Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 224:1699 | Cite as

Comparative Sorption and Mobility of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) Species in a Range of Soils: Implications to Bioavailability

  • Girish Choppala
  • Nanthi BolanEmail author
  • Dane Lamb
  • Anitha Kunhikrishnan
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Remediation of Site Contamination

Abstract

The sorption of chromium (Cr) species to soil has become the focus of research as it dictates the bioavailability and also the magnitude of toxicity of Cr. The sorption of two environmentally important Cr species [Cr(III) and Cr(VI)] was examined using batch sorption, and the data were fitted to Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms. The effects of soil properties such as pH, CEC, organic matter (OM), clay, water-extractable SO4 2– and PO4 3–, surface charge, and different iron (Fe) fractions of 12 different Australian representative soils on the sorption, and mobility of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) were examined. The amount of sorption as shown by K f was higher for Cr(III) than Cr(VI) in all tested soils. Further, the amount of Cr(III) sorbed increased with an increase in pH, CEC, clay, and OM of soils. Conversely, the chemical properties of soil such as positive charge and Fe (crystalline) had a noticeable influence on the sorption of Cr(VI). Desorption of Cr(VI) occurred rapidly and was greater than desorption of Cr(III) in soils. The mobility of Cr species as estimated by the retardation factor was higher for Cr(VI) than for Cr(III) in all tested soils. These results concurred with the results from leaching experiments which showed higher leaching of Cr(VI) than Cr(III) in both acidic and alkaline soils indicating the higher mobility of Cr(VI) in a wide range of soils. This study demonstrated that Cr(VI) is more mobile and will be bioavailable in soils regardless of soil properties and if not remediated may eventually pose a severe threat to biota.

Keywords

Chromium species Sorption Soil properties Mobility Bioavailability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC CARE), Australia for funding this research work in collaboration with University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, SA, Australia. The Postdoctoral fellowship program (PJ008650042012) at National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, supported Dr. Kunhikrishnan’s contribution.

References

  1. Adriano, D. C. (2001). Trace elements in terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability, and risks of metals. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2009). 1301.0 – Year Book, Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Avudainayagam, S., Naidu, R., Kookana, R. S., Alston, A. M., McClure, S., & Smith, L. H. (2001). Effects of electrolyte composition on chromium desorption in soils contaminated by tannery waste. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 39, 1077–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, M. K., Schwab, A. P., & Henderson, C. (2006). Leaching and reduction of chromium in soil as affected by soil organic content and plants. Chemosphere, 62, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, R. J., & James, B. R. (1988). Mobility and bioavailability of chromium in soils. Advances in Environmental Science & Technology, 20, 267–304.Google Scholar
  6. Bloomfield, C., & Pruden, G. (1980). The behaviour of Cr(VI) in soil under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Environmental Pollution, 23, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blowes, D. (2002). Environmental chemistry: tracking hexavalent Cr in groundwater. Science, 295, 2024–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D. C., Natesan, R., & Koo, B. J. (2003). Effects of organic amendments on the reduction and phytoavailability of chromate in mineral soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 120–128.Google Scholar
  9. Bradl, H. B. (2004). Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. Journal of Colloid & Interface Science, 277, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, G. E., Foster, A. L., & Ostergren, J. D. (1999). Mineral surfaces and bioavailability of heavy metals: a molecular-scale perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 3388–3395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao, X. H., Guo, J., Mao, J., & Lan, Y. (2011). Adsorption and mobility of Cr (III)-organic acid complexes in soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192, 1533–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chirenje, T., Ma, L. Q., Clark, C., & Reeves, M. (2003). Cu, Cr and As distribution in soils adjacent to pressure-treated decks, fences and poles. Environmental Pollution, 124, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chrysochoou, M., Ferreira, D. R., & Johnston, C. P. (2010). Calcium polysulfide treatment of Cr (VI)-contaminated soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179, 650–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Flora, S. (2000). Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium(VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 21, 533–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fendorf, S. E., & Sparks, D. L. (1994). Mechanisms of chromium(III) sorption on silica. 2. Effect of reaction conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 28, 290–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao, S., Walker, W. J., Dahlgren, R. A., & Bold, J. (1997). Simultaneous sorption of Cd, Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, and Cr on soils treated with sewage sludge supernatant. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 93, 331–345.Google Scholar
  17. Gillman, G. P., & Sumpter, E. A. (1986). Modification to the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 24, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin, R., Au, A. K., & Frost, R. (1977). Effect of pH on adsorption of chromium from landfill–leachate by clay minerals. Journal of Environmental Science & Health, 12, 431–449.Google Scholar
  19. Grossl, P. R., Eick, M., Sparks, D. L., Goldberg, S., & Ainsworth, C. C. (1997). Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 2. Kinetic evaluation using a pressure-jump relaxation technique. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jardine, P. M., Mehlhorn, T. L., Bailey, W. B., Brooks, S. C., Fendorf, S., Gentry, R. W., Phelps, T. J., & Saiers, J. E. (2011). Geochemical processes governing the fate and transport of chromium(III) and chromium(VI) in soils. Vadose Zone Journal, 10, 1058–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang, J., Xu, R., Wang, Y., & Zhao, A. (2008). The mechanism of chromate sorption by three variable charge soils. Chemosphere, 71, 1469–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalidhasan, S., Ganesh, M., Sricharan, S., & Rajesh, N. (2009). Extractive separation and determination of chromium in tannery effluents and electroplating waste water using tribenzylamine as the extractant. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165, 886–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, I. S., Kang, K. H., Johnson-Green, P., & Lee, E. J. (2003). Investigation of heavy metal accumulation in Polygonum thunbergii for phytoextraction. Environmental Pollution, 126, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kookana, R. S., Gerritse, R. G., & Aylmore, L. A. G. (1990). Effect of organic co-solvent on adsorption and desorption of linuron and simazine in soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 28, 717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marsh, K. B., Syers, J. K., & Tillman, R. W. (1987). Charge relationships of sulfate sorption by soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 318–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McBride, M. B. (1994). Environmental chemistry of soils. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, W., & Miller, D. (1987). A micro-pipette method for soil mechanical analysis. Communication in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mollah, M., McCarthy, K. J., & Cookson, L. J. (2006). Plantation species that would make stronger vineyard posts than Pinus radiata. The Journal of the Institute of Foresters of Australia, 69, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naidu, R., Bolan, N. S., Kookana, R. S., & Tiller, K. (1994). Ionic–strength and pH effects on the sorption of cadmium and the surface charge of soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 45, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naidu, R., Kookana, R., Cox, J., Mowat, D. & Smith, L. (2000). Fate of Chromium at tannery waste–contaminated sites at Mount Barker, South Australia. In ‘Towards better management of soils contaminated with tannery waste (No. 88, pp 57–70). ACIAR (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research) proceedings. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Palmer, C. D., & Wittbrodt, P. R. (1991). Processes affecting the remediation of chromium-contaminated sites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 92, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Qafoku, N. P., Evan Dresel, P., Ilton, E., McKinley, J. P., & Resch, C. T. (2010). Chromium transport in an acidic waste contaminated subsurface medium: the role of reduction. Chemosphere, 81, 1492–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rayment, G. E., & Higginson, F. R. (1992). Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Melbourne: Inkata Press Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  34. Robinson, B., Greven, M., Sivakumaran, S., Green, S. & Clothier, B. (2004). Results of an initial survey of the leaching from treated posts in vineyards in the Marlborough region. A Report to the Marlborough District Council, HortResearch Client Report −12173, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  35. Robinson, B., Greven, M., Green, S., Sivakumaran, S., Davidson, P., & Clothier, B. (2006). Leaching of copper, chromium and arsenic from treated vineyard posts in Marlborough, New Zealand. Science of the Total Environment, 364, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sarin, V., & Pant, K. K. (2006). Removal of chromium from industrial waste by using eucalyptus bark. Bioresource Technology, 97, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schofield, R. (1950). Effect of pH on electric charges carried by clay particles. European Journal of Soil Science, 1, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sparks, D. L. (2003). Environmental soil chemistry (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stewart, M. A., Jardine, P. M., Barnett, M. O., Mehlhorn, T. L., McKay, L. D., & Hyder, L. K. (2003a). Influence of soil geochemical and physical properties on the sorption and bioaccessibility of chromium (III). Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 129–137.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart, M. A., Jardine, P. M., Brandt, C. C., Barnett, M. O., Fendorf, S. E., McKay, L. D., Mehlhorn, T. L., & Paul, K. (2003b). Effects of contaminant concentration, aging, and soil properties on the bioaccessibility of Cr (III) and Cr (VI) in soil. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 12, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tzou, Y. M., Chen, Y. R., & Wang, M. K. (1998). Chromate sorption by acidic and alkaline soils. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 33, 1607–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vega, F. A., Covelo, E. F., & Andrade, M. L. (2006). Competitive sorption and desorption of heavy metals in mine soils: influence of mine soil characteristics. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 298, 582–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weng, C. H., Huang, C. P., Allen, H. E., Cheng, A. H. D., & Sanders, P. F. (1994). Chromium leaching behavior in soil derived from chromite ore processing waste. Science of the Total Environment, 154, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whittleston, R. A., Stewart, D. I., Mortimer, R. J. G., Tilt, Z. C., Brown, A. P., Geraki, K., & Burke, I. T. (2011). Chromate reduction in Fe (II)-containing soil affected by hyperalkaline leachate from chromite ore processing residue. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 194, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wierenga, P. J., & Van Genuchten, M. T. (1989). Solute transport through small and large unsaturated soil columns. Ground Water, 27, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yu, T. R. (1997). Chemistry of variable charge soils. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Zhitkovich, A. (2011). Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism and cancer risks. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 24, 1617–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ziemniak, S. E., Jones, M. E., & Combs, K. E. S. (1998). Solubility and phase behavior of Cr (III) oxides in alkaline media at elevated temperatures. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 27, 33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Girish Choppala
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nanthi Bolan
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Dane Lamb
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anitha Kunhikrishnan
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, Building–XUniversity of South AustraliaSalisburyAustralia
  2. 2.Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the EnvironmentSalisburyAustralia
  3. 3.Chemical Safety Division, Department of Agro–Food SafetyNational Academy of Agricultural ScienceGyeonggi-doRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations