Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, 224:1382 | Cite as

High Polyacrylamide Application Rates Do Not Affect Eubacterial Structural Diversity

  • James A. Entry
  • DeEtta Mills
  • Krish Jayachandran
  • R. E. Sojka


Anionic polyacrylamide (PAM) is a linear, water-soluble anionic polymer that is widely used for erosion control and water quality protection. There has been an issue whether this formulation could possibly have negative effects on soil microbial diversity by altering microbial binding to soil particles or to one another and thus restricting their mobility and role in carbon and nutrient cycling. We conducted an 8-year study annually applying ultra-high rates of PAM to soil and then monitored impacts on soil bacterial diversity. In July and August, we measured active soil bacterial and fungal biomass and microbial diversity in soils receiving 0 (control), 2,691, and 5,382 kg active ingredient PAM ha−1. Active microbial biomass in soil was 19–33 % greater in the untreated control than soil treated with 2,691 or 5,382 kg of active ingredient PAM ha−1. Active bacterial biomass in soil was 21–31 % greater in the control treatment than in soil treated with 2,691 or 5,382 kg of active ingredient PAM ha−1 in August, but not July. Active fungal biomass in soils was 38–50 % greater in the control treatment than soil treated with 2,691 or 5,382 kg of active ingredient PAM ha−1 in July, but not August. Molecular methods were used to access the bacterial diversity, richness, and evenness in an agricultural soil that received 0 (control), 2,691, and 5,382 kg of active ingredient PAM ha−1. We found that although soil receiving these massive PAM application rates and prolonged exposure may reduce active bacterial and fungal biomass, PAM application did not substantially or consistently affect bacterial structural diversity, richness, or evenness in this agricultural soil.


Anionic polyacrylamide DNA Amplicon length heterogeneity Bacterial diversity 


  1. Barvenik, F. W. (1994). Polyacrylamide characteristics related to soil applications. Soil Science, 158(1), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bologna, L. S., Andrawes, F. F., Barvenik, F. W., Lentz, R. D., & Sojka, R. E. (1999). Analysis of residual acrylamide in field crops. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 37(1), 240–244.Google Scholar
  3. Dunbar, J., Takala, S., Barns, S. M., Davis, J. A., & Kuske, C. R. (1999). Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65(4), 1662–1669.Google Scholar
  4. Dunbar, J., Ticknor, L. O., & Kuske, C. R. (2001). Phylogenetic specificity and reproducibility and new method for analysis of terminal restriction fragment profiles of 16S rRNA genes from bacterial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(1), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Entry, J. A., Sojka, R. E., & Hicks, B. J. (2008). Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios measurement of anionic polyacrylamide degradation in soil. Geoderma, 145(1), 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Entry, J. A., Phillips, I., Stratton, H., & Sojka, R. E. (2003). Polyacrylamide, polyacrylamide+Al(SO4)3 and polyacrylamide+CaO remove microorganisms and nutrients from animal wastewater. Environmental Pollution, 121(2), 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Entry, J. A., Sojka, R. E., Watwood, M. E., & Ross, C. (2002). Environmental and agricultural applications of polyacrylamide preparations. Environmental Pollution, 120(1), 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Entry, J. A., & Sojka, R. E. (2000). Efficacy of polyacrylamide+Al(SO4)3 and polyacrylamide+CaO to filter microorganisms and nutrients from animal wastewater. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29(5), 1905–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingham, E. R., & Klein, D. A. (1984). Soil fungi relationships between hyphal activity and staining with fluorescein diacetate. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 16(1), 273–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenkinson, D. S., & Ladd, J. M. (1981). Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In E. A. Paul & J. N. Ladd (Eds.), Soil biochemistry, vol. 5 (pp. 415–471). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  11. Kay-Shoemake, J. L., Watwood, M. E., Lentz, R. D., & Sojka, R. E. (1998a). Polyacrylamide as an organic nitrogen source for soil microorganisms with potential impact on inorganic soil nitrogen in agricultural soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30(4), 1045–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kay-Shoemake, J. L., Watwood, M. E., Lentz, R. D., & Sojka, R. E. (1998b). Polyacrylamide as a substrate for microbial amidase. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30(6), 1647–1654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lande, S. S., Bosch, S. J., & Howard, P. H. (1979). Degradation and leaching of acrylamide in soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 8(1), 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lentz, R. D., Sojka, R. E., & Robbins, C. W. (1998). Reducing phosphorus losses from surface-irrigated fields: emerging polyacrylamide technology. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27(2), 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lentz, R. D., Sojka, R. E., & Ross, C. W. (2000). Polymer charge and molecular weight effects on treated irrigation furrow processes. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
  16. Lodge, D. J., & Ingham, E. R. (1991). A comparison of agar film techniques for estimating fungal biovolumes in litter and soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 5(1), 31–37.Google Scholar
  17. MacWilliams, D. C. (1978). Acrylamides. In I. Kirk & D. F. Othmer (Eds.), Encyclopedia of chemical technology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 298–311). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Mills, D. K., Fitzgerald, K., Litchfield, C. D., & Gillvet, P. M. (2003). A comparison of DNA profiling techniques for monitoring nutrient impact on microbial community composition during bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 54(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nadler, A., & Steinberger, Y. (1993). Trends in structure, plant growth and microorganism interrelations in the soil. Soil Science, 115, 114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Orts, W. J., Sojka, R. E., Glenn, G. M., & Gross, R. A. (1999). Preventing soil erosion with polymer additives. Polymer News, 24, 406–413.Google Scholar
  21. Orts, W. J., Sojka, R. E., Glenn, G. M., & Gross, R. A. (2000). Biopolymer additives to reduce erosion-induced soil losses during irrigation. Industrial Crops and Products, 11, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orts, W. J., Sojka, R. E., Glenn, G. M., & Gross, R. A. (2002). Polymer additives in irrigation water to reduce erosion and better manage water infiltration. Agro Food Industry Hi-Technology, 13, 37–41.Google Scholar
  23. Seybold, C. A. (1994). Polyacrylamide review: soil conditioning and environmental fate. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 25(8), 2171–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shanker, R., Ramakrishna, C., & Seth, P. K. (1990). Microbial degradation of acrylamide monomer. Archives of Microbiology, 154(1), 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Snedecor, W. G., & Cochran, W. G. (1994). Statistical methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sojka, R. E., Bjorneberg, D. L., Entry, J. A., Lentz, R. D., & Orts, W. J. (2007). Polyacrylamide (PAM) in agriculture and environmental land management. Advances in Agronomy, 92(1), 76–141.Google Scholar
  27. Sojka, R. E., Entry, J. A., & Furhmann, J. J. (2006). The influence of high application rates of polyacrylamide on microbial metabolic potential in an agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 108(2), 405–412.Google Scholar
  28. Sojka, R. E., & Entry, J. A. (2000). Influence of polyacrylamide application to soil on movement of microorganisms in runoff water. Environmental Pollution, 108(2), 405–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sojka, R. E., Lentz, R. D., Ross, C. W., Trout, T., Bjorneberg, D. L., & Aase, J. K. (1998). Polyacrylamide effects on infiltration in irrigated agriculture. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 54(2), 325–331.Google Scholar
  30. Sojka, R. E., Lentz, R. D., & Westermann, D. T. (1998). Water and erosion management with multiple applications of polyacrylamide in furrow irrigation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62(4), 1672–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sojka, R.E., Lentz, R.D., Bjorneberg, D.L., Aase, J.K. (1998c). The PAMphlet: a concise guide for safe and practical use of polyacrylamide (PAM) for irrigation-induced erosion control and infiltration enhancement. USDA-ARS Northwest Irrigation Soils Research Lab, Kimberly, ID, Station Note #02-98.Google Scholar
  32. Sojka, R. E., Carter, D. L., & Brown, M. J. (1992). Imhoff cone determination of sediment in irrigation runoff. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56(3), 884–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sojka, R. E., Lentz, R. D., & Foerster, J. A. (1994). Software utilizing Imhoff cone volumes to estimate furrow-irrigation erosion. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 49(2), 400–406.Google Scholar
  34. Stadmatiadis, S., Doran, J. W., & Ingham, E. R. (1990). Use of staining inhibitors to separate fungal and bacterial activity in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steinberger, Y., Sarig, S., Nadler, A., & Barnes, G. (1993). The effect of synthetic soil conditioners on microbial biomass. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 7(2), 303–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallace, A., & Wallace, G.A. (1996). Need for solution or exchangeable calcium and/or critical EC level for flocculation of clay by polyacrylamides. In: Proceedings: Managing Irrigation-Induced Erosion and Infiltration with Polyacrylamide. (Eds. R.E Sojka & R.D. Lentz.). University of Idaho Misc. Pub. 101–96, pp. 59–63.Google Scholar
  37. West, A. W., Ross, D. J., & Cowling, J. C. (1986). Changes in microbial C, N, P, and ATP contents, numbers and respiration on storage of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 18(1), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Entry
    • 1
    • 2
  • DeEtta Mills
    • 3
  • Krish Jayachandran
    • 4
  • R. E. Sojka
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA Agricultural Research Service, Northwest Irrigation and Soils Research LaboratoryKimberlyUSA
  2. 2.Nutrigrown LLCColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA
  4. 4.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesFlorida International UniversityMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations