Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 230:257 | Cite as

Microplastics in the Digestive Tracts of Four Fish Species from the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta Estuary in Colombia

  • Ernesto A. Calderon
  • Peter Hansen
  • Adriana Rodríguez
  • Martin C. M. Blettler
  • Kristian Syberg
  • Farhan R. KhanEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the presence of microplastics (MPs) in the gastrointestinal tracts of four fish species from the estuarine Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta (CGSM) in northern Colombia. Of the 140 fish purchased at a local market, 17 (12.1%) were found to contain MPs as confirmed by FT-IR analysis. Among the four different species, Mugil incilis (mullet) showed the highest MP prevalence with just over a fifth of the individuals containing MPs in their gastrointestinal tracts (10 out of 46 (frequency of MP occurrence in %) FO% = 21.7%). This was followed by Caranx hippos (crevalle jack, 2 out of 19 (FO% = 10.5%)), Caquetaia kraussii (yellow mojarra, 3 out of 35 (FO% = 8.6%)), and Eugerres plumieri (striped mojarra, 2 out of 40 (FO% = 5.0%)). From the 17 fish, only 19 MPs were found of which 17 (89.5% were fibers) and 2 (10.5%) were fragments. While polyester and polyethylene were the most common fibers, nylon, acrylic, polyethylene, and modacrylic were also identified suggesting a wide variety of origins and sources. These finding provide the first evidence of MP ingestion by resident fish species in Colombian estuarine waters. Since the region has been variously recognized as being of regional and international importance (i.e., RAMSAR site in 1998 and UNESCO Biosphere Reserve in 2000), we advocate the ongoing investigation of MP pollution in both the environment and biota.

Keywords

Microplastics Fish Estuary Colombia South America 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Y. Shashoua (National Museum of Denmark) for assistance with interpreting some FT-IR spectra.

References

  1. Arias, A. H., Ronda, A. C., Oliva, A. L., & Marcovecchio, J. E. (2019). Evidence of microplastic ingestion by fish from the Bahía Blanca estuary in Argentina, South America. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 102, 750–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias-Villamizar, C. A., & Vazquez-Morillas, A. (2018). Degradation of conventional and oxodegradable high density polyethylene in tropical aqueous and outdoor environments. Revista Internacional de Contaminacion Ambiental, 34, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellas, J., Martínez-Armental, J., Martínez-Cámara, A., Besada, V., & Martínez-Gomes, C. (2016). Ingestion of microplastics by demersal fish from the Spanish Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 109, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg, J., Tymoczko, J. & Stryer, L. (1995) Biochemistry (5th International edition) WH Freeman 24 and Co.Google Scholar
  5. Biginagwa, F., Mayoma, B., Shashoua, Y., Syberg, K., & Khan, F. R. (2016). First evidence of microplastics in the African Great Lakes: recovery from Lake Victoria Nile perch and Nile tilapia. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 42, 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blettler, M. C. M., Abrial, E., Khan, F. R., Sivri, N., & Espinola, L. A. (2018). Freshwater plastic pollution: recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps. Water Research, 143, 416–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boerger, C. M., Lattin, G. L., Moore, S. L., & Moore, C. J. (2010). Plastic ingestion by planktivorous fish in the North Pacific central gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60, 2275–2278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brate, I. L. N., Eidsvoll, D. P., Steindal, C. C., & Thomas, K. V. (2016). Plastic ingestion by Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) from the Norwegian coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 112, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, M. A., Galloway, T. S., & Thompson, R. C. (2010). Spatial patterns of plastic debris along estuarine shorelines. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 3404–3409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Correa-Herrera, T., Barletta, M., Lima, A., Jiménez-Segura, L. F., & Arango-Sánchez, L. B. (2017). Spatial distribution and seasonality of ichthyoplankton and anthropogenic debris in a river delta in the Caribbean Sea. Journal of Fish Biology, 90, 1356–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foekema, E. M., De Gruijter, C., Mergia, M. T., Murk, A. J., van Franeker, J. A., & Koelmans, A. A. (2013). Plastic in North Sea fish. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 8818–8824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Free, C. M., Jensen, O. P., Mason, S. A., Eriksen, M., Williamson, N. J., & Boldgiv, B. (2014). High levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lake. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 85, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frias, J. P., Otero, V., & Sobral, P. (2014). Evidence of microplastics in samples of zooplankton from Portuguese coastal waters. Marine Environmental Research, 95, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gago, J., Galgani, F., Maes, T., & Thompson, R. C. (2016). Microplastics in seawater: recommendations from the marine strategy framework directive implementation process. Frontiers in Marine Science, 3, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gocke, K., Ernesto, J., Pineda, M., Vidal, L. A., & Fonseca, D. (2003). Planktonic primary production and community respiration in several coastal lagoons of the outer delta of the Rio Magdalena, Colombia. Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - INVEMAR, 32, 125–144.Google Scholar
  16. Güven, O., Gökdağ, K., Jovanović, B., & Kıdeyş, A. E. (2017). Microplastic litter composition of the Turkish territorial waters of the Mediterranean Sea, and its occurrence in the gastrointestinal tract of fish. Environmental Pollution, 223, 286–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hettiarachchi, H., Ryu, S., Caucci, S., & Silva, R. (2018). Municipal solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean: issues and potential solutions from the governance perspective. Recycling, 3.Google Scholar
  18. Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012). Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 3060–3075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jabeen, K., Lei, S., Li, J., Dongqi, Y., Tong, C., Jingli, M., & Shi, H. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environmental Pollution, 221, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan, F. R., Mayoma, B. S., Biginagwa, F. J., & Syberg, K. (2018). Microplastics in inland African waters: presence, sources, and fate. In M. Wagner & S. Lambert (Eds.), Freshwater microplastics. The handbook of environmental chemistry (Vol. 58). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Lusher, A. L., McHugh, M., & Thompson, R. C. (2013). Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 67, 94–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Map of the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta Estuary. Google Earth, https://www.earth.google.com/web/. Accessed 02 Jan 2019.
  23. Nadal, M. A., Alomar, C., & Deudero, S. (2016). High levels of microplastic ingestion by the semipelagic fish bogue Boops boops (L.) around the Balearic Islands. Environmental Pollution, 214, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nel, H. A., Dalu, T., & Wasserman, R. J. (2018). Sinks and sources: assessing microplastic abundance in river sediment and deposit feeders in an austral temperate urban river system. Science of the Total Environment, 612, 950–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neves, D., Sobral, P., Ferreira, J. L., & Pereira, T. (2015). Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish off the Portuguese coast. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 101, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pazos, R. S., Maiztegui, T., Colautti, D. C., Paracampo, A. H., & Gómez, N. (2017). Microplastics in gut contents of coastal freshwater fish from Río de la Plata estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 122, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pegado, T. d. S. e. S., Schmid, K., Winemiller, K. O., Chelazzi, D., Cincinelli, A., Dei, L., & Giarrizzo, T. (2018). First evidence of microplastic ingestion byfishes from the Amazon River estuary. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 133, 814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng, X., Chen, M., Chen, S., Dasgupta, S., Xu, H., Ta, K., & Bai, S. (2018). Microplastics contaminate the deepest part of the world’s ocean. Geochemical Perspectives Letters, 9, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Possatto, F. E., Barletta, M., Costa, M. F., Ivar do Sul, J. A., & Dantas, D. V. (2011). Plastic debris ingestion by marine catfish: an unexpected fisheries impact. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62, 1098–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ramos, J. A. A., Barletta, M., & Costa, M. F. (2012). Ingestion of nylon threads by Gerreidae while using a tropical estuary as foraging grounds. Aquatic Biology, 17, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rueda, M., & Santos-Martínez, A. (1999). Population dynamics of the striped mojarra Eugerres plumieri from the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. Fisheries Research, 42, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rummel, C. D., Löder, M. G. J., Fricke, N. F., Lang, T., Griebeler, E.-M., Janke, M., & Gerdts, G. (2016). Plastic ingestion by pelagic and demersal fish from the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 102, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez, W., Bender, C., & Porcher, J. M. (2014). Wild gudgeons (Gobio gobio) from French rivers are contaminated by microplastics: preliminary study and first evidence. Environmental Research, 128, 98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tanaka, K., & Takada, H. (2016). Microplastic fragments and microbeads in digestive tracts of planktivorous fish from urban coastal waters. Scientific Reports, 6, 34351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torres-Guevara, L. E., Lopez, M. C., & Schlüter, A. (2016). Understanding artisanal fishers’ behaviors: the case of Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, Colombia. Sustain., 8, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Viloria Maestre, E., Acero, A., & Blanco, J. (2012). El colapso de la pesquería de la mojarra rayada Eugerres plumieri (Pisces: Gerridae) en la Ciénga Grande de Santa Marta: Causas pesqueras, naturales o biológicas? Boletín de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras, 41, 399–428.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, M., Scherer, C., Alvarez-Munoz, D., Brennholt, N., Bourrain, X., Buchinger, S., Fries, E., Grosbois, C., Klasmeier, J., Marti, T., Rodriguez-Mozaz, S., Urbatzka, R., Vethaak, A. D., WintherNielson, M., & Reifferscheid, G. (2014). Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. Environmental Sciences Europe, 26, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodall, L. C., Sanchez-Vidal, A., Canals, M., Paterson, G. L. J., Coppock, R., Sleight, V., Calafat, A., Rogers, A. D., Narayanaswamy, B. E., & Thompson, R. C. (2014). The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. Royal Society Open Science, 1, 140317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang, K., Su, J., Xiong, X., Wu, X., Wu, C., & Liu, J. (2016). Microplastic pollution of lakeshore sediments from remote lakes in Tibet plateau, China. Environmental Pollution, 219, 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and EnvironmentRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Programa de Ingeniería Pesquera, Laboratorio de AcuiculturaUniversidad del MagdalenaSanta MartaColombia
  3. 3.Instituto Nacional de Limnología (INALI; CONICET-UNL)Ciudad UniversitariaSanta FeArgentina

Personalised recommendations