Nitrate Reductase-Dependent Nitric Oxide Production Is Involved in Microcystin-LR-Induced Oxidative Stress in Brassica rapa
Histochemical and biochemical approaches were used to investigate the phytotoxicity induced by microcystin-LR (MC-LR) in the shoots of Brassica rapa seedlings. MC-LR exposure was able to induce oxidative stress by triggering the over-generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including superoxide anion radical (O2 ● − ) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in the shoots of B. rapa. MC-LR exposure led to the significant increase in the concentration of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) in B. rapa. However, such increase was completely suppressed by the treatment with nitrate reductase (NR) inhibitor NaN3, while l-NMMA, a NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, had only slight effect on the content of endogenous NO in MC-LR-treated plant. These data suggested that NR-dependent pathway was the main source for endogenous NO generation under MC-LR stress. Afterwards, treatment with NaN3 reduced the ROS generation, lipid peroxidation, and loss of membrane integrity in MC-LR-treated plant. MC-LR stress induced the increase in the expression of superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, and catalase. However, such an effect could be reversed by the treatment with NaN3. These results indicate that NR-dependent NO production mediates MC-LR-induced oxidative stress by triggering the over-generation of ROS in B. rapa.
KeywordsBrassica rapa Microcystin-LR Nitrate reductase Nitric oxide Oxidative stress
This research was supported by Jiangsu Agricultural Science Innovative Founds [CX(11)4065].
- Beers, R. F., Jr., & Sizer, I. W. (1952). A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 195, 133–140.Google Scholar
- de Pinto, M. C., Tomassi, F., & de Gara, L. (2002). Changes in the antioxidant systems as a part of the signaling pathway responsible for the programmed cell death activated by nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in tobacco bright-yellow 2 cells. Plant Physiology, 130, 689–708.Google Scholar
- Delledone, M. (2005). NO news is good news for plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 38, 44–52.Google Scholar
- M-Hamvas, M., Máthé, C., Vasas, G., Jámbrik, K., Papp, M., et al. (2011). Cylindrospermopsin and microcystin-LR alter the growth, development and peroxidase enzyme activity of white mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seedlings, a comparative analysis. Acta Biologica Hungarica, 61, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nakano, Y., & Asada, K. (1981). Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant & Cell Physiology, 22, 867–880.Google Scholar
- Ono, E., Wong, H. L., Kawasaki, T., Hasegawa, M., Kodama, O., & Shimamoto, K. (2001). Essential role of the small GTPase Rac in disease resistance of rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 759–764.Google Scholar
- Pereira, S., Saker, M., Vale, M., & Vasconcelos, V. (2009). Comparison of sensitivity of grasses (Lolium perenne L. and Festuca rubra L.) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) exposed to water contaminated with microcystins. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 83, 81–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pflugmacher, S., Jung, K., Lundvall, L., Neumann, S., & Peuthert, A. (2006). Effects of cyanobacterial toxins and cyanobacterial cell-free crude extract on germination of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and induction of oxidative stress. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 2381–2387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prieto, A., Campos, A., Cameán, A., & Vasconcelos, V. (2011). Effects on growth and oxidative stress status of rice plants (Oryza sativa) exposed to two extracts of toxin-producing cyanobacteria (Aphanizomenon ovalisporum and Microcystis aeruginosa). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 74, 1973–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L., & Jones, J. D. (2002). Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar