Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 230:242 | Cite as

Radionuclide Immobilization by Sorption onto Waste Concrete and Bricks—Experimental Design Methodology

  • Ivana JelićEmail author
  • Marija Šljivić-Ivanović
  • Slavko Dimović
  • Dragi Antonijević
  • Mihajlo Jović
  • Zoran Vujović
  • Ivana Smičiklas
Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

The utilization of construction and demolition waste materials for the radionuclide immobilization by sorption processes was investigated. Given that the liquid radioactive waste usually has a complex composition and that effects of competition may significantly influence the efficiency of the treatment, the Simplex Centroid experimental design was used to explore ions sorption from multi-component solutions. For the purpose of this study, the common components of construction and demolition waste, such as pathway concrete and different bricks samples, were used along with the multi-component Sr2+, Co2+, and Ni2+ ions solutions. The equations for the prediction of metal ions sorption capacities were derived. The coefficients that correspond to the linear and interaction terms were obtained using a special cubic model. Likewise, by analysis of variance, statistically significant terms of the obtained polynomial were defined. The investigation has shown that the most effective sorption was onto the pathway concrete for all three cations, while the highest sorption capacity was found for Co2+ ions. Also, it has been determined that concerning Sr2+ ion removal there was a competition with coexisting Co2+ and Ni2+ ions, reducing its sorption capacity, while sorption of Co2+ and Ni2+ occurred more independently on other cations in multi-component solutions. Based on the obtained results, the applied experimental design can be efficiently used for the description of competitive sorption process and could be a powerful tool for the prediction of cation immobilization in liquid radioactive waste treatment.

Keywords

Liquid radioactive waste Experimental design Sorption 

Notes

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Projects III 43009 and TR-34023).

References

  1. Bennert, T., Papp, W. J., Maher, A., & Gucunski, N. (2000). Utilization of construction and demolition debris under traffic-type loading in base. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1714(1), 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bianchini, G., Marrocchino, E., Tassinari, R., & Vaccaro, C. (2005). Recycling of construction and demolition waste materials: a chemical-mineralogical appraisal. Waste Management, 25(2), 149–159 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, L., Garbev, K., & Gee, I. (2008). Surface carbonation of synthetic C-S-H samples: a comparison between fresh and aged C-S-H using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, G., & Parks, G. (2001). Sorption of trace elements on mineral surfaces: modern perspectives from spectroscopic studies, and comments on sorption in the marine environment. International Geology Review, 43(11), 963–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Consoli, N. C., Cruz, R. C., Floss, M. F., & Festugato, L. (2009). Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(5), 759–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cui, H., Tang, W., Liu, W., Dong, Z., & Xing, F. (2015). Experimental study on effects of CO2 concentrations on concrete carbonation and diffusion mechanisms. Construction and Building Materials, 93, 522–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Gohary, M. A., & Al-Naddaf, M. M. (2009). Characterization of bricks used in the external casing of Roman bath walls “Gadara-Jordan”. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 9, 29–46.Google Scholar
  8. EU Commission. (2014). Towards a circular economy: a zero waste program for Europe. COM(2014) 398 final. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/circular-economy-communication.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2019.
  9. Fan, Y., & Luan, H. (2013). Pore structure in concrete exposed to acid deposit. Construction and Building Materials, 49, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grace, M. A., Clifford, E., & Healy, M. G. (2016). The potential for the use of waste products from a variety of sectors in water treatment processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 788–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haratake, M., Hatanaka, E., Fuchigami, T., Akashi, M., & Nakayama, M. (2012). A Strontium-90 Sequestrant for first-aid treatment of radiation emergency. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 60(10), 1258–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossain, K., Rashid, M. A., & Karim, R. (2015). Effect of cement content and size of coarse aggregate on the strength of brick aggregate concrete. Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, 2(2), 20–24.Google Scholar
  13. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1998). Radiological characterization of shut down nuclear reactors for decommissioning purposes. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TRS389_scr.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2019.
  14. Jelic, I., Sljivic-Ivanovic, M., Dimovic, S., Antonijevic, D., Jovic, M., Mirkovic, M., & Smiciklas, I. (2017). The applicability of construction and demolition waste components for radionuclide sorption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jelic, I., Sljivic-Ivanovic, M., Dimovic, S., Antonijevic, D., Jovic, M., Serovic, R., & Smiciklas, I. (2016). Utilization of waste ceramics and roof tiles for radionuclide sorption. Process Safety and Environment Protection, 105, 348–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kampa, M., & Castanas, E. (2008). Human health effects of air pollution. Environmental Pollution, 151, 362–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan, S., Cao, Q., Zheng, Y. M., Huang, Y. Z., & Zhu, Y. G. (2008). Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. Environmental Pollution, 152, 686–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lazić, Ž. (2005). Design of experiments in chemical engineering. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &Co.Google Scholar
  19. Lovrić, M. (2008). Basics of statistics. (in Serbian). Kragujevac: Faculty of Economics press.Google Scholar
  20. Montaña, M., Camacho, A., Devesa, R., Vallés, I., Céspedes, R., Serrano, I., Blàzquez, S., & Barjola, V. (2013). The presence of radionuclides in wastewater treatment plants in Spain and their effect on human health. Journal of Cleaner Production, 60, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mymrin, V. A., Alekseev, K. P., Catai, R. E., Izzo, R. L. S., Rose, J. L., Nagalli, A., & Romano, C. A. (2015). Construction material from construction and demolition debris and lime production wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 79, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Šljivić-Ivanović, M., Smičiklas, I., Dimović, S., Jović, M., & Dojčinović, B. (2015). Study of simultaneous radionuclide sorption by mixture design methodology. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(44), 11212–11221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sljivic-Ivanovic, M., Jelic, I., Dimovic, S., Antonijevic, D., Jovic, M., Mrakovic, A., & Smiciklas, I. (2018). Exploring innovative solutions for aged concrete utilization: treatment of liquid radioactive waste. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 20(6), 1343–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sljivic-Ivanovic, M., Jelic, I., Loncar, A., Nikezic, D., Dimovic, S., & Loncar, B. (2017). The application of experimental design methodology for the investigation of liquid radioactive waste treatment. Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection, 32(3), 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Trindade, M. J., Dias, M. I., Coroado, J., & Rocha, F. (2009). Mineralogical transformations of calcareous rich clays with firing: a comparative study between calcite and dolomite rich clays from Algarve, Portugal. Applied Clay Science, 42(3–4), 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu, G., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Shaob, H., Chu, L., & Ruan, C. (2010). A critical review on the bio-removal of hazardous heavy metals from contaminated soils: Issues, progress, eco-environmental concerns and opportunities. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 174, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yi, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhang, S. (2011). Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in sediment and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in fishes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2575–2585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zimbili, O., Salim, W., & Ndambuki, M. (2014). A review on the usage of ceramic wastes in concrete production. International Journal of Civil, Architectural, Structural and Construction Engineering, 8(1), 91–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Development Institute Lola Ltd.BelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Vinča Institute of Nuclear SciencesUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Innovation Center of Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  4. 4.Faculty for applied ecology – FuturaMetropolitan UniversityBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations