Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 231:34 | Cite as

Comparative Study of Iron-Oxidizing and Sulfur-Oxidizing Bioleaching Processes for Heavy Metal Removal and Nutrient Leaching from Pig Manure

  • Xiaocheng Wei
  • Jiajia Li
  • Wenli Huang
  • Xiangqun Zheng
  • Songrong Li
  • Xi Chen
  • Dongfang LiuEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The potential of using iron-oxidizing and sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process for removal of heavy metals (HMs) was investigated at initial unadjusted pH of pig manure (PM). The indigenous iron-oxidizing and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms enriched from PM were primarily Alicyclobacillus and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, respectively. After 12 days of bioleaching, 95% of Cu, 96.5% of Zn, 93.6% of Mn, and 92.7% of Cd were removed from the PM in sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process. Besides, 92.9% of Cu, 94.1% of Zn, 91.9% of Mn, and 90.5% of Cd were removed in iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. Furthermore, 18.1% of TN, 63.3% of TP, 65.4% of TK, and 45.6% of TOC were leached from the PM in the sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process, whereas only 21.6% of TN, 32.8% of TP, 4% of TK, and 49% of TOC were solubilized in the iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. The X-ray diffraction analysis results demonstrated that there was a large amount of sulfur remained in bioleached manure from the sulfur-oxidizing process which poses a potential risk of soil re-acidification. The Standards, Measurements and Testing Program extraction protocol study on fraction of P in PM showed that the amount of bioavailable P in the sulfur-oxidizing bioleaching process was dramatically declined, whereas it was elevated by 25.9% in the iron-oxidizing bioleaching process. The results obtained in this study indicated that both the sulfur- and iron-oxidizing bioleaching process were able to efficiently remove HMs from PM at initial unadjusted pH, whereas the iron-oxidizing process was proved better method in reserving the fertilizing property and more friendly to the environment.

Keywords

Pig manure Heavy metal Nutrients Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria Iron-oxidizing bacteria 

Notes

Funding Information

This work was financially supported by the Agro-Environment Protection Institute (AEPI) of the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) of China (No. 2016YFD0801002-01), Tianjin Rural Work Committee of China (No. 201601190), and Open Foundation of the Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Recycling of Argo-Waste in Cold Region (201716).

References

  1. APAH. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste-waters. In American public health association. Washing-ton: DC.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, S. Y., Chiu, Y. C., Chang, P. L., & Lin, J. G. (2003). Assessment of recoverable forms of sulfur particles used in bioleaching of contaminated sediments. Water Research, 37, 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng, S., Yang, H., Xin, Y., Gao, K., Yang, J., Liu, T., Zhang, L., & Wang, W. (2013). A novel and highly efficient system for chalcopyrite bioleaching by mixed strains of Acidithiobacillus. Bioresource Technology, 129, 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Girotto, E., Ceretta, C. A., Rossato, L. V., Farias, J. G., Tiecher, T. L., De, C. L., Schmatz, R., Brunetto, G., Schetinger, M. R., & Nicoloso, F. T. (2013). Triggered antioxidant defense mechanism in maize grown in soil with accumulation of cu and Zn due to intensive application of pig slurry. Ecotoxity Environmental Safe, 93, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu, W., Bai, J., Dong, B., Zhuang, X., Zhao, J., Zhang, C., Wang, J., & Shih. (2017). Enhanced bioleaching efficiency of copper from waste printed circuit board driven by nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes modified electrode. Chemical Engineering Journal, 324, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo, X., You, X. Y., Liu, L. J., Zhang, J. Y., Liu, S. J., & Jiang, C. Y. (2009). Alicyclobacillus aeris sp. nov., a novel ferrous- and sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a copper mine. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59, 2415–2420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang, W., Cai, W., Huang, H., Lei, Z., Zhang, Z., Tay, J. H., & Lee, D. J. (2015). Identification of inorganic and organic species of phosphorus and its bio-availability in nitrifying aerobic granular sludge. Water Research, 68, 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, R. N., & Nagendran, R. (2007). Influence of initial pH on bioleaching of heavy metals from contaminated soil employing indigenous Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Chemosphere, 66, 1775–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar, R. N., & Nagendran, R. (2009). Fractionation behavior of heavy metals in soil during bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 169, 1119–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Leclerc, A., & Laurent, A. (2017). Framework for estimating toxic releases from the application of manure on agricultural soil: National release inventories for heavy metals in 2000-2014. Science of the Total Environment, 590-591, 452–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liao, Y., Zhou, L., Bai, S., Liang, J., & Wang, S. (2009). Occurrence of biogenic schwertmannite in sludge bioleaching environments and its adverse effect on solubilization of sludge-borne metals. Applied Geochemistry, 24, 1739–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Long, C., Yu-jun, W., Dong-mei, Z., & Yuan-hua, D. (2004). Heavy metals pollution in poultry and livestock feeds and manures under intensive farming in Jiangsu Province, China. Journal of Environmental Science, 16, 371–374.Google Scholar
  13. Maccari, A. P., Baretta, D., Paiano, D., Leston, S., Freitas, A., Ramos, F., Sousa, J. P., & Klauberg-Filho, O. (2016). Ecotoxicological effects of pig manure on Folsomia candida in subtropical Brazilian soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 314, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mccarthy, G., Lawlor, P. G., Gutierrez, M., & Gardiner, G. E. (2013). Assessing the biosafety risks of pig manure for use as a feedstock for composting. Science of the Total Environment, 463-464, 712–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Medeiros, J. J. G., Cid, B. P., & Gómez, E. F. (2005). Analytical phosphorus fractionation in sewage sludge and sediment samples. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 381, 873–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehrotra, A., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2017). Heavy metal bioleaching and sludge stabilization in a single stage reactor using indigenous acidophilic heterotrophs. Environmental Technology, 38, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nareshkumar, R., & Nagendran, R. (2008). Changes in nutrient profile of soil subjected to bioleaching for removal of heavy metals using Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 156, 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholson, F. A., Chambers, B. J., Williams, J. R., & Unwin, R. J. (1999). Heavy metal contents of livestock feeds and animal manures in England and Wales. Bioresource Technology, 70, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pathak, A., Dastidar, M. G., & Sreekrishnan, T. R. (2009). Bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge by indigenous iron-oxidizing microorganisms using ammonium ferrous sulfate and ferrous sulfate as energy sources: A comparative study. Jounal of Hazardous Materials, 171, 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, S., Yue, Z., Yan, W., Chen, L., Mahadevan, G. D., & Feng, Z. (2016). Enhanced bioleaching efficiency of metals from E-wastes driven by biochar. Jounal of Hazardous Materials, 320, 393–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wei, X., Liu, D., Liao, L., Wang, Z., Li, W., & Huang, W. (2018a). Bioleaching of heavy metals from pig manure with indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria: Effects of sulfur concentration. Heliyon, 4, e00778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wei, X. C., Liu, D. F., Li, W. J., Liao, L. R., Wang, Z. D., Huang, W. W., & Huang, W. L. (2018b). Biochar addition for accelerating bioleaching of heavymetals from swine manure and reserving the nutrients. Science of the Total Environment, 631-632, 1553–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong, J. W. C., Xiang, L., Gu, X. Y., & Zhou, L. X. (2004). Bioleaching of heavy metals from anaerobically digested sewage sludge using FeS2 as an energy source. Chemosphere, 55, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Xiong, X., Li, Y., Li, W., Lin, C., Han, W., & Yang, M. (2010). Copper content in animal manures and potential risk of soil copper pollution with animal manure use in agriculture. Resource Conservatons and Recycling, 54, 985–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xu, Y., Yu, W., Ma, Q., & Zhou, H. (2013). Accumulation of copper and zinc in soil and plant within ten-year application of different pig manure rates. Plant, Soil and Environment, 59, 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang, X., Li, Q., Tang, Z., Zhang, W., Yu, G., Shen, Q., & Zhao, F. J. (2017). Heavy metal concentrations and arsenic speciation in animal manure composts in China. Waste Management, 64, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zeng, J., Gou, M., Tang, Y. Q., Li, G. Y., Sun, Z. Y., & Kida, K. (2016). Effective bioleaching of chromium in tannery sludge with an enriched sulfur-oxidizing bacterial community. Bioresource Technology, 218, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang, P., Yi, Z., Zhang, G., Zou, S., Zeng, G., & Zhen, W. (2008). Sewage sludge bioleaching by indigenous sulfur-oxidizing bacteria: Effects of ratio of substrate dosage to solid content. Bioresource Technology, 100, 1394–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou, D. M., Hao, X. Z., Wang, Y. J., Dong, Y. H., & Cang, L. (2005). Copper and Zn uptake by radish and pakchoi as affected by application of livestock and poultry manures. Chemosphere, 59, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou, J., Zhou, L., Liu, F., Zheng, C., & Deng, W. (2012). Transformation of heavy metals and the formation of secondary iron minerals during pig manure bioleaching by the co-inoculation acidophilic thiobacillus. Environmental Technology, 33, 2553–2560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhou, H., Meng, H., Zhao, L., Shen, Y., Hou, Y., Cheng, H., & Song, L. (2018). Effect of biochar and humic acid on the copper, lead, and cadmium passivation during composting. Bioresource Technology, 258, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaocheng Wei
    • 1
  • Jiajia Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wenli Huang
    • 3
  • Xiangqun Zheng
    • 1
  • Songrong Li
    • 3
  • Xi Chen
    • 3
  • Dongfang Liu
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Agro-Environmental Protection InstituteMinistry of Agriculture and Rural AffairsTianjinChina
  2. 2.College of Life Science and TechnologyHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural UniversityDaqingChina
  3. 3.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringNankai UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations