Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 225:1820 | Cite as

Effects of Cow Dung Biochar Amendment on Adsorption and Leaching of Nutrient from an Acid Yellow Soil Irrigated with Biogas Slurry

  • Yanjun Guo
  • Hua Tang
  • Guangdi Li
  • Deti Xie
Article

Abstract

A laboratory-scale study was conducted to test whether biochar from cow dung as a soil amendment can reduce nutrient leaching from soil irrigated with biogas slurry. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) columns were packed with soils containing 0, 20, and 40 g kg−1 of biochar. The biogas slurry was applied at 0, 200, and 400 ml per column, equivalent to 0, 130, and 260 kg N ha−1. The biogas slurry was diluted to 1,500 ml with water and then applied five times every 6 days at 300 ml each time. All leached solutions were collected separately. Results showed that soil available phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) increased significantly with increased biogas slurry rates and biochar rates. The concentrations of total N, P, and K in leached solutions increased significantly as biogas slurry rates increased. Biochar significantly increased the concentrations of total and available P, total K, and electric conductance in leached solution. Contributions of biochar and biogas slurry treatments to the net amount of N, P, and K in leached solution increased with increased biochar and biogas slurry rates except at 4 % biochar rate where total N was decreased. Nutrient removal rate of biochar was over 10.6 % for total N and negative for total K at 2 % biochar rate. Nutrient removal rate of biochar was over 7.19 % for total P and negative for total N and total K at 4 % biochar rate. It is suggested that both biogas slurry and biochar have the potential to pollute water when leaching happens although biochar has the ability to adsorb N and P from biogas slurry.

Keywords

Biochar Biogas slurry Nutrient adsorption Environment safety Leaching 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by the National Water Project during the 12th Five-Year Plan Period (2012ZX07104-003) and Chongqing Science and Technology Commission (CSCT2010AC1010).

