Hydrologic and Biogeochemical Drivers of Riparian Denitrification in an Agricultural Watershed
- 531 Downloads
This study investigated drivers of denitrification and overall NO3 − removal in an agricultural riparian area in central New York. Denitrification was measured using an in situ “push-pull” method with 15N–NO3 − as a tracer during summer and fall 2011 at a pair of riparian sites characterized by different hydrologic regimes. Median denitrification rates were 1347 and 703 μg N kg soil−1 day−1 for the two study sites. These rates are higher than those reported for other riparian areas, emphasizing the role of some riparian areas as hotspots of NO3 − removal. N2O production was significantly higher at one site, demonstrating that riparian areas can be a greenhouse gas source under certain conditions. Denitrification was negatively correlated with groundwater flux, suggesting that slower flushing of water, and thus longer residence time, promotes denitrification. A mass balance of NO3 − loss revealed that denitrification only accounted for 5–12 % of total NO3 − loss, and production of NH4 + indicated that dissimilatory NO3 − reduction to NH4 + (DNRA) may be occurring at both sites. While both sites were characterized by high NO3 − removal, differences in denitrification rates and NO3 − removal processes demonstrate the need to improve our ability to capture spatial and process heterogeneity in landscape biogeochemical models.
KeywordsDenitrification DNRA Water quality Nitrogen cycling Riparian systems Ecohydrology Riparian groundwater
Assistance with the push-pull method was provided by T. Anderson, assistance in the field and laboratory was provided by L. Kreitinger, A. Fortman, and S. Giri, and site access was provided by S. McKay. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. 1144153 and the Cornell Cross-Scale Biogeochemistry & Climate IGERT under NSF Grant No. 1069193. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station (CUAES) (2013). ‘Homer C. Thompson Vegetable Farm.’ http://cuaes.cornell.edu/ag-operations/freeville-farm/ Accessed 11 March 2013.
- Dubrovsky, N. M., Burow, K. R., Clark, G. M., Gronberg, J. M., Hamilton, P. A., Hitt, K. J., et al. (2010). The quality of our nation’s water: nutrients in the nation’s streams and groundwater, 1992–2004. US Geological Survey Circular, 1350, 174.Google Scholar
- Groffman, P. M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Fulweiler, R. W., Gold, A. J., Morse, J. L., Stander, E. K., et al. (2009). Challenges to incorporating spatially and temporally explicit phenomena (hotspots and hot moments) in denitrification models. Biogeochemistry, 93, 49–77. doi: 10.1007/s10533-008-9277-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hedin, L. O., von Fischer, J. C., Ostrom, N. E., Kennedy, B. P., Brown, M. G., & Robertson, G. P. (1998). Thermodynamic constraints on nitrogen transformations and other biogeochemical processes at soil-stream interfaces. Ecology, 79(2), 684–703.Google Scholar
- Jencso, K. G., McGlynn, B. L., Gooseff, M. N., Bencala, K. E., & Wondzell, S. M. (2010). Hillslope hydrologic connectivity controls riparian groundwater turnover: implications of catchment structure for riparian buffering and stream water sources. Water Resources Research, 46, W10524. doi: 10.1029/2009WR008818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mosier, A. R., & Klemedtsson, L. (1994). Measuring denitrification in the field. In R. W. Weaver et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties (2nd ed.). Madison: SSSA.Google Scholar
- National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). (2013). Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm Accessed 11 March 2013.
- Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC) (2013), The Ithaca Climate Page, http://www.nrcc.cornell.edu/climate/ithaca/, Accessed 11 March 2013.
- Robertson, G. P., Sollins, P., Ellis, B. G., & Lajtha, K. (1999). Exchangeable ions, pH and cation exchange capacity. In G. P. Robertson et al. (Eds.), Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Santisteban, J. I., Mediavilla, R., Lopez-Pamo, E., Dabrio, C. J., Ruiz Zapata, M. B., Gil Garcıa, M. J., et al. (2004). Loss on ignition: a qualitative or quantitative method for organic matter and carbonate mineral content in sediments? Journal of Paleolimnology, 32, 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tiedje, J. M. (1994). Denitrifiers. In R. W. Weaver et al. (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis, part 2: microbiological and biochemical properties (2nd ed.). Madison: SSSA.Google Scholar
- Townsend, A.R., Martinelli, L.A., & Howarth, R.W. (2009). The global nitrogen cycle, biodiversity, and human health. In: Biodiversity change and human health: from ecosystem services to spread of disease. SCOPE, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Triska, F. J., Duff, J. H., Sheibley, R. W., Jackman, A. P., & Avanzino, R. J. (2007). DIN retention-transport through four hydrologically connected zones in a headwater catchment of the Upper Mississippi River. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(1), 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (1990). National pesticide survey: nitrate. Office of Water, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2005). Riparian buffer width, vegetative cover, and nitrogen removal effectiveness: a review of current science and regulations. EPA/600/R-05/118, Office of Research and Development, Washington DC.Google Scholar
- Zaman, M., Nguyen, M. L., Gold, A. J., Groffman, P. M., Kellogg, D. Q., & Wilcock, R. J. (2008). Nitrous oxide generation, denitrification, and nitrate removal in a seepage wetland intercepting surface and subsurface flows from a grazed dairy catchment. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 46, 565–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar