Advertisement

Mixed Agricultural Pollutant Mitigation Using Woodchip/Pea Gravel and Woodchip/Zeolite Permeable Reactive Interceptors

  • Tristan G. Ibrahim
  • Alexis Goutelle
  • Mark G. Healy
  • Raymond Brennan
  • Patrick Tuohy
  • James Humphreys
  • Gary Lanigan
  • Jade Brechignac
  • Owen FentonEmail author
Article

Abstract

Dairy soiled water (DSW) is water from concreted areas, hard stand areas and holding areas for livestock that has become contaminated by livestock faeces or urine, chemical fertilisers and parlour washings. Losses of DSW occur as point (e.g. storage, pivot irrigators) and diffuse losses (e.g. during or shortly after land application). The concept of a permeable reactive interceptor (PRI), comprising a denitrifying bioreactor woodchip cell to convert nitrate (NO3 ) to dinitrogen (N2) gas and an adsorptive media cell for phosphorus (P) and ammonium (NH4 +) mitigation, attempts to simultaneously treat mixed pollutants. This study is the first attempt to test this concept at laboratory-scale. Washing of woodchip media prior to PRI operation produced low NO3 but high NH4 +, dissolved reactive P (DRP) and dissolved organic carbon losses. Dairy soiled water was then treated in replicated PRIs containing woodchip in combination with zeolite or gravel compartments. In general, all PRIs were highly efficient at reducing NO3 , NH4 +, DRP, dissolved unreactive phosphorus (DUP) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) from an influent water replicating DSW. Longitudinal and hydrochemical PRI profiles, as well as zeolite batch experiments, showed that woodchip can both enhance NO3 reduction and adsorb nutrients. Since woodchip is likely to become saturated, it is important to place the reactive media cell further into the sequence of treatment. Even though the majority of the dissolved nutrients were mitigated, the PRIs also emitted greenhouse gases, which would need further remediation sequences.

Keywords

Permeable reactive interceptor Nitrogen, phosphorus Ammonium Agriculture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Department of Agriculture Food and Marine under the Project 11/S/152 Improving the productivity of heavy wet grassland for delivery of Food Harvest 2020. The authors would like to thank all staff at Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland for any help given during the duration of the laboratory experiment.

Supplementary material

11270_2015_2335_MOESM1_ESM.docx (416 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 415 kb)
11270_2015_2335_MOESM2_ESM.docx (413 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 413 kb)

References

  1. Anon (2013). Studies on the management and utilisation of soiled water and dilute slurry on Irish farms. Technology Update. Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation. Teagasc. http://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2012/2798/5796.pdf.
  2. Antonini, S., Paris, S., Eichert, T., & Clemens, J. (2011). Nitrogen and phosphorus recovery from human urine by struvite precipitation and air stripping in Vietnam. Clean: Soil, Air, Water, 39, 1099–1104.Google Scholar
  3. Cameron, S. G., & Schipper, L. A. (2011). Evaluation of passive solar heating and alternative flow regimes on nitrate removal in denitrification beds. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1195–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fenton, O., Healy, M. G., & Schulte, R. P. O. (2008). A review of remediation and control systems for the treatment of agricultural waste water in Ireland to satisfy the requirements of the Water Framework Directive. Biology and Environment, 108B(2), 69–79.Google Scholar
  5. Fenton, O., Healy, M. G., Henry, T., Khalil, M. I., Grant, J., Baily, A., & Richards, K. G. (2011). Exploring the relationship between groundwater geochemical factors and denitrification potentials on a dairy farm in south east Ireland. Ecological Engineering, 37, 1304–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fenton, O., Richards, K. G., Thornton, S., Brennan, F., Healy, M. G., Jahangir, M. M. R., & Ibrahim, T. G. (2014). Permeable reactive interceptors—blocking diffuse nutrient and greenhouse gas losses in key areas of the farming landscape. The Journal of Agricultural Science. Available on CJO2014. doi: 10.1017/S0021859613000944.
  7. Grubb, K. L., McGrath, J. M., Penn, C. J., & Bryant, R. B. (2011). Land application of spent gypsum from ditch filters: phosphorus source or sink? Agricultural Sciences, 2, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grubb, K. L., McGrath, J. M., Penn, C. J., Bryant, R. B. (2012). Effect of land application of phosphorus saturated gypsum on soil phosphorus. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. Article ID 506951, & pages, Open Access.Google Scholar
  9. Haralambous, A., Maliou, E., & Malamis, M. (1992). The use of zeolite for ammonium uptake. Water Science and Technology, 25, 139–145.Google Scholar
  10. Healy, M. G., Ibrahim, T. G., Lanigan, G. J., Serrenho, A. J., & Fenton, O. (2012). Nitrate removal rate, efficiency and pollution swapping potential of different organic media in laboratory denitrification bioreactors. Ecological Engineering, 40, 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Healy, M. G., Barrett, M., Lanigan, G. J., João Serrenho, A., Ibrahim, T. G., Thornton, S. F., Rolfe, S. A., Huang, W. E., & Fenton, O. (2014). Optimizing nitrate removal and evaluating pollution swapping trade-offs from laboratory denitrification bioreactors. Ecological Engineering, 74, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kana, T. M., Darksngelo, C., Hunt, M. D., Oldham, D., Bennet, J. B., & Cornwell, J. C. (1994). A membrane inlet mass spectrometer for rapid high precision determination of N2, O2, and Ar in environmental water samples. Analytical Chemistry, 66, 4166–4170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lebedynets, M., Sprynskyy, M., Sakhnyuk, I., Zbytniewski, R., Golembiewski, R., & Buszewski, B. (2004). Adsorption of ammonium ions onto a natural zeolite: transcarpathian clinoptilolite. Adsorption Science and Technology, 22, 731–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McBride, M. B. (2000). Chemisorption and precipitation reactions. In: Sumner ME, editor. Handbook of soil science. Boca Raton, Fl: CRC Press; p. B-265–302.Google Scholar
  15. Necpalova, M., Fenton, O., Casey, I., & Humphreys, J. (2012). N leaching to groundwater from dairy production involving grazing over the winter on a clay-loam soil. The Science of the Total Environment, 432, 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Njoroge, B. N. K., & Mwamachi, S. G. (2004). Ammonia removal from an aqueous solution by the use of a natural zeolite. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 3, 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penn, C. J., Bryant, R. B., Callahan, M. A., & McGrath, J. M. (2011). Use of industrial byproducts to sorb and retain phosphorus. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42, 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Penn, C. J., McGrath, J. M., Rounds, E., Fox, G., & Heeren, D. (2012). Trapping phosphorus in runoff with a phosphorus removal structure. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(3), 672–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruane, E., Murphy, P., Clifford, E., Healy, G., French, P., & Rodgers, M. (2011). On-farm treatment of dairy soiled water using aerobic woodchip filters. Water Research, 45, 6668–6676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sakadevan, K., & Bavor, H. J. (1998). Phosphate adsorption characteristics of soils, slags and zeolite to be used as substrates in constructed wetland systems. Water Research, 32(2), 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saltali, K., Sari, A., & Aydin, M. (2007). Removal of ammonium ion from aqueous solution by natural Turkish (Yildizeli) zeolite for environmental quality. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141(1), 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt, C. A., & Clark, M. W. (2012). Efficacy of a denitrification wall to treat continuously high nitrate loads. Ecological Engineering, 42, 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wen, T., Zhang, X., Zhang, H. Q., & Liu, J. D. (2010). Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by zeolite adsorption together with chemical precipitation. Water Science and Technology, 61(8), 1941–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Widiastuti, N., Wu, H., Ang, H. M., & Zhang, D. (2011). Removal of ammonium from greywater using natural zeolite. Desalination, 277, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woli, K. P., David, M. B., Cooke, R. A., McIsaac, G. F., & Mitchell, C. A. (2010). Nitrogen balance in and export from agricultural fields associated with controlled drainage systems and denitrifying bioreactors. Ecological Engineering, 36, 1558–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tristan G. Ibrahim
    • 1
  • Alexis Goutelle
    • 2
  • Mark G. Healy
    • 3
  • Raymond Brennan
    • 3
  • Patrick Tuohy
    • 4
  • James Humphreys
    • 4
  • Gary Lanigan
    • 5
  • Jade Brechignac
    • 6
  • Owen Fenton
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Sustainable Land and SoilsDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural AffairsLondonUK
  2. 2.Elève ingénieur agronome Montpellier SupAgroMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.Civil EngineeringNational University of Ireland GalwayGalwayIreland
  4. 4.Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, TeagascFermoyIreland
  5. 5.Teagasc, Environment Research CentreJohnstown CastleIreland
  6. 6.ENSAIAVandœuvre-lès-NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations