Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 223, Issue 7, pp 4253–4273 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices: Literature Review and Suggestions for Future Research

  • Laurent M. Ahiablame
  • Bernard A. Engel
  • Indrajeet Chaubey
Article

Abstract

Low impact development (LID) is a land development strategy for managing stormwater at the source with decentralized micro-scale control measures. Since the emergence of LID practices, they have been successfully used to manage stormwater runoff, improve water quality, and protect the environment. However, discussions still surround the effectiveness of many of these practices, resulting in a reluctance to widely adopt them. This paper highlights evidence in the literature regarding the beneficial uses of LID practices. A discussion of how LID practices are represented in hydrologic/water quality models is also provided using illustrative examples of three computational models developed with algorithms and modules to support widespread adoption of LID practices. Finally, the paper suggests directions for future research opportunities.

Keywords

Modeling Diffuse pollution Urban water planning Environmental impact Runoff Water quality 

References

  1. Abi Aad, M. P., Suidan, M. T., & Shuster, W. D. (2010). Modeling techniques of best management practices: rain barrels and rain gardens using EPA SWMM-5. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, D., & Stein, E. D. (2008). Evaluating the effectiveness of best management practices using dynamic modeling. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 134, 628–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahiablame, L., Engel, B., & Chaubey, I. (2012). Representation and evaluation of low impact development practices with L-THIA-LID: An example for planning. Environment and Pollution, 1(2). doi:10.5539/ep.v1n2p1.
  4. Aitkenhead-Peterson, J. A., Dvorak, B. D., Volder, A., & Stanley, N. C. (2011). Chemistry of growth medium and leachate from green roof systems in south-central Texas. Urban Ecosystems, 14, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alsup, S., Ebbs, S., & Retzlaff, W. (2010). The exchangeability and leachability of metals from select green roof growth substrates. Urban Ecosystems, 13, 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, E. A. (1973). National Weather Service River Forecast System-Snow Accumulation and Ablation Model. Washington, DC: NOAA Technical Memorandum, NWS HYDRO-17. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.Google Scholar
  7. Avellaneda, P., Ballestro, T., Roseen, R., & Houle, J. (2010). Modeling urban storm-water quality treatment: model development and application to a surface sand filter. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136, 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bäckström, M. (2002). Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events. Water Science and Technology, 45, 41–49.Google Scholar
  9. Bäckström, M. (2003). Grassed swales for stormwater pollution control during rain and snowmelt. Water Science and Technology, 48(9),123–134.Google Scholar
  10. Baird, C., Jennings, M., & Ockerman, D. (1996). Characterization of non-point sources and loadings to the Corpus Christi Bay National Estuary Program study area (p. 226). Texas: Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Barrett, M. E., Walsh, P. M., Malina, J. F., & Charbeneau, R. J. (1998). Performance of vegetative control for treating highway runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124, 1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bass, B., & Baskaran, B., (2003). Evaluating rooftop and vertical gardens as an adaptation strategy for urban areas. National Research Council Canada publication NRCC-46737.Google Scholar
  13. Bean, E. Z., Hunt, W. F., & Bidelspach, D. A. (2007). Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bedan, E. S., & Clausen, J. C. (2009). Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from traditional and low impact development watersheds. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 4, 998–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beecham, S., Pezzaniti, D., & Kandasamy, J. (2012). Stormwater treatment using permeable pavements. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 165(3), 161–170.Google Scholar
  16. Bengtsson, L., Grahn, L., & Olsson, J. (2005). Hydrological function of a thin extensive green roof in southern Sweden. Nordic Hydrology, 36, 259–268.Google Scholar
  17. Berndtsson, J. C. (2010). Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: a review. Ecological Engineering, 36, 351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berndtsson, J. C., Emilsson, T., & Bengtsson, L. (2006). The influence of extensive vegetated roofs on runoff water quality. Science of the Total Environment, 355, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berndtsson, J. C., Bengtsson, L., & Jinno, K. (2009). Runoff water quality from intensive and extensive vegetated roofs. Ecological Engineering, 35, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bianchini, F., & Hewage, K. (2012). How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials. Building and Environment, 48, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C., Kittle, Jr., J.L., Jobes, T.H., & Donigian, Jr., A.S. (2001). Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN, version 12, User’s Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA., in cooperation with U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
  22. Bliss, D. J., Neufeld, R. D., & Riess, R. J. (2009). Storm water runoff mitigation using a green roof. Environmental Engineering Science, 26, 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Boivin, M., Lamy, M., Gosselin, A., & Dansereau, B. (2001). Effect of artificial substrate depth on freezing injury of six herbaceous perennials grown in a green roof system. HortTechnology, 11, 409–412.Google Scholar
  24. Bosley, E. K., II. (2008). Hydrologic evaluation of low impact development using a continuous, spatially-distributed model. Master’s thesis. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  25. Brattebo, B. O., & Booth, D. B. (2003). Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Research, 37, 4369–4376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown, R. A., & Hunt, W. F. (2010). Impacts of construction activity on bioretention performance. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 386–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brown, R. A., & Hunt, W. F. (2012). Improving bioretention/biofiltration performance with restorative maintenance. Water Science and Technology, 65(2), 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Buccola, N., & Spolek, G. (2011). A pilot-scale evaluation of green roof runoff retention detention, and quality. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 216, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carpenter, D. D., & Kaluvakolanu, P. (2011). Effect of roof surface type on storm-water runoff from full-scale roofs in a temperate climate. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carter, T.L., & Rasmussen, T.C. (2005). Vegetated roofs as a stormwater best management practice in an ultra-urban watershed. Edited by K.J. Hatcher. Proceedings of the 2005 Georgia Water Resources Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  31. CEI (Comprehensive Environmental Inc.). (2003). City of Nashua, New Hampshire alternative stormwater management methods planning and guidance. Final Report, Part 1, March. Google Scholar
  32. CEI (Comprehensive Environmental Inc.). (2008). New Hampshire Stormwater Manual. Volume 1: Stormwater and antidegradation. Concord: NH. Comprehensive Environmental Inc. & New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. WD-08-20A.Google Scholar
  33. Chapman, C., & Horner, R. R. (2010). Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system. Water Environment Research, 82(109), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coffman, L. S. (2002). Low-impact development: an alternative stormwater management technology. In R. L. France (Ed.), Handbook of water sensitive planning and design (pp. 97–124). Washington, D.C.: Lewis.Google Scholar
  35. Collins, K. A., Hunt, W. F., & Hathaway, J. M. (2008). Hydrologic comparison of four types of permeable pavement and Standard Asphalt in Eastern North Carolina. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13, 1146–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Collins, K. A., Hunt, W. F., & Hathaway, J. M. (2010). Side-by-side comparison of nitrogen species removal for four types of permeable pavement and Standard Asphalt in Eastern North Carolina. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 512–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Damodaram, C., Giacomoni, M. H., Khedun, C. P., Holmes, H., Ryan, A., Saour, W., & Zechman, E. M. (2010). Simulation of combined best management practices and low impact development for sustainable stormwater management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 46, 907–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Davis, A. L. (2005). Green engineering principles promote low impact development. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 338A–344A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Davis, A. P. (2007). Field performance of bioretention: Water quality. Environmental Engineering Science, 24(8), 1048–1063.Google Scholar
  40. Davis, A. P. (2008). Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., & Minami, C. (2001). Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environment Research, 73(1), 5–14.Google Scholar
  42. Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., & Winogradoff, D. (2003). Water quality improvement through bioretention: lead, copper, and zinc removal. Water Environment Research, 75, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., & Minami, C. (2006). Water quality improvement through bioretention media: nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Environment Research, 78, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Davis, A. P., Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., & Clar, M. (2009). Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Debo, T., & Reese, A. J. (2002). Municipal stormwater management. NY: CRC.Google Scholar
  46. DeBusk, K. M., Hunt, W. F., Line, D. E. (2011). Bioretention outflow: does it mimic nonurban watershed shallow interflow? Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16(3), 274–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. DeBusk, K. M., & Wynn, K. M. (2011). Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 137, 800–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Deletic, A., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment-a field and modelling study. Journal of Hydrology, 317, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. DeNardo, J. C., Jarrett, A. R., Manbeck, J. B., Beattie, D. J., & Berghage, R. D. (2005). Stormwater mitigation and surface temperature reduction by green roofs. Transactions of the ASABE, 48, 1491–1496.Google Scholar
  50. Dierkes, C., Holte, A., & Geiger, W. F. (1999). Heavy metal retention within a porous pavement structure. Proc. 8th International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage, August 30-September 3, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Dierkes, C., Kuhlmann, L., Kandasamy, J., & Angelis, G. (2002). Pollution retention capability and maintenance of permeable pavements. In: Proceedings of the Global Solutions for Urban Drainage. Proc. 9th International Conference on Urban Drainage, American Society of Civil Engineers, September 8-13, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  52. Dierkes, C., Lohmann, M., Becker, M. & Raasch, U. (2005). Pollution retention of different permeable pavements with reservoir structure at high hydraulic loads. Proc. 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, August 21-26, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  53. Dietz, M. E. (2007). Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 186, 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2005). A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 167, 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2006). Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(4), 1335–1340.Google Scholar
  56. DoD (Department of Defense). (2004). The low impact development manual, UFC-3-210-10.Google Scholar
  57. Dreelin, E. A., Fowler, L., & Ronald Carroll, C. (2006). A test of porous pavement effectiveness on clay soils during natural storm events. Water Research, 40, 799–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Dunnett, N., Nagase, A., Booth, R., & Grime, P. (2008). Influence of vegetation composition on runoff in two simulated green roof experiments. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Elliot, A. H., & Trowsdale, S. A. (2007). A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environmental Modeling and Software, 22, 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Elliot, A. H., Trowsdale, S. A., & Wadhwa, S. (2009). Effect of aggregation on on-site storm-water control devices in an urban catchment model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14, 975–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Emilsson, T., Berndtsson, J., Mattsson, J., & Rolf, K. (2007). Effect of using conventional and controlled release fertilizer on nutrient runoff from various vegetated roof systems. Ecological Engineering, 29, 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Engel, B. (2001). L-THIA NPS Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment and Non Point Source Pollutant Model, version 2.1. Purdue University and USEPA.Google Scholar
  63. Engel, B., & Ahiablame, L. M. (2011). L-THIA-LID Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment-Low Impact Development model, sv_version1.1. Purdue University.Google Scholar
  64. Engel, B., Storm, D., White, M., Arnold, J., & Arabi, M. (2007). A hydrologic/water quality model application protocol. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43, 1223–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ergas, S. J., Sengupta, S., Siegel, R., Pandit, A., Yao, Y., & Yuan, X. (2010). Performance of nitrogen-removing bioretention systems for control of agricultural runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136(10), 1105–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Fach, S., & Geiger, W. (2005). Effective pollutant retention capacity of permeable pavements for infiltrated road runoffs determined by laboratory tests. Water Science and Technology, 51, 37–45.Google Scholar
  67. Fach, S., Engelhard, C., Wittke, N., & Rauch, W. (2011). Performance infiltration swales with regard to operation in winter times in Alpine region. Water Science and Technology, 63, 2658–2664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Fassman, E. A., & Blackbourn, S. (2010). Urban runoff mitigation by a permeable pavement system over impermeable soils. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Fioretti, R., Palla, A., Lanza, L. G., & Principi, P. (2010). Green roof energy and water related performance in the Mediterranean climate. Building and Environment, 45, 1890–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Forrester, K. (2007). Evaluation of stormwater runoff from a Midwest green roof system. Masters thesis, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.Google Scholar
  71. GeoSyntec Consultants, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, and Urban Water Resources Research Council of ASCE. (2002). Urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring, a guidance manual for meeting the national stormwater BMP database requirements. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-821-B-02-021 (CDROM).Google Scholar
  72. Glass, C., & Bissouma, S. (2005). Evaluation of a parking lot bioretention cell for removal of stormwater pollutants. Ecosystems and Sustainable Development V (81, pp. 699–708). Southampton: WIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Golroo, A., & Tighe, S. L. (2011). Alternative modeling framework for pervious concrete pavement condition analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 4043–4051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gregoire, B. G., & Clausen, J. C. (2011). Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater runoff and water quality. Ecological Engineering, 37, 963–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Grove, M., Harbor, J., Engel, B. A., & Muthukrishnan, S. (2001). Impacts of urbanization on surface hydrology, Little Eagle Creek, Indiana, and analysis of L-THIA model sensitivity to data resolution. Physical Geography, 22, 135–153.Google Scholar
  76. GRRP (Green Roof Research Program). (2010). The Green roof research program at Michigan State University [online]. http://www.hrt.msu.edu/greenroof/#Green%20Roof%20Research%20at%20Michigan%20State%20University. Accessed 12 Feb 2010.
  77. Harbor, J. (1994). A practical method for estimating the impact of land-use change on surface runoff, groundwater recharge, and wetland hydrology. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hathaway, A. M., Hunt, W. F., & Jennings, G. D. (2008). A field study of green roof hydrologic and water quality performance. Transactions of the ASABE, 51(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
  79. Hathaway, A. M., Hunt, W. F., Wright, J. D., & Jadlocki, S. J. (2009). Field evaluation of indicator bacteria removal by stormwater BMPs in North Carolina. Great Rivers: World Environmental and Water Resources Congress-ASCE.Google Scholar
  80. He, Z., & Davis, A. P. (2011). Process modeling of storm-water flow in a bioretention cell. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(3), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hong, E., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P. (2006). Sustainable oil and grease removal from synthetic storm water runoff using bench-scale bioretention studies. Water Environment Research, 78(2), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Hsieh, C., & Davis, A. P. (2005). Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(11), 1521–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hsieh, C. H., Davis, A. P., & Needleman, B. A. (2007a). Nitrogen removal from urban stormwater runoff through layered bioretention columns. Water Environment Research, 79, 2404–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Hsieh, C. H., Davis, A. P., & Needleman, B. A. (2007b). Bioretention column studies of phosphorus removal from urban stormwater runoff. Water Environment Research, 79, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Huber, W.C. (2006). BMP modeling concepts and simulation. EPA Contract No. 68-C-01-020. Water Supply and Water Resources Division National Risk Management Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  86. Huber, W.C., & Dickinson, R.E. (1988). Storm Water Management Model, version 4, user’s manual. EPA 600/388/001a (NTIS PB88-236641/AS). USEPA, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
  87. Huber, W. C., Cannon, L., & Stouder, M. (2006). BMP modeling concepts and simulation. EPA Contract No. 68-C-01-020. Cincinnati: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  88. HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). (2003). The practice of low impact development. Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, D.C. Report prepared by NAHB Research Center, Inc. Contract No. H-21314CAGoogle Scholar
  89. Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., & Sharkey, L. J. (2006). Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 132(6), 600–608.Google Scholar
  90. Hunt, W. F., & Lord, W. G. (2006). Bioretention performance, design, construction, and maintenance. Raleigh: N.C. State University. Urban Waterways, N.C. Cooperative Extension publication no. AGW-588-05.Google Scholar
  91. Hunt, W. F., & Szpir, L. L. (2006). Permeable pavements, green roofs, and cisterns: Stormwater treatment practices for low-impact development. Raleigh: N.C. State University. Urban Waterways, N.C. Cooperative Extension publication no. AGW-588-06.Google Scholar
  92. Hunt, W. F., Stephens, S., & Mayes, D. (2002). Permeable pavement effectiveness in Eastern North Carolina. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Urban Drainage. ASCE. Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  93. Hunt, W. F., Smith, J. T., Jadlocki, S. J., Hathaway, J. M., & Eubanks, P. R. (2008). Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 5(134), 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Hunt, W. F., Traver, R. G., Davis, A. P., Emerson, C. H., Collins, K. A., & Stagge, J. H. (2010). Low impact development practices: designing to infiltrate in urban environments. In N. Chang (Ed.), Effects of urbanization on groundwater (pp. 308–343). Reston: ASCE, Environmental Water Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  95. Hunter, J.G., Engel, B.A., & Quansah, J.E. (2010). Web-based low impact development decision support tool for watershed planning. Proceedings of Low Impact Development 2010: Redefining Water in the City. April 11–14. San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  96. Hutchinson, D., Abrams, P., Retzlaff, R., & Liptan, T. (2003). Stormwater monitoring two ecoroofs in Portland, Oregon, USA. In Proc. Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities: Chicago 2003: May 29–30, 2003, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  97. James, W., & Shahin, R. (1998). Pollutants leached from pavements by acid rain. In W. James (Ed.), Advances in modeling the management of stormwater impacts, Vol. 6, Ch 17, (pp. 321–349). Guelph: Computational Hydraulics.Google Scholar
  98. Jones, M. P., & Hunt, W. F. (2009). Bioretention impact on runoff temperature in trout sensitive waters. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(8), 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kercher, W. C., Landon, J. C., & Massarelli, R. (1983). Grassy swales prove cost-effective for water pollution control. Public Works, 114, 53–55.Google Scholar
  100. Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P. (2003). Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environment Research, 75(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kirby, J. T., Durrans, S. R., Pitt, R., & Johnson, P. D. (2005). Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 131(1), 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Kwiatkowski, M., Welker, A. L., Traver, R. G., Vanacore, M., & Ladd, T. J. A. (2007). Evaluation of an infiltration bet management practice utilizing pervious concrete. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(5), 1208–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Legret, M., Colandini, V., & Le Marc, C. (1999). Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on runoff water: water quality and fate of heavy metals. Water Science and Technology, 39(2), 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Li, H., & Davis, A. P. (2009). Water Quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(8), 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Li, H., Sharkey, L. J., Hunt, W. F., & Davis, A. P. (2009). Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(4), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Line, D. E., & Hunt, W. F. (2009). Performance of a bioretention area and a level spreader-grass filter strip at two highway sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 135(2), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Lloyd, S. D. (2001). Water sensitive urban design in the Australian context. Synthesis of a conference held 30–31 August 2000, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  108. Lloyd, S.D., Fletcher, T.D., Wong, T.H.F., & Wootton, R. (2001). Assessment of pollutant removal in a newly constructed bioretention system. Proceedings of the Second South Pacific Stormwater Conference, 2001, New Zealand Water and Wastewater Association, Auckland pp. 20–30.Google Scholar
  109. Lucas, W. C., & Greenway, M. (2011). Phosphorus retention by bioretention mesocosms using media formulated for phosphorus sorption: response to accelerated loads. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(3), 144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Luell, S. K., Hunt, W. F., & Winston, R. J. (2011). Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff. Water Science and Technology, 64(4), 974–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Lui, K. (2003). Engineering performance of rooftop gardens through field evaluation. Proceedings of RCI 18th International Convention and Trade Show. Tampa, FL: March 13–18, 2003, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  112. McNett, J. K., Hunt, W. F., & Davis, A. P. (2011). Influent pollutant concentrations as predictors of effluent pollutant concentrations for Mid-Atlantic bioretention. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 137(9), 790–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Metcalf and Eddy, Inc. (2003). Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  114. Meyers, B., Beecham, S., & Leeuwen, J. A. (2011). Water quality with storage in permeable pavement basecourse. Water Management, 164(7), 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Miller, C. (1998). Vegetated roof covers: a new method for controlling runoff in urbanized areas. Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Symposium, October 21–22, Villanova University, Villanova, PA.Google Scholar
  116. Moglen, G. E., Gabriel, S. A., & Faria, J. A. (2003). A framework for quantitative smart growth in land development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(4), 947–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Monterusso, M. A., Rowe, D. B., Russell, D. K., & Rugh, C. L. (2004). Runoff water quantity and quality from green roof systems. Acta Horticulturae, 639, 369-376. University of Florida, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  118. Moran, A., Hunt, W., & Jennings, G. (2005). Green roof research of stormwater runoff quantity and quality in North Carolina. NC State University, A&T State University, Cooperative Extension, ISSN: 1062-9149.Google Scholar
  119. Moscrip, A. L., & Montgomery, D. R. (1997). Urbanization, flood frequency and salmon abundance in Puget Lowland streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33(6), 1289–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Newman, A. P., Pratt, C. J., Coupe, S. J., & Cresswell, N. (2002). Oil bio-degradation in permeable pavements by microbial communities. Water Science and Technology, 45, 51–56.Google Scholar
  121. NRC (National Research Council). (2008). Urban stormwater management in the United States. Washington, DC: NRC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  122. NRCS (National Research Conservation Service). (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds, Technical Release 55. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services.Google Scholar
  123. Pagotto, C., Legret, M., & Le Cloirec, P. (2000). Comparison of the hydraulic behaviour and the quality of highway runoff water according to the type of pavement. Water Research, 34(18), 4446–4454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Palhegyi, G. E. (2010). Modeling and sizing bioretention using flow duration control. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(6), 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Park, J., Yoo, Y., Park, Y., Yoon, H., Kim, J., Park, Y., Jeon, J., & Lim, K. J. (2008). Analysis of runoff reduction with LID adoption using the SWMM. Journal of Korean Society of Water Quality, 24(6), 805–815.Google Scholar
  126. Passeport, E., & Hunt, W. F. (2009). Asphalt parking lot runoff nutrient characterization for eight sites in North Carolina, USA. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(4), 352–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Pezzaniti, D., Beecham, S., & Kandasamy, J. (2009). Influence of clogging on the effective life of permeable pavements. Water Management, 162(3), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. PGCo (Prince George’s County). (1999a). Low-impact development hydrologic analysis. Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County.Google Scholar
  129. PGCo (Prince George’s County, Maryland). (1999b). Low-impact development design manual. Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County.Google Scholar
  130. PGCo (Prince George’s County, Maryland). (2007). Bioretention manual. Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County.Google Scholar
  131. Reese, A. J. (2009). Volume-based hydrology. Examining the shift in focus from peak flows and pollution treatment to mimicking predevelopment volumes. http://www.stormh2o.com/september-2009/volume-based-hydrology-1.aspx. Accessed 12 Dec 2010.
  132. Roehr, D., & Kong, Y. (2010). Runoff reduction effects of green roofs in Vancouver, BC, Kelowna, BC, and Shanghai, P.R. China. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 35(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Roseen, R. M., Ballestero, T. P., Houle, J. J., Avelleneda, P., Wildey, R., & Briggs, J. (2006). Stormwater low-impact development, conventional structural, and manufactured treatment strategies for parking lot runoff. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 1984, 135–147.Google Scholar
  134. Rowe, D. B. (2011). Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2100–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Roy-Poirier, A., Champagne, P., & Filion, Y. (2010). Review of bioretention system research and design: past, present, and future. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136(9), 878–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Rusciano, G. M., & Obropta, C. C. (2007). Bioretention column study: fecal coliform and total suspended solids reductions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1261–1269.Google Scholar
  137. Rushton, B. (2001). Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sample, D. J., Heaney, J. P., Wright, L. T., & Koustas, R. (2001). Geographic information systems, decision support systems, and urban storm-water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Sansalone, J. J., Koran, J. M., & Smithson, J. A. (1998). Physical characteristics of urban solids transported during rain events. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124(5), 427–440.Google Scholar
  140. Sansalone, J., Kim, J.-Y., (2008). Transport of particulate matter fractions in urban pavement surface runoff. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37(5), 1883–1893.Google Scholar
  141. Scholtz-Barth, K. (2001). Green roofs: stormwater management from the top down. http://www.edcmag.com/archives?Issue=620. Accessed 12 Dec 2010.
  142. Scholz, M., & Grabowiecki, P. (2007). Review of permeable pavement systems. Building and Environment, 42, 3830–3836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Schroll, E., Lambrinos, J., Righetti, T., & Sandrock, D. (2011). The role of vegetation in regulating stormwater runoff from green roofs in a winter rainfall climate. Ecological Engineering, 37, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Schueler, T. (1995). Environmental land planning series: site planning for urban streams Protection. Washington, DC: Center for Watershed Protection Publication No. 95708. MetropolitanWashington Council of Governments.Google Scholar
  145. Selbig, W.R., & Bannerman, R.T. (2008). A comparison of runoff quantity and quality from two small basins undergoing implementation of conventional- and low-impact-development (LID) strategies: Cross Plains, Wisconsin, water years 1999–2005. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2008–5008, p. 57Google Scholar
  146. Shuster, W. D., & Pappas, E. (2011). Laboratory simulation of urban runoff and estimation of runoff hydrographs with experimental curve numbers implemented in USEPA SWMM. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 137(6), 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Stovin, V. (2010). The potential of green roofs to manage urban stormwater. Water and Environment Journal, 24, 192–199.Google Scholar
  148. Stovin, V., Vesuviano, G., & Kasmin, H. (2012). The hydrological performance of a green roof test bed under UK climatic conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 414, 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Strecker, E. W., Quigley, M. M., Urbonas, B. R., Jones, J. E., & Clary, J. K. (2001). Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Sun, X. L., & Davis, A. P. (2007). Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere, 66(9), 1601–1609.Google Scholar
  151. Tota-Maharaj, K., & Scholz, M. (2010). Efficiency of permeable pavement systems for the removal of urban runoff pollutants under varying environmental conditions. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, 29(3), 358–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Trowsdale, S. A., & Simcock, R. (2011). Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. Journal of Hydrology, 387, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (1999a). Stormwater technology fact sheet. Bioretention. Washington, D.C: Office of Water. EPA 832-F-99-012.Google Scholar
  154. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (1999b). Stormwater technology fact sheet. Porous pavement. Washington, D.C: Office of Water. EPA 832-F-99-023.Google Scholar
  155. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (1999c). Stormwater technology fact sheet. Vegetated swales. Washington, D.C: Office of Water. EPA 832-F-99-006.Google Scholar
  156. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2000a). Low impact development (LID). A literature review. Washington, D.C: Office of Water. EPA-841-B-00-005.Google Scholar
  157. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2000b). Vegetated roof cover, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Washington, D.C: Office of Water. EPA-841-B-00-005D.Google Scholar
  158. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2001). Our built and natural environments: a technical review of the interactions between land use, transportation, and environmental quality. p. 4.Google Scholar
  159. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2004). The use of best management practices (BMPs) in urban watersheds. Water Supply and Water Resources Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory. EPA-600-R-04-184.Google Scholar
  160. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2009). SUSTAIN. A framework for placement of best management practices in urban watersheds to protect water quality. Office of Research and Development National Risk Management Research Laboratory-Water Supply and Water Resources Division. EPA-600-R-09-095.Google Scholar
  161. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). (1999). The quality of our nation’s waters-nutrients and pesticides. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1225, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.Google Scholar
  162. VanWoert, N. D., Rowe, D. B., Andresen, J. A., Rugh, C. L., Fernandez, R. T., & Xiao, L. (2005). Green roof stormwater retention: effects of roof surface, slope, and media depth. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 34, 1036–1044.Google Scholar
  163. Vijayaraghavan, K., Joshi, U. M., & Balasubramanian, R. (2012). A field study to evaluate runoff quality from green roofs. Water Research, 46(4), 1337–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Voyde, E., Fassman, E., & Simcock, R. (2010). Hydrology of an extensive living roof under sub- tropical climate conditions in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Hydrology, 394, 384–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Wang, X., Shuster, W., Pal, C., Buchberger, S., Bonta, J., & Avadhanula, K. (2010). Low impact development design-integrating suitability analysis and site planning for reduction of post-development stormwater quantity. Sustainability, 2(8), 2467–2482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Wild, T. B., & Davis, A. P. (2009). Simulation of the performance of a storm-water BMP. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 135(12), 1257–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Ying, G., & Sansalone, J. (2010a). Transport and solubility of hetero-disperse dry deposition particulate matter subject to urban source area rainfall-runoff processes. Journal of Hydrology, 383(3–4), 156–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Ying, G., & Sansalone, J. (2010b). Particulate matter and metals partitioning in highway rainfall-runoff. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 4(1), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Yousef, Y. A., Hvitved-Jacobsen, T., Wanielista, M. P., & Harper, H. H. (1987). Removal of contaminants in highway runoff following through swales. The Science of the Total Environment, 59, 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Yu, S. L., Kuo, J. T., Fassman, E. A., & Pan, H. (2001). Field test of grassed-swale performance in removing runoff pollution. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Zhang, W., Brown, G. O., & Storm, D. E. (2008). Enhancement of heavy metals retention in sandy soil by amendment with fly ash. Transactions of the ASABE, 51(4), 1247–1254.Google Scholar
  172. Zhang, L., Seagren, E. A., Davis, A. P., & Karns, J. S. (2010). The capture and destruction of Escherichia coli from simulated urban runoff using conventional bioretention media and iron oxide-coated sand. Water Environment Research, 82, 701–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Zhang, L., Seagren, E. A., Davis, A. P., & Karns, J. S. (2011). Long-term sustainability of Escherichia coli removal in conventional bioretention media. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 137(8), 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Zhang, X., Shen, L., Tam, V. W. Y., & Lee, W. W. Y. (2012). Barriers to implement extensive green roof systems: a Hong Kong study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 314–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Zimmer, C. A., Heathcote, I. W., Whiteley, H. R., & Schroeter, H. (2007). Low-impact-development practices for stormwater: implications for urban hydrology. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 32(3), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Zimmerman, M.J., Barbaro, J.R., Sorenson, J.R., & Waldron, M.C. (2010). Effects of selected low-impact-development (LID) techniques on water quality and quantity in the Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts—field and modeling studies. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2010–5007 p. 113.Google Scholar
  177. Zobrist, J., Muller, S. R., Ammann, A., Bucheli, T. D., Mottier, V., Ochs, M., Schoenenberger, R., Eugster, J., & Boller, M. (2000). Quality of roof runoff for groundwater infiltration. Water Research, 34, 1455–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent M. Ahiablame
    • 1
  • Bernard A. Engel
    • 1
  • Indrajeet Chaubey
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Biological EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Division of Environmental and Ecological EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations