Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 13, Issue 5, pp 499–508 | Cite as

Salvaged-Wetland Soil as a Technique to Improve Aquatic Vegetation at Created Wetlands in Wyoming, USA

Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Aquatic plants usually establish following wetland creation from a variety of mechanisms including animal transport, inflows from nearby wetlands, wind dispersal, and seed banks if they are available. However, at created wetlands that are isolated from natural wetlands, aquatic plant communities may not establish even after 10 or more years. One method of improving the establishment of aquatic plants is through the use of salvaged-marsh soils. Using this method, wetland soil from a donor site is collected and spread across the basin of the created wetland. When the proper hydrologic regime is reached at the created site, the seed bank from the donor soil is then present to take advantage of the uncolonized site. Over 1500 wetlands have been created in northeast Wyoming, USA from bentonite mining and most of them have not developed submersed and emergent plant communities due to isolation from plant sources. Our goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of using salvaged-wetland soil as a tool for improving plant growth at created wetlands. Our study took place at 12 newly created wetlands that were isolated from other wetlands by >5 km. Six wetlands were treated as reference wetlands, with no introductions of seeds or propagules. At the other six wetlands we spread ≈10–15 cm of salvaged soil from a donor wetland during the winter of 1999–2000. To identify the potential plants in donor soil, we collected 10 random samples from the donor wetlands and placed them within wetland microcosms in a greenhouse where they were treated to either moist-soil conditions (water at or just below the soil line) or submersed conditions (water levels maintained at 15–30 cm). Treatment wetlands were evaluated for plant growth during the fall of 2000 and 2001, whereas the greenhouse samples were grown for two growing seasons then harvested. Our results show that using salvaged wetland soil increases: (1) the number of plant species present at a wetland over time, (2) the total vegetation coverage in a treated wetland over time, and (3) the total plant biomass in a treated wetland. The species pool available in the salvaged wetland soil was limited to 10 obligate wetland species, but several of them are considered valuable to waterfowl and other wildlife. Furthermore, salvaged-wetland soil could be useful for ameliorating poor substrate conditions (i.e., bentonite) and improving conditions for the establishment of additional species. One concern with this technique is the introduction of invasive or exotic species that could form monocultures of undesirable plants (e.g., cattail [Typha spp.]); introducing more desirable species during the application of salvaged soil could reduce this probability. We believe incorporating salvaged-wetland soil during basin construction could be used to increase the value and productivity of created wetlands in this region.

Key words

Aquatic plants Bentonite Mining Reclamation Restoration Salvaged soil Salvaged-wetland soil Wetland creation Wetland Restoration Wetlands Wyoming 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.R., Link, M.A., Johnson, D.H., Burnham, K.P. 2001Suggestions for presenting the results of data analysesJ. Wildl. Manage.65373378Google Scholar
  2. Birnbaum, D., Sheps, S.B. 1992The merits of confidence intervals relative to hypothesis testingInfect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.13553555PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S.C., Bedford, B.L. 1997Restoration of wetland vegetation with transplanted wetland soil: an experimental studyWetlands17424437Google Scholar
  4. Burke, D.J. 1997Donor wetland soil promotes revegetation in wetland trialsRestoration Manage. Notes15168172Google Scholar
  5. Clean Water Act. 1972. Public Law 92-500. United States Congress, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Cole, C.A. 1991The seedbank of a young surface mine wetlandWetlands Ecol. Manage.1173184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowardin L.M., Carter V., Golet F.C. and LaRoe E.T. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. Biological Report 79/31, U.S. Fish and Wildl. ServiceWashington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Davis J.C. 1963. Geology of the Clay Spur Bentonite DistrictCrook and Weston Counties, Wyoming. M.S. thesis, University of Wyoming, Laramie Wyoming, USA.Google Scholar
  9. deVlaming, V., Proctor, V.W. 1968Dispersal of aquatic organisms: viability of seeds recovered from the droppings of captive killdeer and mallard ducksAm. J. Bot.552026Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, J.M. 1975Assembly of species communitiesCody, M.L.Diamond, J.M. eds. Ecology and Evolution of CommunitiesBelknap Press, Harvard University PressCambridge Massachusetts, USA342444Google Scholar
  11. Donahue, R.L., Miller, R.W., Shickluna, J.C. 1985Soils: an Introduction to Soils and Plant Growth5th ednPrentice-Hall Inc.Englewood Cliffs New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn, W.J., Best, G.R. 1983Enhancing ecological succession: 5. Seed bank survey of some Florida marshes and role of seed banks in marsh reclamationProceedings from the Symposium on Surface Mining, Hydrology, Sedimentology, and ReclamationUniversity of KentuckyLexington Kentucky, USA365370Google Scholar
  13. Fassett, N.C. 1957A Manual of Aquatic Plants, 2nd ednUniversity of Wisconsin PressMadison Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Fennessy, M.S., Cronk, J.K., Mitsch, W.J. 1994Macrophyte productivity and community development in created freshwater wetlands under experimental hydrological conditionsEcol. Eng.3469484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galatowitsch, S.M., van der Valk, A.G. 1996The vegetation of restored and natural prairie wetlandsEcol. Appl.6102112Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, D.H. 1999The insignificance of statistical significance testingJ. Wildl. Manage.63763772Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, D.H. 2002The importance of replication in wildlife researchJ. Wildl. Manage.66919932Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan, D., Oron, T., Gutman, M. 1998Development of macrophytic vegetation in the Agmon wetland of Israel by spontaneous colonization and reintroductionWetlands Ecol. Manage.6143150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keddy, P. 1999Wetland restoration: the potential for assembly rules in the service of conservationWetlands19716732Google Scholar
  20. Larson G.E. 1993. Aquatic and Wetland Vascular Plants of the Northern Great Plains. U.S. Forest Service General Technical ReportRM-238, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins ColoradoUSA.Google Scholar
  21. Lowry M.E. and Wilson J.F. 1986. Hydrology of Area 50, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Wyoming and Montana. Water-Resources Investigations 83-545, U.S. Geological Survey, Cheyenne Wyoming, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Martin A.C. and Uhler F.M. 1951. Food of Game Ducks in the United States and Canada. Research Report 30. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceWashington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  23. McKinstry, M.C., Anderson, S.H. 1994Evaluation of wetland creation and waterfowl use in conjunction with abandoned mine lands in northeast WyomingWetlands14284292Google Scholar
  24. McKinstry, M.C., Anderson, S.H. 2002Creating wetlands for waterfowl in WyomingEcol. Eng.18293304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKinstry, M.C., Anderson, S.H. 2004Improving aquatic plant growth using propagules and topsoil in created wetlands of WyomingEcol. Eng.21175189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKinstry, M.C., Richmond, T.C., Anderson, S.H. 2001Wetland enhancement and creation on reclaimed abandoned mined lands in northeast WyomingAm. Soc. Surf. Min. Reclamation18348355Google Scholar
  27. Minitab2000Minitab Release 13 User's GuideMinitab Inc.State College PennsylvaniaUSAGoogle Scholar
  28. Mitsch, W.J., Wu, X., Nairn, R.W., Weihe, P.E., Wang, N., Deal, R., Boucher, C.E. 1998Creating and restoring wetlands: a whole-ecosystem experiment in self-designBioscience4810191030Google Scholar
  29. Nawrot, J.R., Klimstra, W.D. 1989Wetland habitat development on mined landsMajer, J.D. eds. Animals in Primary Succession: the Role of Fauna in Reclaimed LandsCambridge University PressNew York, USA269287Google Scholar
  30. Odum, H.T. 1989Ecological engineering and self-organizationMitsch, W.J.Jorgensen, S.E. eds. Ecological Engineering: an Introduction to EcotechnologyJohn Wiley and SonsNew York, USA79101Google Scholar
  31. Pederson, R.L., van der Valk, A.J. 1984Vegetation change and seed banks in marshes: ecological and management implicationsTrans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf.49271280Google Scholar
  32. Reinartz, J.A., Warne, E.L. 1993Development of vegetation in small created wetlands in southeastern WisconsinWetlands13153164Google Scholar
  33. Rutherford, A. 2001Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA a GLM ApproachSage Publications Ltd.Thousand Oaks CaliforniaUSAGoogle Scholar
  34. Stauffer, A.L., Brooks, R.P. 1997Plant and soil responses to salvaged marsh surface and organic matter amendments at a created wetland in central PennsylvaniaWetlands1790105Google Scholar
  35. Steidl, R.J., Hayes, J.P., Schauber, E. 1997Statistical power analysis in wildlife researchJ. Wildl. Manage.61270279Google Scholar
  36. United States Salinity Laboratory Staff 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. U.S.D.A., Agricultural Handbook Number 60, U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  37. Uresk, D.W., Yamamoto, T. 1986Growth of forbs, shrubs, and trees on bentonite mine spoil under greenhouse conditionsJ. Range Manage.39113117Google Scholar
  38. van der Valk, A.J., Davis, C.B. 1978The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshesEcology59322335Google Scholar
  39. van der Valk A.G. and Pederson R.L. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetaion. In: Leck M.A., Parker, V.T., and Simpson, R.L. (eds.), Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 329–346.Google Scholar
  40. van der Valk, A.J., Pederson, R.L., Davis, C.B. 1992Restoration and creation of freshwater wetlands using seed banksWetlands Ecol. Manage.1191197Google Scholar
  41. Vivian-Smith, G., Handel, S.N. 1996Freshwater wetland restoration of an abandoned sand mine: seed bank recruitment dynamics and plant colonizationWetlands16185196Google Scholar
  42. Vivian-Smith, G., Stiles, E.W. 1994Dispersal of salt marsh seeds on the feet and feathers of waterfowlWetlands14316319Google Scholar
  43. Weinstein, M.P., Weishar, L.L. 2002Beneficial use of dredged material to enhance the restoration trajectories of formerly diked landsEcol. Eng.19187201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weller, M.W. 1975Studies of cattail in relation to management for marsh wildlifeIowa State J. Sci.49383412Google Scholar
  45. WLQA. 2000. Noncoal Rules and Regulations. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. Land Quality Division, Cheyenne Wyoming, USA. May 2000.Google Scholar
  46. Zar, J.H. 1996Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd ednPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitUniversity of WyomingUniversity Station, LaramieUSA
  2. 2.Upper Colorado Regional OfficeU.S. Bureau of ReclamationSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations