Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 229:380 | Cite as

Photoperiod and Soil Munition Constituent Effects on Phytoaccumulation and Rhizosphere Interactions in Boreal Vegetation

  • Ryan R. BusbyEmail author
  • Robyn A. Barbato
  • Carina M. Jung
  • Kate A. Morozova
  • Anthony J. Bednar
  • Andrew L. Bray
  • Jenifer M. Milam
  • Jared C. Smith
  • Karl J. Indest
Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Permafrost thaw is expected to alter biogeochemistry and hydrology, potentially increasing the mobility of soil constituents. Northern latitude boreal forests where permafrost thaw is occurring also experience extreme changes in day length during the growing season. As the effects of photoperiod on plant uptake of soil constituents or interactions with the rhizosphere are unknown, our objective was to determine these interactions with three plant species from different functional groups. A tree, forb, and grass common to military training ranges in this region were grown in soil spiked with or without lead, antimony, or 2,4-dinitrotoluene and grown under 16, 20, or 24 h of light. Plant biomass, soil constituent uptake, and rhizosphere bacterial communities were compared between treatments. Photoperiod had no effect on plant uptake of any soil constituent or on rhizosphere community, indicating that plants and their associated microbial communities adapted to this environment are resilient to extremes in photoperiod. Lead uptake was not significant in any plant species and had no effect on the rhizosphere. Antimony increased the percentage composition of Saprospirales in the rhizospheres of two of the three plants, indicating an interaction between this bacterial order and antimony. Antimony uptake by white spruce (Picea glauca) was considerable, with a mean concentration of 1731 mg kg−1 in roots, while mean shoot concentration was only 155 mg kg−1, indicating its potential to phytostabilize this heavy metal. Although antimony had the strongest impact on the rhizosphere bacterial community, it was also readily accumulated by the grass and tree.

Keywords

Phytostabilization Rhizosphere Antimony Lead Picea Photoperiod Oxytropis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sarah Kania and Kristian Hopkins (University of Illinois) and Tom Douglas, Chris Hiemstra, and David Ringelberg (US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory) for their assistance in multiple aspects of this study.

Funding Information

This research was funded by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Environmental Quality Program.

References

  1. Adams, S. R., & Langton, F. A. (2005). Photoperiod and plant growth: a review. Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 80, 2–10.Google Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Ayusa, E., Otones, V., Murciego, A., García-Sánchez, A., & Santa Regina, I. (2013). Mobility and phytoavailability of antimony in an area impacted by a former stibnite mine exploitation. Science of the Total Environment, 449, 260–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakken, A. K. (1992). Effect of day length on the nitrogen status of timothy (Phleum pretense L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica B – Plant Soil Sciences, 42, 62–68.Google Scholar
  4. Benedict, H. M. (1940). Effect of day length and temperature on the flowering and growth of four species of grasses. Journal of Agricultural Research, 61, 661–671.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, G., & Smalla, K. (2009). Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 68, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenthal, M. J., & Harris, C. A. (1998). Effects of photoperiod and temperature on shoot, root and rhizome growth in three Lotus uliginosis Schkuhr populations. Annals of Botany, 81, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourgeau-Chavez, L. L., Alexander, M. E., Stocks, B. J., & Kasischke, E. S. (2000). Distribution of forest ecosystems and the role of fire in the North American boreal region. In E. S. Kasischke & B. J. Stocks (Eds.), Fire, climate change, and carbon cycling in the boreal Forest (pp. 111–131). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Walters, W. A., Berg-Lyons, D., Lozupone, C. A., Turnbaugh, P. J., Fierer, N., & Knight, R. (2011). Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 4516–4522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caporaso, J. G., Lauber, C. L., Walters, W. A., Berg-Lyons, D., Huntley, J., Fierer, N., Owens, S. M., Betley, J., Fraser, L., Bauer, M., Gormley, N., Gilbert, J. A., Smith, G., & Knight, R. (2012). Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME Journal, 6, 1621–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clausen, J. L., Scott, C., Mulherin, N., Bigl, S., Gooch, G., Douglas, T., Osgerby, I., & Palm, B. (2010). Adsorption/desorption of nitroglycerin and dinitrotoluene in Camp Edwards, Massachusetts soil. Hanover: U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory Report ERDC/CRREL TR-10-1.Google Scholar
  11. Ding, Z., Wu, J., You, A., Huang, B., & Cao, C. (2017). Effects of heavy metals on soil and microbial community structure and diversity in the rice (Oryza sativa L. subsp. Japonica, Food Crops Institute of Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences) rhizosphere. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 63, 75–83.Google Scholar
  12. Frey, K. E., & McClelland, J. W. (2009). Impacts of permafrost degradation on arctic river biogeochemistry. Hydrological Processes, 23, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hargreaves, S. K., Williams, R. J., & Hofmockel, K. S. (2015). Environmental filtering of microbial communities in agricultural soil shifts with crop growth. PLoS One, 10, e0134345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hay, R. K. M. (1990). The influence of photoperiod on the dry matter production of grasses and cereals. New Phytologist, 116, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jana, U., Chassany, V., Bertrand, G., Castrec-Rouelle, M., Aubry, E., Soudsocq, S., Laffray, D., & Repellin, A. (2012). Analysis of arsenic and antimony distribution with plants growing at an old mine site in Ouche (Cantal, France) and identification of species suitable for site revegetation. Journal of Environmental Management, 110, 188–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jenkins, T. F., Pennington, J. C., Ranney, T. A., Berry Jr., T. E., Miyares, P. H., Walsh, M. E., Hewitt, A. D., Perron, N. M., Parker, L. V., Hayes, C. A., & Wahlgren, E. G. (2001). Characterization of explosives contamination at military firing ranges. Vicksburg: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Report ERDC TR-01-05.Google Scholar
  17. King, A. J., Freeman, K. R., McCormick, K. F., Lynch, R. C., Lozupone, C., Knight, R., & Schmidt, S. K. (2010). Biogeography and habitat modelling of high-alpine bacteria. Nature Communications, 1, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuske, C. R., Ticknor, L. O., Miller, M. E., Dunbar, J. M., Davis, J. A., Barns, S. M., & Belnap, J. (2002). Comparison of soil bacterial communities in rhizospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 1854–1863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lafond, S., Blais, J.-F., Martel, R., & Mercier, G. (2013). Chemical leaching of antimony and other metals from small arms shooting range soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 224(1371).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1371-6.
  20. Langella, F., Grawunder, A., Stark, R., Weist, A., Merten, D., Haferburg, G., Büchel, G., & Kothe, E. (2014). Microbially assisted phytoremediation approaches for two-element contaminated sites. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21, 6845–6858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meeinkuirt, W., Kruatrachue, M., Tanhan, P., Chaiyarat, R., & Pokethitiyook, P. (2013). Phytostabilization potential of Pb mine tailings by two grass species, Thysanolaena maxima and Vetiveria zizanioides. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 224(1750).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1750-7.
  22. Mozafar, A., Schreiber, P., & Oertli, J. J. (1993). Photoperiod and root-zone temperature: interacting effects on growth and mineral nutrients of maize. Plant and Soil, 153, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Noda, Y., Furukawa, J., Aohara, T., Nihei, N., Hirose, A., Tanoi, K., Nakanishi, T. M., & Satoh, S. (2016). Short day length-induced decrease of cesium uptake without altering potassium uptake manner in poplar. Scientific Reports, 6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38360.
  24. O’Donnell, J. A., Jorgenson, M. T., Harden, J. W., McGuire, A. D., Kanevskiy, M. Z., & Wickland, K. P. (2012). The effects of permafrost thaw on soil hydrologic, thermal, and carbon dynamics in Alaskan peatland. Ecosystems, 15, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Olmsted, C. E. (1943). Growth and development in range grasses. III. Photoperiodic responses in the genus Bouteloua. Botanical Gazette, 105, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Opatrná, J., Ullmann, J., Pavlová, L., & Krekule, J. (1980). Changes in organ growth of Chenopodium rubrum due to suboptimal and multiple photoperiodic cycles with and without flowering effect. Biologia Plantarum, 22, 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pacwa-Plociniczak, M., Plociniczak, T., Yu, D., Kurola, J. M., Sinkkonen, A., Piotrowska-Seget, Z., & Romantschuk, M. (2018). Effect of Silene vulgaris and heavy metal pollution on soil microbial diversity in long-term contaminated soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 229(13).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3655-3.
  28. Phelan, J.M., & Barnett, J.L. (2001). Solubility of 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene in water. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, 46, 375–376.Google Scholar
  29. Podlipná, R., Pospíšilová, B., & Vaněk, T. (2015). Biodegration of 2,4-dinitrotoluene by different plant species. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 112, 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Proebsting, W. M., & Chaplin, M. H. (1981). The effect of photoperiod-induced flowering on the nutrient content of pea shoots. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 4, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rocheleau, S., Kuperman, R. G., Simini, M., Hawari, J., Checkai, R. T., Thiboutot, S., Ampleman, G., & Sunahara, G. I. (2010). Toxicity of 2,4-dinitrotoluene to terrestrial plants in natural soils. Science of the Total Environment, 408, 3193–3199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rossi, S., Deslauriers, A., Anfodillo, T., Morin, H., Saracino, A., Motta, R., & Borghetti, M. (2006). Conifers in cold environments synchronize maximum growth rate of tree-ring formation with day length. New Phytologist, 170, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheridan, C., Depuydt, P., De Ro, M., Petit, C., Van Gysegem, E., Delaere, P., Dixon, M., Stasiak, M., Aciksöz, S. B., Frossard, E., & Paradiso, R. (2017). Microbial community dynamics and response to plant growth-promoting microorganisms in the rhizosphere of four common food crops cultivated in hydroponics. Microbial Ecology, 73, 378–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh, N., Berns, A. E., Hennecke, D., Hoerner, J., Koerdel, W., & Schaeffer, A. (2010). Effect of soil organic matter chemistry on sorption of trinitrotoluene and 2,4-dinitrotoluene. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang, Y.-T., Qiu, R.-L., Zeng, X.-W., Ying, R.-R., Yu, F.-M., & Zhou, X.-Y. (2009). Lead, zinc, cadmium hyperaccumulation and growth stimulation in Arabis paniculata Franch. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 66, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, Q., He, M., & Wang, Y. (2011). Influence of combined pollution of antimony and arsenic on culturable soil microbial populations and enzyme activities. Ecotoxicology, 20, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, S. C., Leech, C. D., Butler, L., Lisle, L., Ashley, P. M., & Lockwood, P. V. (2013). Effects of nutrient and lime additions in mine site rehabilitation strategies on the accumulation of antimony and arsenic by native Australian plants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 261, 801–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yoon, J. M., Oliver, D. J., & Shanks, J. V. (2006). Phytotransformation of 2,4-dinitrotoluene in Arabidopsis thaliana: toxicity, fate, and gene expression studies in vitro. Biotechnology Progress, 22, 1524–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan R. Busby
    • 1
    Email author return OK on get
  • Robyn A. Barbato
    • 2
  • Carina M. Jung
    • 3
  • Kate A. Morozova
    • 1
  • Anthony J. Bednar
    • 3
  • Andrew L. Bray
    • 3
  • Jenifer M. Milam
    • 3
  • Jared C. Smith
    • 3
  • Karl J. Indest
    • 3
  1. 1.US Army Construction Engineering Research LaboratoryChampaignUSA
  2. 2.US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryHanoverUSA
  3. 3.US Army Environmental LaboratoryVicksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations