Advertisement

Relationships Between Mercury Concentration in Young-of-the-Year Yellow Perch and Precipitation Depth, Water Level, and Temperature

  • John A. SorensenEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article identifies environmental factors that explain most of the dynamic year-to-year changes in mercury concentrations of young-of-year (YOY) yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in study reservoirs. Mercury concentrations in fish, collected each fall, were measured for 9 years in four reservoirs in northeastern Minnesota. Three to 4 years of data were also obtained for two natural lakes and one other reservoir. Average annual concentrations varied considerably from year to year with a mean change of 39% between consecutive years across all lakes. Those averages show a similar time trend for each lake over the years and suggest that important factors influencing mercury bioaccumulation change annually and are also experienced in common over the study region. Three factors satisfying that description are precipitation depth, water level, and average air temperature. This article reveals that all three have statistically significant correlations with observed mercury concentrations. Moreover, multiple regressions indicate that maximum water levels and average air temperatures explain most of the observed variations. Regressions employing precipitation depth and temperature are less significant.

Keywords

Mercury Fish Water levels Reservoir Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Field sampling was assisted by FDLR staff including Thomas Howes, Terry Perrault, Brian Borkholder, Sean Thompson, Adam Thompson, John Goodreau, and Lance Overland. Also helping with sample collection were Gary Sorensen, Diane Sorensen, and Donna Busick. Stephanie Suckow helped with mercury analyses, and Richard Green provided valuable assistance with statistics advice. Amber Waseen, Gary Glass, Diane Sorensen, and Donna Busick provided appreciated advice with writing this report.

Funding Information

Funding for sample collection and analyses were obtained from the National Park Service 6820-0202-NYZ, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Fond du Lac Reservation (FDLR).

References

  1. Anderson, C., Niemela, S., Anderson, J., Grayson, S., Monson, B., Christopherson, D., Lundeen, B., Jasperson, J., Kennedy, M., Parson, K., & Kelly, M. (2013). St. Louis River watershed monitoring report and assessment report. St. Paul: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  2. Bodaly, R., Hecky, R., & Fudge, R. (1984). Increases in fish mercury levels in lakes flooded by the Churchill River diversion, northern Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41, 682–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodaly, R. A., Rudd, J. W. M., Fudge, R. J. P., & Kelly, C. A. (1993). Mercury concentrations in fish related to size of remote Canadian shield lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50(5), 980–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callister, S. M., & Winfrey, M. R. (1986). Microbial methylation of mercury in Upper Wisconsin River sediments. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 29, 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, C., Herr, J., & Goldstein, R. (2008). Model calculations of total maximum daily loads of mercury for drainage lakes. Journal of American Water Resources, 44(5), 1295–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dijkstra, J. A., Buckman, K. L., Ward, D., Evans, D. W., Dionne, M., & Chen, C. Y. (2013). Experimental and natural warming elevates mercury concentrations in estuarine fish. PLoS One, 8(3), e58401.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eckley, C. S., Luxton, T. P., McKernan, J. L., Goetz, J., & Goulet, J. (2015). Influence of reservoir water level fluctuations on sediment methylmercury concentrations downstream of the historical Black Butte mercury mine, OR. Applied Geochemistry, 61, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilmour, C. C., Krabbenhoft, D. P., Orem, W. H., & Aiken, G. R. (2004). Appendix 2B-1: influence of drying and rewetting on mercury and sulfur cycling in Everglades and STA soils. In: 2004 Everglades consolidated report (19 pp.). West Palm Beach: South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  9. Glass, G. E., & Sorensen, J. A. (1999). Six-Year trend (1990-1995) of wet mercury deposition in the Upper Midwest, U.S.A. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 3303–3312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1987). A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55(2), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kendall, M. G., & Smith, B. (1939). The problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10(3), 275–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Larson, J. H., Maki, R. P., Knights, B. C., & Gray, B. R. (2014). Can mercury in fish be reduced by water level management? Evaluating the effects of water level fluctuation on mercury accumulation in yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Ecotoxicology, 23, 1555–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCombie, A. M. (1959). Some relations between air temperatures and the surface water temperature of lakes. Limnologu & Oceanography, 4, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MDC. (1968). An inventory of Minnesota lakes. Bulletin No. 25. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Conservation.Google Scholar
  15. MNDNR. (2017). Lake Finder. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/index.html. Accessed Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  16. Mosteller, F., & Fisher, R. A. (1948). Questions and answers. The American Statistician, 2(5), 30–31.Google Scholar
  17. MPC. (2003–2013). Series of personal communications. Duluth: Minnesota Power Company.Google Scholar
  18. NOAA. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration https://gis.ncdc.noaa.gov/maps/ncei/summaries/daily. Accessed Jan 2016.
  19. Selch, T. M., Hoagstrom, C. W., Weimer, E. J., Duehr, J. P., & Chipps, S. R. (2007). Influence of fluctuating water levels on mercury concentrations in adult walleye. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 79, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sorensen, J. A., Glass, G. E., Schmidt, K. W., Huber, J. K., & Rapp, G. R. (1990). Airborne mercury deposition and watershed characteristics in relation to mercury concentrations in water, sediments, plankton, and fish of eighty northern Minnesota lakes. Environmental Science & Technology, 24(11), 1716–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sorensen, J. A., Kallemeyn, L., & Sydor, M. (2005). Relationship between mercury accumulation in young-of-the-year yellow perch and water-level fluctuations. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 9237–9243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. USDA. US Department of Agriculture http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_022925.pdf. Accessed Jan 2017.
  23. USEPA. (1991). Methods for the determination of metals in environmental samples. EPA/600/4-91/010. Washington, D. C: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.Google Scholar
  24. Wasik, K. C., Engstrom, D. R., Mitchell, C. P. J., Swain, E. B., Monson, B. A., Balogh, S. J., Jeremiason, J. D., Branfireun, B. A., Kolka, R. K., & Almendinger, J. E. (2015). The effects of hydrologic fluctuation and sulfate regeneration on mercury cycling in an experimental peatland. JGR Biogeosciences, 120(9), 1697–1715.Google Scholar
  25. Yeo, I.-K., & Johnson, R. A. (2000). A new family of power transformations to improve normality or symmetry. Biometrika Series B, 87(4), 954–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of Minnesota, DuluthDuluthUSA

Personalised recommendations