Continuous Treatment of Phenol over an Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst in a Fixed-Bed Reactor

  • Minghui Lu
  • Yue Yao
  • Lulu Gao
  • Dongmei Mo
  • Fang Lin
  • Shuxiang Lu
Article

Abstract

Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 catalysts were prepared using the wet impregnation method and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and nitrogen adsorption–desorption. The continuous catalytic wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation of an aqueous phenol solution over Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 was studied in a fixed-bed reactor. The effects of several factors, such as the weight hourly space velocity (WHSV), particle size, reaction temperature, H2O2 concentration, and initial pH, were studied to optimize the operation conditions for phenol mineralization. For a 1 g L−1 phenolic aqueous solution, the phenol was nearly completely removed and chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal was approximately 92 % at steady-state conditions with a WHSV of 2.4 × 10−2 gPhOH h−1 gcat −1 at 80 °C with 5.1 g L−1 H2O2. The long-term stability of the Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 catalyst was also investigated for the continuous treatment of phenolic water. The removal of phenol and COD exhibited a slowly decreasing trend, which was primarily due to the complexation of active sites with acid organic compounds and the adsorption of intermediate products. The deposition of organic carbon and Fe leached from the catalyst had a small role in the partial deactivation of the catalyst. The Fe leached from the catalyst partially contributed to the phenol removal during a short run. However, this contribution could be neglected after 36 h because the Fe leached from the catalyst decreased to approximately 5 mg L−1.

Keywords

Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 Catalytic oxidation Phenol Hydrogen peroxide Fixed-bed reactor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge financial support for this research from the Key Project of Tianjin Municipal Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (Project No. 14JCZDJC40600) and the Training Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Undergraduates (Project No. 201410057040).

References

  1. Bajaj, M., Gallert, C., & Winter, J. (2008). Biodegradation of high phenol containing synthetic wastewater by an aerobic fixed bed reactor. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8376–8381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bel Hadjltaief, H., Da Costa, P., Beaunier, P., Gálvez, M. E., & Ben Zina, M. (2014). Fe-clay-plate as a heterogeneous catalyst in photo-Fenton oxidation of phenol as probe molecule for water treatment. Applied Clay Science, 91–92, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhargava, S. K., Tardio, J., Prasad, J., Foger, K., Akolekar, D. B., & Grocott, S. C. (2006). Wet oxidation and catalytic wet oxidation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 45, 1221–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botas, J. A., Melero, J. A., Martínez, F., & Pariente, M. I. (2010). Assessment of Fe2O3/SiO2 catalysts for the continuous treatment of phenol aqueous solutions in a fixed bed reactor. Catalysis Today, 149, 334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Busca, G., Berardinelli, S., Resini, C., & Arrighi, L. (2008). Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 160, 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calleja, G., Melero, J. A., Martinez, F., & Molina, R. (2005). Activity and resistance of iron-containing amorphous, zeolitic and mesostructured materials for wet peroxide oxidation of phenol. Water Research, 39, 1741–1750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaliha, S., & Bhattacharyya, K. G. (2008). Wet oxidative method for removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol in water using Fe(III), Co(II), Ni(II) supported MCM41 catalysts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 150, 728–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowther, N. (2003). Iron-containing silicalites for phenol catalytic wet peroxidation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 46, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Laat, J., & Gallard, H. (1999). Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by Fe(III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 2726–2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dharmadhikari, D. M., Vanerkar, A. P., & Barhate, N. M. (2005). Chemical oxygen demand using closed microwave digestion system. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 6198–6201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Domínguez, C. M., Ocón, P., Quintanilla, A., Casas, J. A., & Rodriguez, J. J. (2013). Highly efficient application of activated carbon as catalyst for wet peroxide oxidation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 140–141, 663–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duarte, F., Morais, V., Maldonado-Hódar, F. J., & Madeira, L. M. (2013). Treatment of textile effluents by the heterogeneous Fenton process in a continuous packed-bed reactor using Fe/activated carbon as catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal, 232, 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrido-Ramírez, E. G., Theng, B. K. G., & Mora, M. L. (2010). Clays and oxide minerals as catalysts and nanocatalysts in Fenton-like reactions—a review. Applied Clay Science, 47, 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrido-Ramirez, E. G., Sivaiah, M. V., Barrault, J., Valange, S., Theng, B. K. G., Ureta-Zañartu, M. S., & Mora, M. L. (2012). Catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol over iron or copper oxide-supported allophane clay materials: Influence of catalyst SiO2/Al2O3 ratio. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 162, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guélou, E., Barrault, J., Fournier, J., & Tatibouët, J.-M. (2003). Active iron species in the catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol over pillared clays containing iron. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 44, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo, J., & Al-Dahhan, M. (2003). Catalytic wet oxidation of phenol by hydrogen peroxide over pillared clay catalyst. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 42, 2450–2460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamoudi, S., Larachi, F., & Sayari, A. (1998). Wet oxidation of phenolic solutions over heterogeneous catalysts: degradation profile and catalyst behavior. Journal of Catalysis, 177, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamoudi, S., Sayari, A., Belkacemi, K., Bonneviot, L., & Larachi, F. (2000). Catalytic wet oxidation of phenol over PtxAg1-xMnO2/CeO2 catalysts. Catalysis Today, 62, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, C. W. (1999). Applications of hydrogen peroxide and derivates. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, J. M., & Liu, M. (2009). Singlet oxygen generated from the decomposition of peroxymonocarbonate and its observation with chemiluminescence method. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A, Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 72, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, H., Wang, G., Park, J., Wang, J., Liu, H., & Zhang, C. (2009). Electrochemical performance of alpha-Fe2O3 nanorods as anode material for lithium-ion cells. Electrochimica Acta, 54, 1733–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, Q. S., Yu, J. F., Wang, Z. L., Yang, P. P., & Wu, T. H. (2001). Preparation, characterization and catalytic properties of alpha-Fe2O3/SiO2 catalyst in phenol hydroxylation with hydrogen peroxide. Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters, 73, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, W.-J., Zeng, F.-X., Jiang, H., Zhang, X.-S., & Li, W.-W. (2012). Composite Fe2O3 and ZrO2/Al2O3 photocatalyst: preparation, characterization, and studies on the photocatalytic activity and chemical stability. Chemical Engineering Journal, 180, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martínez, F., Melero, J. A., Botas, J. Á., Pariente, M. I., & Molina, R. (2007). Treatment of phenolic effluents by catalytic wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation over Fe2O3/SBA-15 extruded catalyst in a fixed-bed reactor. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46, 4396–4405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melero, J. A., Calleja, G., Martı́nez, F., Molina, R., & Lázár, K. (2004). Crystallization mechanism of Fe-MFI from wetness impregnated Fe2O3–SiO2 amorphous xerogels: role of iron species in Fenton-like processes. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 74, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molina, C. B., Casas, J. A., Zazo, J. A., & Rodríguez, J. J. (2006). A comparison of Al-Fe and Zr-Fe pillared clays for catalytic wet peroxide oxidation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 118, 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Munoz, M., de Pedro, Z. M., Casas, J. A., & Rodriguez, J. J. (2013). Improved wet peroxide oxidation strategies for the treatment of chlorophenols. Chemical Engineering Journal, 228, 646–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ovejero, G., Sotelo, J. L., Martinez, F., Melero, J. A., & Gordo, L. (2001). Wet peroxide oxidation of phenolic solutions over different iron-containing zeolitic materials. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 40, 3921–3928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pariente, M. I., Siles, J. A., Molina, R., Botas, J. A., Melero, J. A., & Martinez, F. (2013). Treatment of an agrochemical wastewater by integration of heterogeneous catalytic wet hydrogen peroxide oxidation and rotating biological contactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 226, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pera-Titus, M., Garcı́a-Molina, V., Baños, M. A., Giménez, J., & Esplugas, S. (2004). Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 47, 219–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phu, N. H., Hoa, T. T. K., Van Tan, N., Thang, H. V., & Le Ha, P. (2001). Characterization and activity of Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts for the total oxidation of phenol in aqueous solutions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 34, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pinto, I. S. X., Pacheco, P. H. V. V., Coelho, J. V., Lorençon, E., Ardisson, J. D., Fabris, J. D., de Souza, P. P., Krambrock, K. W. H., Oliveira, L. C. A., & Pereira, M. C. (2012). Nanostructured δ-FeOOH: an efficient Fenton-like catalyst for the oxidation of organics in water. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 119–120, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quintanilla, A., Casas, J., Mohedano, A., & Rodriguez, J. (2006). Reaction pathway of the catalytic wet air oxidation of phenol with a Fe/activated carbon catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 67, 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos, A., Yustos, P., Quintanilla, A., Ruiz, G., & Garcia-Ochoa, F. (2005). Study of the copper leaching in the wet oxidation of phenol with CuO-based catalysts: causes and effects. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 61, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Santos, A., Yustos, P., Rodriguez, S., & Garcia-Ochoa, F. (2006). Wet oxidation of phenol, cresols and nitrophenols catalyzed by activated carbon in acid and basic media. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 65, 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi, H.-C., Wang, X.-Y., Hua, R., Zhang, Z.-G., & Tang, J. (2005). Epoxidation of α, β-unsaturated acids catalyzed by tungstate (VI) or molybdate (VI) in aqueous solvents: a specific direct oxygen transfer mechanism. Tetrahedron, 61, 1297–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shukla, P., Wang, S., Sun, H., Ang, H.-M., & Tadé, M. (2010). Adsorption and heterogeneous advanced oxidation of phenolic contaminants using Fe loaded mesoporous SBA-15 and H2O2. Chemical Engineering Journal, 164, 255–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tian, S. H., Tu, Y. T., Chen, D. S., Chen, X., & Xiong, Y. (2011). Degradation of Acid Orange II at neutral pH using Fe2(MoO4)3 as a heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal, 169, 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, W., Liu, Y., Li, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Heterogeneous Fenton catalytic degradation of phenol based on controlled release of magnetic nanoparticles. Chemical Engineering Journal, 242, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yan, Y., Jiang, S., & Zhang, H. (2014). Efficient catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of phenol over Fe-ZSM-5 catalyst in a fixed bed reactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 133, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang, A., Wang, N., Zhou, J., Jiang, P., & Liu, G. (2012). Heterogeneous Fenton-like catalytic removal of p-nitrophenol in water using acid-activated fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 201–202, 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Minghui Lu
    • 1
  • Yue Yao
    • 1
  • Lulu Gao
    • 1
  • Dongmei Mo
    • 1
  • Fang Lin
    • 1
  • Shuxiang Lu
    • 1
  1. 1.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper, School of Materials Science and Chemical EngineeringTianjin University of Science and TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations