Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 229:347 | Cite as

Determination of Kinetic, Isotherm, and Thermodynamic Parameters of the Methamidophos Adsorption onto Cationic Surfactant-Modified Zeolitic Materials

  • S. Alvarez-García
  • J. J. Ramírez-GarcíaEmail author
  • F. Granados-Correa
  • J. C. Sánchez-Meza
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, a natural clinoptilolite was conditioned with NaCl solution and subsequently modified with different cationic hexadecyltrimethylammonium surfactant concentrations for methamidophos removal. The surfactant-modified zeolitic material with maximum methamidophos adsorption capacity was chosen, and the effect of several parameters such as contact time and initial pesticide concentration were performed by batch system. Other parameters such as the effect of adsorbent dosage, pH, and temperature were also evaluated. Natural, NaCl-conditioned, and the best surfactant-modified zeolitic materials were systematically characterized by several analytic techniques such as scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and BET-specific surface area by N2 physisorption measurements. The zero point charge was also determined in each studied zeolitic material. Derived results showed a maximum methamidophos adsorption of 1.385 mg/g onto zeolitic material surfactant-modified with 25 mmol/L at 20 °C. The experimental adsorption kinetics and isotherms data were well adjusted with pseudo-second order and Langmuir isotherm models in its not linearized form, respectively. The amount of adsorbent and pH in the surfactant-modified zeolitic material influences the pesticide adsorption capacity. Thermodynamic parameters indicated that methamidophos adsorption on surfactant-modified zeolitic material at 25 mmol/L was an exothermic in nature process, not spontaneous, and with decreased randomness. The obtained results in the present research contribute as study of methamidophos adsorption behavior with zeolitic materials application as an alternative removal method for organophosphates pesticides.

Keywords

Zeolitic materials Adsorption Methamidophos Kinetics Isotherms Thermodynamic parameters 

Notes

Funding Information

The authors acknowledge financial support from CONACYT (Project 215997), Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, and CONACYT scholar Grant No. 364190 for Sonia Alvarez García.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, T., Rafatullah, M., Ghazali, A., Sulaiman, O., Hashim, R., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Removal of pesticides from water and wastewater by different adsorbents: a review. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part C Environmental Carcinogenesis and Ecotoxicology Reviews, 28(4), 231–271.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2010.525782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bellú, S., Sala, L., González, J., García, S., & Frascaroli, M. (2010). Thermodynamic and dynamic of chromium biosorption by pectic and lignocellulocic biowastes. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2(10), 888–897.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.210106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caloni, F., Cortinovis, C., Rivolta, M., & Davanzo, F. (2016). Suspected poisoning of domestic animals by pesticides. Science of the Total Environment, 539, 331–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carbajal-López, Y., Gómez-Arroyo, S., Villalobos-Pietrini, R., Calderón-Segura, M. E., & Martínez-Arroyo, A. (2016). Biomonitoring of agricultural workers exposed to pesticide mixtures in Guerrero state, Mexico, with comet assay and micronucleus test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(3), 2513–2520.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5474-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castillo-Cadena, J., Tenorio-Vieyra, L. E., Quintana-Carabia, A. I., García-Fabila, M. M., Ramírez-San Juan, E., & Madrigal-Bujaidar, E. (2006). Determination of DNA damage in floriculturists exposed to mixtures of pesticides. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology.  https://doi.org/10.1155/JBB/2006/97896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai, K., Peng, T., Chen, H., Zhang, R., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Photocatalytic degradation and mineralization of commercial methamidophos in aqueous titania suspension. Environmental Science and Technology, 42(5), 1505–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es702268p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dávila-Estrada, M., Ramírez-García, J. J., Díaz-Nava, M. C., & Solache-Ríos, M. (2016). Sorption of 17α-ethinylestradiol by surfactant-modified zeolite-rich tuff from aqueous solutions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2850-y.
  8. Dávila-Estrada, M., Ramírez-García, J. J., Solache-Ríos, M. J., & Gallegos-Pérez, J. L. (2018). Kinetic and equilibrium sorption studies of ceftriaxone and paracetamol by surfactant-modified zeolite. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 229(4).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3783-4.
  9. Durán-Lara, E. F., Ávila-Salas, F., Galaz, S., John, A., Maricán, A., Gutiérrez, M., et al. (2015). Nano-detoxification of organophosphate agents by PAMAM derivatives. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 26(3), 580–591.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20150013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutta, A., & Singh, N. (2015). Surfactant-modified bentonite clays: preparation, characterization, and atrazine removal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(5), 3876–3885.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3656-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fenik, J., Tankiewicz, M., & Biziuk, M. (2011). Properties and determination of pesticides in fruits and vegetables. TrAC - Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 30(6), 814–826.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2011.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiedler, N., Rohitrattana, J., Siriwong, W., Suttiwan, P., Ohman Strickland, P., Ryan, P. B., et al. (2015). Neurobehavioral effects of exposure to organophosphates and pyrethroid pesticides among Thai children. NeuroToxicology, 48, 90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2015.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu, J., Chen, Z., Wang, M., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2015). Adsorption of methylene blue by a high-efficiency adsorbent (polydopamine microspheres): kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamics and mechanism analysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 259, 53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukahori, S., Fujiwara, T., Ito, R., & Funamizu, N. (2011). PH-dependent adsorption of sulfa drugs on high silica zeolite: Modeling and kinetic study. Desalination.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghosal, P. S., & Gupta, A. K. (2017). Determination of thermodynamic parameters from Langmuir isotherm constant-revisited. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 225, 137–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.11.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González-Alzaga, B., Hernández, A. F., Rodríguez-Barranco, M., Gómez, I., Aguilar-Garduño, C., López-Flores, I., et al. (2015). Pre- and postnatal exposures to pesticides and neurodevelopmental effects in children living in agricultural communities from south-eastern Spain. Environment International.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grundgeiger, E., Lim, Y. H., Frost, R. L., Ayoko, G. A., & Xi, Y. (2015). Application of organo-beidellites for the adsorption of atrazine. Applied Clay Science, 105–106, 252–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashemian, S., Ardakani, M. K., & Salehifar, H. (2013). Kinetics and thermodynamics of adsorption methylene blue onto tea waste/CuFe2O4 composite. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 4(7), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajac.2013.47A001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho, Y. S., & McKay, G. (1999). Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 34(5), 451–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hommaid, O., & Hamdo, J. Y. (2014). Adsorption of chromium (VI) from an aqueous solution on a Syrian surfactant-modified zeolite. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 6(7), 3753–3761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. José Conceição Lima, F. D. A., Roberto Brasil Oliveira Marques, P. D. E., Silva Nunes, G., & Maria Carvalho Neiva Tanaka, S. (2001). INseticida organofosforado metamidofós: aspectos toxicológicos e analíticos. Pesticidas: R.Ecotoxicol. e Meio Ambiente, 11, 17–34.Google Scholar
  22. Jusoh, A., Hartini, W. J. H., Ali, N., & Endut, A. (2011). Study on the removal of pesticide in agricultural run off by granular activated carbon. Bioresource Technology, 102(9), 5312–5318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan, D. A., Bhatti, M. M., Khan, F. A., & Naqvi, S. T. (2008). Adverse effects of pesticides residues on biochemical markers in Pakistani tobacco farmers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 1, 274–282 www.ijcem.com/IJCEM806001.Google Scholar
