Developing Critical Loads of Nitrate and Sulfate Deposition to Watersheds of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA
- 347 Downloads
Long-term impacts of acidic deposition on the Great Smoky Mountains National Park (GRSM) include elevated inputs of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium; the depletion of available nutrient cations from soil; and acidification of high-elevation streams. Critical loads and target loads (CLs/TLs) are useful tools to help guide future air quality management. We evaluated past and potential future effects of nitrate and sulfate deposition for 12 watersheds in the GRSM, USA, using the hydrochemical model, photosynthesis evapotranspiration biogeochemical (PnET-BGC). Two of the streams studied were listed by the state of Tennessee as impaired due to low stream pH. We reconstructed historical meteorological, atmospheric deposition, and land disturbance data for study watersheds for the period 1850 to present for model hindcasts. As future emissions are expected to decline, the model was run under a range of future scenarios from 2008 to 2200 of decreases in sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium and combinations of sulfate and nitrate deposition to estimate CLs and TLs of how watersheds might respond to emission control strategies. Model simulations of stream chemistry generally agreed with long-term (>10 years) observations. Model hindcasts indicate that watersheds in the GRSM are inherently sensitive to acidic deposition. Simulated mean projected stream ANC of 71 μeq/L (range 32 to 107 μeq/L) prior to industrial development (~1850) decreases in response to historical acidic deposition to 33 μeq/L (−13 to 88 μeq/L) in 2007. Future model projections show that decreases in sulfate deposition result in smaller increases in stream ANC compared with equivalent decreases in nitrate deposition; simultaneous controls on nitrate and sulfate deposition are more effective in ANC increases than individual control of nitrate or sulfate. Although there are no current programs in the USA to control ammonia emissions, model simulations suggest that decreases in ammonium deposition could also help mitigate acidification to a greater extent than equivalent controls on nitrate deposition.
KeywordsAcidic deposition Acidification modeling Critical loads Great Smoky Mountains National Park Watersheds
This work was supported by the National Park Service under Agreement H54710090015 signed September 25, 2009.
- Cai, M., Schwartz, J. S., Robinson, R. B., Moore, S. E., & Kulp, M. A. (2010). Long-term effects of acid deposition on water quality in a high-elevation Great Smoky Mountain National Park watershed: use of n ion input–output budget. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 209, 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, L., & Driscoll, C. T. (2004). An evaluation of processes regulating spatial and temporal patterns in lake sulfate in the Adirondack region of New York. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18, GB3024.Google Scholar
- Driscoll, C. T., Lawrence, G. B., Bulger, A. J., Butler, T. J., Cronan, C. S., Eagar, C., Lambert, K., Likens, G. E., Stoddard, J. L., & Weathers, K. C. (2001). Acidic deposition in the Northeastern United States: Sources and inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience, 51, 180–198.Google Scholar
- Gbondo-Tugbawa, S. S., & Driscoll, C. T. (2003). Factors controlling long-term changes in soil pools of exchangeable basic cations and stream acid neutralizing capacity in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Biogeochemistry, 63, 161–185.Google Scholar
- Grell, M. (2010). Soil chemistry characterization of acid sensitive watersheds in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
- Kahl, J. S., Stoddard, J. L., Haeuber, R., Paulsen, S. G., Birnbaum, R., Deviney, F. A., Webb, J. R., DeWalle, D. R., Sharpe, W., Driscoll, C. T., et al. (2014). Have U.S. surface waters responded to the 1990 Clean Air Act amendments? Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 484A–490A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neff, K. J., Schwartz, J. S., Henry, T. B., Robinson, R. B., Moore, S. E., & Kulp, M. A. (2009). Physiological stress in native southern brook trout during episodic stream acidification in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Archives of Environment Contamination and Toxicology, 57, 366–376. doi: 10.1007/s00244-008-9269-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nilsson, J., and Grennfelt, P. (1988). Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. UNECE/Nordic Council workshop report, Skokloster, Sweden. March 1988. Nordic Council of Ministers: Copenhagen. 418 pp.Google Scholar
- Pardo, L.H. (2010). Approaches for estimating critical loads of N and S deposition for forest ecosystems on U.S. federal lands. Gen. Technical Rep. NRS-71 USDA For. Serv. North. Res. Stn. Newtown Sq. Pa. USA.Google Scholar
- Pardo, L. H., Fenn, M., Goodale, C. L., Geiser, L. H., Driscoll, C. T., Allen, E., Baron, J., Bobbink, R., Bowman, W. D., Clark, C., et al. (2011). Effects of nitrogen deposition and empirical nitrogen critical loads for ecoregions of the United States. Ecological Applications, 21, 3049–3082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pourmokhtarian, A., Driscoll, C.T., Campbell, J.L., and Hayhoe, K. (2012). Modeling potential hydrochemical responses to climate change and rising CO2 at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest using a dynamic biogeochemical model (PnET-BGC). Water Resour. Res. 48, W07514, 13 pp.Google Scholar
- Pyle, C. (1985). Vegetation disturbance history of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: an analysis of archival maps and records. Natl. Park Serv.-Southeast Reg. Res. Manag. Rep. SER-77. 69 pp.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, J.S., Gonzalez, A., Neff, K.J., Moore, S.E., and Kulp, M.A. (2013). Great Smoky Mountains National Park 2013 Water Quality Report. Prepared for the US Dept. of Interior, National Park Service. University of Tennessee—Knoxville, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. September 2014.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, J.S., Cai, M., Kulp, M.A., Moore, S.E., Nichols, B., and Parker., C. (2014). Biological effects of stream water quality on aquatic macroinvertebrates and fish communities within the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRSM/NRR-2014/778, NPS, Ft. Collins, CO.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Driscoll, C. T., McDonnell, T. C., Herlihy, A. T., and Burns, D. A. (2012). Target loads of atmospheric sulfur and nitrogen deposition for protection of acid sensitive aquatic resources in the Adirondack Mountains, New York. Water Resour. Res. 48, W01547, 16 pp.Google Scholar
- TDEC (2010). Proposed total maximum load (TMDL) for low pH in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park located in the Pigeon River Watershed (HUC 06010106), Lower French Broad River Watershed (HUC 06010107), Watts Bar Lake Watershed (HUC 06010201), Cocke and Sevier County, Tennessee (prepared by Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control).Google Scholar
- USEPA (2009). Risk and exposure assessment for review of the secondary national ambient air quality standards for oxides of nitrogen and oxides of sulfur. EPA-452/P-09-004a.Google Scholar
- Van Breemen, N., Mulder, J., & Driscoll, C. T. (1983). Acidification and alkalization of soils. Plant and Soil, 75, 283visiGoogle Scholar
- Zhai, J., Driscoll, C. T., Sullivan, T. J., and Cosby, B. J. (2008). Regional application of the PnET-BGC model to assess historical acidification of Adirondack lakes. Water Resour. Res, 44, W01421. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005532.