Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 230:215 | Cite as

Enhanced Bioremediation of Heavy Metal Contaminated Landfill Soil Using Filamentous Fungi Consortia: a Demonstration of Bioaugmentation Potential

  • Auwalu Hassan
  • Agamuthu Pariatamby
  • Aziz Ahmed
  • Helen Shnada Auta
  • Fauziah Shahul HamidEmail author
Article
  • 236 Downloads

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the mycoremediative capacity of filamentous fungi consortia in landfill heavy metal contaminated soil. Streak plate method was utilized for the isolation of fungi from the landfill soil. Isolates were identified using morphological and molecular techniques. Heavy metal tolerance of the fungi was determined using radial growth diameter technique. Twelve species of landfill indigenous fungi were used for the bioremediation process. Two categories of fungi consortia namely highly tolerant fungi (Perenniporia subtephropora, Daldinia starbaeckii, Phanerochaete concrescens, Cerrena aurantiopora, Fusarium equiseti, Polyporales sp., Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Trametes versicolor) and moderately tolerant fungi (Paecilomyces lilacinus, Antrodia serialis, and Penicillium cataractum) were used to amend the contaminated soil; meanwhile, the unamended soil served as control. Maximum tolerance index of 1.0 was reported in Cr-, Cu-, and Fe-amended PDA medium. Meanwhile, the maximum heavy metal bioremoval efficiencies were for highly tolerant fungal consortium treated soil and were recorded as As (62%) > Mn (59%) > Cu (49%) > Cr (42%) > Fe (38%). Likewise, the maximum metal removal rate constant (K) and the half-lives (t1/2) were 0.0097/day 71 days, 0.0088/day 79 days, 0.0067/day 103 days, 0.0054/day 128 days, and 0.0048/day 144 days for As, Mn, Cu, Cr, and Fe, respectively, which were all for soil treated with consortium of highly tolerant fungi (P. subtephropora, D. starbaeckii, P. concrescens, C. aurantiopora, F. equiseti, Polyporales sp., A. niger, A. fumigatus, and T. versicolor). Spectra analysis revealed a clear distinction in the functional groups between the fungal treated and the untreated soils. Peaks at 874 ± 2 cm−1 and 1425 ± 2 cm−1 were only found in fungi amended soil. Physicochemical parameters mainly pH and redox potential played a key role in the bioremediation process, and bioaccumulation was believed to be the favored mechanism for the metal bioremoval. The data are suitable for assessing the contribution of bioaugmentation with consortia of fungi. It is equally important for assessing the synergistic effect of fungi on the reduction of extractable heavy metals in contaminated soil.

Keywords

Bioaugmentation Bioaccumulation Filamentous fungi Heavy metals Consortium Soil pollution 

Notes

Funding Information

This work was funded by the University of Malaya with the research grants RP011A-14SUS and PG070-2014B.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel-Azeem, A., El-Morsy, E., Nour El-Dein, M., & Rashad, H. (2015). Occurrence and diversity of mycobiota in heavy metal contaminated sediments of Mediterranean coastal lagoon El-Manzala, Egypt. Mycosphere, 6, 228–240.Google Scholar
  2. Abdi, O., & Kazemi, M. (2015). A review study of biosorption of heavy metals and comparison between different biosorbents. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 6, 1386–1399.Google Scholar
  3. Achal, V., Kumari, D., & Pan, X. (2011). Bioremediation of chromium contaminated soil by a brown-rot fungus, Gloeophyllum sepiarium. Research Journal of Microbiology, 6, 1–7.Google Scholar
  4. Adesodun, J., & Mbagwu, J. (2008). Biodegradation of waste-lubricating petroleum oil in a tropical alfisol as mediated by animal droppings. Bioresource Technology, 99, 5659–5665.Google Scholar
  5. Ahemad, M. (2015). Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria-assisted phytoremediation of metalliferous soils: A review. 3 Biotech, 5, 111–121.Google Scholar
  6. Ahemad, M., & Kibret, M. (2013). Recent trends in microbial biosorption of heavy metals: A review. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1, 19–26.Google Scholar
  7. Ahemad, M., & Kibret, M. (2014). Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 26, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Akgul, A., & Akgul, A. (2018). Mycoremediation of copper: Exploring the metal tolerance of Brown rot fungi. BioResources, 13, 7155–7171.Google Scholar
  9. Akhtar, S., Mahmood-ul-Hassan, M., Ahmad, R., Suthor, V., & Yasin, M. (2013). Metal tolerance potential of filamentous fungi isolated from soils irrigated with untreated municipal effluent. Soil Environment, 32, 55–62.Google Scholar
  10. Alam, A., Tabinda, A. B., Qadir, A., Butt, T. E., Siddique, S., & Mahmood, A. (2017). Ecological risk assessment of an open dumping site at Mehmood Booti Lahore, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 17889–17899.Google Scholar
  11. Ali, J., Tuzen, M., Hazer, B., & Kazi, T. G. (2019). Chromium speciation in water samples by loading a new sulfide-containing biodegradable polymer adsorbent in tip of the syringe system. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 230, 45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4092-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balaji, V., Arulazhagan, P., & Ebenezer, P. (2014). Enzymatic bioremediation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by fungal consortia enriched from petroleum contaminated soil and oil seeds. Journal of Environmental Biology, 35, 521–529.Google Scholar
  13. Benaisa, S., Arhoun, B., Villen-Guzman, M., El Mail, R., & Rodriguez-Maroto, J. M. (2019). Immobilization of brown seaweeds Sargassum vulgare for Fe 3+ removal in batch and fixed-bed column. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 230, 19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4069-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhat, M. M., Shankar, S., Shikha, Y. M., & Shukla, R. (2011). Remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil through microbial degradation-FTIR based prediction. Advances in Applied Science Research, 2, 321–326.Google Scholar
  15. Boonchan, S., Margaret, L. B., & S., G. A. (2000). Degradation and mineralization of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by defined fungal-bacterial cocultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66, 1007–1019.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, J. L., Williams, M. A., Bottomley, P. J., & Myrold, D. D. (2003). Microbial community dynamics associated with rhizosphere carbon flow. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 6793–6800.Google Scholar
  17. Cánovas, D., & De Lorenzo, V. (2007). Osmotic stress limits arsenic hypertolerance in Aspergillus sp. P37. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 61, 258–263.Google Scholar
  18. Chakraborty, R., Wu, C. H., & Hazen, T. C. (2012). Systems biology approach to bioremediation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23, 483–490.Google Scholar
  19. Chuan, M., Shu, G., & Liu, J. (1996). Solubility of heavy metals in a contaminated soil: Effects of redox potential and pH. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 90, 543–556.Google Scholar
  20. Coates, J. (2000). Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, 12, 10815–10837.Google Scholar
  21. Damodaran, D., Balakrishnan, R. M., & Shetty, V. K. (2013). The uptake mechanism of Cd (II), Cr (VI), Cu (II), Pb (II), and Zn (II) by mycelia and fruiting bodies of Galerina vittiformis. Biomedical Research International, 2013, 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Datta, B. (2015). Heavy metal tolerance of filamentous fungi isolated from metal-contaminated soil. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences, 17, 965–968.Google Scholar
  23. de Freitas, F., Battirola, L. D., & de Andrade, R. L. T. (2018). Adsorption of Cu 2+ and Pb 2+ ions by Pontederia rotundifolia (Lf)(Pontederiaceae) and Salvinia biloba Raddi (Salviniaceae) biomass. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 229, 349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4005-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Godoy Leme, M. A., & Miguel, M. G. (2018). Permeability and retention to water and leachate of a compacted soil used as liner. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 229, 374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-4001-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dhankhar, R., & Hooda, A. (2011). Fungal biosorption–an alternative to meet the challenges of heavy metal pollution in aqueous solutions. Environmental Technology, 32, 467–491.Google Scholar
  26. Emenike, C. U., Agamuthu, P., & Fauziah, S. H. (2016). Blending Bacillus sp., Lysinibacillus sp. and Rhodococcus sp. for optimal reduction of heavy metals in leachate contaminated soil. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1–8.Google Scholar
  27. Emenike, C. U., Agamuthu, P., & Fauziah, S. H. (2017). Sustainable remediation of heavy metal polluted soil: A biotechnical interaction with selected bacteria species. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 182, 275–278.Google Scholar
  28. EPA. (2000). A guide to the sampling and analysis of waters, wastewaters, soils and wastes (7th edn., pp. 1–54): Melbourne.Google Scholar
  29. Fauziah, S. H., Izzati, M. N., & Agamuthu, P. (2013). Toxicity on Anabas Testudineus: A case study of sanitary landfill leachate. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 18, 14–19.Google Scholar
  30. Fawzy, E. M., Abdel-Motaal, F. F., & El-zayat, S. A. (2017). Biosorption of heavy metals onto different eco-friendly substrates. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences, 9, 35–44.Google Scholar
  31. Fazli, M. M., Soleimani, N., Mehrasbi, M., Darabian, S., Mohammadi, J., & Ramazani, A. (2015). Highly cadmium tolerant fungi: Their tolerance and removal potential. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
  32. Fukuda, T., Ishino, Y., Ogawa, A., Tsutsumi, K., & Morita, H. (2008). Cr (VI) reduction from contaminated soils by Aspergillus sp. N2 and Penicillium sp. N3 isolated from chromium deposits. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 54, 295–303.Google Scholar
  33. Gola, D., Dey, P., Bhattacharya, A., Mishra, A., Malik, A., Namburath, M., & Ahammad, S. Z. (2016). Multiple heavy metal removal using an entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana. Bioresource Technology, 218, 388–396.Google Scholar
  34. Goswami, U., & Sarma, H. (2008). Study of the impact of municipal solid waste dumping on soil quality in Guwahati city. Pollution Research, 27, 327–330.Google Scholar
  35. Hanif, M. A., Nadeem, R., Rashid, U., & Zafar, M. N. (2005). Assessing pollution levels in effluents of industries in city zone of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 1713–1717.Google Scholar
  36. Hansda, A., & Kumar, V. (2016). A comparative review towards potential of microbial cells for heavy metal removal with emphasis on biosorption and bioaccumulation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32, 1–14.Google Scholar
  37. Hettick, B. E., Canas-Carrell, J. E., French, A. D., & Klein, D. M. (2015). Arsenic: A review of the Element's toxicity, plant interactions, and potential methods of remediation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63, 7097–7107.Google Scholar
  38. Igiehon, N. O., & Babalola, O. O. (2019). Fungal bio-sorption potential of chromium in Norkrans liquid medium by shake flask technique. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 59, 62–73.Google Scholar
  39. Iram, S., & Abrar, S. (2015). Biosorption of copper and lead by heavy metal resistant fungal isolates. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
  40. Ivanova, J., Toncheva-Panova, T., Chernev, G., & Samuneva, B. (2008). Effect of Ag+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ containing hybrid nanomatrixes on the green algae Chlorella keissleri. General and Applied Plant Physiology, 34, 339–346.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, P., Robinson, K., Puxty, G., & Attalla, M. (2009). In situ Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) analysis of carbon dioxide absorption and desorption in amine solutions. Energy Procedia, 1, 985–994.Google Scholar
  42. Jayanthi, B., Emenike, C. U., Agamuthu, P., Simarani, K., Mohamad, S., & Fauziah, S. H. (2016). Selected microbial diversity of contaminated landfill soil of Peninsular Malaysia and the behavior towards heavy metal exposure. Catena, 147, 25–31.Google Scholar
  43. Jayanthi, B., Emenike, C. U., Auta, S. H., Agamuthu, P., & Fauziah, S. H. (2017). Characterization of induced metal responses of bacteria isolates from active non-sanitary landfill in Malaysia. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 119, 467–475.Google Scholar
  44. Jeyasingh, J., & Philip, L. (2005). Bioremediation of chromium contaminated soil: Optimization of operating parameters under laboratory conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 118, 113–120.Google Scholar
  45. Khamesy, S., Hamidian, A., & Atghia, O. (2016). Identification of the fungi absorbing heavy metals isolated from waste deposits of zinc factories. Mycologia Iranica, 3, 65–73.Google Scholar
  46. Lebeau, T. (2011). Bioaugmentation for in situ soil remediation: How to ensure the success of such a process Bioaugmentation, biostimulation and biocontrol (pp. 129-186). Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Madejón, P., Domínguez, M. T., Gil-Martínez, M., Navarro-Fernández, C. M., Montiel-Rozas, M., Madejón, E., Murillo, J., Cabrera, F., & Marañón, T. (2018). Evaluation of amendment addition and tree planting as measures to remediate contaminated soils: The Guadiamar case study (SW Spain). Catena, 166, 34–43.Google Scholar
  48. Mandal, S. K., & Das, N. (2018). Phyto-mycoremediation of benzo a pyrene in soil by combining the role of yeast consortium and sunflower plant. Journal of Environmental Biology, 39, 261–268.Google Scholar
  49. Mandal, A., Thakur, J., Sahu, A., Bhattacharjya, S., Manna, M., & Patra, A. K. (2016). Plant–microbe interaction for the removal of heavy metal from contaminated site. Plant-Microbe Interaction: An Approach to Sustainable Agriculture (pp. 227-247). Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Miransari, M. (2011). Hyperaccumulators, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and stress of heavy metals. Biotechnology Advances, 29, 645–653.Google Scholar
  51. Mohammadian, E., Ahari, A. B., Arzanlou, M., Oustan, S., & Khazaei, S. H. (2017). Tolerance to heavy metals in filamentous fungi isolated from contaminated mining soils in the Zanjan Province, Iran. Chemosphere, 185, 290–296.Google Scholar
  52. Muneer, B., Lali, T., Iqbal, M. J., Shakoori, F. R., & Shakoori, A. R. (2016). Arsenic processing of yeast isolates IIB-As1 & IIB-As2 and production of glutathione under stress conditions. Journal of Basic Microbiology, 56, 1124–1131.Google Scholar
  53. Munoz, A. J., Ruiz, E., Abriouel, H., Galvez, A., Ezzouhri, L., Lairini, K., & Espinola, F. (2012). Heavy metal tolerance of microorganisms isolated from wastewaters: Identification and evaluation of its potential for biosorption. Chemical Engineering Journal, 210, 325–332.Google Scholar
  54. Nagajyoti, P., Lee, K., & Sreekanth, T. (2010). Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 8, 199–216.Google Scholar
  55. Namkoong, W., Hwang, E. Y., Park, J. S., & Choi, J. Y. (2002). Bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil with composting. Environmental Pollution, 119, 23–31.Google Scholar
  56. Oladipo, O. G., Awotoye, O. O., Olayinka, A., Ezeokoli, O. T., Maboeta, M. S., & Bezuidenhout, C. C. (2016). Heavy metal tolerance potential of Aspergillus strains isolated from mining sites. Bioremediation Journal, 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
  57. Oladipo, O. G., Auiotoye, O. O., Olayinka, A., Bezuidenhout, C. C., & Maboeta, M. S. (2018). Heavy metal tolerance traits of filamentous fungi isolated from gold and gemstone mining sites. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 49, 29–37.Google Scholar
  58. Pariatamby, A., Cheah, W. Y., Shrizal, R., Thamlarson, N., Lim, B. T., & Barasarathi, J. (2015). Enhancement of landfill methane oxidation using different types of organic wastes. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73, 2489–2496.Google Scholar
  59. Popenda, A. (2014). Effect of redox potential on heavy metals and As behavior in dredged sediments. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52, 3918–3927.Google Scholar
  60. Rocco, C., Agrelli, D., Coppola, I., Gonzalez, I., & Adamo, P. (2018). Native plant colonization of brownfield soil and sludges: Effects on substrate properties and pollutant mobility. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18, 2282–2291.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1850-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schalk, I. J., Hannauer, M., & Braud, A. (2011). New roles for bacterial siderophores in metal transport and tolerance. Environmental Microbiology, 13, 2844–2854.Google Scholar
  62. Sharma, M. R., & Raju, N. (2013). Correlation of heavy metal contamination with soil properties of industrial areas of Mysore, Karnataka, India by cluster analysis. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 2, 22–27.Google Scholar
  63. Singh, A., Parmar, N., Kuhad, R. C., & Ward, O. P. (2011). Bioaugmentation, biostimulation, and biocontrol in soil biology Bioaugmentation, Biostimulation and Biocontrol (Vol. 28, pp. 1-23). Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Singh, M., Srivastava, P., Verma, P., Kharwar, R., Singh, N., & Tripathi, R. (2015). Soil fungi for mycoremediation of arsenic pollution in agriculture soils. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 119, 1278–1290.Google Scholar
  65. Sprocati, A. R., Alisi, C., Segre, L., Tasso, F., Galletti, M., & Cremisini, C. (2006). Investigating heavy metal resistance, bioaccumulation and metabolic profile of a metallophile microbial consortium native to an abandoned mine. Science of the Total Environment, 366, 649–658.Google Scholar
  66. Sprocati, A. R., Alisi, C., Tasso, F., Marconi, P., Sciullo, A., Pinto, V., Chiavarini, S., Ubaldi, C., & Cremisini, C. (2012). Effectiveness of a microbial formula, as a bioaugmentation agent, tailored for bioremediation of diesel oil and heavy metal co-contaminated soil. Process Biochemistry, 47, 1649–1655.Google Scholar
  67. Srivastava, P. K., Vaish, A., Dwivedi, S., Chakrabarty, D., Singh, N., & Tripathi, R. D. (2011). Biological removal of arsenic pollution by soil fungi. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 2430–2442.Google Scholar
  68. Su, S., Zeng, X., Bai, L., Li, L., & Duan, R. (2011). Arsenic biotransformation by arsenic-resistant fungi Trichoderma asperellum SM-12F1, Penicillium janthinellum SM-12F4, and Fusarium oxysporum CZ-8F1. Science of the Total Environment, 409, 5057–5062.Google Scholar
  69. Su, S., Zeng, X., Li, L., Duan, R., Bai, L., Li, A., Wang, J., & Jiang, S. (2012). Arsenate reduction and methylation in the cells of Trichoderma asperellum SM-12F1, Penicillium janthinellum SM-12F4, and Fusarium oxysporum CZ-8F1 investigated with X-ray absorption near edge structure. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 243, 364–367.Google Scholar
  70. Tang, J. D., Parker, L. A., Perkins, A. D., Sonstegard, T. S., Schroeder, S. G., Nicholas, D. D., & Diehl, S. V. (2013). Gene expression analysis of copper tolerance and wood decay in the brown rot fungus Fibroporia radiculosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 79, 1523–1533.Google Scholar
  71. Toal, M., Yeomans, C., Killham, K., & Meharg, A. (2000). A review of rhizosphere carbon flow modelling. Plant and Soil, 222, 263–281.Google Scholar
  72. Ullah, R., Hadi, F., Ahmad, S., Jan, A. U., & Rongliang, Q. (2019). Phytoremediation of lead and chromium contaminated soil improves with the endogenous phenolics and proline production in Parthenium, Cannabis, Euphorbia, and Rumex species. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 230, 40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-019-4089-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. USEPA. (1996). Method 3050B. Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils (pp. 1-12). US-EPA Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  74. Viti, C., Marchi, E., Decorosi, F., & Giovannetti, L. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of Cr (VI) resistance in bacteria and fungi. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 38, 633–659.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, J., & Chen, C. (2014). Chitosan-based biosorbents: Modification and application for biosorption of heavy metals and radionuclides. Bioresource Technology, 160, 129–141.Google Scholar
  76. Wang, S., & Zhao, X. (2009). On the potential of biological treatment for arsenic contaminated soils and groundwater. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2367–2376.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, M. X., Zhang, Q. L., & Yao, S.-J. (2015). A novel biosorbent formed of marine-derived Penicillium janthinellum mycelial pellets for removing dyes from dye-containing wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 259, 837–844.Google Scholar
  78. Xu, X., Huang, X., Liu, D., Lin, J., Ye, X., & Yang, J. (2018). Inhibition of metal ions on Cerrena sp. laccase: Kinetic, decolorization and fluorescence studies. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 84, 1–10.Google Scholar
  79. Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Pennerman, K., Wu, G., Hua, S., Yu, J., Jurick, W., Guo, A., & Bennett, J. (2017). Characterization of blue mold Penicillium species isolated from stored fruits using multiple highly conserved loci. Journal of Fungi, 3, 1–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Center for Research in Waste Management, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceFederal UniversityKashereNigeria
  4. 4.Faculty of Marine SciencesLasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine SciencesUthalPakistan
  5. 5.Department of MicrobiologyFederal University of TechnologyMinnaNigeria

Personalised recommendations