Advertisement

Sediment and Phosphorous Fluxes Analysis in Aquia Creek, a Sub-watershed of the Chesapeake Bay Basin, VA, USA

  • B. K. Odhiambo
  • T. Coxon
  • H. Somers
Article

Abstract

Decline in global surface water quality around the world is closely linked to excess sediment and nutrient inputs. This study examined sediment and phosphorus fluxes in Aquia Creek, a fourth-order sub-watershed of the Chesapeake Bay located in Stafford, Virginia. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), sediment delivery ratio (SDR), field sediment traps, bank erosion pins, and LIDAR data, combined with historical aerial images, were used in quantifying rill and inter-rill erosion from the basin, as well as internally generated sediments. Stream water and stream bank soils were analyzed for phosphorus. RUSLE/SDR modeling estimates a basin total sediment flux of 25,247 tons year−1. The greatest calculated soil losses were in deciduous forests and cropland areas, whereas medium and high-intensity developed areas had the least soil loss. Cut-bank erosion ranged from 0.2 to 27.4 cm year−1, and annual bank sediment fluxes were estimated at 1444 Mg, with a corresponding annual mass of phosphorous of 13,760 kg year−1. The highest bank loss estimates were incurred along reaches draining urban areas. Stream water total phosphorous levels ranged from 0.054 μg g−1 during low flows to 134.94 μg g−1 during high discharge periods in autumn and spring. These results show that stormwater management practices in urban areas are limiting runoff water and soil contact, reducing surficial soil loss. However, the runoff acceleration due to expansion of impervious surfaces is progressively increasing the significance of intrinsic sediment and phosphorous sources by exacerbating stream bank erosion and resuspension of internally stored sediments.

Keywords

Phosphorous RUSLE Erosion pins Chesapeake Bay Sediment fluxes Aquia Creek 

References

  1. Clark, E. V., Odhiambo, B. K., Yoon, S., & Pilati, L. (2015). Hydroacoustic and spatial analysis of sediment fluxes and accumulation rates in two Virginia reservoirs, USA. Journal of Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22, 8659–8671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper, S. R., & Brush, G. S. (1993). A 2,500-year history of anoxia and eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries, 16(3), 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeWolfe, M. N., Hession, W. C., & Watzin, M. C. (2004). Sediment and phosphorus loads from streambank erosion in Vermont, USA. In: G. Sehlke, D.F. Hayes, & D.K. StevensCritical transitions in water and environmental resources management Reston, VA: America Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. Dodd, A. L., & Lee, A. M. (2007). Stafford County. Mt. Pleasant: Arcadia Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, E. J., Reddy, R., & Clark, M. W. (2006). Biogeochemical indices of phosphorus retention and release by wetland soils and adjacent stream sediments. Wetlands, 26(4), 1026–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fu, B. J., Zhao, W. W., Chen, L. D., Zhang, Q. J., Lü, Y. H., Gulinck, H., & Poesen, J. (2005). Assessment of soil erosion at large watershed scale using RUSLE and GIS: a case study in the Loess Plateau of China. Land Degradation & Development, 16(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hooda, P. S., Rendell, A. R., Edwards, A. C., Withers, P. J. A., Aitken, M. N., & Truesdale, V. W. (2000). Relating soil phosphorus indices to potential phosphorus release to water. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(4), 1166–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janes, V. J. J., Nicholas, A. P., Collins, A. L., & Quine, T. A. (2017). Analysis of fundamental physical factors influencing channel bank erosion: results for contrasting catchments in England and Wales. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(7), 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Julian, J. P., & Torres, R. (2006). Hydraulic erosion of cohesive riverbanks. Geomorphology, 76(1–2), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karl, T. R., & Knight, R. W. (1998). Secular trends of precipitation amount, frequency, and intensity in the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(2), 231–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kemp, W. M., Boynton, W. R., Adolf, J. E., Boesch, D. F., Boicourt, W. C., Brush, G., ... & Harding, L. W. (2005). Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 303, 1–29.Google Scholar
  12. King, K. W., Williams, M. R., Johnson, L. T., Smith, D. R., LaBarge, G. A., & Fausey, N. R. (2017). Phosphorus availability in Western Lake Erie Basin drainage waters: legacy evidence across spatial scales. Journal of Environmental Quality, 46(2), 466–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lufafa, A., Tenywas, M. M., Isabirye, M., Majaliwa, M. J. G., & Woomer, P. L. (2003). Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using GIS-based universal soil loss mode. Agricultural Systems, 76, 883–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McDowell, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Folmar, G. (2003). Modification of phosphorus export from an eastern USA catchment by fluvial sediment and phosphorus inputs. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 99(1–3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mehlich, A. (1984). Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15(12), 1409–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nearing, M. A. (2001). Potential changes in rainfall erosivity in the US with climate change during the 21st century. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 56(3), 229–232.Google Scholar
  17. Niemitz, J., Haynes, C., & Lasher, G. (2013). Legacy sediments and historic land use: Chemostratigraphic evidence for excess nutrient and heavy metal sources and remobilization. Geology, 41(1), 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. NOAA (2018). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. State Data – NOAA’s National Weather Service. http://iwin.nws.noaa.gov/view/states.php?state=VA.
  19. Noe, G. B., & Hupp, C. R. (2005). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in floodplains of Atlantic Coastal Plain rivers, USA. Ecological Applications, 15(4), 1178–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Odhiambo, B. K., & Ricker, M. C. (2012). Spatial and isotopic analysis of watershed soil loss and reservoir sediment accumulation rates in Lake Anna, Virginia, USA. Environmental Earth Sciences, 65, 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Odhiambo, B. K., Ricker, M. C., Le Blanc, L. M., & Moxey, K. A. (2016). Effects of forested floodplain soil properties on phosphorous concentrations in two Chesapeake Bay sub-watersheds, Virginia, USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(16), 16056–16066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ourso, R. T., & Frenzel, S. A. (2003). Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska. Hydrobiologia, 501(1–3), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pitchford, J., Strager, M., Riley, A., Lin, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Modelling streambank erosion potential using maximum entropy in a central Appalachian watershed. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 367, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pope, I. C., & Odhiambo, B. K. (2014). Soil erosion and sediment fluxes analysis: a watershed study of the Ni Reservoir, Spotsylvania County, VA, USA. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(3), 1719–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., & Porter, J. P. (1991). RUSLE: revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 46(1), 30–33.Google Scholar
  26. Renfro, G. W. (1975). Use of erosion equations and sediment delivery ratios for predicting sediment yield. Present and Prospective Technology for Predicting Sediment Yields and Sources. USA Agricultural Resources Services Report ARS-S-40, 33–45.Google Scholar
  27. Restrepo, J. D., & Syvitski, J. P. (2006). Assessing the effect of natural controls and land use change on sediment yield in a major Andean river: the Magdalena drainage basin, Colombia. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 35(2), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rhoades, E. L., O’Neal, M. A., & Pizzuto, J. E. (2009). Quantifying bank erosion on the South River and its importance in assessing Hg contamination. Applied Geography, 29, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricker, M. C., Odhiambo, B. K., & Church, J. M. (2008). Spatial analysis of soil erosion and sediment fluxes: a paired watershed study of two Rappahannock River tributaries, Stafford County, Virginia. Environmental Management, 41, 766–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers, J. C., & Leigh, D. S. (2013). Modeling stream-bank erosion in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains. Physical Geography, 34(4–5), 354–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, K. G., & Owens, P. N. (2009). Sediments in urban river basins: a review of sediment–contaminant dynamics in an environmental system conditioned by human activities. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 9(4), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. The Chesapeake Bay Foundation (2014) Chesapeake Bay watershed geography and facts. http://www.cbf.org/about-the-bay/more-than-just-the-bay/chesapeake-bay-watershed-geography-and-facts.
  33. Trimble, S. W. (1997). Contribution of stream channel erosion to sediment yield from an urbanizing watershed. Science, 278(5342), 1442–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. USCB. Stafford County quick facts. (2016). United States Census Bureau. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/51/51179.html.
  35. USDA. Web Soil Survey (2016). Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/.
  36. USGS. (2014-2016). USGS Water Watch. United States Geological Survey. http://waterwatch.usgs.gov
  37. Walsh, C. J., Roy, A. H., Feminella, J. W., Cottingham, P. D., Groffman, P. M., & Morgan, R. P. (2005). The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 24(3), 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang, S., Fu, B., Liang, W., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Driving forces of changes in water and sediment relationship in the Yellow River. Science of the Total Environment, 576, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ward, A. D., & Stanley, W. T. (2004). Soil conservation and sediment budgets. Environmental hydrology: Second Edition (pp. 255–271). New York: Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, M. R., Filoso, S., Longstaff, B. J., & Dennison, W. C. (2010). Long-term trends of water quality and biotic metrics in Chesapeake Bay: 1986 to 2008. Estuaries and Coasts, 33(6), 1279–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wischmeier, W. H., & Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 537, p 9.Google Scholar
  42. Young, E. O., Ross, D. S., Cade-Menun, B. J., & Liu, C. W. (2013). Phosphorus speciation in riparian soils: a phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enzyme hydrolysis study. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 77(5), 1636–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Mary WashingtonFredericksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations