Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 321–334

Macroinvertebrate community structure across a wetland hydroperiod gradient in southern New Hampshire, USA



We conducted a field study to examine the influence of hydroperiod and concomitant changes in abiotic (wetland size, pH, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and water temperature) and biotic (predatory fish presence) characteristics on macroinvertebrate communities in isolated wetlands in southern New Hampshire. Invertebrates were sampled using dipnet sweeps in 42 wetlands with short (<4 months), intermediate (4–11 months) or long (permanent) hydroperiods in 1998 and 1999. We found that invertebrate genera richness, and to a lesser degree abundance, increased linearly along the hydrological gradient, and in response to temperature and dissolved oxygen. Relative abundance of genera also differed markedly with respect to hydroperiod. Most notably, invertebrate communities changed from Acilius-dominated communities to Notonecta-dominated communities. Invertebrate relative abundances in permanent wetlands also differed with respect to the occurrence of predatory fish. Some genera (e.g., Libellula, and Dytiscus) were more likely to occur in permanent wetlands without fish, whereas other genera (e.g., Buena, and Basiaeshna) were more likely to occur in wetlands with predatory fish. Because aquatic invertebrate communities differed markedly with respect to wetland hydroperiod, and in relation to the occurrence of predatory fish, it is essential to retain a diversity of wetlands in the landscape to ensure the long-term persistence of aquatic invertebrate biodiversity.


Fish Hydroperiod Invertebrates Macroinvertebrate Wetland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Babbitt, K.J., Baber, M.J, Tarr, T.L. 2003Patterns of larval amphibian distribution along the wetland hydroperiod gradientCan. J. Zool.8115391552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batzer, D.P., Jackson, C.R., Mosner, M. 2000Influences of riparian logging on plants and invertebrates in small, depressional wetlands of GeorgiaUSAHydrobiologia44123132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bray, J.R., Curtis, J.T. 1957An ordination of the upland forest assemblages of southern WisconsinEcol. Monogr.27325349Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks, R.T. 2000Annual and seasonal variation and the effects of hydroperiod on benthic macroinvertebrates of seasonal forest (“vernal”) ponds in central Massachusetts, USAWetlands20707715Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldwell, J.P., Thorp, J.H., Jervey, T.O. 1980Predator–prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders and frogsOecologia46285289Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clarke, K.R. 1993Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structureAust. J. Ecol.18117143Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colburn, E.A. 1995Certified: A Citizen’s Step-by-step Guide to Certifying Vernal Pools. 6th edMassachussetts Audubon SocietyLincoln, MAUSAGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collet, D. 1994Modeling Binary DataChapman and HallLondonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Corti, D., Kohler, S.L., Sparks, R.E. 1999Effects of hydroperiod and predation on a Mississippi River floodplain invertebrate communityOecologia109154165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Donahue, D.F. 1995A Guide to the Identification and Protection of Vernal Pool Wetlands of ConnecticutUniversity of Connecticut Cooperative Extinction and Connecticut Forest Stewardship ProgramStorrs, CT, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duffy, W.G. 1999

    Wetlands of Grand Teton and Yellowstone National Parks: aquatic invertebrate diversity and community structure

    Batzer, D.P.Rader, R.B.Wissinger, S.A. eds. Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North AmericaJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NY, USA733756
    Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eriksen, C.H., Resh, V.H., Lamberti, G.A. 1996

    Aquatic insect respiration

    Merritt, R.W.Cummins, K.W. eds. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 3rd edKendall–Hunt PublishingDubuqueIAUSA2940
    Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    ESRI Inc.1999ArcInfo User’s Manual Version 7.2.1Environmental Systems Research Institute IncRedlands, CAUSAGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gibbs, J.P. 1993Importance of small wetlands for the persistence of local populations of wetland-associated animalsWetlands132531Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giles, N., Wright, R.M., Shoesmith, E.A. 1995The effects of perchPerca fluviatilisbronze breamAbramis bramaon insect emergence and benthic invertebrate abundance in experimental pondsFish. Manage. Ecol.21725Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Hanski, I., Gilpin, M.E. 1991Metapopulation dynamics: a brief history and conceptual domainBiol. J. Linn. Soc.42316Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    Hanson, M.A., Riggs, M.R. 1995Potential effects of fish predation on wetland invertebrates: a comparison of wetlands with and without fathead minnowsWetlands15167175Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Heck, K.L.,Jr., Crowder, L.B. 1991

    Habitat structure and predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems

    Bell, S.S.McCoy, E.D.Mushinsky, H.R. eds. Habitat StructureChapman and HallNew York, NY, USA281299
    Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Hershey, A.E., Shannon, L., Niemi, G.J., Lima, A.R., Regal, R.R. 1999

    Prairie wetlands of south-central Minnesota: effects of drought on invertebrate communities

    Batzer, D.P.Rader, R.B.Wissinger, S.A. eds. Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North AmericaJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NY, USA515542
    Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Huener, J.D., Kadlec, J.A. 1992Macroinvertebrates response to marsh management strategies in UtahWetlands127278Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Kholin, S.K., Nilsson, A.N. 1998Regional enrichment of predacious water beetles in temporary ponds at opposite east-west ends of the PalearcticJ. Biogeogr.254755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 23.
    Kohler, S.L., Corti, D., Slamecka, M.C., Schneider, D.W. 1999

    Prairie floodplain ponds: mechanisms affecting invertebrate community structure

    Batzer, D.P.Rader, R.B.Wissinger, S.A. eds. Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North AmericaJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NY, USA711730
    Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Leeper, D.A., Taylor, B.E. 1998Abundancebiomass, and production of aquatic invertebrates in Rainbow Bay, a temporary wetland in South CarolinaUSAArchives fur Hydrobiologia143335362Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    Mallory, M.L., Blancher, P.J., Weatherhead, P.J., McNicol, D.K. 1994Presence or absence of fish as a cue to macroinvertebrate abundance in boreal wetlandsHydrobiologia279–280345351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 26.
    McCormick, S., Polis, G.A. 1982Arthropods that prey on vertebratesBiol. Rev.572958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 27.
    McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. 1989Generalized Linear Models. 2nd edChapman and HallLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. 28.
    McCune, B., Mefford, M.J. 1997PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological DataVersion 3.0MjM Software DesignGleneden BeachOR, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. 30.
    Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W. 1996An Introduction to the Aquatic Invertebrates of North America. 3rd edKendall/Hunt Publishing CompanyDubuqueIAUSAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Merritt, R.W., Cummins, K.W., Berg, M.B., Novak, J.A., Higgins, M.J., Wessell, K.J., Lessard, J.L. 2002Development and␣application of a macroinvertebrate functional-group approach in the bioassessment of remnant river oxbows in southwest FloridaJ. N Am. Benthol. Soc.21290310Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    Minchin, P.R. 1987An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques in ordinationVegetatio6989107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Mitsch, W.J., Gosselink, J.G. 1993Wetlands. 2nd edVan Nostrand ReinholdNY, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. 33.
    Morin, P.J., Lawler, S.P., Johnson, D.E. 1988Competition between aquatic insects and invertebrates: interaction strength and higher order interactionsEcology6914011409Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Nilsson, A.N., Svensson, B.W. 1995Assemblages of dytiscid predators and culicid prey in relation to environmental factors in natural and clear-cut boreal swamp forest poolsHydrobiologia308183196Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Paton, P.W.C., Crouch, W.B.,III. 2002Using the phenology of pond-breeding amphibians to develop conservation strategiesConserv. Biol.16194204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 36.
    Pechmann, J.H.K., Estes, R.A., Scott, D.E., Gibbons, J.W. 2001Amphibian colonization and use of ponds created for trial mitigation of wetland lossesWetlands2193111Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    Peckarsky, B.L., Fraissinet, P.R., Penton, M.A., Conklin, D.J.,Jr. 1990Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North AmericaCornell University PressIthacaNY, USAGoogle Scholar
  37. 38.
    Pierce, C.L., Hinrichs, B.D. 1997Response of littoral invertebrates to reduction of fish density: simultaneous experiments in ponds with different fish assemblagesFreshwater Biol.37397408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 39.
    Roth, A.H., Jackson, J.F. 1987The effect of pool size on recruitment of predatory insects and on mortality in a larval anuranHerpetologica43224232Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    SAS.2001SAS/STAT softwareVersion 8m SAS instituteCary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  40. 41.
    Schneider, D.W., Frost, T.M. 1996Habitat duration and community structure in temporary pondsJ. N Am. Benthol. Soc.156486Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    Semlitsch, R.D., Bodie, J.R. 1998Are small, isolated wetlands expendable?Conserv. Biol.1211291133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 43.
    Shriver, P., Bogestrand, J., Jeppesen, E., Sondergaard, M. 1995Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish–zooplankton–phytoplankton–interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lakeFreshwater Biol.33255270Google Scholar
  43. 45.
    Skelly, D.K., Freidenburg, L.K., Kiesecker, J.M. 2002Forest canopy and the performance of larval amphibiansEcology83983992Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Skelly, D.K., Werner, E.E., Cortwright, S.A. 1999Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblageEcology8023262337Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    Snodgrass, J.W., Komoroski, M.J., Bryan, A.L.,Jr., Burger, J. 2000aRelationships among isolated wetland sizehydroperiodand amphibian species richness: implications for wetland regulationsConserv. Biol.14414419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 47.
    Snodgrass, J.W., Bryan, A.L.,Jr., Burger, J. 2000bDevelopments of expectations of larval amphibian assemblage structure in southern depression wetlandsEcol. Appl.1012191229Google Scholar
  47. 48.
    Spencer, M., Blaustein, L., Schwartz, S.S., Cohen, J.E. 1999Species richness and the proportion of predatory animal species in temporary freshwater pools: relationships with habitat size and permanenceEcol. Lett.2157166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 49.
    Stone, M.K., Wallace, J.B. 1998Long-term recovery of a mountain stream from clear-cut logging: the effects of forest succession on benthic invertebrate community structureFreshwater Biol.39151169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 50.
    Tappan, A. 1997Identification and Documentation of Vernal Pools in New HampshireNew Hampshire Fish and Game DepartmentNongame and Endangered Wildlife ProgramConcordNH, USAGoogle Scholar
  50. 51.
    Walker, E.M. 1958The Odonata of Canada and AlaskaVol. 2Oxford University PressLondon, UKGoogle Scholar
  51. 52.
    Wellborn, G.A., Skelly, D.K., Werner, E.E. 1996Mechanisms creating structure across a freshwater habitat gradientAnn. Rev. Ecology Syst.27337363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 53.
    Werner, E.E., Glennemeier, K.S. 1999Influence of forest canopy cover on breeding pond use of several amphibian speciesCopeia1999112Google Scholar
  53. 54.
    Werner, E.E., McPeek, M.A. 1994Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species along an environmental gradientEcology7513681382Google Scholar
  54. 55.
    Wiggens, G.B., MacKay, R.J., Smith, I.M. 1980Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary poolsArchives fur Hydrobiologia Supplement5897206Google Scholar
  55. 56.
    Williams, D.D. 1996Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect faunaJ. N Am. Benthol. Soc.14634650Google Scholar
  56. 57.
    Wissinger, S.A., Boonak, A.J., Whiteman, H.H., Brown, W.S. 1999

    Subalpine wetlands in Colorado: habitat permanencesalamander predation, and invertebrate communities

    Batzer, D.P.Rader, R.B.Wissinger, S.A. eds. Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North AmericaJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NY, USA757790
    Google Scholar
  57. 58.
    Wissinger, S.A., Gallagher, L.J. 1999

    Beaver pond wetlands in northwestern Pennsylvania: modes of colonization and succession after drought

    Batzer, D.P.Rader, R.B.Wissinger, S.A. eds. Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North AmericaJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, NY, USA333362
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural ResourcesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.N.H. Soil Consultants, Inc., One Simons LaneNewmarketUSA

Personalised recommendations