  24. Koleli, N., Demir, A., Arslan, H., & Kantar, C. (2007). Sorption behavior of methamidophos in a heterogeneous alluvial soil profile. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langmuir, I. (1917). The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. II. Liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 39(9), 1848–1906.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02254a006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, Z., Yuansheng, D., & Hanlie, H. (2008). Transport of micelles of cationic surfactants through clinoptilolite zeolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lo, C.-C. (2010). Effect of pesticides on soil microbial community. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B, 45(5), 348–359.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601231003799804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Low, M. J. D. (1960). Kinetics of chemisorption of gases on solids. Chemical Reviews, 60(3), 267–312.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60205a003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lukaszewicz-Hussain, A. (2010). Role of oxidative stress in organophosphate insecticide toxicity - short review. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mbarki, F., & Kesraoui, A. (2018). Kinetic, thermodynamic, and adsorption behavior of cationic and anionic dyes onto corn stigmata : nonlinear and stochastic analyses.Google Scholar
  31. Misaelides, P. (2011). Application of natural zeolites in environmental remediation: a short review. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 144(1–3), 15–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitrogiannis, D., Markou, G., Çelekli, A., & Bozkurt, H. (2015). Biosorption of methylene blue onto Arthrospira platensis biomass: Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 3(2), 670–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.02.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monroy-Noyola, A., Sogorb, M. A., & Vilanova, E. (2007). Stereospecific hydrolysis of a phosphoramidate as a model to understand the role of biotransformation in the neurotoxicity of chiral organophosphorus compounds. Toxicology Letters.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mozgawa, W., Król, M., & Bajda, T. (2011). IR spectra in the studies of anion sorption on natural sorbents. Journal of Molecular Structure.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.11.070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakhli, S. A. A., Delkash, M., Bakhshayesh, B. E., & Kazemian, H. (2017). Application of zeolites for sustainable agriculture: a review on water and nutrient retention. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3649-1.
  36. Phugare, S. S., Gaikwad, Y. B., & Jadhav, J. P. (2012). Biodegradation of acephate using a developed bacterial consortium and toxicological analysis using earthworms (Lumbricus terrestris) as a model animal. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 69, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.11.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramu, S., & Seetharaman, B. (2014). Biodegradation of acephate and methamidophos by a soil bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain Is-6. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 49(1), 23–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2013.836868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasouli, M., Yaghobi, N., Chitsazan, S., & Sayyar, M. H. (2012). Influence of monovalent cations ion-exchange on zeolite ZSM-5 in separation of para-xylene from xylene mixture. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reeve, P. J., & Fallowfield, H. J. (2018). Natural and surfactant modified zeolites: a review of their applications for water remediation with a focus on surfactant desorption and toxicity towards microorganisms. Journal of Environmental Management, 205, 253–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rojas-Pavón, C. X., Olguín, M. T., Jiménez-Cedillo, M. J., Maubert, A. M., & México, D. F. (2015). Sorption properties of modified clinoptilolite-and mordenite-rich tuffs for manganese removal from aqueous systems. Research and Reviews in Materials Science and Chemistry, 5(1), 29–61.Google Scholar
  41. Roxana Elena Apreutesei, C. C., & Teodosiu, C. (2008). Surfactant-modified natural zeolites for environmental applications in water purification. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 7(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruiz-Serrano, D., Flores-Acosta, M., Conde-Barajas, E., Ramírez-Rosales, D., Yáñez-Limón, J. M., & Ramírez-Bon, R. (2010). Study by XPS of different conditioning processes to improve the cation exchange in clinoptilolite. Journal of Molecular Structure.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salvestrini, S., Leone, V., Iovino, P., Canzano, S., & Capasso, S. (2014). Considerations about the correct evaluation of sorption thermodynamic parameters from equilibrium isotherms. Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 68, 310–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2013.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shah, J., Jan, M. R., Muhammad, M., Ara, B., & Ur Rehman, I. (2015). Development of an indirect spectrophotometric method for determination of methamidophos insecticide in soil, water and vegetable samples. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Ethiopia.  https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v29i2.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tran, H. N., You, S. J., & Chao, H. P. (2016). Thermodynamic parameters of cadmium adsorption onto orange peel calculated from various methods: a comparison study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3), 2671–2682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turiel, E., Perez-Conde, C., & Martin-Esteban, A. (2003). Assessment of the cross-reactivity and binding sites characterisation of a propazine-imprinted polymer using the Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm. Analyst, 128(2), 137–141.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b210712k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, L., Wen, Y., Guo, X., Wang, G., Li, S., & Jiang, J. (2010). Degradation of methamidophos by Hyphomicrobium species MAP-1 and the biochemical degradation pathway. Biodegradation, 21(4), 513–523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-009-9320-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang, H. Y., Huang, H. F., & Jiang, J. Q. (2011). The effect of metal cations on phenol adsorption by hexadecyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (hdtma) modified clinoptilolite (Ct.). Separation and Purification Technology, 80(3), 658–662.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.06.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wei, L., Shifu, C., Wei, Z., & Sujuan, Z. (2009). Titanium dioxide mediated photocatalytic degradation of methamidophos in aqueous phase. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164(1), 154–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu, Y., & Zhou, Q. X. (2005). Adsorption characteristics of pesticides methamidophos and glyphosate by two soils. Chemosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.08.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, L., Yan, F., Wang, Y., Guo, X., & Zhang, P. (2006). Photocatalytic degradation of methamidophos by UV irradiation in the presence of nano-TiO2. Inorganic Materials, 42(12), 1379–1387.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S002016850612017X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang, L., Yan, F., Shu, M., Li, Q., & Zhao, Z. Y. (2009a). Investigation of the degradation behaviour of methamidophos under microwave irradiation. Desalination, 247(1–3), 396–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang, L., Yan, F., Su, M., Han, G., & Kang, P. (2009b). A study on the degradation of methamidophos in the presence of nano-TiO2 catalyst doped with Re. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, 54(8), 1210–1216.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023609080075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de QuímicaUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico
  2. 2.Departamento de QuímicaInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones NuclearesCiudad de MéxicoMexico
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Análisis Instrumental, Facultad de QuímicaUAEM, Paseo TollocanTolucaMéxico

Personalised recommendations