References

  1. Altland, J. E., & Locke, J. C. (2012). Biochar affects macronutrient leaching from a soilless substrate. Hortscience, 47(8), 1136–1140.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010). Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant and Soil, 337(1-2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., & Smith, V. H. (1998). Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications, 8(3), 559–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cui, H. J., Wang, M. K., Fu, M. L., & Ci, E. (2011). Enhancing phosphorus availability in phosphorus-fertilized zones by reducing phosphate adsorbed on ferrihydrite using rice straw-derived biochar. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 11(7), 1135–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dauden, A., Quílez, D., & Vera, M. V. (2004). Pig slurry application and irrigation effects on nitrate leaching in Mediterranean soil lysimeters. Journal of Environmental Quality, 33(6), 2290–2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding, Y., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, W.-X., Shi, D.-Z., Yang, M., & Zhong, Z.-K. (2010). Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 213(1–4), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eghball, B., Ginting, D., & Gilley, J. E. (2004). Residual effects of manure and compost applications on corn production and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 96(2), 442–447.Google Scholar
  8. Garg, R. N., Pathak, H., Das, D. K., & Tomar, R. K. (2005). Use of flyash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of soil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 107(1–3), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hao, X., Hong, J., & Qiao, Z. (2011). Effect of biogas slurry on biological properties of cabbage continuous cropping soil. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 17(3), 384–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hass, A., Gonzalez, J. M., Lima, I. M., Godwin, H. W., Halvorson, J. J., & Boyer, D. G. (2012). Chicken manure biochar as liming and nutrient source for acid Appalachian soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 1096–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heckrath, G., Brookes, P., Poulton, P., & Goulding, K. (1995). Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk Experiment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 24(5), 904–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IBI (2012). Standardized product definition and product testing guidelines for biochar that is used in soil. Accessed Feb 25 2013. http://www.biochar-international.org/characterizationstandard.
  13. Islam, M. R., Rahman, S. M. E., Rahman, M. M., Oh, D. H., & Ra, C. S. (2010). The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 34(1), 91–99.Google Scholar
  14. Laird, D., Fleming, P., Wang, B., Horton, R., & Karlen, D. (2010). Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma, 158(3–4), 436–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu, J., Jiang, L., Chen, D., Toyota, K., Strong, P. J., Wang, H., et al. (2012). Decontamination of anaerobically digested slurry in a paddy field ecosystem in Jiaxing region of China. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 146(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma, X., Li, Y., Zhang, M., Zheng, F. Z., & Du, S. (2011). Assessment and analysis of non-point source nitrogen and phosphorus loads in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of Hubei Province, China. Science of the Total Environment, 412, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Major, J., Rondon, M., Molina, D., Riha, S. J., & Lehmann, J. (2012). Nutrient leaching in a Colombian savanna Oxisol amended with biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41(4), 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matsunaka, T., Sawamoto, T., Ishimura, H., Takakura, K., & Takekawa, A. (2006). Efficient use of digested cattle slurry from biogas plant with respect to nitrogen recycling in grassland. In Greenhouse gases and animal agriculture (Ed.), an update. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture, Zurich, Switzerland (Vol. 1293, pp. 242–252). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Mochizuk, Y. (2000). Estimation of nitrogen leaching rates in a vegetable field with a subsurface drainage system in a coastal sand dune area. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 71(4), 512–519.Google Scholar
  20. NBTSC. (1990). Water quality (Vol. GB 11894–89, pp. 188–239). Beijing: Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, N. O., Agudelo, S. C., Yuan, W., & Gan, J. (2011). Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in biochar-amended soils. Soil Science, 176(5), 218–226.Google Scholar
  22. Olsen, S., & Sommers, L. (1982). Phosphorus. In A. Page, R. Miller, & D. Keeney (Eds.), Methods of soil analyses, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties (pp. 403–430). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
  23. Parvage, M. M., Ulén, B., Eriksson, J., Strock, J., & Kirchmann, H. (2013). Phosphorus availability in soils amended with wheat residue char. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49(2), 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Payne, R., Harding, S., Murray, D., Soutar, D., Baird, D., Glaser, A., et al. (2010). The Guide to GenStat release 13, part 2: statistics. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.Google Scholar
  25. Prendergast-Miller, M. T., Duvall, M., & Sohi, S. P. (2011). Localisation of nitrate in the rhizosphere of biochar-amended soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 43(11), 2243–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spokas, K. A., Novak, J. M., & Venterea, R. T. (2012). Biochar's role as an alternative N-fertilizer: ammonia capture. Plant and Soil, 350(1–2), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang, H., Guo, Y. J., & Li, Z. Y. (2011). Effect of slurry application on ryegrass growth and soil properties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 19(6), 939–942 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  28. Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Fujimaki, H., Zahoor, A., & Nishihara, E. (2011a). Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use and Management, 27(2), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uzoma, K. C., Inoue, M., Andry, H., Zahoor, A., & Nishihara, E. (2011b). Influence of biochar application on sandy soil hydraulic properties and nutrient retention. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 9(3–4), 1137–1143.Google Scholar
  30. Wachendorf, C., Taube, F., & Wachendorf, M. (2005). Nitrogen leaching from N-15 labelled cow urine and dung applied to grassland on a sandy soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 73(1), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, T., Zhu, B., Gao, M. R., Xu, T. P., & Kuang, F. H. (2006). Nitrate pollution of groundwater in a typical small watershed in the Central Sichuan Hilly Region. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 22(3), 84–87.Google Scholar
  32. Yao, Y., Gao, B., Zhang, M., Inyang, M., & Zimmerman, A. R. (2012). Effect of biochar amendment on sorption and leaching of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate in a sandy soil. Chemosphere, 89(11), 1467–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yeomans, J. C., & Bremner, J. M. (1988). A rapid and precise method for routine determination of organic carbon in soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 13, 1467–1476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu, F. B., Luo, X. P., Song, C. F., Zhang, M. X., & Shan, S. D. (2010). Concentrated biogas slurry enhanced soil fertility and tomato quality. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B Soil and Plant Science, 60(3), 262–268.Google Scholar
  35. Yuan, J. H., & Xu, R. K. (2010). Effects of rice-hull-based biochar regulating acidity of red soil and yellow brown soil. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 26(5), 472–476.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Animal Science and TechnologySouthwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Graham Centre for Agricultural InnovationNSW Department of Primary Industries–Charles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Resources and EnvironmentsSouthwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations