Solid-Phase Distribution and Leaching Behaviour of Nickel and Uranium in a Uranium Waste-Rock Piles
- 443 Downloads
The potential risk of surface and groundwater contamination by the heavy metals and radionuclides leached from uranium waste-rock piles (UWRP) is a major environmental concern in the uranium-mining district of Northern Saskatchewan, Canada. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the nickel and uranium leaching behaviour in the UWRP lithological materials. In addition to the chemical characterization, these selected UWRP geomedia samples were also subjected to the sequential extraction procedure, availability test to quantify leaching potential and cumulative leaching test (CLT). Sequential extractions results demonstrated substantial observed differences in the Ni and U distribution patterns among various operationally defined geochemical fractions. A large fraction of total Ni concentration was associated with non-labile residual fraction while U was mainly present in the labile fractions. The observed labile Ni and U concentrations also remained relatively high in the gneissic basement materials and underlying organic-rich lake sediment. In case of basement materials, both Ni and U concentrations in solution with the first CLT fraction exceeds their maximum permissible levels in both surface and groundwater. Leaching test results confirmed that Ni and U leachability depends on their total content distribution in various solid phase fractions, and several geochemical processes are controlling the solubility of Ni and U geochemical phases in the UWRP. Our experimental data suggest the potential for a long-term risk to surface and groundwater contamination from these UWRP.
KeywordsUranium waste-rock pile Availability test Cascade leaching test Sequential extraction procedure
Funding for this research work was provided by research grants from Cameco Corporation Ltd and the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada.
- Cameco. (1998). Key Lake Operation preliminary geochemistry report: 1996–1997 waste rock drilling and investigation project. Saskatoon: Cameco Corp. Engineering and Projects Department.Google Scholar
- Lacala, J., da Silvaa, M. P., Garćia, R., Sevilla, T. M., Procopioa, J. R., & Hernández, L. (2003). Study of fractionation and potential mobility of metal in sludge from pyrite mining and affected river sediments: changes in mobility over time and use of artificial ageing as a tool in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Pollution, 124, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- NEN 7341 (1995a). Leaching characteristics of solid earthy and stony building and waste materials. Leaching tests. Determination of availability of inorganic compounds for leaching, 1st edn, February 1995, Delft, 10 pp.Google Scholar
- NEN 7349 (1995b). Leaching characteristics of solid earthy and stony building and waste materials. Leaching tests. Determination of the leaching of inorganic components from granular materials with the cascade test, 1st edn, February 1995, Delft, 10 pp.Google Scholar
- Quevauviller, P., Rauret, G., Muntau, H., Ure, A. M., Rubio, R., López-Sánchez, J. F., Fiedler, H. D., & Griepink, B. (1994). Evaluation of a sequential extraction procedure for the determination of extractable trace metal contents in sediments. Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 349, 808–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Quevauviller, P., Lachica, M., Barahona, B., Rauret, G., Ure, A. M., Gomez, A., & Muntau, H. (1996). Inter laboratory comparison of EDTA and DTPA procedures prior to certification of extractable trace elements in calcareous soils. Science of the Total Environment, 178, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramos, L., Hernandez, L. M., & Gonzalez, M. J. (1994). Sequential extraction of copper, lead, cadmium, and zinc in soils from or near Donana national park. Journal of Environmental Quality, 17, 42–47.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, A. I. M. (1994). The waste rock environment. In J.L. Jambor & D.W. Blowes (Eds.), Short course handbook on environmental geochemistry of sulfide mine-wastes (Vol. 22, pp. 201–245). Québec: Mineralogical Association of Canada.Google Scholar
- Sowder, A. G., Bertch, P. M., & Morris, P. J. (2003). Partitioning and availability of uranium and nickel in contaminated riparian sediments. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 885–898.Google Scholar
- Ure, A. M. (1990). Methods of analysis for heavy metals in soils. In B. J. Alloway (Ed.), Heavy metals in soils (pp. 40–73). Glasgow: Blackie.Google Scholar
- US Environment Protection Agency (2000). Current drinking water standards. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html; updated July 24th 2000.
- Utermann, J., Düwel, O., Gäbler, H. E., Hindel R. (1999). Substrate- and element specific relation of real total versus aqua regia soluble contents of heavy metals in soils. In: W. W. Wenzel, et al. (ed.) Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements, Vienna, Austria (pp. 406–407). 11 Jul-15 Jul. 1999.Google Scholar