West Virginia. North J Appl For 9:89–90Google Scholar
  37. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  38. Moorhead KK, Moynihan RE, Simpson SL (2000) Soil characteristics of four southern Appalachian fens in North Carolina, USA. Wetlands 20:560–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moorhead KK, Rossell IM (1998) Southern mountain fens. In: Messina MG, Conner WH (eds) Southern forested wetlands: ecology and management. CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 379–403Google Scholar
  40. Muzika R-M, Hunsucker R, DeMeo T (1996) Botanical reconnaissance of Big Run Bog candidate natural area. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rep NE-223Google Scholar
  41. National Climate Data Center (NCDC), National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2003) Available from website, accessed February 15, 2007, http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/orders
  42. National Research Council (NRC) (1995) Wetlands: characteristics and boundaries. Report by the National Research Council to the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). (2003) Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States: Guide for identifying and delineating hydric soils, version 5.01. Hurt, GW, Whited PM, Pringle RF (eds) Fort Worth, TXGoogle Scholar
  44. NatureServe (2007) NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life. Version 6.2. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available from website, accessed: October 18, 2007, http://www.natureserve.org/explorer
  45. Nelson DW, Sommer LE (1982) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part II. Chemical and biological properties. Agronomy monograph No. 9, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 539–579Google Scholar
  46. Orwig DA, Foster DR (2000) Stand, landscape, and ecosystem analyses of hemlock woolly adelgid outbreaks in southern New England: an overview. In: McManus KA, Shields KS, Souto DR (eds) Proceedings: symposium on sustainable management of hemlock ecosystems in eastern North America; June 22–24, 1999, Durham, NH. USDA Forest Service, Gen Tech Rep GTR-267Google Scholar
  47. Pittillo JD (1994) Appalachian bogs and implications of their vegetational history. Water Air Soil Pollut 77:333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pollock MM, Naiman RJ, Hanley TA (1998) Plant species in riparian wetlands: a test of biodiversity theory. Ecology 79:94–105Google Scholar
  49. Russell FL, Zippin DB, Fowler NL (2001) Effects of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on plants, plant populations and communities: a review. Am Midl Nat 146:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semlitsch RD, Bodie JR (1998) Are small, isolated wetlands expendable? Conserv Biol 12:1129–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snyder CD, Young JA, Stout BM III (2006) Aquatic habitats of Canaan Valley, West Virginia: diversity and environmental threats. North East Nat 13:333–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stewart CN Jr, Nilsen ET (1993) Association of edaphic factors and vegetation in several isolated Appalachian peat bogs. Bull Torrey Bot Club 12:128–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1968) An introduction to tree-ring dating. University Arizona Press, Tuscon, AZGoogle Scholar
  54. Strausbaugh PD, Core EL (1977) Flora of West Virginia, 2nd edn. Seneca Books, Grantsville, West VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  55. Thomas GW (1982) Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of soil analysis, Part II. Chemical and biological properties. Agronomy monograph no. 9, 2nd edition. American Society of Agronomy, Inc, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, pp 159–165Google Scholar
  56. USACoE, Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. NTIS No. AD A176 912Google Scholar
  57. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2006) Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States, Version 6.0. Hurt GW, Vasilas LM (eds) USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. Available from website: ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/Hydric_Soils/FieldIndicators_v6_0.pdf, accessed 12 November, 2007
  58. USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2007) The PLANTS Database. Available from website: http://plants.usda.gov, accessed 14 February 2007. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA
  59. Vitt DH (1994) An overview of factors that influence the development of Canadian peatlands. Mem Entomol Soc Can 169:7–20Google Scholar
  60. Walbridge MR (1994) Plant community composition and surface water chemistry of fen peatlands in West Virginia’s Appalachian Plateau. Water Air Soil Pollut 77:247–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wieder RK, McCormick AM, Lang GE (1981) Vegetational analysis of Big Run Bog, a nonglaciated Sphagnum bog in West Virginia. Castanea 46:16–29Google Scholar
  62. Wieder RK (1985) Peat and water chemistry at Big Run Bog, a peatland in the Appalachian Mountains of West Virginia. Biogeochemistry 1:277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yavitt JB (1994) Carbon dynamics in Appalachian peatlands of West Virginia and western Maryland. Water Air Soil Pollut 77:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Rentch
    • 1
  • James T. Anderson
    • 1
  • Sam Lamont
    • 2
  • John Sencindiver
    • 3
  • Robert Eli
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Forestry and Natural ResourcesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.Division of Plant and Soil SciencesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations