Microbial Community Diversity as a Potential Bioindicator of AMD and Steel Plant Effluent in a Channelled Valley Bottom Wetland
Freshwater resources in semi-arid countries are under constant threat from pollution. One of the major pollutants is acid mine drainage (AMD), which not only lowers the pH of the water, but contains high sulphuric acid and high metal concentrations. Bacteria and algae are the first organisms to respond to stressors such as reduced pH and high metal concentrations. The bacterial community in a natural freshwater wetland impacted by AMD and steel plant effluent was identified, with the objective to include bacterial indicator communities in an ecotoxicological screening tool for wetland ecosystem health estimation. Five study sites at the Grootspruit canal valley bottom wetland in Mpumalanga, South Africa, were identified as case study areas which include a reference site and four AMD-impacted sites displaying various degrees of degradation. Physical, chemical and microbiological parameters were measured at each site. The bacterial community was sampled from both the water column and bottom sediment and subjected to next-generation sequencing for identification. The bacterial diversity was high, even at the most impacted sites. The phyla that were predominant in all the samples were the alpha-, beta- and gamma-Proteobacteria and Bacteriodetes. The bacterial based bio-assessment tool scored the reference site as mostly unaffected by anthropogenic impacts, while the AMD and steel plant effluent-impacted sites were classified as modified to severely modify. The outcome of the study showed that the proposed bacterial bioindicators can potentially be employed as part of the ecotoxicological screening tool to determine wetland ecosystem health.
KeywordsMicrobial diversity Wetland ecosystem health Anthropogenic impacts
The authors express their sincere gratitude to co-workers for helping with the sampling and Coaltech for providing funding for the project. The authors also thank the unknown referees for critically reviewing the manuscript and suggesting useful changes.
- American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF). (1992). In APHA, AWWA, and WPCF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th ed.). Washington, D.C..Google Scholar
- Castro-Roa, D., & Pinilla-Agudelo, G. (2014). Periphytic diatom index for assessing the ecological quality of the Colombian Andean urban wetlands of Bogotá. Limnetica, 33, 297–312.Google Scholar
- Environmental Mining Council of British Columbia (EMCBC). (2001). Acid mine drainage: mining and water pollution issues in British Columbia, www.miningwatch.org/emcbc/publications/amd-water.html.
- González, J. M., Mayer, F., Moran, M. A., Hodson, R. E., & Whitman, W. B. (1997). Microbulbifer hydrolyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., and Marinobacterium georgiense gen. nov., sp. nov., two marine bacteria from a lignin-rich pulp mill waste enrichment community. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 47, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gore, J. A. (2006). Discharge measurements and streamflow analysis. In F. R. Hauer & G. A. Lamberti (Eds.), Methods in stream ecology (pp. 51–81). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ligi, T., Oopkaup, K., Truu, M., Preem, J.-K., Nõlvak, H., Mitsch, W. J., Mander, Ü., & Truu, J. (2014). Characterization of bacterial communities in soil and sediment of a created riverine wetland complex using high-throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Ecological Engineering, 72, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Limpitlaw, D. (1996). Sediments as indicators of wetland efficacy in ameliorating acid mine drainage. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 97, 309–316.Google Scholar
- Macfarlane, D.M. (2013). Phase 1 – planning report: ‘Zaalklapspruit Wetland’ (B20G-01), working for wetlands rehabilitation programme, SANBI, Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. T. (1999). Environmental science: working with the earth (7th ed.). Wadsworth: Belmont.Google Scholar
- Miller, S. R., Strong, A. L., Jones, K. L., & Ungerer, M. C. (2009). Bar-coded pyrosequencing reveals shared bacterial community properties along the temperature gradients of two alkaline hot springs in Yellowstone National Park. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 4565–4572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munishi, P. K. T., Wilfred, N. N., Nshare, J. S., Moe, S. R., Shirma, D. D., & Kilungu, H. H. (2011). Valley bottom wetlands can serve for both biodiversity conservation and local livelihoods improvements. In Ecosystems Biodiversity, O. Grillo (pp. 219–232). Croatia: InTech.Google Scholar
- Ochieng, G. M., Seanego, E. S., & Nkwonta, O. I. (2010). Impacts of mining on water resources in South Africa: a review. Scientific Research and Essays, 5, 3351–3357.Google Scholar
- Oliveira, S. V., & Cortes, R. M. (2006). Environmental indicators of ecological integrity and their development for running waters in northern Portugal. Limnetica, 25, 479–498.Google Scholar
- Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., Sahl, J. W., Stres, B., Thallinger, G. G., van Horn, D. J., & Weber, C. F. (2009). Introducing mother: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75, 7537–7541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schloss, P. D., Gevers, D., & Westcott, S. L. (2011). Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One, 6, 1–14.Google Scholar
- Selala, M. C., Botha, A.-M., de Klerk, A. R., de Klerk, L. P., Myburgh, J. G., Bletter, M. C. M., & Oberholster, P. J. (2013). Effects of vegetable oil pollution on aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblage in a freshwater wetland and its use as a remediation tool. Water Air, & Soil Pollution, 224, 1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shelton, L. R. (1994). Field guide for collecting and processing stream-water samples for the National Water-Quality Assessment Program, US Geological Survey Open-File Rep, pages. 94–455.Google Scholar
- Singh, P. (2014). The assessment of sediment contamination in an acid mine drainage impacted river in Gauteng (South Africa) using three sediment bioassays in the at the. University of Johannesburg. https://ujcontent.uj.ac.za/vital/access/services/Download/uj:13667/CONTENT1. Access date 11 August 2018.
- Stevenson, R. J., & Bahls, L. L. (1999). Periphyton protocols. In M. T. Barbour, J. Gerritren, B. D. Snyder, & J. B. Stribling (Eds.), Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd ed (pp. 6–22). Washington DC: USA EPA 841-B-99-002.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y., Sheng, H. F., He, Y., Wu, J. Y., Jiang, Y. X., Tam, N. F. Y., & Zhou, H. W. (2012). Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in freshwater, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of Illumina tags. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78, 8264–8271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zdyb, L. (1999). Microbial sulphate reduction as a method of passive treatment of acid mine drainage using undefined carbon sources, MSc thesis, Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria.Google Scholar