Assessment of the Hydraulic and Toxic Metal Removal Capacities of Bioretention Cells After 2 to 8 Years of Service
Bioretention cells, also known as raingardens, are increasingly being constructed as a means to collect, infiltrate, and treat stormwater runoff. There are concerns, however, about how stormwater management practices might function in terms of infiltration and pollutant removal as they age. Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) values were obtained for eight cells in 2006 and again for three of those cells in 2010 using an infiltrometer. A strong positive correlation of mean Ksat with service time was observed (slope = 10.2 ± 2.4 cm/h per year, R2 = 0.67). Results from metals analyses of bioretention media cores collected from six bioretention cells showed the expected trend of Cu and Zn enrichment at the surface while Cd was detected only in one out of 72 media samples analyzed. Sorption isotherms from batch testing of field media samples (T = 22.5 °C, pH = 7.2) were used to estimate metal sorption capacities based on representative stormwater Cd and Zn concentrations. Cu was not considered, as very little of the metal is dissolved under these conditions (22.8 ± 7.1 %). The mean equilibrium sorption capacities for Cd (10.2 ± 3.1 mg/kg) and Zn (294.9 ± 14.9 mg/kg) far exceeded observed levels in the bioretention media such that the remaining sorption capacity was ≥83 % for Zn and ≥90 % for Cd for the cells. Overall, the results of this investigation suggest that bioretention cells can provide many years of effective infiltration (>6 years) and metals removal performance (>25 years).
KeywordsBioretention Stormwater Metals Sorption Hydraulic conductivity Organic matter
- Dingman, S. L. (2002). Physical hydrology. Prentice-Hall, (2nd), New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
- Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration (FAWB). (2009). Stormwater bioinfiltration systems. Melbourne, Australia: Adorption Guidelines.Google Scholar
- Glass, C., and Bissouma, S. (2005). Evaluation of a parking lot bioretention cell for removal of stormwater pollutants. In: Ecosystems and Sustainable Development V, pp. 699–708.Google Scholar
- Gregory, J. H., Dukes, M. D., Jones, P. H., & Miller, G. L. (2006). Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 61(3), 117–124.Google Scholar
- Heier, L. S., Lien, I. B., Stromseng, A. E., Ljones, M., Rosseland, B. O., Tollefsen, K.-E., et al. (2009). Speciation of lead, copper, zinc and antimony in water draining a shooting range—time dependant metal accumulation and biomarker responses in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). Science of the Total Environment, 407(13), 4047–4055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, P. S., & Davis, A. P. (2013). Spatial accumulation and strength of affiliation of heavy metals in bioretention media. Environmental Science and Technology, 139(4), 479–487.Google Scholar
- Klute, A. (1986). Methods of soil analysis: Part I (Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edition). Madison: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
- Langergraber, G., Haberl, R., Laber, J., & Pressl, A. (2003). Evaluation of substrate clogging processes in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 48(5), 25–34.Google Scholar
- Maestre, A., & Pitt, R. (2005). The national stormwater quality database, Version 1.1 A Compilation and analysis of NPDES stormwater monitoring information, U.S. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water.Google Scholar
- Minitab (2010). Minitab Statistical Software Version 16.1.0. Google Scholar
- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) (2008). Minnesota stormwater manual. St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/stormwater/stormwater-management/minnesotas-stormwater-manual.html.
- Morgan, J. (2011). Sorption and release of dissolved pollutants via bioretention media. Minneapolis, USA: M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2013). Climate normals for Minneapolis/St. Paul (1981–2010). http://climate.umn.edu/pdf/normals_means_and_extremes/msp_normals_1981-2010.pdf
- Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 ed., A.L. Page et al. Ed. Agronomy 9:961–1010. American Society of Agronomy, (2nd), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
- Nestingen, R. S. (2007). The comparison of infiltration devices and modification of the Philip-Dunne permeameter for the assessment of rain gardens. Minneapolis, USA: M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
- Parkhurst, D. I. and Appelo, C. A. J. (2010). PHREEQC-2 Version 2.17.01.Google Scholar
- Prince George's County (PGC) (2007). Bioretention manual. Environmental Service Division. Department of Environmental Resources, Maryland. http://www.princegeorgescountymd.gov/Government/AgencyIndex/DER/ESG/Bioretention/pdf/Bioretention%20Manual_2009%20Version.pdf.
- Sparks, D. L. (2003). Environmental soil chemistry. Academic Press, (2nd), San Diego, USA.Google Scholar