Intracellular Versus Extracellular Iron Accumulation in Freshwater Periphytic Mats Across a Mine Water Treatment Lagoon
- 268 Downloads
Despite the importance of periphyton–metal interactions in bioremediation schemes and in phosphorus (P) cycling, the processes controlling metal accumulation in periphytic mats are still poorly understood. Iron (Fe) accumulation in periphytic mats was examined across a Fe settlement lagoon receiving mine drainage in Scotland, UK, between March and June 2008. Quantification and mapping of intracellular and extracellular Fe concentrations in periphyton samples using scanning electron microscopy–energy dispersive spectroscopy suggested that Fe accumulation was dominated by the association of Fe-rich precipitates with the extracellular polymeric substances matrix, rather than biotic uptake. Intracellular Fe concentrations were significantly higher in periphyton samples exposed to the highest dissolved Fe concentrations. Neither intracellular nor extracellular Fe concentrations were significantly affected by light availability or cell density. While diatoms dominated the periphyton communities there was no significant association of diatom functional groups with Fe accumulation, indicating that community composition may not affect the function of periphytic mats with respect to Fe removal. Scale-up calculations based on the mean measured Fe accumulation rate by periphyton substrates of 0.021 g m−2 day−1 showed that exposure of large surface areas of periphyton substrate in the settlement lagoon would only increase the Fe removal efficiency of the lagoon by c.1%.
KeywordsAlgae Diatom Extracellular polymeric substances Iron Mine water SEM-EDS
The Coal Authority provided permission to access the study site and data for inflow pumping and water quality. At The University of Edinburgh, Peter Anderson, Nicola Cayzer, Lorna Eades, Andrew Gray, John Morman, and Emma Passmore assisted with laboratory analysis, David Messenger with reference compound preparation, and Bryne Ngwenya with geochemical interpretation. E.L. was supported by a University of Edinburgh Masters Scholarship.
- CEN (European Committee for Standardization) (2004). Water quality. Standard for the routine analysis of phytoplankton abundance and composition using inverted microscopy (Utermöhl technique). CEN/TC230/WG2/TG3/N83 report.Google Scholar
- Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-channel hydraulics. New York: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
- de Brouwer, J. F. C., Cooksey, K. D., Wigglesworth-Cooksey, B., Staal, M. J., Stal, L. J., & Avci, R. (2006). Time of flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry on isolated extracellular fractions and intact biofilms of three species of benthic diatoms. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 65(3), 562–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gerbersdorf, S. U., Jancke, T., Westrich, B., & Paterson, D. M. (2008). Microbial stabilization of riverine sediments by extracellular polymeric substances. Geobiology, 6(1), 57–69.Google Scholar
- Heldal, M., Norland, S., & Tumyr, O. (1985). X-ray microanalytic method for measurement of dry matter and elemental content of individual bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 50(5), 1251–1257.Google Scholar
- Kalin, M. (1998). Biological polishing of zinc in a mine waste management area. In W. Geller, H. Klapper, & W. Salomons (Eds.), Acidic mining lakes: Acid mine drainage, limnology and reclamation (pp. 321–334). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kalin, M., Wheeler, W. N., & van Everdingen, R. O. (1991). Periphyton communities as biological polishing agents in mine waste waters and the precipitation process in tailings. Final Report to CANMET, DSS File 028SQ.23440-0-9182. Toronto: Boojum Research Ltd.Google Scholar
- Liehr, S. K., Chen, H. J., & Lin, S. H. (1994). Metals removal by algal biofilms. Water Science and Technology, 30(11), 59–68.Google Scholar
- Spears, B. M., Funnell, J., Saunders, J., & Paterson, D. M. (2007). On the boundaries: sediment stability measurements across aquatic ecosystems. In B. Westrich & U. Förstner (Eds.), Sediment dynamics and pollutant mobility in rivers: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 68–79). New York: Springer.Google Scholar