Advertisement

Activated Biochar as an Effective Sorbent for Organic and Inorganic Contaminants in Water

  • Flavia Lega Braghiroli
  • Hassine Bouafif
  • Carmen Mihaela Neculita
  • Ahmed Koubaa
Article

Abstract

Adsorption is acknowledged as effective for the removal of pollutants from drinking water and wastewater. Biochar, as a widely available material, holds promises for pollutant adsorption. So far, biochar has been found to be effective for multiple purposes, including carbon sequestration, nutrient storage, and water-holding capacity. However, its limited porosity restricts its use in water treatment. Activation of biochars, when performed at a high temperature (i.e., 900 °C) and in the presence of certain chemicals (H3PO4, KOH) and/or gases (CO2, steam), improves the development of porosity through the selective gasification of carbon atoms. Physicochemical activation process is appropriate for the production of highly porous materials. As well, the morphological and chemical structure of feedstock together with pyro-gasification operating conditions for the biochar production can greatly impact the porosity of the final materials. The effectiveness of activated biochar as adsorbent depends on porosity and on some functional groups connected to its structure, both of these are developed during activation. This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the effect of several activated biochars when applied to the treatment of organic and inorganic contaminants in water. Results show that high aromaticity and porosity are essential for the sorption of organic contaminants, while the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups and optimum pH are crucial for the sorption of inorganic contaminants, especially metals. Finally, although activated biochar is a promising option for the treatment of contaminants in water, further research is required to evaluate its performance with real effluents containing contaminants of emerging concern.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biomass waste Biochar Activation Adsorption Water treatment Organic and inorganic contaminants 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Québec’s Ministry of Economy, Science, and Innovation (Ministère de l’Économie, de la Science et de l’Innovation du Québec), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the Canada Research Chair Program, Abitibi-Témiscamingue College, and the Technology Center for Industrial Waste (Centre Technologique des Résidus Industriels) through its partner on this project, Airex Energy.

Funding

The first author, Dr. Flavia Lega Braghiroli, sincerely acknowledges financial support by the NSERC via a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship (2017–2019).

References

  1. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., et al. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Degs, Y. S., Khraisheh, M. A. M., Allen, S. J., & Ahmad, M. N. (2009). Adsorption characteristics of reactive dyes in columns of activated carbon. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165(1–3), 944–949.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anastopoulos, I., & Kyzas, G. Z. (2015). Composts as biosorbents for decontamination of various pollutants: a review. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 226(3).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2345-2.
  4. Angın, D., Köse, T. E., & Selengil, U. (2013). Production and characterization of activated carbon prepared from safflower seed cake biochar and its ability to absorb reactive dyestuff. Applied Surface Science, 280, 705–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armandi, M., Bonelli, B., Geobaldo, F., & Garrone, E. (2010). Nanoporous carbon materials obtained by sucrose carbonization in the presence of KOH. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 132(3), 414–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babel, S., & Kurniawan, T. A. (2003). Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 97(1–3), 219–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00263-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baçaoui, A., Yaacoubi, A., Dahbi, A., Bennouna, C., Ayele, J., & Mazet, M. (1998). Activated carbon production from Moroccan olive wastes—influence of some factors. Environmental Technology, 19(12), 1203–1212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331908616780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, S., LaminKa-ot, A., Joshi, S. R., Mandal, T., & Halder, G. (2016). Biosorptive uptake of Fe2+, Cu2+ and As5+ by activated biochar derived from Colocasia esculenta: isotherm, kinetics, thermodynamics, and cost estimation. Journal of Advanced Research, 7(5), 597–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bouchelta, C., Medjram, M. S., Zoubida, M., Chekkat, F. A., Ramdane, N., & Bellat, J.-P. (2012). Effects of pyrolysis conditions on the porous structure development of date pits activated carbon. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 94, 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2011.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boving, T. B., & Zhang, W. (2004). Removal of aqueous-phase polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons using aspen wood fibers. Chemosphere, 54(7), 831–839.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calo, J. M., & Perkins, M. T. (1987). A heterogeneous surface model for the “steady-state” kinetics of the boudouard reaction. Carbon, 25(3), 395–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(87)90011-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calugaru, I. L., Neculita, C. M., Genty, T., & Zagury, G. J. (2018). Metals and metalloids treatment in contaminated neutral effluents using modified materials. Journal of Environmental Management, 212, 142–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charumathi, D., & Das, N. (2012). Packed bed column studies for the removal of synthetic dyes from textile wastewater using immobilised dead C. tropicalis. Desalination, 285, 22–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiavola, A., D’Amato, E., & Baciocchi, R. (2012). Ion exchange treatment of groundwater contaminated by arsenic in the presence of sulphate. Breakthrough experiments and modeling. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(5), 2373–2386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-1031-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dąbrowski, A., Podkościelny, P., Hubicki, Z., & Barczak, M. (2005). Adsorption of phenolic compounds by activated carbon—a critical review. Chemosphere, 58(8), 1049–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Demirbas, A. (2009). Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167, 1–3), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.12.114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dialynas, E., & Diamadopoulos, E. (2009). Integration of a membrane bioreactor coupled with reverse osmosis for advanced treatment of municipal wastewater. Desalination, 238(1–3), 302–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.01.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ding, Z., Hu, X., Wan, Y., Wang, S., & Gao, B. (2016). Removal of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel from aqueous solutions by alkali-modified biochar: batch and column tests. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 33, 239–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dufour, A. (2016). Thermochemical conversion of biomass for energy and chemical production. Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. El-Hendawy, A.-N. A., Samra, S. E., & Girgis, B. S. (2001). Adsorption characteristics of activated carbons obtained from corncobs. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 180(3), 209–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00682-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fairbairn, D. J., Arnold, W. A., Barber, B. L., Kaufenberg, E. F., Koskinen, W. C., Novak, P. J., et al. (2016). Contaminants of emerging concern: mass balance and comparison of wastewater effluent and upstream sources in a mixed-use watershed. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(1), 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gaspard, S., & Ncibi, M. C. (2013). Biomass for sustainable applications: pollution remediation and energy. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghosh, P., Samanta, A. N., & Ray, S. (2011). Reduction of COD and removal of Zn2+ from rayon industry wastewater by combined electro-Fenton treatment and chemical precipitation. Desalination, 266(1–3), 213–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Girgis, B. S., Soliman, A. M., & Fathy, N. A. (2011). Development of micro-mesoporous carbons from several seed hulls under varying conditions of activation. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 142(2–3), 518–525.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. González-García, P. (2018). Activated carbon from lignocellulosics precursors: a review of the synthesis methods, characterization techniques and applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(1), 1393–1414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B., & Moulin, P. (2009). Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Research, 43(9), 2317–2348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo, Y., Yang, S., Yu, K., Zhao, J., Wang, Z., & Xu, H. (2002). The preparation and mechanism studies of rice husk based porous carbon. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 74(3), 320–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00473-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta, V. K., Srivastava, S. K., Mohan, D., & Sharma, S. (1998). Design parameters for fixed bed reactors of activated carbon developed from fertilizer waste for the removal of some heavy metal ions. Waste Management, 17(8), 517–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(97)10062-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haghseresht, F., Nouri, S., Finnerty, J. J., & Lu, G. Q. (2002). Effects of surface chemistry on aromatic compound adsorption from dilute aqueous solutions by activated carbon. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 106(42), 10935–10943.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp025522a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hameed, B. H., & Rahman, A. A. (2008). Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from biomass material. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 160(2–3), 576–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hamid, S. B. A., Chowdhury, Z. Z., & Zain, S. M. (2014). Base catalytic approach: a promising technique for the activation of biochar for equilibrium sorption studies of copper, Cu(II) ions in single solute system. Materials, 7(4), 2815–2832.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7042815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Han, R., Wang, Y., Yu, W., Zou, W., Shi, J., & Liu, H. (2007). Biosorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by rice husk in a fixed-bed column. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141(3), 713–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hasan, Z., & Jhung, S. H. (2015). Removal of hazardous organics from water using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): plausible mechanisms for selective adsorptions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 283, 329–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.09.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Health Canada. (2017). Guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality. Summary Table (pp. 9, 12). Ottawa, Canada. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/hc-sc/migration/hc-sc/ewh-semt/alt_formats/pdf/pubs/water-eau/sum_guide-res_recom/sum_guide-res_recom-eng.pdf.
  35. Hove, M., van Hille, R. P., & Lewis, A. E. (2007). Iron solids formed from oxidation precipitation of ferrous sulfate solutions. AICHE Journal, 53(10), 2569–2577.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IBI. (2012). International Biochar Initiative. http://www.biochar-international.org/. Accessed 21 Jan 2018.
  37. Iriarte-Velasco, U., Sierra, I., Zudaire, L., & Ayastuy, J. L. (2016). Preparation of a porous biochar from the acid activation of pork bones. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 98, 341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2016.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jang, H. M., Yoo, S., Choi, Y.-K., Park, S., & Kan, E. (2018). Adsorption isotherm, kinetic modeling and mechanism of tetracycline on Pinus taeda-derived activated biochar. Bioresource Technology, 259, 24–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jung, S.-H., & Kim, J.-S. (2014). Production of biochars by intermediate pyrolysis and activated carbons from oak by three activation methods using CO2. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 107, 116–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jung, C., Park, J., Lim, K. H., Park, S., Heo, J., Her, N., et al. (2013). Adsorption of selected endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals on activated biochars. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 263(Part 2), 702–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.10.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jung, C., Boateng, L. K., Flora, J. R. V., Oh, J., Braswell, M. C., Son, A., & Yoon, Y. (2015a). Competitive adsorption of selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on activated biochars: experimental and molecular modeling study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 264, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jung, C., Phal, N., Oh, J., Chu, K. H., Jang, M., & Yoon, Y. (2015b). Removal of humic and tannic acids by adsorption–coagulation combined systems with activated biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 300, 808–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Karunarathne, H. D. S. S., & Amarasinghe, B. M. W. P. K. (2013). Fixed bed adsorption column studies for the removal of aqueous phenol from activated carbon prepared from sugarcane bagasse. 10th Eco-Energy and Materials Science and Engineering Symposium, 34, 83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.736.
  44. Katsou, E., Malamis, S., Kosanovic, T., Souma, K., & Haralambous, K. J. (2012). Application of adsorption and ultrafiltration processes for the pre-treatment of several industrial wastewater streams. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(9), 5519–5534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1255-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, X. Z., Zhao, Q. L., & Hao, X. D. (1999). Ammonium removal from landfill leachate by chemical precipitation. Waste Management, 19(6), 409–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(99)00148-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li, W., Zhang, L., Peng, J., Li, N., & Zhu, X. (2008). Preparation of high surface area activated carbons from tobacco stems with K2CO3 activation using microwave radiation. Industrial Crops and Products, 27(3), 341–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li, W.-B., Song, Y.-B., Xu, H.-K., Chen, L.-Y., Dai, W.-H., & Dong, M. (2015). Ion-exchange method in the collection of nitrate from freshwater ecosystems for nitrogen and oxygen isotope analysis: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(13), 9575–9588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4522-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lima, I. M., Boateng, A. A., & Klasson, K. T. (2010). Physicochemical and adsorptive properties of fast-pyrolysis bio-chars and their steam activated counterparts. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 85, 1515–1521.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lima, I. M., Boykin, D. L., Thomas Klasson, K., & Uchimiya, M. (2014). Influence of post-treatment strategies on the properties of activated chars from broiler manure. Chemosphere, 95, 96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu, W.-J., Jiang, H., & Yu, H.-Q. (2015). Development of biochar-based functional materials: toward a sustainable platform carbon material. Chemical Reviews, 115(22), 12251–12285.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lozano-Castelló, D., Calo, J. M., Cazorla-Amorós, D., & Linares-Solano, A. (2007). Carbon activation with KOH as explored by temperature programmed techniques, and the effects of hydrogen. Carbon, 45(13), 2529–2536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Malik, P. K. (2003). Use of activated carbons prepared from sawdust and rice-husk for adsorption of acid dyes: a case study of acid yellow 36. Dyes and Pigments, 56(3), 239–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(02)00159-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mandal, S., Sarkar, B., Igalavithana, A. D., Ok, Y. S., Yang, X., Lombi, E., & Bolan, N. (2017). Mechanistic insights of 2,4-D sorption onto biochar: Influence of feedstock materials and biochar properties. Bioresource Technology, 246, 160–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Marsh, H., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2006). Activated carbon (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  55. Martínez-Huitle, C. A., & Ferro, S. (2006). Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes. Chemical Society Reviews, 35(12), 1324–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B517632H.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mohan, D., & Pittman Jr., C. U. (2006). Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137(2), 762–811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mondal, S., Aikat, K., & Halder, G. (2016a). Ranitidine hydrochloride sorption onto superheated steam activated biochar derived from mung bean husk in fixed bed column. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(1), 488–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mondal, S., Bobde, K., Aikat, K., & Halder, G. (2016b). Biosorptive uptake of ibuprofen by steam activated biochar derived from mung bean husk: equilibrium, kinetics, thermodynamics, modeling and eco-toxicological studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 581–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moreno-Castilla, C. (2004). Adsorption of organic molecules from aqueous solutions on carbon materials. Carbon, 42(1), 83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2003.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moriwaki, H., Yamada, K., & Usami, H. (2017). Electrochemical extraction of gold from wastes as nanoparticles stabilized by phospholipids. Waste Management, 60, 591–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oh, G. H., & Park, C. R. (2002). Preparation and characteristics of rice-straw-based porous carbons with high adsorption capacity. Fuel, 81(3), 327–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00171-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ozoemena, K. I., & Chen, S. (Eds.). (2016). Nanomaterials in advanced batteries and supercapacitors. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Panday, K. K., Prasad, G., & Singh, V. N. (1985). Copper(II) removal from aqueous solutions by fly ash. Water Research, 19(7), 869–873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(85)90145-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pandey, A., Bhaskar, T., Stöcker, M., & Sukumaran, R. (Eds.). (2015). Recent Advances in Thermochemical Conversion of Biomass (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  65. Park, J., Hung, I., Gan, Z., Rojas, O. J., Lim, K. H., & Park, S. (2013). Activated carbon from biochar: Influence of its physicochemical properties on the sorption characteristics of phenanthrene. Bioresource Technology, 149, 383–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Park, C. M., Han, J., Chu, K. H., Al-Hamadani, Y. A. J., Her, N., Heo, J., & Yoon, Y. (2017). Influence of solution pH, ionic strength, and humic acid on cadmium adsorption onto activated biochar: experiment and modeling. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 48, 186–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.12.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peng, H., Gao, P., Chu, G., Pan, B., Peng, J., & Xing, B. (2017). Enhanced adsorption of Cu(II) and Cd(II) by phosphoric acid-modified biochars. Environmental Pollution, 229, 846–853.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Petrie, B., Barden, R., & Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. (2015). A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Occurrence, fate, removal and assessment of emerging contaminants in water in the water cycle (from wastewater to drinking water), 72, 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053.
  69. Rafatullah, M., Sulaiman, O., Hashim, R., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177(1–3), 70–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rajapaksha, A. U., Vithanage, M., Ahmad, M., Seo, D.-C., Cho, J.-S., Lee, S.-E., et al. (2015). Enhanced sulfamethazine removal by steam-activated invasive plant-derived biochar. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 290, 43–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rakotonimaro, T. V., Neculita, C. M., Bussière, B., Benzaazoua, M., & Zagury, G. J. (2017). Recovery and reuse of sludge from active and passive treatment of mine drainage-impacted waters: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(1), 73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7733-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rambabu, N., Rao, B. V. S. K., Surisetty, V. R., Das, U., & Dalai, A. K. (2015). Production, characterization, and evaluation of activated carbons from de-oiled canola meal for environmental applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 65, 572–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rengaraj, S., Moon, S.-H., Sivabalan, R., Arabindoo, B., & Murugesan, V. (2002). Agricultural solid waste for the removal of organics: adsorption of phenol from water and wastewater by palm seed coat activated carbon. Waste Management, 22(5), 543–548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(01)00016-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rostamian, R., Heidarpour, M., Mousavi, S. F., & Afyuni, M. (2015). Characterization and sodium sorption capacity of biochar and activated carbon prepared from rice husk. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 17(4), 1057–1069.Google Scholar
  75. Rubio, J., Souza, M. L., & Smith, R. W. (2002). Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique. Minerals Engineering, 15(3), 139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(01)00216-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sadaf, S., & Bhatti, H. N. (2014). Batch and fixed bed column studies for the removal of indosol yellow BG dye by peanut husk. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 45(2), 541–553.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Saikia, R., Goswami, R., Bordoloi, N., Senapati, K. K., Pant, K. K., Kumar, M., & Kataki, R. (2017). Removal of arsenic and fluoride from aqueous solution by biomass based activated biochar: optimization through response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(6), 5528–5539.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.10.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sancho, J. L. S., Rodríguez, A. R., Torrellas, S. Á., & Rodríguez, J. G. (2012). Removal of an emerging pharmaceutical compound by adsorption in fixed bed column. Desalination and Water Treatment, 45(1–3), 305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.692062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sauvé, S., & Desrosiers, M. (2014). A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chemistry Central Journal, 8(1), 15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-153X-8-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shim, T., Yoo, J., Ryu, C., Park, Y.-K., & Jung, J. (2015). Effect of steam activation of biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus on copper sorption and toxicity. Bioresource Technology, 197, 85–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sözen, S., Teksoy Başaran, S., Akarsubaşı, A., Ergal, I., Insel, G., Karaca, C., & Orhon, D. (2016). Toward a novel membrane process for organic carbon removal—fate of slowly biodegradable substrate in super fast membrane bioreactor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16230–16240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6795-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sudilovskiy, P. S., Kagramanov, G. G., & Kolesnikov, V. A. (2008). Use of RO and NF for treatment of copper containing wastewaters in combination with flotation. Desalination, 221(1–3), 192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sumalinog, D. A. G., Capareda, S. C., & de Luna, M. D. G. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness and mechanisms of acetaminophen and methylene blue dye adsorption on activated biochar derived from municipal solid wastes. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 255–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Takaya, C. A., Fletcher, L. A., Singh, S., Okwuosa, U. C., & Ross, A. B. (2016). Recovery of phosphate with chemically modified biochars. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(1), 1156–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.01.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tan, G., Sun, W., Xu, Y., Wang, H., & Xu, N. (2016). Sorption of mercury (II) and atrazine by biochar, modified biochars and biochar based activated carbon in aqueous solution. Bioresource Technology, 211, 727–735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tan, X., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Gu, Y., Zeng, G., Hu, X., et al. (2017). Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresource Technology, 227, 359–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Uchimiya, M., Wartelle, L. H., Lima, I. M., & Klasson, K. T. (2010). Sorption of deisopropylatrazine on broiler litter biochars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(23), 12350–12356.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102152q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Unuabonah, E. I., Olu-Owolabi, B. I., Fasuyi, E. I., & Adebowale, K. O. (2010). Modeling of fixed-bed column studies for the adsorption of cadmium onto novel polymer–clay composite adsorbent. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179(1), 415–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vaneeckhaute, C., Meers, E., Michels, E., Christiaens, P., & Tack, F. M. G. (2012). Fate of macronutrients in water treatment of digestate using vibrating reversed osmosis. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 223(4), 1593–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0967-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Verma, A. K., Dash, R. R., & Bhunia, P. (2012). A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. Journal of Environmental Management, 93(1), 154–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang, F., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Bu, F., & Shen, X. (2017). Effects of ozonation, powdered activated carbon adsorption, and coagulation on the removal of disinfection by-product precursors in reservoir water. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21), 17945–17954.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9451-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Westholm, L. J., Repo, E., & Sillanpää, M. (2014). Filter materials for metal removal from mine drainage—A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 21(15), 9109–9128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2903-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wu, F.-C., & Tseng, R.-L. (2006). Preparation of highly porous carbon from fir wood by KOH etching and CO2 gasification for adsorption of dyes and phenols from water. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 294(1), 21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.06.084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Xia, D., Tan, F., Zhang, C., Jiang, X., Chen, Z., Li, H., et al. (2016). ZnCl2-activated biochar from biogas residue facilitates aqueous As(III) removal. Applied Surface Science, 377, 361–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flavia Lega Braghiroli
    • 1
  • Hassine Bouafif
    • 2
  • Carmen Mihaela Neculita
    • 3
  • Ahmed Koubaa
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de recherche sur les forêts (IRF—Research Forest Institute)Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT)Rouyn-NorandaCanada
  2. 2.Centre Technologique des Résidus Industriels (CTRI, Technology Center for Industrial Waste)Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue (Abitibi-Témiscamingue College)Rouyn-NorandaCanada
  3. 3.Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME)Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT)Rouyn-NorandaCanada

Personalised recommendations