Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 226:388 | Cite as

Alkylphenols and Phthalates in Greywater from Showers and Washing Machines

  • Steven DeshayesEmail author
  • Véronique Eudes
  • Christine Droguet
  • Magali Bigourie
  • Johnny Gasperi
  • Régis MoilleronEmail author
Article

Abstract

Paris conurbation is a heavily urbanized but weakly industrialized catchment. Recently, it has been shown at the scale of Paris that alkylphenols (AP) and phthalates (PAE) are not rejected by the industry, but they originate from domestic wastewater at more than 95 %. However, the contribution of the different types of greywater to the pollution by alkylphenols and phthalates was not addressed. This work aims at providing new insights on this particular point. Hence, the concentration of four phthalates (diethyl phthalate (DEP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DnBP), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP), and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)) and two alkylphenols (octylphenols (OP) and isomers of nonylphenol (NP)) were followed in greywater. For each sample, analyses were carried out on both the dissolved and particulate phases. Moreover, water quality parameters were also monitored, in order to find out whether or not any correlation exists between the concentration of the investigated contaminants and the quality of water. Water quality parameters studied are pH, total suspended solids (TSS), dissolved and particular organic carbon (DOC and POC), chemical and biochemical oxygen demands (COD and BOD5), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), and anionic detergents (methylene blue active substance or MBAS). This paper presents the methodology used to monitor two greywater with the most important volumes: showers and washing machines. These greywater showed high variability with regard to water quality parameters. Moreover, AP and PAE concentrations are given for the first time for these two types of greywater. All compounds except OP were observed in almost all samples in at least one of the two monitored phases. The concentrations varied between limit of quantification for OP and 102 μg/l for DEHP. The levels measured in washing machines were higher than those for showers for all compounds. For instance, median NP concentration in washing machines was 3.59 μg/l against 1.09 μg/l in showers, DEHP was observed at 102 μg/l in washing machines against 16.6 μg/l in showers. Variability of the results was explained by habits of individuals (shower time, number of products used…) but also by differences in product composition. However, each type of water exhibited the same distribution. NP was the most abundant AP (about 85 % of the total amount) while DEHP represented the two thirds of the PAE compounds. The partition coefficients (Kd in l/kg) were evaluated. The results showed that log Kd ranged between 2.1 (DEP) and 4.8 (DEHP). Log Koc presented similar trends lying in the 2.4 (DEP)-5.0 (DEHP) range. Finally, with regard to greywater quality, the application for greywater reuse is discussed.

Keywords

Alkylphenols Phthalates Emission sources Greywater Showers Washing machines 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the LCPP for providing the PhD grant of S. Deshayes and also the people who provided samples of greywater. The authors also would like to thank SEVESC and the OPUR research program for their financial supports.

References

  1. Antonopoulou, G., Kirkou, A., Stasinakis, A.S. (2013) Quantitative greywater charactérisation in Greek households and investigation of their treatment using physicochemical methods. Science of the Total Environment, 426–432.Google Scholar
  2. Bergé, A. (2012). Identification of sources of alkylphenols and phthalates in urban area. Comparison of domestic discharges to pure industrial wastewater, Universe and Environmental Sciences Ph.D. Dissertation (in French), Paris-Est University, 290 p.Google Scholar
  3. Bergé, A., Gasperi, J., Rocher, V., Gras, L., Coursimault, A., & Moilleron, R. (2014). Phthalates and alkylphenols in industrial and domestic effluents: case of Paris conurbation (France). Science of the Total Environment, 488, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berryman, D., Houde, F., Deblois, C., O’Shea M. (2003). Monitoring of nonylphenol ethoxylates in raw and treated water of eleven drinking water treatment plants in Quebec (in French). Environmental Department, Quebec, Envirodoq: ENV/2003/0001, 42 p.Google Scholar
  5. Bocken. (2001). Get working paper on prevention and restoration of significant environmental damage. Tijdschrift voor milieurecht, 5, 352.Google Scholar
  6. Boyjoo, Y., Pareek, V. K., & Ang, M. (2013). A review of greywater characteristics and treatment processes. Water Science and Technology, 67(7), 1403–1424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaillou, K., Gérente, C., Andrès, Y., & Wolbert, D. (2011). Bathroom greywater characterization and potential treatments for reuse. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 215, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cladière M (2012) Sources, transfer and fate of alkylphenol and bisphenol A within the upstream part of the Seine River basin, study case of the Île-de-France Region. : study case of the Île-de-France Region, Environmental Sciences and Techniques, Ph.D. Dissertation (in French). Paris-Est University, 254 p.Google Scholar
  9. Clara, M., Scharf, S., Scheffknecht, C., & Gans, O. (2007). Occurrence of selected surfactants in untreated and treated sewage. Water Research, 41, 4339–4348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deshayes, S., Eudes, V., Droguet, C., Bigourie, M., & Moilleron, R. (2014). Sources of alkylphenols and phthalates in greywaters. Kuching: International Conference on Urban Drainage. http://www.13icud2014.com/, 8 p.Google Scholar
  11. Eriksson, E., Auffarth, K., Henze, M., & Ledin, A. (2002). Characteristics of grey wastewater. Urban Water, 4, 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson, E., Auffarth, K., Eilersen, A. M., Henze, M., & Ledin, A. (2003). Household chemicals and personal care products as sources for xenobiotic organic compounds in grey wastewater. Water SA, 29(2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EU (2003) Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 amending for the 26th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol, nonylphenol ethoxylate and cement), 4 p.Google Scholar
  14. EU (2009) Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on cosmetic products, 151 p.Google Scholar
  15. Fu, M., Li, Z., & Gao, H. (2007). Distribution characteristics of nonylphenol in Jiaozhou Bay of Qingdao and its adjacent rivers. Chemosphere, 69(7), 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giger, W., Brunner, P. H., & Schaffner, C. (1984). 4-Nonylphenol in sewage sludge: accumulation of toxic metabolites from non-ionic surfactants. Science, 225, 623–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gross, A., Shmueli, O., Ronen, Z., & Raveh, E. (2007). Recycled vertical flow constructed wetland (RVFCW)—a novel method of recycling greywater for irrigation in small communities and household. Chemosphere, 66, 916–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halalsheh, M., Dalahmeh, S., Sayed, M., Suleiman, W., Shareef, M., Mansour, M., & Safi, M. (2008). Grey water characteristics and treatment options for rural areas in Jordan. Bioresource Technology, 99, 6635–6641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. INSEE (2012) Moderate decline in household size in the Ile-de-France http://www.insee.fr/fr/insee_regions/idf/themes/faits_et_chiffres/fc291/fc291.pdf, 3 p.
  20. Isobe, T., Nishiyama, H., Nakashima, A., & Takada, H. (2001). Distribution and behavior of nonylphenol, octylphenol, and nonylphenol monoethoxylate in Tokyo metropolitan area: their association with aquatic particles and sedimentary distributions. Environmental Science and Technology, 35(6), 1041–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jamrah, A., Al-Futaisi, A., Prathapar, S., & Al Harrasi, A. (2008). Evaluating greywater reuse potential for sustainable water resources management in Oman. Environmental Monioring and Assessment, 137, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jefferson, B., Palmer, A., Jeffrey, P., Stuetz, R., & Judd, S. (2004). Grey water characterisation and its impact on the selection and operation of technologies for urban reuse. Water Science and Technology, 50(2), 157–164.Google Scholar
  23. Källqvist, T., & Kopangen, M. (2005). Environmental risk assessment of artificial turf systems. Report of the Norwegian Institute for Water Research.. 20 p.Google Scholar
  24. Kim, R. H., Lee, S., Jeong, J., Lee, J. H., & Kim, Y. K. (2007). Wastewater reclamation and reuse for sustainability reuse of greywater and rainwater using fiber filter media and metal membrane. Desalination, 202(1–3), 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li, F., Wichmann, K., & Otterpohl, R. (2009). Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3439–3449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Melcer, H., Monteith, H., Staples, C., & Klecka, G. (2006). Wastewater treatment of alkylphenols and their ethoxylates. Washington, DC: Water Environment Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Palmquist, H., & Hanæus, J. (2005). Hazardous substances in separately collected grey- and blackwater from ordinary Swedish household. Science of the Total Environment, 348, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., & Struijs, J. (2006). Occurrence of phthalate esters in the environment of the Netherlands. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 63(2), 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pidou, M., Avery, L., Stephenson, T., Jeffrey, P., Parsons, S. A., Liu, S., Memon, F. A., & Jefferson, B. (2008). Chemical solutions for greywater recycling. Chemosphere, 71, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Renner, R. (1997). European bans on surfactant trigger transatlantic debate. Environmental Science and Technology, 31, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ronen, Z., Guerrero, A., & Gross, A. (2010). Greywater disinfection with the environmentally friendly hydrogen peroxide plus (HPP). Chemosphere, 78, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Staples, C. A., Peterson, D. R., Parterton, T. F., & Adams, W. J. (1997). The environmental fate of phthalate esters: a literature review. Chemosphere, 25, 667–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ying, G.-G., Williams, B., & Kookana, R. (2002). Environmental fate of alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates: a review. Environment International, 28, 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zgheib, S. (2009). Flows and principal pollution sources in urban water linked with land use, Environmental Sciences and Techniques, Ph.D. Dissertation (in French), Paris-Est University, 359 p.Google Scholar
  35. Zgheib, S., Moilleron, R., Saad, M., & Chebbo, G. (2011). Partition of pollution between dissolved and particulate phases: what about emerging substances in urban stormwater catchments? Water Research, 45(2), 913–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Deshayes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Véronique Eudes
    • 1
  • Christine Droguet
    • 1
  • Magali Bigourie
    • 1
  • Johnny Gasperi
    • 2
  • Régis Moilleron
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratoire Central de la Préfecture de PoliceParisFrance
  2. 2.LeesuUniversité Paris-Est, AgroParisTech, UMR MA-102Créteil CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations